Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"dk"
  1. Buch, L.: Teknikken vinder over intellektet : eller hvordan man myrded formidleren i dansk forskningsbiblioteksvaesen (1993) 0.02
    0.016367726 = product of:
      0.07638272 = sum of:
        0.036007844 = weight(_text_:subject in 7329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036007844 = score(doc=7329,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 7329, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7329)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 7329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=7329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 7329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7329)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 7329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=7329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 7329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7329)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on Statens Bibliotekstjeneste's 1993 report on subject data in research libraries. Despite the failure in the 70s to create a common classification system using notation, the report recommends just such a system but using verbal expressions. It assumes that subject indexing problems can be solved by reusing other libraries' key words and that user groups are homogeneous and able to use the systems thus leaving libraries as professionals intermediaries without responsibility. Uses the experiences of the author's library, the Environmental Library, which itself indexes all material, and gives 6 examples of how other institutions index the same publications differently, to show that the simple recycling system which the report recommends cannot be used there. Rather than spend recources on developing electronic catalogues, as the report recommends, funds should be used to help research libraries construct systems targeting their specific user group
  2. Madsen, M.; Strunck, K.: Bibliografiske posters funktionaliatet : funktionaliatet som mal for kvalitet og kvantitet i bibliografiske data (1997) 0.01
    0.005027704 = product of:
      0.070387855 = sum of:
        0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070387855 = score(doc=689,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The 1992 IFLA Study Group issued its report functional requirements for bibliographic records in mid 96. The investigation's method was based on the entity/relation analysis technique. The 1st step in this model is identification of entities, and for each entity a set of attributes. Finally the relations between the entities are analyzed, and evaluation of the relevance of attributes and relations connected with user tasks is carried out. With these analyses the report recommended basic functional requirements for national bibliographic records. The matrix of attributes, relations and user tasks provides a useful tool for determining the cataloguing level
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The functionality of bibliographic entries: functionality as objective for quality and quantity of bibliographic data
  3. Bruhns, S.: Bibliografisk sogning som forskning : Don R. Swansons projekt (1995) 0.00
    0.0040629986 = product of:
      0.056881975 = sum of:
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=4412,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic searching usually involves finding documents which fulfil already specified search criteria, but Swanson has attempted to develop methods described as a systematic trial and error stzrategy, to find unknown causal scientific connections between already known phenomena, so-called undiscoverd public knowledge, or complementary but disjoint literatures. To this end he conducted 3 investigations in biomedicine. While specialist knowlegde is needed to find the literature linking the literature of problems with that of the solutions, Swanson hopes to make the method more automatic. Clinical trials seem to support his hypothesis
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Bibliographic searching as research: Don R. Swanson's project
  4. Aam, K.A.: "Kunnskapsorganisering og metadata pa nettet" : hostseminar i regi av NFF/Trondheim (1997) 0.00
    0.002872974 = product of:
      0.04022163 = sum of:
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Speakers dealt with the following topics: Definition of net documents, net robots and metadata; Dublic core, a project in which BIBSYS is involved, and the Nordic metadata project, which uses Dublin core; teaching of IT-related subjects at Oslo College Library and Information Department; NBR in Rana's BIBLINK project on bibliographic control of electronic publications; and common access to collections of visual information
  5. Christensen, F.H.: Publikations- og citationsanalyser (1997) 0.00
    0.002513852 = product of:
      0.035193928 = sum of:
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Within informetry publication and citation analyses stand out. The former are defined as quantitative studies of the content of the bibliographic fields, e.g. authors, in a defined document collection, the latter deal with the documents' literature lists and can be citations fron or to a document. Gives examples of how the RANK command in DIALOG can be used to count information units in phrase indexed fields enabling ranked lists of publications to be produced. DIALOG is best for analysing citations 'from'. A citation analysis 'to' is used for research evaluation, although it is agreed that it can only supplement, not supplant peer review. The Danish Library School's Centre for Informetric Studies researches online analysis and other other informetric questions
  6. Brattli, T.: Fagreferentkonferansen 1998 : nettbaserte bibliotektjenester (1998) 0.00
    0.0024248946 = product of:
      0.033948522 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 3001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=3001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 3001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3001)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The subject specialists' conference 1998: netbased library services