Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Summerlin, J."
  • × author_ss:"Carlyle, A."
  1. Carlyle, A.; Ranger, S.; Summerlin, J.: Making the pieces fit : little women, works, and the pursuit of quality (2008) 0.02
    0.023156079 = product of:
      0.1080617 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
        0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060957674 = score(doc=799,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Bibliographic database quality"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 46(2008) no.1, S.35-63
  2. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.02
    0.02075909 = product of:
      0.09687576 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=5626,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Displays grouping retrieved bibliographic record sets into categories or clusters may communicate search results more quickly and effectively to users than current catalog displays providing long alphabetical lists of records. Bibliographic records associated with three large fiction works are analyzed to discover the presence of relationship-type indicators. Preliminary results show that 94% of the records in this study contained indicators of cluster type that would allow them to be correctly identified automatically. However, the clusters formed by the relationship types used here are of unequal size. Because of this, it is suggested that alternative strategies be investigated for their potential to create more useful clustered displays.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2002) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  3. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : records clustering for works of fiction (2000) 0.00
    0.003047249 = product of:
      0.042661484 = sum of:
        0.042661484 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042661484 = score(doc=100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Displays grouping retrieved bibliographic record sets into categories or clusters may communicate search results more quickly and effectively to users than current catalogs providing long alphabetical lists of records. In this research, automatic clustering based on types of relationships, including translation, presence of illustrations, etc., is proposed as a model for clustering. Bibliographic records associated with three large fiction works (Kidnapped by Robert Lewis Stevenson, Bleak House by Charles Dickens, and Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas) are analyzed to discover the presence of relationship-type indicators to determine the extent to which an automatic clustering program would succeed in clustering work records. Preliminary results show that 94 percent of the records in this study contained indicators of cluster type that would allow them to be correctly identified automatically