Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.39

0.3917228 = product of:
  1.0968238 = sum of:
    0.095375985 = product of:
      0.28612795 = sum of:
        0.28612795 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28612795 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.28612795 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28612795 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.14306398 = product of:
      0.28612795 = sum of:
        0.28612795 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28612795 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.28612795 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28612795 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.28612795 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28612795 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)

Content: Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16

0.16321784 = product of:
  0.45700994 = sum of:
    0.039739996 = product of:
      0.11921998 = sum of:
        0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11921998 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.05960999 = product of:
      0.11921998 = sum of:
        0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11921998 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)

Footnote: Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.16

0.16321784 = product of:
  0.45700994 = sum of:
    0.039739996 = product of:
      0.11921998 = sum of:
        0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11921998 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.05960999 = product of:
      0.11921998 = sum of:
        0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11921998 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11921998 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)

Content: Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.03

0.030741926 = product of:
  0.10759674 = sum of:
    0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02546139 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
    0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03496567 = score(doc=4408,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
    0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03496567 = score(doc=4408,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
    0.0122040035 = product of:
      0.024408007 = sum of:
        0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024408007 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)

Abstract: Unser Projekt soll eine Kreuzkonkordanz zwischen den Universalklassifikationen wie der "Regensburger Verbundsklassifikation (RVK)" und der "Basisklassifikation (BK)" sowie den Fachklassifikationen "Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC2010)" und "Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS2010)" in den Fachgebieten Mathematik und Physik herstellen. Fazit: "Die klassifikatorische Übereinstmmung zwischen Regensburger Verbundklassifikation und Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme war in einzelnen Fachbereichen (z. B. Kernphysik) recht gut. Doch andere Fachbereiche (z.B. Polymerphysik, Mineralogie) stimmten sehr wenig überein. Insgesamt konnten wir 890 einfache Verbindungen erstellen. Mehrfachverbindungen wurden aus technischen Gründen nicht mitgezählt. Das Projekt war insgesamt sehr umfangreich, daher konnte es im Rahmen der zwanzig Projekttage nicht erschöpfend behandelt werden. Eine Weiterentwicklung, insbesondere hinsichtlich des kollektiven Zuganges in Form eines Webformulars und der automatischen Klassifizierung erscheint jedoch sinnvoll."
Pages: 22 S

Adams, B.: Charles Ami Cutters 'Expansive classification' : eine kritsche Darstellung (1965) 0.02

0.019032901 = product of:
  0.1332303 = sum of:
    0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 4943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06661515 = score(doc=4943,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 4943, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4943)
    0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 4943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06661515 = score(doc=4943,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 4943, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4943)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Object: Cutter expansive classification

Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006) 0.02

0.017635275 = product of:
  0.08229795 = sum of:
    0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023552012 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
    0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035193928 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
    0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023552012 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract: Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit den praktischen Aspekten des Automatischen Klassifizierens bibliographischer Referenzdaten. Im Vordergrund steht die konkrete Vorgehensweise anhand des eigens zu diesem Zweck entwickelten Open Source-Programms COBRA "Classification Of Bibliographic Records, Automatic". Es werden die Rahmenbedingungen und Parameter f¨ur einen Einsatz im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geklärt. Schließlich erfolgt eine Auswertung von Klassifizierungsergebnissen am Beispiel sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten aus der Datenbank SOLIS.

Engbarth, M.: ¬Die Library of Congress Classification : Geschichte, Struktur, Verbreitung und Auswirkungen auf deutsche Bibliotheksklassifikationen (1980) 0.02

0.015380906 = product of:
  0.107666336 = sum of:
    0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053833168 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
    0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053833168 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Urban, A.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification als Normklassifikation : Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung und Verbreitung der DDC unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der zentralen Sacherschließung (1977) 0.02

0.015380906 = product of:
  0.107666336 = sum of:
    0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053833168 = score(doc=6824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6824)
    0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053833168 = score(doc=6824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6824)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Thielemann, A.: Sacherschließung für die Kunstgeschichte : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von DDC 700: The Arts (2007) 0.02

0.015022537 = product of:
  0.07010517 = sum of:
    0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026916584 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
    0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026916584 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
    0.016272005 = product of:
      0.03254401 = sum of:
        0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03254401 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract: Nach der Veröffentlichung einer deutschen Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification 22 im Oktober 2005 und ihrer Nutzung zur Inhaltserschließung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie seit Januar 2006 stellt sich aus Sicht der deutschen kunsthistorischen Spezialbibliotheken die Frage nach einer möglichen Verwendung der DDC und ihrer generellen Eignung zur Inhalterschließung kunsthistorischer Publikationen. Diese Frage wird vor dem Hintergrund der bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen für die Kunstgeschichte sowie mit Blick auf die inhaltlichen Besonderheiten, die Forschungsmethodik und die publizistischen Traditionen dieses Faches erörtert.

Engbarth, M.: ¬Die Library of Congress Classification : Geschichte, Struktur, Verbreitung und Auswirkungen auf deutsche Bibliotheksklassifikationen (1980) 0.01

0.013458293 = product of:
  0.09420805 = sum of:
    0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047104023 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
    0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047104023 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Haßelmeier, B.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification : Eine Einführung im Zusammenhang mit dem Projekt "DDC Deutsch" (2004) 0.01

0.013458293 = product of:
  0.09420805 = sum of:
    0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047104023 = score(doc=2880,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
    0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047104023 = score(doc=2880,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract: Diese Arbeit möchte im Zusammenhang mit dem Übersetzungsprojekt "Dewey Decimal Classification Deutsch" eine Einführung zur Entstehung, Anwendung, Struktur und Erscheinungsweise des amerikanischen Originals geben. Zunächst werden einige grundlegende Begriffe der allgemeinen Klassifikationslehre erläutert. Anschließend werden Funktion und Bedeutung von Klassifikationen für den Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationsbereich skizziert. Im dritten Kapitel wird dann ausführlich auf die Dewey Decimal Classification eingegangen, bevor im letzten Kapitel dargestellt wird, welche Ziele mit dem Projekt "DDC Deutsch" verfolgt werden und welche Schwierigkeiten und Herausforderungen mit der Übersetzung verbunden sind. Die Arbeit schließt mit einem Ausblick auf die Möglichkeiten, die sich für das Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen in Deutschland durch eine Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification eröffnen.

Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.01

0.010761541 = product of:
  0.07533079 = sum of:
    0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05092278 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
    0.024408007 = product of:
      0.048816014 = sum of:
        0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048816014 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Date: 22. 6.2002 19:41:59

Grünberg, H.: ¬Die Sacherschließung auf der Grundlage der Regensburger Aufstellungssystematiken in einer wissenschaftlichen Spezialbibliothek : dargestellt am Beispiel der Fachbibliothek Geodäsie / Kartographie / Geographie an der Technischen Universität Dresden (1993) 0.01

0.009613066 = product of:
  0.06729146 = sum of:
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract: The thesis showed how the classification system of the Regensburg library could be applied in the special library for geodesy, cartography, and geography of the Technical University of Dresden

John, M.: ¬Die Sacherschließung auf der Grundlage der Regensburger Aufstellungssystematiken und der RSWK in einer wissenschaftlichen Spezialbibliothek (1993) 0.01

0.009613066 = product of:
  0.06729146 = sum of:
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract: The thesis showed how the classification system of the Regensburg library could be applied in the special library for chemistry of the Technical University of Dresden

Küchler, J.: ¬Die Sacherschließung auf der Grundlage der Regensburger Aufstellungssystematiken in einer wissenschaftlichen Spezialbibliothek : dargestellt am Beispiel der Fachbibliothek Informatik der UB Dresden (1993) 0.01

0.009613066 = product of:
  0.06729146 = sum of:
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5916)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5916)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract: The thesis showed how the classification system of the Regensburg library could be applied in the special library for computer science of the Technical University of Dresden

Müller, G.: ¬Die Sacherschließung auf der Grundlage der Regensburger Aufstellungssystematiken : dargestellt am Beispiel der Zweigbibliothek der Philosophie, Ästhetik und Kulturwissenschaft der Universitätsbibliothek der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin (1993) 0.01

0.009613066 = product of:
  0.06729146 = sum of:
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract: The thesis showed how the classification system of the Regensburg library could be applied in the university library of the Humboldt university (for philosophy, aesthetics and culture science)

Düring, M.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification : Entstehung, Aufbau und Ausblick auf eine Nutzung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2003) 0.01
```
0.009389086 = product of:
  0.043815732 = sum of:
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
    0.010170003 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020340007 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
```
Abstract

Die ständig steigende Zahl an publizierter Information in immer neuen Formen verlangt besonders von Informations- und Dokumentationseinrichtungen immer präzisere Lösungen zur Erschließung dieser Informationen und ihrer benutzerfreundlichen Aufbereitung. Besonders im derzeitigen Zeitalter der Datenbanken und Online-Kataloge ist die Kombination von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Sacherschließung gefordert, ohne dabei die Verbindung zu den älteren, vielerorts noch (zumindest zusätzlich) in Verwendung befindlichen, Zettelkatalogen zu verlieren. Weltweit ist eine Vielzahl an verschiedenen Klassifikationen im Einsatz. Die Wahl der für eine Einrichtung passenden Klassifikation ist abhängig von ihrer thematischen und informationellen Ausrichtung, der Größe und Art der Bestände und nicht zuletzt von technischen und personellen Voraussetzungen. Auf Seiten der zu wählenden Klassifikation sind die Einfachheit der Handhabung für den Bibliothekar, die Verständlichkeit für den Benutzer, die Erweiterungsfähigkeit der Klassifikation durch das Aufkommen neuer Wissensgebiete und die Einbindung in informationelle Netze mit anderen Einrichtungen von entscheidender Bedeutung. In dieser Arbeit soll die Dewey Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) hinsichtlich dieser Punkte näher beleuchtet werden. Sie ist die weltweit am häufigsten benutzte Klassifikation. Etwa 200.000 Bibliotheken in 135 Ländern erschließen ihre Bestände mit diesem System. Sie liegt derzeit bereits in der 22. ungekürzten Auflage vor und wurde bisher in 30 Sprachen übersetzt. Eine deutsche Komplettübersetzung wird im Jahre 2005 erscheinen. Trotz teils heftig geführter Standardisierungsdebatten und Plänen für die Übernahme von amerikanischen Formalerschließungsregeln herrscht in Bezug auf die Sacherschließung unter deutschen Bibliotheken wenig Einigkeit. Die DDC ist in Deutschland und anderen europäischen Ländern kaum verbreitet, sieht von Großbritannien und von der Verwendung in Bibliografien ab. Diese Arbeit geht demzufolge auf die historischen Gründe dieser Entwicklung ein und wagt einen kurzen Ausblick in die Zukunft der Dezimalklassifikation.
Karlova-Bourbonus, N.: Automatic detection of contradictions in texts (2018) 0.01
```
0.0055192295 = product of:
  0.038634606 = sum of:
    0.012730695 = weight(_text_:subject in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012730695 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.11854853 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
    0.025903909 = product of:
      0.051807817 = sum of:
        0.051807817 = weight(_text_:texts in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051807817 = score(doc=5976,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3147372 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
```
Abstract

Implicit contradictions will only partially be the subject of the present study, aiming primarily at identifying the realization mechanism and cues (Chapter 5) as well as finding the parts of contradictions by applying the state of the art algorithms for natural language processing without conducting deep meaning processing. Further in focus are the explicit and implicit contradictions that can be detected by means of explicit linguistic, structural, lexical cues, and by conducting some additional processing operations (e.g., counting the sum in order to detect contradictions arising from numerical divergencies). One should note that an additional complexity in finding contradictions can arise in case parts of the contradictions occur on different levels of realization. Thus, a contradiction can be observed on the word- and phrase-level, such as in a married bachelor (for variations of contradictions on lexical level, see Ganeev 2004), on the sentence level - between parts of a sentence or between two or more sentences, or on the text level - between the portions of a text or between the whole texts such as a contradiction between the Bible and the Quran, for example. Only contradictions arising at the level of single sentences occurring in one or more texts, as well as parts of a sentence, will be considered for the purpose of this study. Though the focus of interest will be on single sentences, it will make use of text particularities such as coreference resolution without establishing the referents in the real world. Finally, another aspect to be considered is that parts of the contradictions are not neces-sarily to appear at the same time. They can be separated by many years and centuries with or without time expression making their recognition by human and detection by machine challenging. According to Aristotle's ontological version of the LNC (Section 3.1.1), how-ever, the same time reference is required in order for two statements to be judged as a contradiction. Taking this into account, we set the borders for the study by limiting the ana-lyzed textual data thematically (only nine world events) and temporally (three days after the reported event had happened) (Section 5.1). No sophisticated time processing will thus be conducted.

Zedelmaier, H.: Bibliotheca universalis und bibliotheca selecta : das Problem der Ordnung des gelehrten Wissens in der frühen Neuzeit (1992) 0.01

0.0054379716 = product of:
  0.0380658 = sum of:
    0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0190329 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
    0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0190329 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

LCSH: Classification / Books / History
Subject: Classification / Books / History

Lenes, V.: ¬Ein Vergleich feministischer Thesauri am Beispiel der thesaurA und des Feministischen Thesaurus des FrauenMediaTurm (2002) 0.00
```
0.004806533 = product of:
  0.03364573 = sum of:
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 3318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=3318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3318)
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 3318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=3318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3318)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
```
Abstract

Im Rahmen der virtuellen Lehrveranstaltung "Frauen in Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen" wollte ich mich zunächst mit der Dewey Decimal Classification und dem feministischen Projekt von Hope A. Olson, der femDDC beschäftigen. Die DDC erhebt den Anspruch einer Universalklassifikation und wird im Großteil der amerikanischen Bibliotheken eingesetzt. Hope Olson versuchte in ihrem Projekt, die DDC dahingehend zu ergänzen und zu verändern, dass die DDC nicht länger Frauen unf Frauenthemen diskriminiert. Leider stellte sich bei der persönlichen Kontaktaufnahme mit Hope A. Olson heraus, dass das Projekt bis auf weiteres nicht fortgeführt wird und auch die bisher erzielten Ergebnisse nicht einsehbar sind. Ansonsten droht eine Klage von OCLC, den Rechtinhabern der DDC, die ihr Urheberrecht verletzt sehen. So entschloss ich mich vergleichbaren österreichischen bzw. deutschsprachigen Projekten zuzuwenden. In Europa ist die DDC nicht so stark verbreitet wie in den USA, deswegen führte meine Recherche weg von Klassifikationen, hin zur inhaltlichen Erschließung mittels Thesauri, Schlagwortnormdateien, etc. Ähnlich wie in der Aufstellungssystematik birgt auch die inhaltliche Erschließung die Gefahr der bewussten oder unbewussten Diskriminierung durch die BibliothekarInnen. Durch die Erschließung wird Literatur wiederauffindbar gemacht und zugeordnet, oder aber es geschieht das Gegenteil: Die beschlagworteten Dokumente werden unsichtbar gemacht oder "ghettoisiert". Im folgenden möchte ich die beiden deutschsprachigen, feministischen Thesauri, die dem obengenannten Problem entgegewirken möchten, vorstellen und vergleichen: die thesaurA und den feministischen Thesaurus des FrauenMediaTurm.

Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

Authors

Years

Themes

Subjects

Classifications