Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.32
    0.31934646 = product of:
      0.6386929 = sum of:
        0.047687992 = product of:
          0.14306398 = sum of:
            0.14306398 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14306398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14306398 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14306398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045140486 = score(doc=2918,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.07153199 = product of:
          0.14306398 = sum of:
            0.14306398 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14306398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14306398 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14306398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045140486 = score(doc=2918,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14306398 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14306398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(7/14)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.04
    0.036511607 = product of:
      0.12779061 = sum of:
        0.03675035 = weight(_text_:subject in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03675035 = score(doc=3942,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34222013 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.0237488 = product of:
          0.0474976 = sum of:
            0.0474976 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0474976 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2956176 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
  3. Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995) 0.02
    0.015046829 = product of:
      0.1053278 = sum of:
        0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0526639 = score(doc=2219,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
        0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0526639 = score(doc=2219,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Classification of office documents is one of the administrative functions carried out by almost every organization and institution which sends and receives correspondence. Processing of this increasing amount of information coming and out going mail, in particular its classification, is time consuming and expensive. More and more organizations are seeking a solution for meeting this challenge by designing computer based systems for automatic classification. Examines the present status of available knowledge and methodology which can be used for automatic classification of office documents. Besides a review of classic methods and techniques, the focus id also placed on the application of artificial intelligence
  4. Spitz, A.L.; Wilcox, L.D.: Classification techniques applied to the recognition of office documents (1988) 0.01
    0.013594929 = product of:
      0.0951645 = sum of:
        0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04758225 = score(doc=137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
        0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04758225 = score(doc=137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    In the process of developing a document recognition network service, techniques were developed for the segmentation and classification of text, line drawing graphics and pictures
  5. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.01
    0.01314472 = product of:
      0.061342027 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.014238005 = product of:
          0.02847601 = sum of:
            0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02847601 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
  6. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.01
    0.010875943 = product of:
      0.0761316 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2480,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2480,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This communication describes part of a current research carried out at the Université de Technologie de Troyes and funded by a postdoctoral grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. Under the title "Design and evaluation of a faceted classification for uniform and personal organization of administrative electronic documents", our research investigates the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-points-of-view classification scheme for administrative document organization and retrieval in online environments.
  7. Cory, K.A.: ¬The imaging industry wants us! (1992) 0.01
    0.009516451 = product of:
      0.06661515 = sum of:
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Paper-based manual filing systems are inadequate to handle the flood of information found in most commercial offices and government agencies. Examples are included to delineate the dimensions of the problem. In response, imaging technology, which converts information in paper format to computer-readable binary format, is creating a multitude of electronic databases. However, imaging vendors are minimizing the difficulties of database organization. The author, drawing on personal experience, recounts instances of inadequate database organization. Because classification and indexing principles are only imparted in schools of library and/or information science, the imaging industry is highly dependent upon expertise possessed by library science graduates. In order to take advantage of this new job market, recommendations for library science students and faculty are included.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.3, S.3-14
  8. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design and evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.01
    0.0067291465 = product of:
      0.047104023 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Content
    This paper describes part of a current research investigating the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-viewed knowledge organization system (KOS) for administrative document organization in online environments. Preliminary findings support the faceted and multi-viewed classification as a promising altemative to the hierarchical paradigm for personal administrative electronic documents organization. Further analysis about identification of semantic relations between facets to reduce number of facet descriptors is required. Technical improvements are also needed to enhance the faceted navigation interface used within the pilot test.
  9. Bergland, K.; Knudson Davis, K.; Traill, S.: CatDoc HackDoc : tools and processes for managing documentation lifecycle, workflows, and accessibility (2019) 0.01
    0.0067291465 = product of:
      0.047104023 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5343)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5343)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.7/8, S.463-495
  10. Spree, U.: Wissensorganisation und Records Management : Was ist der State of the Art? Literaturübersicht (2009) 0.00
    0.00237488 = product of:
      0.03324832 = sum of:
        0.03324832 = product of:
          0.06649664 = sum of:
            0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06649664 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Ordnungssysteme, vor allem in Form von Aktenplänen und business classifications schemes, gelten weiterhin als ein Kernelement von elektronischen Records Management Systemen. Die Rezeption und Nutzung von in den Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften entwickelten normativen Vorgaben und/oder Forschungsergebnissen zu Ordnungssystemen ist in der Records Management Community hingegen noch eher selten und zufällig. Aufgrund der Auswertung aktueller Fachliteratur zum Thema Records Management / Schriftgutverwaltung sowie der Erfahrungen der Autorin in zwei Lehrveranstaltungen, die die Eignung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze der Wissensorganisation auf Probleme der Schriftgutverwaltung überprüft haben, lässt sich eine Reihe von konkreten Empfehlungen für die Integration wissensorganisatorischer Expertise bei der Entwicklung von Records Management Systemen auf organisatorischer und inhaltlicher Ebene ableiten.
  11. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.00
    0.0023245723 = product of:
      0.03254401 = sum of:
        0.03254401 = product of:
          0.06508802 = sum of:
            0.06508802 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06508802 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  12. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.00
    0.0020356115 = product of:
      0.02849856 = sum of:
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=3771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
  13. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.00
    0.0020340008 = product of:
      0.02847601 = sum of:
        0.02847601 = product of:
          0.05695202 = sum of:
            0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05695202 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  14. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.00
    0.0017434291 = product of:
      0.024408007 = sum of:
        0.024408007 = product of:
          0.048816014 = sum of:
            0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048816014 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  15. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.00
    0.0014528577 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = product of:
          0.040680014 = sum of:
            0.040680014 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040680014 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  16. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.00
    0.0014528577 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = product of:
          0.040680014 = sum of:
            0.040680014 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040680014 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  17. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.00
    0.0014382558 = product of:
      0.02013558 = sum of:
        0.02013558 = product of:
          0.04027116 = sum of:
            0.04027116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04027116 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  18. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.00
    0.0014382558 = product of:
      0.02013558 = sum of:
        0.02013558 = product of:
          0.04027116 = sum of:
            0.04027116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04027116 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
  19. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  20. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80

Years

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 11
  • f 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 30
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…