Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2f_documents %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c heery evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bloss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bloss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
-
Walker, S.: Subject access in online catalogues (1991)
0.00
0.004200041 = product of: 0.058800567 = sum of: 0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.058800567 = score(doc=5690,freq=6.0), product of: 0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of: 3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218) 0.03002521 = queryNorm 0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses some of the methods of subject access to on-line catalohues (OPACs) and argues that none are entirley satisfactory. Describes 2 methods for improving subject access: best match searching; and automatic query expansion application and discusses their feasibility. Mentions emerging application standards for information retrieval and concludes that existing standards are incompatible with most methods for improving standards
-
Walker, S.; DeVere, R.: Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues : T.2: Relevance feedback and query expansion (1990)
0.00
0.0030311183 = product of: 0.042435654 = sum of: 0.042435654 = weight(_text_:subject in 1816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.042435654 = score(doc=1816,freq=2.0), product of: 0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of: 3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218) 0.03002521 = queryNorm 0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 1816, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1816) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)