Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011) 0.01 
    0.008543084 = product of:
  0.068344675 = sum of:
    0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035374884 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
    0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03296979 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    A bibliometric method for analyzing and visualizing national research profiles is adapted to describe national preferences for publishing particular document types. Similarities in national profiles and national peculiarities are discussed based on the publication output of the 26 most active countries indexed in the Web of Science annual volume 2007.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1403-1411
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.01 
    0.007868913 = product of:
  0.062951304 = sum of:
    0.04121224 = weight(_text_:american in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04121224 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.3766845 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
    0.021739064 = product of:
      0.043478128 = sum of:
        0.043478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043478128 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
  3. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.; Chen, J.: ¬A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks (2012) 0.01 
    0.007475199 = product of:
  0.059801593 = sum of:
    0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030953024 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Date
    26. 8.2012 18:54:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1834-1842
  4. Yan, S.; Rousseau, R.; Huang, S.: Contributions of chinese authors in PLOS ONE (2016) 0.01 
    0.005106521 = product of:
  0.08170433 = sum of:
    0.08170433 = weight(_text_:author in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08170433 = score(doc=2765,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.527708 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Beginning with a short review of Public Library of Science (PLOS) journals, we focus on PLOS ONE and more specifically the contributions of Chinese authors to this journal. It is shown that their contribution is growing exponentially. In 2013 almost one fifth of all publications in this journal had at least one Chinese author. The average number of citations per publication is approximately the same for articles with a Chinese author and for articles without any Chinese coauthor. Using the odds-ratio, we could not find arguments that Chinese authors in PLOS ONE excessively cite other Chinese contributions.
  5. Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Metric-wiseness (2015) 0.00 
    0.003869128 = product of:
  0.061906047 = sum of:
    0.061906047 = weight(_text_:26 in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061906047 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    18.10.2015 19:30:26
  6. Rousseau, R.; Ding, J.: Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary Journals? (2016) 0.00 
    0.0031229493 = product of:
  0.04996719 = sum of:
    0.04996719 = weight(_text_:american in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04996719 = score(doc=2860,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.4567057 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Generally, multicountry papers receive more citations than single-country ones. In this contribution, we examine if this rule also applies to American scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary journals. Concretely, we compare the citations received by American scientists in Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). It is shown that, statistically, American scientists publishing in Nature and Science do not benefit from international collaboration. This statement also holds for communicated submissions, but not for direct and for contributed submissions, to PNAS.
  7. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00 
    0.002185609 = product of:
  0.034969743 = sum of:
    0.034969743 = weight(_text_:american in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034969743 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31962737 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  8. Rousseau, R.: Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator (2012) 0.00 
    0.0018030355 = product of:
  0.028848568 = sum of:
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 4993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=4993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 4993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4993)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.416-420
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.00 
    0.0018030355 = product of:
  0.028848568 = sum of:
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
  10. Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions (2012) 0.00 
    0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.6, S.1213-1225
  11. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations : a case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion (2010) 0.00 
    0.0012878824 = product of:
  0.02060612 = sum of:
    0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02060612 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.340-351

Authors