Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Milstead, J.L."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Milstead, J.L.: Methodologies for subject analysis in bibliographic databases (1992) 0.01
    0.014146028 = product of:
      0.099022195 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=3092,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Report on a subject analysis review undertaken to aid managers of databases in determining if new and little-known capabilities would improve the cost-effectiveness of subject analysis operations. Operational machine-aided and automatic indexing systems were found to form a continuum. Commercial automatic indexing packages were also reviewed. The primary obstacle to development of automatic indexing is the lack of machine understanding of natural language. Recommendations for action include: increasing the power of the indexer interface, studying indexing policies, enrichment of thesauri, and considering the development of machine-aided indexing
  2. Milstead, J.L.: Needs for research in indexing (1997) 0.01
    0.013320256 = product of:
      0.09324179 = sum of:
        0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046620894 = score(doc=585,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
        0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046620894 = score(doc=585,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  3. Milstead, J.L.: Methodologies for subject analysis in bibliographic databases (1992) 0.01
    0.013111556 = product of:
      0.091780886 = sum of:
        0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042009152 = score(doc=2311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=2311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of the study was to determine the state of the art of subject analysis as applied to large bibliographic data bases. The intent was to gather and evaluate information, casting it in a form that could be applied by management. There was no attempt to determine actual costs or trade-offs among costs and possible benefits. Commercial automatic indexing packages were also reviewed. The overall conclusion was that data base producers should begin working seriously on upgrading their thesauri and codifying their indexing policies as a means of moving toward development of machine aids to indexing, but that fully automatic indexing is not yet ready for wholesale implementation
  4. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.00
    0.0044839755 = product of:
      0.03138783 = sum of:
        0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021217827 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.010170003 = product of:
          0.020340007 = sum of:
            0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020340007 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  5. Milstead, J.L.; Borko, H.: Shoes for the Cobbler's children : the ASIS thesaurus (1994) 0.00
    0.0020340008 = product of:
      0.02847601 = sum of:
        0.02847601 = product of:
          0.05695202 = sum of:
            0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05695202 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 21(1994) no.1, S.22-24