-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.28
0.27713922 = product of:
0.73903793 = sum of:
0.050968137 = product of:
0.1529044 = sum of:
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.0764522 = product of:
0.1529044 = sum of:
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.1529044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27206317 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Harroch, M.: ¬The importance of leaflets as an historical source and the difficulties in cataloguing them (2000)
0.04
0.041490622 = product of:
0.22128332 = sum of:
0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053062323 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08411049 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08411049 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Date
- 1.11.2000 14:59:26
-
Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023)
0.04
0.035497397 = product of:
0.18931946 = sum of:
0.05948331 = product of:
0.11896662 = sum of:
0.11896662 = weight(_text_:rules in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11896662 = score(doc=1171,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.7360998 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11896662 = weight(_text_:rules in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11896662 = score(doc=1171,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.7360998 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.010869532 = product of:
0.021739064 = sum of:
0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021739064 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Logical rules are essential for uncovering the logical connections between relations, which could improve the reasoning performance and provide interpretable results on knowledge graphs (KGs). Although there have been many efforts to mine meaningful logical rules over KGs, existing methods suffer from the computationally intensive searches over the rule space and a lack of scalability for large-scale KGs. Besides, they often ignore the semantics of relations which is crucial for uncovering logical connections. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in the field of natural language processing and various applications, owing to their emergent ability and generalizability. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs. Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs to prompt LLMs to generate logical rules. To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs. Last, a rule validator harnesses the reasoning ability of LLMs to validate the logical correctness of ranked rules through chain-of-thought reasoning. ChatRule is evaluated on four large-scale KGs, w.r.t. different rule quality metrics and downstream tasks, showing the effectiveness and scalability of our method.
- Date
- 23.11.2023 19:07:22
-
Jaenecke, P.: Knowledge organization due to theory formation (1995)
0.02
0.01558988 = product of:
0.12471904 = sum of:
0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035374884 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.08934415 = weight(_text_:2nd in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08934415 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.49606967 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 17:26:47
- Source
- Vortrag, anläßlich der Tagung 'EOCONSID '95: 2nd Meeting on Knowledge Organization in Information and Documentation Systems', Madrid, Nov. 16-17, 1995
-
Peponakis, M.; Mastora, A.; Kapidakis, S.; Doerr, M.: Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) : an analysis of concepts and relations (2020)
0.01
0.008430966 = product of:
0.06744773 = sum of:
0.022482576 = product of:
0.04496515 = sum of:
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.
-
Rahmstorf, G.: Methoden und Formate für mehrsprachige Begriffssysteme (1996)
0.00
0.0033163952 = product of:
0.053062323 = sum of:
0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053062323 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 9. 3.1996 13:26:38
-
Zhai, X.: ChatGPT user experience: : implications for education (2022)
0.00
0.0025791824 = product of:
0.04126692 = sum of:
0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04126692 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- ChatGPT, a general-purpose conversation chatbot released on November 30, 2022, by OpenAI, is expected to impact every aspect of society. However, the potential impacts of this NLP tool on education remain unknown. Such impact can be enormous as the capacity of ChatGPT may drive changes to educational learning goals, learning activities, and assessment and evaluation practices. This study was conducted by piloting ChatGPT to write an academic paper, titled Artificial Intelligence for Education (see Appendix A). The piloting result suggests that ChatGPT is able to help researchers write a paper that is coherent, (partially) accurate, informative, and systematic. The writing is extremely efficient (2-3 hours) and involves very limited professional knowledge from the author. Drawing upon the user experience, I reflect on the potential impacts of ChatGPT, as well as similar AI tools, on education. The paper concludes by suggesting adjusting learning goals-students should be able to use AI tools to conduct subject-domain tasks and education should focus on improving students' creativity and critical thinking rather than general skills. To accomplish the learning goals, researchers should design AI-involved learning tasks to engage students in solving real-world problems. ChatGPT also raises concerns that students may outsource assessment tasks. This paper concludes that new formats of assessments are needed to focus on creativity and critical thinking that AI cannot substitute.
-
Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996)
0.00
0.002305776 = product of:
0.036892418 = sum of:
0.036892418 = product of:
0.073784836 = sum of:
0.073784836 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073784836 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 7. 2.1996 22:38:41
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Tramullas, J.; Garrido-Picazo, P.; Sánchez-Casabón, A.I.: Use of Wikipedia categories on information retrieval research : a brief review (2020)
0.00
0.0016581976 = product of:
0.026531162 = sum of:
0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026531162 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 25. 4.2020 10:08:26
-
Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996)
0.00
0.0013586915 = product of:
0.021739064 = sum of:
0.021739064 = product of:
0.043478128 = sum of:
0.043478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043478128 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 2. 2.1996 15:40:22
-
Lange, C.; Ion, P.; Dimou, A.; Bratsas, C.; Sperber, W.; Kohlhasel, M.; Antoniou, I.: Getting mathematics towards the Web of Data : the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification (2012)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- The Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC), maintained by the American Mathematical Society's Mathematical Reviews (MR) and FIZ Karlsruhe's Zentralblatt für Mathematik (Zbl), is a scheme for classifying publications in mathematics according to their subjects. While it is widely used, its traditional, idiosyncratic conceptualization and representation requires custom implementations of search, query and annotation support. This did not encourage people to create and explore connections of mathematics to subjects of related domains (e.g. science), and it made the scheme hard to maintain. We have reimplemented the current version of MSC2010 as a Linked Open Dataset using SKOS and our focus is concentrated on turning it into the new MSC authority. This paper explains the motivation, and details of our design considerations and how we realized them in the implementation. We present in-the-field use cases and point out how e-science applications can take advantage of the MSC LOD set. We conclude with a roadmap for bootstrapping the presence of mathematical and mathematics-based science, technology, and engineering knowledge on the Web of Data, where it has been noticeably underrepresented so far, starting from MSC/SKOS as a seed.
