Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.03
    0.032000832 = product of:
      0.11200291 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.93-90
  2. Piascik, J.M.: Enhanced subject access in Ohio public libraries (1993) 0.02
    0.0241358 = product of:
      0.112633735 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=6965,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a survey of heads of cataloging in Ohio public libraries. The survey focused on subject enhancements in automated catalogs. Results reveal that additional subject access points and more anaytical entries ranked as the most useful enhancements for patrons. These enhancements were seen as less useful for technical services staff.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.4, S.77-91
  3. Dwyer, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement : from the drawing board to the catalog screen (1991) 0.02
    0.023724673 = product of:
      0.11071514 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.29-51
  4. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.02
    0.023087012 = product of:
      0.10773939 = sum of:
        0.067364514 = weight(_text_:subject in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067364514 = score(doc=3926,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
  5. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.02
    0.02244378 = product of:
      0.10473764 = sum of:
        0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062367413 = score(doc=1187,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.0122040035 = product of:
          0.024408007 = sum of:
            0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024408007 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  6. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.02
    0.022016205 = product of:
      0.10274229 = sum of:
        0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062367413 = score(doc=4651,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  7. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Subject searching in merged catalogues : a plea for redundancy (2008) 0.02
    0.022016205 = product of:
      0.10274229 = sum of:
        0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062367413 = score(doc=2193,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    From a logical point of view, an OPAC is an inventory with indexes. Inventories can be accumulated and the indexes merged. However, in most merged catalogues not all documents have the same subject indexing and a number of documents are indexed by more than one system. In practice, a merged catalogue also contains descriptions without subject indexing. To augment the situation four methods are used: searching with title keywords, mapping and switching, acceptance of descriptions indexed in a given way only, and »citation pearl growing«. The last method uses all available subject indicators by using subject indicators present in relevant descriptions found by already known indicators. This method can also be of help in mapping and switching.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  8. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.02
    0.021506922 = product of:
      0.07527422 = sum of:
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=520,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.008136002 = product of:
          0.016272005 = sum of:
            0.016272005 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016272005 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.157-187
  9. Pappas, E.; Herendeen, A.: Enhancing bibliographic records with tables of contents derived from OCR technologies at the American Museum of Natural History Library (2000) 0.02
    0.02075909 = product of:
      0.09687576 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=5367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on a project undertaken at the American Museum of Natural History Library in 1997 and intended to enhance access to materials in the library's collection by using scanning and OCR software to digitize and add monograph tables of contents to the OPAC bibliographic records. Initially, conference proceedings already in the collection were used, but, as the project developed, other types of materials were also used. The rationale for the project is explained, the procedure developed is described, and the lessons learned from using this particular technology are outlined.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.61-72
  10. Wu, S.: Implementing bibliographic enhancement data in academic library catalogs : an empirical study (2024) 0.02
    0.02075909 = product of:
      0.09687576 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=1159,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines users' needs for bibliographic enhancement data (BIBED) in academic library catalogs. Qualitative data were collected through 30 academic users' activity logs and follow-up interviews. These 30 participants were recruited from a public university in the United States that has over 19,000 students enrolled and over 600 full-time faculty members. This study identified 19 types of BIBED useful for supporting the five user tasks proposed in the IFLA Library Reference Model and in seven other contexts, such as enhancing one's understanding, offering search instructions, and providing readers' advisory. Findings suggest that adopting BIBFRAME and Semantic Web technologies may enable academic library catalogs to provide BIBED to better meet user needs in various contexts.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.3-4, p.308-345
  11. Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (1992) 0.02
    0.015755732 = product of:
      0.11029011 = sum of:
        0.060013074 = weight(_text_:subject in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060013074 = score(doc=2124,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
        0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05027704 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Considers methods of enriching bibliographic USMARC records for OPACs via a subject enhancement process involving the inclusion of subject information derived from the books' contents tables
  12. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.01
    0.012604584 = product of:
      0.088232085 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=1067,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  13. Bellei, M.: ¬Un catalogo 'ricco' (1998) 0.01
    0.012604584 = product of:
      0.088232085 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=4647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    To enhance descriptions, cataloguers can add 'enriching' words or phrases to titles, or introduce content-enriched access features to aid subject-based research. Additional and natural language subject headings designed to support, though not replace, controlled language headings can result in enhanced indexing. Analytical cataloguing and double indexing are 2 other means by which readers can gian access to additional bibliographic data. Also examines how online research tool effectiveness can be enhanced by a system of automatic links between descriptors
  14. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.012555133 = product of:
      0.08788592 = sum of:
        0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059409913 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.02847601 = product of:
          0.05695202 = sum of:
            0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05695202 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  15. Wormell, I.: Indizacion SAP para la exploracion del amplio contexto tematico de libros y para el accesso a entidades semanticos mas pequenas (1994) 0.01
    0.011029012 = product of:
      0.07720308 = sum of:
        0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042009152 = score(doc=4652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications
  16. Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991) 0.01
    0.010595737 = product of:
      0.07417016 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
  17. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬Les tables des matières dans les catalogues en ligne : opportunités, méthodes et couts (1998) 0.01
    0.010595737 = product of:
      0.07417016 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of research to date on improving subject access by including contents tables in bibliographic records. Results indicate the need for clear methodology (criteria for selecting notoces for enrichment, manual and semi automated methods, cost). Evaluations, based on recall, precision and rate of circulation, indicate manifest benefits, especially in virtual libraries where information is superabundant; but enrichment is a complex process
  18. Markey, K.: ¬The process of subject searching in the online catalog : final report of the Subject Access Project (1983) 0.01
    0.006858637 = product of:
      0.096020915 = sum of:
        0.096020915 = weight(_text_:subject in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096020915 = score(doc=2803,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.894149 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  19. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.01
    0.0060013076 = product of:
      0.084018305 = sum of:
        0.084018305 = weight(_text_:subject in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084018305 = score(doc=3116,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7823804 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  20. Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989) 0.01
    0.005745948 = product of:
      0.08044326 = sum of:
        0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08044326 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)