-
Heine, M.H.: ¬A provisional notation for describing the information structure of document (1995)
0.03
0.027429285 = product of:
0.09600249 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Presents a simple notation for describing the internal structure of a document and contrasts it with other more conventional notations in particular those related to subject classification systems, and those for bibliographic purposes, codes such as those of SGML. Such a notation should assist the science of human messaging through: permitting hypotheses to be more readily expressed and/or tested concerning document structure, and facilitating the formation of taxonomies of documents based on their structures. Such a notation should also be of practical value in contributing to document specification, building and testing, and possibly also contribute to new generations of information retrieval systems which link retrieval against record databases to the search systems internal to specific documents. The notation is at present limited to linear documents, but extensions to it to accomodate documents in non linear form (e.g. hypertext documents) and/or existing in physically distributed form, could usefully be constructed. Provides examples of the application of the notation
-
Hoogcarspel, A.: ¬The Rutgers Inventory of Machine-Readable Texts in the Humanities : cataloging and access (1994)
0.02
0.018257514 = product of:
0.1278026 = sum of:
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=8516,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 8516, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8516)
0.07803087 = product of:
0.15606174 = sum of:
0.15606174 = weight(_text_:texts in 8516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15606174 = score(doc=8516,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.94808924 = fieldWeight in 8516, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The Rutgers Inventory of Machine-Readable Texts in the Humanities was established in 1983 as a reference tool to help avoid duplication of effort for scholars and teachers in the humanities who want to use electronic texts in their work. The Inventory catalogers follow AACR2 and use the MARC format to provide bibliographic information about texts in all fields of the humanities, in any language, anywhere in the world, through the RLIN database. This article describes the information in the Inventory and some unresolved issues in relation to bibliographic control of electronic texts in the humanities
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.02
0.016227381 = product of:
0.075727776 = sum of:
0.030006537 = weight(_text_:subject in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030006537 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27942157 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.035551235 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035551235 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
-
Popham, M.: Text encoding, analysis, and retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.011799911 = product of:
0.08259937 = sum of:
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04935105 = product of:
0.0987021 = sum of:
0.0987021 = weight(_text_:texts in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0987021 = score(doc=6604,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5996243 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews the processes available for creating and encoding electronic texts and the availability and types of text analysis and retrieval software. Considers the main elements involved in text encoding; preparation; scanning; keying; reusing electronic texts from archives, such as the Oxford Text Archive (http://ota.ox.ac.uk/~archive.ota.html) and the Electronic Text Center at Virginia University (http://www.lib.virginia.edu/etext/ETC.html); encoding standards; markup; prescriptive versus descriptive approaches; proprietary and non proprietary markup and encoding schemes; PostScript; portable electronic documents; SGML; and the Text Encoding Initiative. Concludes with a review of computer aided text analysis and of text analysis and retrieval software with note on aids to finding information online via the Internet and WWW
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.01
0.011266903 = product of:
0.05257888 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.0122040035 = product of:
0.024408007 = sum of:
0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024408007 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
-
Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021)
0.01
0.009405181 = product of:
0.043890845 = sum of:
0.016974261 = weight(_text_:subject in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974261 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Content
- This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
-
Rada, R.: Hypertext writing and document reuse : the role of a semantic net (1990.)
0.01
0.007690453 = product of:
0.053833168 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- When document components are classified and then recombined during document re-use, a semantic net may serve as the classification language. A theory of analogical inheritance, applied to this semantic net, guides the reorganisation of document components. Authors index paragraphs from various sources with node-link-node triples from a semantic net and then use programs to transverse the semantic net and generate various outlines. The program examines node and link names in deciding which path to take. Describes how these techniques helped in the re-use: parts of an existing book to write a new one
-
Gaunt, M.I.: Center for electronic texts in the humanities (1994)
0.01
0.00697784 = product of:
0.097689755 = sum of:
0.097689755 = product of:
0.19537951 = sum of:
0.19537951 = weight(_text_:texts in 8725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19537951 = score(doc=8725,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1869483 = fieldWeight in 8725, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8725)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities was established jointly by Princeton University and Rutgers University in 1991 to provide a national focus for the development, dissemination, and use of electronic texts in the humanities. The Center's primary activities include documenting existing electronic texts, devloping a core collection of scholarly texts for access on the Internet, testing and promulgating standards for text encoding, and providing educational programs to support librarians, scholars and teachers who are developing, maintaining, and providing access to electronic texts
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.006702908 = product of:
0.04692035 = sum of:
0.03675035 = weight(_text_:subject in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03675035 = score(doc=2593,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34222013 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Ortega, J.L.: Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments : how a web journal club is used (2022)
0.01
0.00576784 = product of:
0.04037488 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Guidelines for the encoding and interchange of machine-readable texts : summary (1992)
0.01
0.005697382 = product of:
0.079763345 = sum of:
0.079763345 = product of:
0.15952669 = sum of:
0.15952669 = weight(_text_:texts in 5929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952669 = score(doc=5929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9691392 = fieldWeight in 5929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Lowry, A.K.: Electronic texts in the humanities : a selected bibliography (1994)
0.01
0.005697382 = product of:
0.079763345 = sum of:
0.079763345 = product of:
0.15952669 = sum of:
0.15952669 = weight(_text_:texts in 8743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952669 = score(doc=8743,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9691392 = fieldWeight in 8743, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- This is a suggested reference and reading list, whose purpose is to provide librarians with a bibliography of basic sources for understanding how scholars in the humanities use electronic texts and computer-based methods of analysis, for identifying and locating electronic texts and related resources, and for addressing some of the issues involved in the production, distribution and use of electronic texts
-
Sukovic, S.: References to e-texts in academic publications (2009)
0.01
0.0056302203 = product of:
0.07882308 = sum of:
0.07882308 = product of:
0.15764616 = sum of:
0.15764616 = weight(_text_:texts in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15764616 = score(doc=3615,freq=20.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9577148 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore roles of electronic texts (e-texts) in research enquiry in literary and historical studies, and to deepen the understanding of the nature of scholars' engagement with e-texts as primary materials. The study includes an investigation of references to e-texts and discussions about researchers' citation practices in interviews. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative methodology was used to explore scholars' interactions with e-texts in 30 research projects. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used to examine citations and any other acknowledgments of e-texts in participants' prepublications and published works. In-depth semi-structured interviews provided data for findings about researchers' citation practices. Findings - Formal acknowledgments of e-texts do not represent the depth and breadth of researchers' interactions with e-texts. Assessments of the relevance and trustworthiness of e-texts, as well as considerations of disciplinary cultures, had some impact on researchers' citation practices. Research limitations/implications - The study was based on in-depth data-gathering from a small group of participants. It does not have any statistical significance and the findings cannot be generalized, but comparisons with other scholars in literary and historical studies are possible. The study indicated a need for further investigation of changing academic practices in general and citation practices in particular. Practical implications - The findings have implications for the development of standards and institutional support for research in the humanities. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into the phenomenon of a very small number of citations of electronic sources in publications in the humanities, and considers issues related to citations from the perspective of changing academic cultures.
-
Sutton, B.: Toward world literature in electronic formats : three promising technical development (1994)
0.00
0.0049852096 = product of:
0.069792934 = sum of:
0.069792934 = product of:
0.13958587 = sum of:
0.13958587 = weight(_text_:texts in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13958587 = score(doc=1399,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.84799683 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Examined 3 technical advances that may hasten the day when electronic representations of literary texts will be a regular part of library service: the network delivery of electronic texts, extended character codes, and markup language. Problems in the creation and dissemination of electronic texts include intellectual property issues, retrospective conversion of printed texts to electronic form, the establishment of archives and the need for alternative cataloguing procedures for the new media. Efforts are being made to extend ASCII character codes in order to be able to represent fully all the forms of wrting found in the world's languages, and use of SGML will enable important aspects of a books's structural organisation to be retained in its electronic form
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.00
0.0044839755 = product of:
0.03138783 = sum of:
0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021217827 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- A statistical analysis of full text downloads of articles in Elsevier's ScienceDirect covering all disciplines reveals large differences in download frequencies, their skewness, and their correlation with Scopus-based citation counts, between disciplines, journals, and document types. Download counts tend to be 2 orders of magnitude higher and less skewedly distributed than citations. A mathematical model based on the sum of two exponentials does not adequately capture monthly download counts. The degree of correlation at the article level within a journal is similar to that at the journal level in the discipline covered by that journal, suggesting that the differences between journals are, to a large extent, discipline specific. Despite the fact that in all studied journals download and citation counts per article positively correlate, little overlap may exist between the set of articles appearing in the top of the citation distribution and that with the most frequently downloaded ones. Usage and citation leaks, bulk downloading, differences between reader and author populations in a subject field, the type of document or its content, differences in obsolescence patterns between downloads and citations, and different functions of reading and citing in the research process all provide possible explanations of differences between download and citation distributions.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
-
Bolter, J.D.: Writing space : the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing (1991)
0.00
0.004273037 = product of:
0.059822515 = sum of:
0.059822515 = product of:
0.11964503 = sum of:
0.11964503 = weight(_text_:texts in 8744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11964503 = score(doc=8744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.72685444 = fieldWeight in 8744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- A provocative exploration of the fundamental differences between the printed book and electronic text and their implications for reading and understanding texts
-
Park, T.K.: Survey of electronic journals in OCLC : the extent and quality of cataloging (1996)
0.00
0.0040629986 = product of:
0.056881975 = sum of:
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=7375,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 7375, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7375)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Examines the degree and extent of bibliographic data of selected electronic journals in the national bibliographic utilities, and the means to provide access to them at individual libraries. The study was limited to networked electronic journals, and each title was searched in OCLC to determine its availability in a national database as well as its holdings libraries
-
Meadows, J.: Electronic publishing and the humanities (1995)
0.00
0.0040286575 = product of:
0.056401204 = sum of:
0.056401204 = product of:
0.11280241 = sum of:
0.11280241 = weight(_text_:texts in 6667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11280241 = score(doc=6667,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6852849 = fieldWeight in 6667, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Considers the issues involved in electronic publishing for the humanities: the transition from old methods of publishing to the new; primary texts; secondary texts; ways in which the new media are used; the transition to electronic publishing; electronic books and electronic periodicals; and the impact of these factors on libraries
-
Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for editors and publishers (1987)
0.00
0.003560864 = product of:
0.04985209 = sum of:
0.04985209 = product of:
0.09970418 = sum of:
0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09970418 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.605712 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Guidelines for editors and publishers of scholarly texts to which markup has been added in accordance with the SGML
-
Coombs, J.H.; Renear, A.H.; DeRose, S.J.: Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing (1987)
0.00
0.003560864 = product of:
0.04985209 = sum of:
0.04985209 = product of:
0.09970418 = sum of:
0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09970418 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.605712 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- An influential analysis of text-markup systems and arguments for the use of descriptive markup in machine-readable texts
