Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2f_documents %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c heery evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bloss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
- precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bloss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 2
-
Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997)
0.01
0.0056211445 = product of: 0.07869602 = sum of: 0.07869602 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.07869602 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of: 0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of: 3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218) 0.03002521 = queryNorm 0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 91, product of: 3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of: 10.0 = termFreq=10.0 3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997)
0.00
0.0035912173 = product of: 0.05027704 = sum of: 0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.05027704 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of: 0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of: 3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218) 0.03002521 = queryNorm 0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues