-
Holley, R.P.; Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬An interview with Karen M. Drabenstott (2001)
0.05
0.05493257 = product of:
0.19226398 = sum of:
0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058800567 = score(doc=5432,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=5432,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=5432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=5432,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- In an interview with Robert P. Holley, Karen M. Drabenstott provides a history of a professional career that has focused on subject access to information. Since her early work with Pauline Cochrane, she has strongly supported enhanced bibliographic records as a way to improve user access in the online catalog. Her Dewey Decimal Classification Online project showed that the classification offers increased subject retrieval. Her current projects include improved strategies for Web searching and multimedia literacy including subject access.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.2, S.5-30
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.05
0.05484921 = product of:
0.19197223 = sum of:
0.0514505 = weight(_text_:subject in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0514505 = score(doc=1524,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
- Source
- International classification. 13(1986), S.73-78
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The consequences of new technologies in classification and subject cataloguing in third world countries : the technological gap (1985)
0.05
0.046418566 = product of:
0.16246498 = sum of:
0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062367413 = score(doc=1733,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Since many nations rely upon subject headings and classification numbers from cataloguing agencies in developed countries, changes requiring computers would hinder subject access in Thrid World areas which lack high technology. New computer-supported systems such as PRECIS will probably take hold only in languages and countries where a subject analysis system does not already exist. For the traditional card catalogue-based subject access system, computer support may lead to more frequent changes in headings, less pre-coordinated structure, and the assignement of more terms per document. Third world countires may have difficulty in adapting to the developments. Classification, especially since it more easily crosses linguistc boundaries, may become to a greater degree the preferred means of subject access in Third World nations. During the transition, IFLA can serve as a forum for developing nations to make their needs known to the providers of bibliographic data
-
Holley, R.P.: Report from the section on classification and indexing : 1988-89 (1989)
0.04
0.040309202 = product of:
0.1881096 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 18(1989), S.59
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008)
0.04
0.03894633 = product of:
0.13631216 = sum of:
0.06365348 = weight(_text_:subject in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06365348 = score(doc=2553,freq=18.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5927426 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=2553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=2553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.014382556 = product of:
0.028765112 = sum of:
0.028765112 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028765112 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Canada has a long history of adapting United States subject access tools, including the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Sears List of Subject Headings, to meet the specific needs of Canadians. This paper addresses the extensions to these American tools for English-speaking Canadians. While the United States and Canada have many similarities, differences exist that require changing terminology and providing greater depth and precision in subject headings and classification for specifically Canadian topics. The major effort has been for Library and Archives Canada (LAC) systematically to provide extensions for LCC and LCSH for use within its cataloging records. This paper examines the history and philosophy of these Canadian efforts to provide enhanced subject access. Paradoxically, French-speaking Canadians may have found it easier to start from scratch with the Repertoire de vedettes-matiere because of the difficult decisions for English-language tools on how much change to implement in an environment where most Canadian libraries use the American subject access tools. Canadian studies scholars around the world can use Canadian records, especially those maintained by LAC, to obtain superior subject access for Canadian topics even if they obtain the documents from other sources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:18
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog (1989)
0.04
0.038191363 = product of:
0.17822635 = sum of:
0.084018305 = weight(_text_:subject in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084018305 = score(doc=445,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7823804 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.3-8
-
Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996)
0.03
0.03274764 = product of:
0.15282232 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.08620717 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620717 = score(doc=5572,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has taken an active role in standard setting to foster universal bibliographic control (UBC). UBC is built upon the assumption that a national cataloging agency will catalog national imprints and then share the records nationally and internationally. Standards in support of UBC include the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions, UNIMARC, authority lists, and miscellaneous guidelines. The IFLA standard setting process requires consensus building and compromise among the various traditions of bibliographic control. The increasing importance of library networks and the internationalization of bibliographic control may reduce the importance of IFLA as a standard setting body.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.17-36
-
Holley, R.P.; Killheffer, R.E.: Is there an answer to the subject access crisis? (1981)
0.03
0.026747305 = product of:
0.124820754 = sum of:
0.08444588 = weight(_text_:subject in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08444588 = score(doc=5531,freq=22.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.786362 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress subject heading policy has been frequently criticized for using obsolete and biased terminology, for not providing subject analysis in depth, and for being overly research library oriented. While both PRECIS and the Subject Analysis Project offer possible solutions, fiscal considerations make their adoptions unlikely. By using existing computer technology, individual libraries could improve subject access by improved subject searching capabilities and by implementations of subject authority files which could tailor LC subject headings to the individual libraries' needs and provide an individualized cross-reference structure. For its part, the Library of Congress should provide an uptatable machine readable file of its complete cross-reference structure. This file should contain all references used in the Library of Congress Public Catalog since much of LC's subject heading practice is based upon its cross-reference structure. With such improvements, LC subject headings could provide much better subject access at an acceptable cost
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.125-133
-
Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002)
0.02
0.016459066 = product of:
0.076808974 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.43-52
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1985)
0.02
0.015380906 = product of:
0.107666336 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1730)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1730)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984)
0.02
0.015380906 = product of:
0.107666336 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
-
Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993)
0.01
0.010742241 = product of:
0.07519568 = sum of:
0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060957674 = score(doc=5054,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
-
Holley, R.P.: Cooperative cataloging outside North America : status report 1993 (1993)
0.01
0.007690453 = product of:
0.053833168 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=7173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=7173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.3/4, S.201-236
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog (1989)
0.01
0.006858637 = product of:
0.096020915 = sum of:
0.096020915 = weight(_text_:subject in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096020915 = score(doc=443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.894149 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley
-
Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011)
0.01
0.0067291465 = product of:
0.047104023 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.1, S.1-13
-
Holley, R.P.: Results of a 'survey on bibliographic control and national bibliography', IFLA Section an Bibliography (1998)
0.01
0.006094498 = product of:
0.08532297 = sum of:
0.08532297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08532297 = score(doc=2113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 27(1998) no.1, S.3-7
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject cataloguing in the USA (1985)
0.01
0.0060622366 = product of:
0.08487131 = sum of:
0.08487131 = weight(_text_:subject in 1732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08487131 = score(doc=1732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.79032356 = fieldWeight in 1732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1732)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002)
0.01
0.005739506 = product of:
0.04017654 = sum of:
0.030006537 = weight(_text_:subject in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030006537 = score(doc=159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27942157 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- In 1946, the Université Laval in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, started using Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in French by creating an authority list, Répertoire de Vedettes-matière (RVM), whose first published edition appeared in 1962. In the 1970s, the most important libraries in Canada with an interest in French-language cataloging - the Université de Montréal, the Bibliothèque Nationale du Canada, and the Bibliothèque Nationale du Quebec - forged partnerships with the Université Laval to support RVM. In 1974, the Bibliothèque Publique d'Information, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France became the first library in Europe to adopt RVM. During the 1980s, the Bibliothèque Nationale de France (BNF) created an authority list, RAMEAU, based upon RVM, which is used by numerous French libraries of all types. The major libraries in Luxembourg adopted RVM in 1985. Individual libraries in Belgium also use RVM, often in combination with LCSH. The spread of RVM in the francophone world reflects the increasing importance of the pragmatic North American tradition of shared cataloging and library cooperation. RVM and its European versions are based upon literary warrant and make changes to LCSH to reflect the specific cultural and linguistic meeds of their user communities. While the users of RVM seek to harmonize the various versions, differences in terminology and probably syntax are inevitable.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Holley, R.P.: Are technical services topics underrepresented in the contributed papers at the ACRL national conferences? (2007)
0.00
0.004806533 = product of:
0.03364573 = sum of:
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.259-269
