Search (84 results, page 1 of 5)

0.05353349 = product of:
  0.14989378 = sum of:
    0.024005229 = weight(_text_:subject in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024005229 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.22353725 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.035607297 = weight(_text_:classification in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035607297 = score(doc=2346,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.37237754 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.046537954 = product of:
      0.09307591 = sum of:
        0.09307591 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09307591 = score(doc=2346,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.57928985 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.035607297 = weight(_text_:classification in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035607297 = score(doc=2346,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.37237754 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.008136002 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016272005 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)

Abstract

Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.

Date

7.11.2008 15:22:04

0.01153568 = product of:
  0.08074976 = sum of:
    0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04037488 = score(doc=122,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
    0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04037488 = score(doc=122,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

This paper reports on a portion of a larger ongoing project. We address the issues of information organization and retrieval in large, active commercial websites. More specifically, we address the use of classification for providing access to the contents of such sites. We approach this analysis by describing the functionality and structure of the classification scheme of one such representative, large, active, commercial websites: eBay.com, a web-based auction site for millions of users and items. We compare eBay's classification scheme with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, which is a tool for describing and providing access to material culture.

0.009516451 = product of:
  0.06661515 = sum of:
    0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033307575 = score(doc=5519,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
    0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033307575 = score(doc=5519,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Content

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.205-219

0.009389086 = product of:
  0.043815732 = sum of:
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
    0.010170003 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020340007 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract

Knowledge-containing documents and data about knowledge have been handled in stable environments by bureaucratic systems using very stable knowledge ontologies. These systems, though not always very effective in such environments, will become highly ineffective in environments where knowledge has to be updated and replaced frequently. Moreover, organizations in such dynamic environments also use knowledge from extemal resources extensively. This makes the development of a stable ontology for knowledge storage and retrieval particularly complicated. This paper describes eight context classes of knowledge ontology development and explores elements of a method for ontology development. These classes are based an the differences in contexts defined along three dimensions: knowledge dynamics, complexity and social dispersion. Ontology development matches these contexts and ontology needs defined by (logical and social) structure and ontology maturity. The classification framework and methodology are applied to two cases. The first case illustrates a descriptive use of our framework to characterize ontology development in an academic environment. The second case illustrates a normative use of our framework. The method proposed seemed to be empirically valid and rich and be useful for detecting options for ontology improvement.

Source

Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers

0.00927127 = product of:
  0.064898886 = sum of:
    0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 1886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029704956 = score(doc=1886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 1886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1886)
    0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035193928 = score(doc=1886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1886)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Business librarianship is affected by a combination of forces. Among them are the nature of business as a discipline, the characteristics of business publications, and the needs and expectations of business patrons. Business reference queries are almost always complex. To handle them well, the librarian must spend considerable time with each patron. Bibliographic expertise and subject knowledge are also required. Ways to improve the quality of business reference service include a willingness to help patrons devise appropriate search strategies, assisting them in understanding and evaluating search results, investing in self-education, developing service-oriented reference policies, implementing flexible reference desk schedules, and establishing formal staff training programs

0.008156957 = product of:
  0.057098698 = sum of:
    0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028549349 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
    0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028549349 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Access to information - and classification techniques and methodologies that support that access - are already playing important roles in making information accessible to employees in the business environment. But most businesses are only beginning to solve the higher level requirements of enabling action, which is the domain of knowledge. The traditional document-oriented model itself is a stumbling block, because ir focuses on the document as a large, inert information artifact, ignoring the ultimate business objectives of getting things done and generating competitive advantage. New models for organizational knowledge resources are needed, and classification approaches will still play a vital role, but such approaches must be highly adaptable, they must be formalized to accomodate technological implmentations, and they must embody meta-principles for self-organizing knowledge resources in business environments

0.00576784 = product of:
  0.04037488 = sum of:
    0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02018744 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
    0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02018744 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

The organisation of knowledge for exploitation and re-use in the modern enterprise is often a most perplexing challenge. The entire knowledge management life-cycle (for example - create, capture, organize, store, search, and transfer) is impacted by the organisation of intellectual capital into a corporate taxonomy or at the least a knowledge map (often incorrectly used interchangeably). Determining the extent to which such an objective is achieved is the focus of what is known as a knowledge audit. In this practice-oriented article, the authors review the fundamentals of creating a taxonomy, the use of metadata in a necessary process known as classification and the role of expertise locators where the knowledge is not explicit but resides within experts in the form of tacit knowledge. The authors conclude with a framework for developing a corporate taxonomy and how such a project may be executed. The conceptual contribution of this article is the postulation that corporate taxonomies that are designed to facilitate knowledge audits lead to greater organizational impact.

0.004806533 = product of:
  0.03364573 = sum of:
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 6697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=6697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 6697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6697)
    0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 6697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016822865 = score(doc=6697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 6697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6697)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

The paper discusses the experiences of Schlumberger in designing and deploying knowledge management (KM) systems and outlines the empathic design techniques that are appropriate and productive for such applications. The user requirements for novel applications, such as Web-based KM systems, are difficult to establish using traditional research tools. It is challenging to determine the utility of innovative ways to access information prior to implementation and deployment. KM applications frequently serve as a testing ground for new business processes and models of communication and collaboration. Through the observation of the usage patterns, the empathic design approach facilitates the creation of more flexible systems that can be adapted to the real needs of the users. In the pre-Intranet environment, electronic information systems were designed for specially trained users, and this level of specialization was justified. The first Intranet navigation tools and systems were built on the principles of the pre-Intranet design, continuing the tradition of specialization. The global character of the Schlumberger Intranet led to the emergence of the new population of "occasional" users, who use many applications as their projects require. These users may never learn an application in depth, but they need to be efficient online. As a result, a "market" approach to designing the Schlumberger KM solutions became more popular, leading to the simplification of systems and interfaces, creation of a new classification system, and a better awareness of the users' needs. The new approach to the Intranet information systems in Schlumberger is reflected in the Schlumberger Knowledge Hub

0.0030214933 = product of:
  0.042300906 = sum of:
    0.042300906 = product of:
      0.08460181 = sum of:
        0.08460181 = weight(_text_:texts in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08460181 = score(doc=5553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5139637 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Webtran tools for authoring and translating domain specific texts can make the multilingual text production in a company more efficient and less expensive. Tile tools have been in production use since spring 2000 for checking and translating product article texts of a specific domain, namely an in-company language in sales catalogues of a mail-order company. Webtran tools have been developed by VTT Information Technology. Use experiences have shown that an automatic translation process is faster than phrase-lexicon assisted manual translation, if an in-company language model is created to control and support the language used within the company

0.0024655813 = product of:
  0.034518138 = sum of:
    0.034518138 = product of:
      0.069036275 = sum of:
        0.069036275 = weight(_text_:22 in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069036275 = score(doc=4179,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

29.11.1999 12:18:22

Source

International Herald Tribune. 15. Nov. 1999, S.22

0.0024248946 = product of:
  0.033948522 = sum of:
    0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033948522 = score(doc=7741,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Answering to the question how distributed information systems can serve management, especially lean management, the autors develop new theoretical insights for the future of decentralized firms and offer concepts for creating and maintaining distributed information systems. The book contains interesting prototypes in logistics and financial indistries and shows designs and applications of workflow systems. A state-of-the-art survey of the subject

0.0023245723 = product of:
  0.03254401 = sum of:
    0.03254401 = product of:
      0.06508802 = sum of:
        0.06508802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06508802 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22

0.0023245723 = product of:
  0.03254401 = sum of:
    0.03254401 = product of:
      0.06508802 = sum of:
        0.06508802 = weight(_text_:22 in 6563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06508802 = score(doc=6563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:42:34

0.0021217826 = product of:
  0.029704956 = sum of:
    0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029704956 = score(doc=850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=850)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Asks if ideas carefully nurtured under the banner of information resource management can have been lost in the new world of knowledge management. Discusses the 3 segments of intellectual capital and examines the distinction between explicit and tacit knowledge, 2 approaches proposed by leading exponents of knowledge management. Forms the view that knowledge is a broader term having components one of which is information. Suggests that a programme to support knowledge management can be developed from people management, process management and information management and that the development of knowledge bases must incorporate specific skills. Argues that IRM is not only consistent with knowlegde management but has a major role to play in the forward development of the subject

0.0020340008 = product of:
  0.02847601 = sum of:
    0.02847601 = product of:
      0.05695202 = sum of:
        0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05695202 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

22. 7.1996 10:51:56

0.0020340008 = product of:
  0.02847601 = sum of:
    0.02847601 = product of:
      0.05695202 = sum of:
        0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 6819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05695202 = score(doc=6819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6819)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

8. 3.1997 13:34:22

0.0020340008 = product of:
  0.02847601 = sum of:
    0.02847601 = product of:
      0.05695202 = sum of:
        0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05695202 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Date

19. 7.2002 22:05:14

0.0017434291 = product of:
  0.024408007 = sum of:
    0.024408007 = product of:
      0.048816014 = sum of:
        0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048816014 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.0017434291 = product of:
  0.024408007 = sum of:
    0.024408007 = product of:
      0.048816014 = sum of:
        0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048816014 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.0017434291 = product of:
  0.024408007 = sum of:
    0.024408007 = product of:
      0.048816014 = sum of:
        0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048816014 = score(doc=350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier