Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Béthery, A.: Liberté bien ordonnée : les classifications encyclopédiques revues et corrigées (1988) 0.02 
    0.020441301 = product of:
  0.095392734 = sum of:
    0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02546139 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
    0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03496567 = score(doc=2532,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
    0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03496567 = score(doc=2532,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    The current trend of simplifying user access to documents in public libraries in France has led to strong criticism of the traditional use of decimal classification, and growing popularity for classifying by centres of interest. The notion of locating documents 'where the reader expects to find them' does not bear reasoned analysis: this approach depends on the subjective attitudes of the reader, whose preconceptions are unknown. Public libraries serve readers of all types, and therefore the classification used must be based on general objective criteria. Argues for the retension of traditional encyclopedic classifications (UDC or Dewey), which despite their drawbacks, are based on subject structures known to everyone, and allow for updating to accommodate new concepts. Classification can operate with visual labelling systems, to simplify access: this approach provides ready identification of centres of interest without discarding the real advantages of universality.
  2. Witt, M.: Lisibilité de l'OPAC (1989) 0.01 
    0.005745948 = product of:
  0.08044326 = sum of:
    0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08044326 = score(doc=424,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 18(1989), S.51-56
  3. Schéma directeur de l'information bibliographique de la Culture : étape no.1 (1988) 0.00 
    0.0043541198 = product of:
  0.060957674 = sum of:
    0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060957674 = score(doc=1548,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Extracts from the official report of a study investigating the situation in French public libraries, The main reason for this evaluation is th proposed review of the role of the Bibliothèque Nationale, in relation to developing the role of France in the world information market. The results reported here cover the production and diffusion of bibliographic information. The overall picture is of a lack of coordination between products available and user needs, failure to establish standards for formats and for information technology equioment. The concluding recommendations emphaisis the need for coordinating initiatives by the various organisations involved in producing/diffusing bibliographic information, and establishing common standards to allow free exchange between bibliographic networks. Further studies are in hand to establish guidelines for future policies in more specialised library sectors.
  4. Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989) 0.00 
    0.0024926048 = product of:
  0.034896467 = sum of:
    0.034896467 = product of:
      0.069792934 = sum of:
        0.069792934 = weight(_text_:texts in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069792934 = score(doc=3516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42399842 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Report of a study comparing 2 methods of indexing: LEXINET, a computerised system for indexing titles and summaries only; and manual indexing of full texts, using the thesaurus developed by French Electricity (EDF). Both systems were applied to a collection of approximately 2.000 documents on artifical intelligence from the EDF data base. The results were then analysed to compare quantitative performance (number and range of terms) and qualitative performance (ambiguity of terms, specificity, variability, consistency). Overall, neither system proved ideal: LEXINET was deficient as regards lack of accessibility and excessive ambiguity; while the manual system gave rise to an over-wide variation of terms. The ideal system would appear to be a combination of automatic and manual systems, on the evidence produced here.
  5. Mitev, N.; Hildreth, C.R.: ¬Les catalogues interactifs en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (1989) 0.00 
    0.0020340008 = product of:
  0.02847601 = sum of:
    0.02847601 = product of:
      0.05695202 = sum of:
        0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05695202 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

Authors

Themes