Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Hypertext"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.00
    0.004806533 = product of:
      0.03364573 = sum of:
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  2. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.00
    0.004806533 = product of:
      0.03364573 = sum of:
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016822865 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  3. Churcher, P.R.: ¬A common notation for knowledge representation, cognitive models, learning and hypertext (1989) 0.00
    0.004200041 = product of:
      0.058800567 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=4065,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The subject areas of psychology, artificial intelligence, education, information science and now hypertext employ a common representation to structure knowledge and information. Examines various interpretations applied to this representation and the uses made and phenomena modelled with it in the different subject domains. Considers the application of these different meanings and functions to hypertext. Discusses the coverage of hypertext and these other subject areas in intelligent tutoring.
  4. Björklund, L.; Olander, B.; Smith, L.C.: ¬The personal hypercatalog (1989) 0.00
    0.002872974 = product of:
      0.04022163 = sum of:
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=3547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a hypertext-based system that integrates the bibliographic information of the library catalogue with user-defined knowledge structures, imports information at the user's command, and offers a dynamic personal information tool for active users. Describes the structure and the content of the data base, and shows how the system can be accommodated to different user groups or individual users.
  5. Kinnell, S.; Richards, T.: ¬An online interface within a hypertext system : Project Jefferson's electronic notebook (1989) 0.00
    0.002513852 = product of:
      0.035193928 = sum of:
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Project Jefferson was designed to help new students at the University of Southern California (USC) to acquire skills necessary for writing research papers through the example of research into ethical issues raised by the US Constitution. It runs on Macintosh Computers and is based on Apple Computer's HyperCard, a system wich allows users to browse different sources of information at their own pace and along their own routes while noting down useful discoveries in the notebook part of the system. Access to USC's locally mounted bibliographic data bases is also given without any tedious logging-on routines.
  6. Griffith, C.: What's all the hype about hypertext? (1989) 0.00
    0.0014528577 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = product of:
          0.040680014 = sum of:
            0.040680014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040680014 = score(doc=2505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information today. 6(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  7. Smith, L.C.: "Wholly new forms of encyclopedias" : electronic knowledge in the form of hypertext (1989) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    7. 1.1996 22:47:52