-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.23
0.22850497 = product of:
0.6398139 = sum of:
0.055635996 = product of:
0.16690798 = sum of:
0.16690798 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16690798 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16690798 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16690798 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.08345399 = product of:
0.16690798 = sum of:
0.16690798 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16690798 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16690798 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16690798 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.16690798 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16690798 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
Gödert, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty (1982)
0.04
0.04337105 = product of:
0.20239824 = sum of:
0.088200845 = weight(_text_:subject in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088200845 = score(doc=744,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.82132834 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987)
0.04
0.038964964 = product of:
0.13637736 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=5138,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=5138,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
-
Gödert, W.: Subject headings for mathematical literature (1980)
0.03
0.032580603 = product of:
0.1520428 = sum of:
0.0759112 = weight(_text_:subject in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0759112 = score(doc=4660,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Analyses mathematical terminology to give practical hints for assigning subject headings to a book and proposes a method to use for subject analysis. The method is based on connections between the subject-classification scheme of the American Mathematical Society and indexing with subject headings. Gives examples and compares them with LCSH and PRECIS. A thesaurus of mathematics, using PRECIS methods and connecting with the Amercian Mathematical Society classification is desirable. Authors could also classify their own work and the data could be printed with the books
-
Gödert, W.; Horny, S.: ¬The design of subject access elements in Online Public Access Catalogs (1990)
0.02
0.022016205 = product of:
0.10274229 = sum of:
0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062367413 = score(doc=5830,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Experiences with retrieval in OPACs suggest that there are major problems for the users of such systems, such as choosing the 'correct' subject access vocabulary, narrowing or broadening the set of items retrieved regarding the search interest. Such problems relate to two facts: (1) that in the early OPACs subject access has not been considered seriously enough and (2) that the complexity of the topic has not been really recognized. Using a typology of users' questions it is demonstrated which requirements musts be met by a successful online subject access. Improvements of subject access tools are primarily aimed at, pinpointing the interplay between the different subcomponents of any subject facility: a) the features of the indexing languages used; b) the indexing principles used; c) the design and structuring of the database; and d) the possibilities of the technical retrieval facility, the search mode, and query languages. The contribution summarizes the manifold interactions between the four subcomponents listed. Any successful retrieval will heavily depend on the design of these components considering their interactions.
- Source
- International Classification. 17(1990) no.2, S.66-76
-
Gödert, W.: Verbale Inhaltserschließung : Ein Übersichtsartikel als kommentierter Literaturbericht (1991)
0.02
0.021823633 = product of:
0.101843625 = sum of:
0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048010457 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Investigates current thinking on the theory and application of index language. Explains their links with on-line retrieval systems and the need to go beyond a narrow library application, identifying 2 regularly occurring points of view: transferring traditional ideas about conventional keyword catalogues to post-coordinate on-line searches and redundant terminology about input and its replacement by pure subject searching. Explores the general subject literature, the theory of verbal documentation languages, syntactical indexing, the thesaurus principle and faceted classification structure
-
Gödert, W.: Ontological spine, localization and multilingual access : some reflections and a proposal (2008)
0.02
0.020640023 = product of:
0.09632011 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 4334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=4334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 4334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4334)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=4334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4334)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=4334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4334)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- In this paper the following problem is discussed: Which possibilities exist to integrate localized knowledge into knowledge structures like classification systems or other documentary languages for the design of OPACs and information systems? It is proposed to combine a de-localized classificatory structure - best describes as 'ontological spine' - with multilingual semantic networks. Each of these networks should represent the respective localized knowledge along an extended set of typed semantic relations serving as entry points vocabulary as well as a semantic basis for navigational purposes within the localized knowledge context. The spine should enable a link between well-known and not well-known knowledge structures.
- Source
- New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
-
Gödert, W.: ¬"Die Welt ist groß - Wir bringen Ordnung in diese Welt" : Das DFG-Projekt DDC Deutsch (2002)
0.02
0.015022537 = product of:
0.07010517 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag wird die Zielsetzung und die geplante Durchführung des Projektes DDC Deutsch zur Herstellung einer deutschen Version der 22. Ausgabe der Dewey Decimal Classification näher beschrieben. Es werden Gründe für die Durchführung des Vorhabens diskutiert und der erwartete spätere Nutzen beschrieben.
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.01
0.014760571 = product of:
0.10332399 = sum of:
0.09315398 = product of:
0.18630797 = sum of:
0.18630797 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18630797 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31821543 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Schöneberg, U.; Gödert, W.: Erschließung mathematischer Publikationen mittels linguistischer Verfahren (2012)
0.01
0.014107771 = product of:
0.065836266 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Die Zahl der mathematik-relevanten Publikationn steigt von Jahr zu Jahr an. Referatedienste wie da Zentralblatt MATH und Mathematical Reviews erfassen die bibliographischen Daten, erschließen die Arbeiten inhaltlich und machen sie - heute über Datenbanken, früher in gedruckter Form - für den Nutzer suchbar. Keywords sind ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Publikationen. Keywords sind meist keine einzelnen Wörter, sondern Mehrwortphrasen. Das legt die Anwendung linguistischer Methoden und Verfahren nahe. Die an der FH Köln entwickelte Software 'Lingo' wurde für die speziellen Anforderungen mathematischer Texte angepasst und sowohl zum Aufbau eines kontrollierten Vokabulars als auch zur Extraction von Keywords aus mathematischen Publikationen genutzt. Es ist geplant, über eine Verknüpfung von kontrolliertem Vokabular und der Mathematical Subject Classification Methoden für die automatische Klassifikation für den Referatedienst Zentralblatt MATH zu entwickeln und zu erproben.
-
Gödert, W.: 4th International Study Conference on Classification Research; 6. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (Bericht) (1983)
0.01
0.013458293 = product of:
0.09420805 = sum of:
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Gödert, W.: Klassifikatorische Inhaltserschließung : Ein Übersichtsartikel als kommentierter Literaturbericht (1990)
0.01
0.013320256 = product of:
0.09324179 = sum of:
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=5143,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=5143,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Identifies the interest in questions of classified catalogues generated by the development of on-line catalogues, establishing a difference between 2 large areas: free access to information items in a systematic arrangement and expressing the contents of books by means of notational symbols in a classification system in a local catalogue. Examines the elements and structure of classification systems, the internationally important universal classifications, the procedures for book display and systematic processing in West German public libraries and exhibtion techniques in West German academic libraries. Covers universal and faceted classifications, as well as classification systems in on-line catalogues
-
Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991)
0.01
0.012716891 = product of:
0.08901823 = sum of:
0.044509117 = weight(_text_:classification in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044509117 = score(doc=5825,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.044509117 = weight(_text_:classification in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044509117 = score(doc=5825,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings
"Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.
- Source
- International classification. 18(1991) no.2, S.98-109
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001)
0.01
0.009479344 = product of:
0.06635541 = sum of:
0.051972847 = weight(_text_:subject in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051972847 = score(doc=5801,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48397237 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.014382556 = product of:
0.028765112 = sum of:
0.028765112 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028765112 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele: durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen; diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden hier in verkürzter Form vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:22
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014)
0.01
0.008043489 = product of:
0.056304425 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=987,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.0122040035 = product of:
0.024408007 = sum of:
0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024408007 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
- Date
- 23. 7.2017 13:49:22
- LCSH
- World Wide Web / Subject access
- Subject
- World Wide Web / Subject access
-
Gödert, W.: Probleme und Nutzen kooperativer Inhaltserschließung (1987)
0.01
0.005422229 = product of:
0.0759112 = sum of:
0.0759112 = weight(_text_:subject in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0759112 = score(doc=5135,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reflects on the situation a few years ago in the field of subject access in libraries and evaluates the present situation in the light of recent developments. Discusses factors which characterise the situation in West Germany today. Examines the organisation of cooperative subject access during the course of which various relationships are explored, and the dovetailing of the network and local library operations, and the formation of local and on-line catalogues are discussed. Describes the relationship between formal and subject access; discusses cooperation in the allocation of catchwords, and cooperation in classified subject access; and addresses 2 forms of cooperative subject access
-
Gödert, W.: Sacherschließung im Jahr 2000 : Spielwiese für Theoretiker oder berufsbedingtes Erfordernis? (1988)
0.01
0.00525005 = product of:
0.0735007 = sum of:
0.0735007 = weight(_text_:subject in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0735007 = score(doc=1551,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68444026 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Outlines the future increase in importance of subject indexing and subject retrieval in libraries. Examines the value of an efficient subject index in public service operations as well as the advantages offered by new technology for exploring the possibility of storing and retrieving documents
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.: Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) : Projektbericht (2001)
0.00
0.0044548153 = product of:
0.062367413 = sum of:
0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062367413 = score(doc=1476,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu errei-chen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele:· Durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; Einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen;· Diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden in dieser Studie ausführlich vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist.
-
Gödert, W.: ¬The design of subject access elements in online catalogues : Some problems (1991)
0.00
0.0034293185 = product of:
0.048010457 = sum of:
0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048010457 = score(doc=5140,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The research, investigating experiences of users with subject searching of on-line public access catalogues (OPACs), stresses that there is an interaction between: features of the indexing languages used; indexing principles used; design and structure of the data base; and the possiblities of the technical retrieval faculty, search mode and query language used
-
Gödert, W.: Zur semantischen Struktur der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD): ein Beitrag zur Problematik des induktiven Aufbaus kontrollierten Vokabulars (1990)
0.00
0.0030006538 = product of:
0.042009152 = sum of:
0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042009152 = score(doc=5136,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Librarians in West Germany have thesauri for subject cataloguing through the use of Regeln fur den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK - Subject Cataloguing Rules) with the Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD - Standard Keyword Data File). There is controversy over the terminological properties of standard keyword data files, over whether SWD is universal and whether inductive vocabulary construction is successful here. Some RSWK chain components have no separate semantic isentity and, although SWD has several aids for definition precision, semantic structures are not fully expressed. At present cooperative cataloguing partners using RSWK should use SWD with it as a starting point and think about possible improvements. RSWK with SWD is at present unsuitable for personal computers
