Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"i"
  1. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.13
    0.1255721 = product of:
      0.35160187 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=992,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.06790464 = product of:
          0.13580929 = sum of:
            0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13580929 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13580929 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=992,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
  2. Aghemo, A.: Anche l'arte ha sue regole : e possibile anche per il bibliotecario del servizio d'informazione fondare la sua attivita su un 'codice' certo? (1993) 0.03
    0.026013425 = product of:
      0.09104698 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.014238005 = product of:
          0.02847601 = sum of:
            0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02847601 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    In some areas of librarianship, such as cataloguing and subject classification, there are established rulebooks to guide librarians in their work. Information librarians however have no such aid; their metier is more an art than a profession, since reader queries may concern any aspect of human knowledge. After analysing hundreds of information library reader requests; G. Jahoda and colleagues have sought to formulate self-operating rules for interpreting such queries, utilising the 2 basic elements - what is 'known' and what is 'required' - contained in each request. Lists the categories into which each element breaks down. When presented in matrix form these can indicate the type of reference work to consult to resolve any reader queries
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  3. Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990) 0.02
    0.024932835 = product of:
      0.11635323 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=3527,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=3527,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Psychologists, philosophers and linguists analyse concepts and investigate their relationship to words. Concepts are also relevant to the issue of bibliographic classification, i.e. "catagorisation". Examines from a chronological point of view the various theories for the analysis and organisation of concepts ranging from the Vickery developed in 1954, to Austin's hypotheses, to Ranganathan's "fundamental categories" and the contribution made by CRG, the Classification Research Group. Illustrates other approaches to categorisation such as Farradane's (relationship between couples of concepts) and calls for a closer study of categories and concepts.
  4. Serrai, A.: ¬La specificita della bibliografia (1995) 0.02
    0.020154601 = product of:
      0.0940548 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliography' s claim to be a discipline is founded on its specific and exclusive concerns with knowledge organization structures and with the logical tools needed for indexing procedures. Discusses in a historical context the theoretical bases of bibliography, exploring such themes as the problems of author/reader communication and the abandonment of university accepted document classification criteria. Suggests that probably the only way to restore bibliographic communication is to adopt cognitive and regulatory 'maps' based on literary communication
  5. Paradisi, F.: Analisi a faccette e categorie semantiche per i termini giuridici nel Thesaurus del Nuovo soggettario (2008) 0.02
    0.016367726 = product of:
      0.07638272 = sum of:
        0.036007844 = weight(_text_:subject in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036007844 = score(doc=2180,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=2180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=2180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Nuovo soggettario, edited by the National Central Library of Florence and published in 2007, is a subject indexing system renewing the existing »Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane« (1956). The new language has been created according to rules and standards internationally recognized and is made up of various components, of which the multidisciplinary Thesaurus is the central one. This paper describes the facet analysis method adopted in developing the Thesaurus, (the terms of which derive mainly from the daily indexing work of the Italian National Bibliography) and how this has been applied to the semantic structure for legal terms. Details are also given concerning problems deriving from the overlapping of facets and how these are being resolved.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  6. Cheti, A.: ¬Il GRIS dall'elaborazione alla sperimentazione (1997) 0.02
    0.015358668 = product of:
      0.10751067 = sum of:
        0.060013074 = weight(_text_:subject in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060013074 = score(doc=1168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
        0.0474976 = product of:
          0.0949952 = sum of:
            0.0949952 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0949952 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5912352 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the work of GRIS, a collaborative project of Italian academic and research libraries, to develop subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, resulting in the recent publication of the 'Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto'
    Object
    GRIS subject heading scheme
  7. Tartaglia, S.: ¬La sintassi delle stringhe di soggetto : metodo e principi (1997) 0.02
    0.015127876 = product of:
      0.105895124 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=1169,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.03799808 = product of:
          0.07599616 = sum of:
            0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07599616 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an account of the theoretical work underpinning the development of subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, as developed by the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Discusses semantic categories and principles of citation, rules for the syntax of subject headings, and logica syntactic principles for citation order
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The syntax of subject strings: methods and principles
    Object
    GRIS subject heading scheme
  8. Gnoli, C.: Classificazione a facette (2004) 0.01
    0.013458293 = product of:
      0.09420805 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Facet classification
  9. Bellei, M.: ¬Un catalogo 'ricco' (1998) 0.01
    0.012604584 = product of:
      0.088232085 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=4647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    To enhance descriptions, cataloguers can add 'enriching' words or phrases to titles, or introduce content-enriched access features to aid subject-based research. Additional and natural language subject headings designed to support, though not replace, controlled language headings can result in enhanced indexing. Analytical cataloguing and double indexing are 2 other means by which readers can gian access to additional bibliographic data. Also examines how online research tool effectiveness can be enhanced by a system of automatic links between descriptors
  10. Maltese, D.: ¬Sul controllo dei termini di indicizzazione per soggetti : contributo al testo definitivo della Guida GRIS (1997) 0.01
    0.012099831 = product of:
      0.08469882 = sum of:
        0.0514505 = weight(_text_:subject in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0514505 = score(doc=1166,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
        0.03324832 = product of:
          0.06649664 = sum of:
            0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06649664 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The 'Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto', the outcome of the work of the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries on subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, was published in 1996, though not in a definitive form. Presents some notes as a contribution to the definitive version, particularly section 3. The latter is concerned with the control of terms, including the analysis of categories, the morphology of terms and the structure of vocabulary
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The control of terms in subject headings: a contribution to the definitive text of the GRIS Guide
    Object
    GRIS subject heading scheme
  11. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.01
    0.011655224 = product of:
      0.08158656 = sum of:
        0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04079328 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
        0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04079328 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
  12. Alessandri, S.: Classificare la letteratura : la classe 800 nelle edizioni della DDC (2002) 0.01
    0.01153568 = product of:
      0.08074976 = sum of:
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Classifying literature: the 800 class in Dewey Decimal Classification editions
  13. Crocetti, L.; Fagiolini, A.: Classificazione decimale Dewey edizione aggiornata a DDC21 (2001) 0.01
    0.01153568 = product of:
      0.08074976 = sum of:
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=3748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=3748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Dewey decimal classification: edition update to DDC21
  14. Lunati, G.: On line union catalogue (OLUC) compie 25 anni (1996) 0.01
    0.011353812 = product of:
      0.079476684 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=105,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins and development to date of OLUC, the worldwide bibliographic database of OCLC launched by Ohio College in 1971. OLUC now has over 34m records, with publications in 400 languages. Aftere arly criticism of database accuracy, OCLC began quality improvement programmes in the 1990s, introducing the TechPro 'turnkey cataloguing' and Prompt-Cat acquisitions services. Explains how OLUC solved the 3 problems of duplicated records, sparse bibliographic data, and too many author and subject headings. OCLC has invested heavily in improving data quality, launching an authority control service in early 1996. Provides details of several cooperation programmes started by OCLC, e.g. Conser, USNP, NACO, Enhance and others
  15. Badalamenti, G.: ¬L'¬introduzione del GRIS in un sistema multibiblioteche : realta e problemi aperti (1997) 0.01
    0.011345906 = product of:
      0.07942134 = sum of:
        0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05092278 = score(doc=1167,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The GRIS subject heading scheme is the outcome of a collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Describes the efforts to introduce the scheme to a number of libraries in the Siena Library Service in Italy in the last 3 years. Notes the phases of this project, pricipally a series of trainign seminars and a year of experimentation, before agreement by most of the libraries to implement the scheme. Describes the main features of the electronic subject heading files as they now exist, as they cope with pre existing schemes and the new scheme. Provides statistical sata on these files and outlines the problems which remain to be solved in thre implementation of the scheme
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The introduction of the GRIS subject heading scheme in a multi library system: reality and continuing problems
    Object
    GRIS subject heading scheme
  16. Cheti, A.; Crocetti, A.; Danesi, D.: Espansione o elencazione? : Ovvero l'equivoco ingombro (1995) 0.01
    0.009516451 = product of:
      0.06661515 = sum of:
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=4463,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=4463,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a rebuttal of criticisms of the Italian version of Dewey's 20th ed., which in the section relating to the geography of Italy was alleged to have expanded and updated Auxiliary Table 2 by using classification methods that resulted in errors in the location of some of the country's 8.000 communes (Bibliotecario 38(1993), 147-148). The debate focuses on aspects such as the numbering system of classification, the use of subdivisions, whether or not to list all communes,and the absence in Italy of an intermediate entity between province and commune
  17. Pedretti, G.: ¬L'¬uso dei cataloghi in biblioteca (1996) 0.01
    0.00927127 = product of:
      0.064898886 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an empirical study at the Queriniana Civic Library, Brescia, of interaction betwee researchers and printed catalogues during bibliographic data retrieval. The study sought to ascertain frequency of catalogue use; research success rate and time taken; and to identify user profiles. Data were obtained by a mixture of questionnaires, interviews and direct observation. Findings showed that 64% of the catalogue users were female; 70% were aged 19-30; 65% were university students or had good school grades; and hardly any were working class. University students preferred keyword access. 50% or all searches were successful. Most search failures related to subject catalogues, which usually required more time. Provides statistics on time spent in research
  18. Cecchini, C.; Zanchetta, C.; Paolo Borin, P.; Xausa, G.: Computational design e sistemi di classificazione per la verifica predittiva delle prestazioni di sistema degli organismi edilizi : Computational design and classification systems to support predictive checking of performance of building systems (2017) 0.01
    0.00832516 = product of:
      0.058276117 = sum of:
        0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029138058 = score(doc=5856,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5856, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5856)
        0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029138058 = score(doc=5856,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5856, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5856)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of control the economic, social and environmental aspects connected to the construction of a building imposes a systematic approach for which t is necessary to make test models aimed to a coordinate analysis of different and independent performance issues. BIM technology, referring to interoperable informative models, offers a significant operative basis to achieve this necessity. In most of the cases, informative models concentrate on a product-based digital models collection built in a virtual space, more than on the simulation of their relational behaviors. This relation, instead, is the most important aspect of modelling because it marks and characterizes the interactions that can define the building as a system. This study presents the use of standard classification systems as tools for both the activation and validation of an integrated performance-based building process. By referring categories and types of the informative model to the codes of a technological and performance-based classification system, it is possible to link and coordinate functional units and their elements with the indications required by the AEC standards. In this way, progressing with an incremental logic, it is possible to achieve the management of the requirements of the whole building and the monitoring of the fulfilment of design objectives and specific normative guidelines.
  19. Annuario dei Thesauri 1991 (1991) 0.01
    0.007690453 = product of:
      0.053833168 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 8908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=8908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 8908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8908)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 8908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=8908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 8908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8908)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (auf Italienisch): CHETI, A.: Classification as a source of terms and relationships for thesauri; DANESI, D.: Che cosa non sono i thesauri?; PETRUCCIANI, A.: Microthesauri for the old and rare book; TAMMARO, A.M.: Hypertext and thesauri: two application examples; ROLLE, M.: A legal-administrative thesaurus for local government: an experience in construction; CAPITANI, P.C.: European multilingual thesauri in the area of education; DANESI, D.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus and the comeback of a faceted thesaurus
  20. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.01
    0.007061705 = product of:
      0.04943193 = sum of:
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.014238005 = product of:
          0.02847601 = sum of:
            0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02847601 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06