Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a angle %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1

Pomerantz, J.: ¬A linguistic analysis of question taxonomies (2005) 0.00

0.0018030355 = product of:
  0.028848568 = sum of:
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=3465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.7, S.715-728