Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Thelwall, M.; Li, X.; Barjak, F.; Robinson, S.: Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups (2008) 0.01
    0.009715533 = product of:
      0.07772426 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.055614963 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055614963 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3094179 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to claim that it is useful to assess the web connectivity of research groups, describe hyperlink-based techniques to achieve this and present brief details of European life sciences research groups as a case study. Design/methodology/approach - A commercial search engine was harnessed to deliver hyperlink data via its automatic query submission interface. A special purpose link analysis tool, LexiURL, then summarised and graphed the link data in appropriate ways. Findings - Webometrics can provide a wide range of descriptive information about the international connectivity of research groups. Research limitations/implications - Only one field was analysed, data was taken from only one search engine, and the results were not validated. Practical implications - Web connectivity seems to be particularly important for attracting overseas job applicants and to promote research achievements and capabilities, and hence we contend that it can be useful for national and international governments to use webometrics to ensure that the web is being used effectively by research groups. Originality/value - This is the first paper to make a case for the value of using a range of webometric techniques to evaluate the web presences of research groups within a field, and possibly the first "applied" webometrics study produced for an external contract.
    Date
    12. 2.2008 14:26:04
  2. Thelwall, M.: Text characteristics of English language university Web sites (2005) 0.01
    0.006407313 = product of:
      0.051258504 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 3463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=3463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3463)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=3463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3463)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The nature of the contents of academic Web sites is of direct relevance to the new field of scientific Web intelligence, and for search engine and topic-specific crawler designers. We analyze word frequencies in national academic Webs using the Web sites of three Englishspeaking nations: Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Strong regularities were found in page size and word frequency distributions, but with significant anomalies. At least 26% of pages contain no words. High frequency words include university names and acronyms, Internet terminology, and computing product names: not always words in common usage away from the Web. A minority of low frequency words are spelling mistakes, with other common types including nonwords, proper names, foreign language terms or computer science variable names. Based upon these findings, recommendations for data cleansing and filtering are made, particularly for clustering applications.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.609-619
  3. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.00
    0.004497245 = product of:
      0.03597796 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
        0.0153718395 = product of:
          0.030743679 = sum of:
            0.030743679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743679 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.434-442
  4. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.00
    0.0039344565 = product of:
      0.031475652 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1631-1644
  5. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004) 0.00
    0.002060612 = product of:
      0.03296979 = sum of:
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1213-1215
  6. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? : an analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals (2008) 0.00
    0.0018213408 = product of:
      0.029141452 = sum of:
        0.029141452 = weight(_text_:american in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029141452 = score(doc=1614,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26635614 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Open-access online publication has made available an increasingly wide range of document types for scientometric analysis. In this article, we focus on citations in online presentations, seeking evidence of their value as nontraditional indicators of research impact. For this purpose, we searched for online PowerPoint files mentioning any one of 1,807 ISI-indexed journals in ten science and ten social science disciplines. We also manually classified 1,378 online PowerPoint citations to journals in eight additional science and social science disciplines. The results showed that very few journals were cited frequently enough in online PowerPoint files to make impact assessment worthwhile, with the main exceptions being popular magazines like Scientific American and Harvard Business Review. Surprisingly, however, there was little difference overall in the number of PowerPoint citations to science and to the social sciences, and also in the proportion representing traditional impact (about 60%) and wider impact (about 15%). It seems that the main scientometric value for online presentations may be in tracking the popularization of research, or for comparing the impact of whole journals rather than individual articles.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.805-815
  7. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.594-602
  8. Price, L.; Thelwall, M.: ¬The clustering power of low frequency words in academic webs (2005) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.883-888
  9. Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: Web crawling ethics revisited : cost, privacy, and denial of service (2006) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 6098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=6098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 6098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6098)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1771-1779
  10. Thelwall, M.; Wouters, P.; Fry, J.: Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources (2008) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1523-1527
  11. Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.: Graph structure in three national academic Webs : power laws with anomalies (2003) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=1681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1681)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.706-712
  12. Thelwall, M.: Interpreting social science link analysis research : a theoretical framework (2006) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=4908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.1, S.60-68
  13. Thelwall, M.; Price, L.: Language evolution and the spread of ideas on the Web : a procedure for identifying emergent hybrid word (2006) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=5896,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1326-1337
  14. Thelwall, M.; Vann, K.; Fairclough, R.: Web issue analysis : an integrated water resource management case study (2006) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1303-1314
  15. Thelwall, M.; Prabowo, R.: Identifying and characterizing public science-related fears from RSS feeds (2007) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.379-390
  16. Thelwall, M.: Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines : case study windows live (2008) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.1, S.38-50
  17. Thelwall, M.: Homophily in MySpace (2009) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2706)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.2, S.219-231
  18. Shifman, L.; Thelwall, M.: Assessing global diffusion with Web memetics : the spread and evolution of a popular joke (2009) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=3303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3303)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2567-2576
  19. Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.; Uppal, S.: Data mining emotion in social network communication : gender differences in MySpace (2009) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.190-199
  20. Thelwall, M.: Extracting macroscopic information from Web links (2001) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 6851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=6851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 6851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6851)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.13, S.1157-1168