Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.04
    0.04214625 = product of:
      0.14751187 = sum of:
        0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046620894 = score(doc=867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.03799808 = product of:
          0.07599616 = sum of:
            0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07599616 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046620894 = score(doc=867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
  2. Watanabe, T.: ¬An experimental OPAC system using NDC8 to improve subject access (1994) 0.03
    0.03086328 = product of:
      0.14402863 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=403,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=403,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=403,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Description of an attempt to improve OPAC subject access at Kobe University Library using Nippon Decimal Classification, 8th ed. (NDC8). Examines the theoretical aspects of using a classification for subject searching, then explains the Kobe system. Using the NDC8 machine-readable data file, a database was created for the OPAC, incorporating class numbers and subject headings. Difficulties arise from subdivisions and the structure of NDC8 itself, but it is an important area for development
  3. ueda, K.: Simplified plan for a new maintenance system for three tools : Basic subject Headings, Nippon Decimal classification, and Nippon Cataloguing Rules (2000) 0.03
    0.028215542 = product of:
      0.13167253 = sum of:
        0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05092278 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
  4. Voshida, K.: ¬A study on improving subject access to the OPAC : a survey of catalogue use comparing an OPAC and a card catalogue in a private university library (1994) 0.02
    0.02314746 = product of:
      0.10802148 = sum of:
        0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05092278 = score(doc=753,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study conducted to compare the use of a new OPAC with that of the card catalogue looking primarily at the area of subject access. Library science students at a private university were asked to respond to questions concerning: the number of subject searches and searches for specific items that they carried out on the OPAC and on the card catalogue; the success rate of the catalogue searches; how the search was carried out (classification number or keywords); librarian assistance required; and knowledge of the Nippon Decimal Classification. Results revealed that while there was an increase in the number of users as a result of the introduction of OPAC facilities, there were certain aspects which required attention such as the area of subject searches
  5. Midorikawa, N.: ¬A discussion of the concepts of facets from the viewpoint of the structures of classification systems (1997) 0.02
    0.017691448 = product of:
      0.08256009 = sum of:
        0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02546139 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    2 concepts of facets have been used in studies of classification systems: one for systems which take hierarchical structure and the other for systems which take multidimensional structure. Both correspond to 'principles of division'. The concepts of facets in multidimensional structure systems is used for addressing a subject from many aspects so should equate to the broadest principle of division in order to grasp a multiplicity of aspects. The concept of facets used in hierarchical systems addresses only the significance of a coherent set of items. This concept is not distinguished from the principle of division and there is no purpose in introducing a concept of facets into hierarchical systems in addition to the principle of division
  6. Kobayashi, Y.: Area tables of Dewey 18 as compared with Nippon Decimal Classification (1976) 0.02
    0.015380906 = product of:
      0.107666336 = sum of:
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  7. Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996) 0.02
    0.015046829 = product of:
      0.1053278 = sum of:
        0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0526639 = score(doc=6583,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
        0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0526639 = score(doc=6583,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'
  8. Hirawa, M.: Role of keywords in the network searching era (1998) 0.01
    0.014146028 = product of:
      0.099022195 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=3446,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of Japanese OPACs available on the Internet was conducted relating to use of keywords for subject access. The findings suggest that present OPACs are not capable of storing subject-oriented information. Currently available keyword access derives from a merely title-based retrieval system. Contents data should be added to bibliographic records as an efficient way of providing subject access, and costings for this process should be estimated. Word standardisation issues must also be addressed
  9. Ishiyama, H.: Outline of the Nippon Decimal Classification, 9th edition : study committee (1992) 0.01
    0.009613066 = product of:
      0.06729146 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  10. Midorikawa, N.: Is the synthetic expression method of the Dewey Decimal Classification an effective device for treating complex subjects? (1997) 0.01
    0.009613066 = product of:
      0.06729146 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=6335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=6335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  11. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994) 0.01
    0.0079494985 = product of:
      0.11129297 = sum of:
        0.11129297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11129297 = score(doc=3085,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.95212156 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
  12. Kawamura, K.; Kita, K.; Shiba, M.: Prospects for the Japanese version of the Broad System of Ordering : the design and uses of machine-readable form (1996) 0.01
    0.007690453 = product of:
      0.053833168 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the ongoing project for the creation of a Japanese version of the BSO. Translation of the original English BSO into Japanese was completed in April 1995. BSO-mrJ has 3 components: a standardized MARC format for data exchange; an object-oriented database; and a device for human-recognizable classification output
  13. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : focusing on the idea of equivalence (1996) 0.01
    0.006424165 = product of:
      0.089938305 = sum of:
        0.089938305 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089938305 = score(doc=491,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7694304 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the conceptual structure of bibliographic relationships between a work and its related bibliographic entities in terms of the idea of equivalence as a mathematical concept. Bibliographic entities, such as the work, the text, the edition, and the printing, are also considered as functional foci resulting from data elements contributed by authors, translators, editors and publishers. Examines 4 types of dominant bibliographic relationships focusing on common structural patterns revealed within each entity
  14. Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.01
    0.0056211445 = product of:
      0.07869602 = sum of:
        0.07869602 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07869602 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
  15. Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997) 0.00
    0.0035912173 = product of:
      0.05027704 = sum of:
        0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05027704 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues
  16. Takano, M.: OPACs in university libraries (1994) 0.00
    0.0030311183 = product of:
      0.042435654 = sum of:
        0.042435654 = weight(_text_:subject in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042435654 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In 1991 60,4% of Japanese university libraries had introduced computerized systems and 57,5% of these had computerized catalogues. In this context, discusses the following: subject searching in computerized catalogues; standardisation of OPACs, particularly as these are now available to a wide range of external users; and access to journal articles, especially in view of increasing journal purchase relative to books
  17. Matsubayashi, M.: ¬The German cataloging rules (RAK) : an introduction and annotated bibliography (1996) 0.00
    0.002872974 = product of:
      0.04022163 = sum of:
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Provides an explpanation of the German cataloguing rules (RAK) focusing on conceptual rules and describes their current situation and the likely nature of future revisions. The special characteristics of RAK are the clearly defined 'basic bibliographic concepts (Grundbegriffe)' as literary units and the related concepts of item (Vorlage), edition (Ausgabe) and work (Werk). RAK will be revised in the near future as RAK2 with a conceptual framework based on AACR2, clearly defined bibliographical concepts on literary units and compatibility with RAK-WB
  18. Anzai, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Ishizuka, H.: Experimental service of cataloguing database through WWW (1996) 0.00
    0.002513852 = product of:
      0.035193928 = sum of:
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    An information retrieval system for a cataloguing database through the WWW is developed, and experimentally served to Japan MARC and ULIS (Univeristy of Library and Information Science) OPAC data. Since Japanese words are not separated by obvious delimiters, ensuring the same segmentation between the query and the database is a problem. The present system solves the problem by using the multiple hash screening technique for processing both book titles and query strings, based on the same dictionary and using similar algorithms. Database management is handled by ADABAS, reducing management chores and and response time. The effectiveness of the multiple hash screening technique for a Japanese text based information system is examined, and the limitation of the Web's hypertext environment for a bibliographic information retrieval service is discussed
  19. Shimo, Y.: Indexing and retrieval methods of moving image database for television news (1995) 0.00
    0.0024248946 = product of:
      0.033948522 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=609)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses indexing methods for moving graphical images and suggests the use of the new indexing language, the Moving Picture Description Language (MPDL) which has the following 7 frames: subject, time, location, object, characteristics, actions, and sensibility. MPDL allows indexers to assign one or more indexing terms to each frame. The retrieval experiment used 110 video images obtained from television news indexed by MPDL and other indexing methods and revealed that MPDL was the superior method. Suggests that MPDL presents many opportunities for improving the indexing and retrieval of the moving graphical image