Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.04
    0.04101864 = product of:
      0.19142032 = sum of:
        0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07811319 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
        0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07811319 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
  2. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.03
    0.034413483 = product of:
      0.16059625 = sum of:
        0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060187314 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060187314 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  3. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.02
    0.02307136 = product of:
      0.16149952 = sum of:
        0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08074976 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
        0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08074976 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  4. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.02
    0.021751886 = product of:
      0.1522632 = sum of:
        0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0761316 = score(doc=4421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
        0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0761316 = score(doc=4421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Object
    UNIMARC for classification data
  5. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994) 0.02
    0.017803647 = product of:
      0.12462553 = sum of:
        0.062312763 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062312763 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
        0.062312763 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062312763 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  6. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.02
    0.017196376 = product of:
      0.12037463 = sum of:
        0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060187314 = score(doc=8865,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
        0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060187314 = score(doc=8865,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  7. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.01
    0.009613066 = product of:
      0.06729146 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Object
    USMARC for classification data