Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"HD30.2"
  1. Dalkir, K.: Knowledge management in theory and practice (2017) 0.00
    0.0030311183 = product of:
      0.042435654 = sum of:
        0.042435654 = weight(_text_:subject in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042435654 = score(doc=4579,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    RSWK
    Unternehmen Subject / Wissensmanagement
    Wissensmanagement Subject / Lernende Organisation
    Subject
    Unternehmen Subject / Wissensmanagement
    Wissensmanagement Subject / Lernende Organisation
  2. Suman, A.: From knowledge abstraction to management : using Ranganathan's faceted schema to develop conceptual frameworks for digital libraries (2014) 0.00
    0.0018186709 = product of:
      0.02546139 = sum of:
        0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 2032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02546139 = score(doc=2032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 2032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2032)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The increasing volume of information in the contemporary world entails demand for efficient knowledge management (KM) systems; a logical method of information organization that will allow proper semantic querying to identify things that match meaning in natural language. On this concept, the role of an information manager goes beyond implementing a search and clustering system, to the ability to map and logically present the subject domain and related cross domains. From Knowledge Abstraction to Management answers this need by analysing ontology tools and techniques, helping the reader develop
  3. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.: ¬The science of managing our digital stuff (2016) 0.00
    0.0014243455 = product of:
      0.019940836 = sum of:
        0.019940836 = product of:
          0.039881673 = sum of:
            0.039881673 = weight(_text_:texts in 3971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039881673 = score(doc=3971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2422848 = fieldWeight in 3971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how design of new PIM systems can help us manage our information more efficiently. Each of us has an ever-growing collection of personal digital data: documents, photographs, PowerPoint presentations, videos, music, emails and texts sent and received. To access any of this, we have to find it. The ease (or difficulty) of finding something depends on how we organize our digital stuff. In this book, personal information management (PIM) experts Ofer Bergman and Steve Whittaker explain why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how the design of new PIM systems can help us manage our collections more efficiently.
  4. Understanding knowledge as a commons : from theory to practice (2007) 0.00
    0.0012124473 = product of:
      0.016974261 = sum of:
        0.016974261 = weight(_text_:subject in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016974261 = score(doc=1362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Looking at knowledge as a shared resource: experts discuss how to define, protect, and build the knowledge commons in the digital age. Knowledge in digital form offers unprecedented access to information through the Internet but, at the same time, is subject to ever-greater restrictions through intellectual property legislation, overpatenting, licensing, overpricing, and lack of preservation. Looking at knowledge as a commons - as a shared resource - allows us to understand both its limitless possibilities and what threatens it. In "Understanding Knowledge as a Commons", experts from a range of disciplines discuss the knowledge commons in the digital era - how to conceptualize it, protect it, and build it. Contributors consider the concept of the commons historically and offer an analytical framework for understanding knowledge as a shared social-ecological system. They look at ways to guard against enclosure of the knowledge commons, considering, among other topics, the role of research libraries, the advantages of making scholarly material available outside the academy, and the problem of disappearing Web pages. They discuss the role of intellectual property in a new knowledge commons, the open access movement (including possible funding models for scholarly publications), the development of associational commons, the application of a free/open source framework to scientific knowledge, and the effect on scholarly communication of collaborative communities within academia, and offer a case study of EconPort, an open access, open source digital library for students and researchers in microeconomics. The essays clarify critical issues that arise within these new types of commons - and offer guideposts for future theory and practice.