Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c heery evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bloss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bloss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2

McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A survey of the use of MARC formats in national libraries (1995) 0.00

0.0040629986 = product of:
  0.056881975 = sum of:
    0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056881975 = score(doc=3818,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract: Presents the results of a survey to discover the use of MARC bibliographic formats in national libraries worldwide in order to determine which formats should be supported by the MINISIS Integrated Library System. The results show USMARC (LCMARC) and UNIMARC (and their derivatives) are the most commonly implemented
Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.4, S.57-58

McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.00

0.002513852 = product of:
  0.035193928 = sum of:
    0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035193928 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.2, S.21-25