-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.13
0.13049598 = product of:
0.26099196 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.050928485 = product of:
0.10185697 = sum of:
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.0122040035 = product of:
0.024408007 = sum of:
0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024408007 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018)
0.12
0.124645576 = product of:
0.29083967 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.050928485 = product of:
0.10185697 = sum of:
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.042661484 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042661484 = score(doc=4650,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
-
Bliss, H.E.: Simplified book notation (1910)
0.07
0.07275498 = product of:
0.50928485 = sum of:
0.16976161 = product of:
0.33952323 = sum of:
0.33952323 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33952323 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33952323 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33952323 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Craven, T.C.: Salient node notation (1979)
0.02
0.024607476 = product of:
0.11483489 = sum of:
0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04079328 = score(doc=1608,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04079328 = score(doc=1608,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Salient node notation is a technique for decreasing the average length of notation in a classification scheme without sacrficing expressiveness or disturbing the succession of chracteristics of the filing order. Assignment of notation begins at a node of the classification tree other than the root. This salient node may be determined algorithmically, given data on the bias of the collection to be classified, even if only part of the tree has been developed. A dummy value is reserved to indicate upward movement in the tree. The technique is especially applicable to classification schemes for spevialized collections and to facets such as space in which the biases of human existence are especially prominent
-
Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013)
0.02
0.024435379 = product of:
0.11403177 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=787,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=787,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=787,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
-
Liu, S.: Online classification notation : proposal for a flexible faceted notation system (FFNS) (1990)
0.02
0.021751886 = product of:
0.1522632 = sum of:
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=1241,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=1241,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- International classification. 17(1990), S.14-20
-
Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996)
0.02
0.019800773 = product of:
0.092403606 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Briefly describes the form and function of Cutter numbers in the classification of books and describes the CUTT-x expert system for the automatic assignment of Cutter numbers with particular reference to the 3 basic elements in the system: knowledge base; inference engine; and user interface. The system was designed, tested and implemented in the Library of the International Civil Aviation Organization and was developed using the MS Access relational database management system in a Windows environment
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
-
Rahmenempfehlungen zur Bildung von Signaturen (1981)
0.02
0.019226132 = product of:
0.13458292 = sum of:
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.151-152
-
Coates, E.J.: Notation in classification (1957)
0.02
0.019032901 = product of:
0.1332303 = sum of:
0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06661515 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06661515 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
-
Satija, M.P.; Comaroni, J.P.: Beyond classification: book numbers (1992)
0.02
0.016303156 = product of:
0.07608139 = sum of:
0.042435654 = weight(_text_:subject in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042435654 = score(doc=1470,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This book seeks to complement two major works on the subject published in the U.S.A.by devoting it self tochronological book numbers. It is mostly an ignored rival line to alphabetical book numbers, indeed an ignored subject. The first four chapters dwell on the theoretical and general problems of book numbers, indeed an ignored subject. the first four chapters dwell on the tehoretical and general problem of book numbers: their definition, nature , usefulness and history. The chapter on the debate over the usefulness of book numbers tries to give the readersa taste of the debate that followed their conceptionand immediate development. Chapter four catalogues advantages of chronological book numbers. The remaining four chapters dwell upon the four specific chronollgical book numbering system. The desription of each system is prefaced by a brief life sketch of the inventor. Ranganathan's system has been fully but concsely explained. The other systems are by W.S.Biscoe, J. D. Brown, Fremont Rider and W.S. Rider and W.S. Merrill. There are twoappendices: one onthe chronology of book numbers (1873-1992), and another an almost exhaustive bibliography on the subject. Its aim is to invite the attention of scholars to a neglected part of our heritage.
-
Satija, M.P.: Book numbers in India with special reference to the author table for Indian names designed and used by the National Library of India (2007)
0.01
0.013639772 = product of:
0.06365227 = sum of:
0.030006537 = weight(_text_:subject in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030006537 = score(doc=660,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27942157 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- A book number takes shelf arrangement of documents to a point where classification per se cannot. Class number alone is not able to uniquely individualise a document on the library shelves. The function of a book number starts from where that of the class number ends. An author number also brings together all the books by one author in one specific subject. A chronological book number will clearly portray the development of a subject over a given period. Book numbers are indispensable for a shelflist. The National Library (NL) of India at Kolkata has a collection of about 3 million documents. For organizing its contents it uses the DDC and the shelf arrangement is by Cutter's three figure author table. For Indian names it uses its home-made author table described here. Though the National Library table is designed especially for Indian names across all religions and regional cultures, vet its use outside the National Library has not been reported mostly due lack of marketing. Since 1961 the Indian cultural names have undergone many changes. The need is to revise and update the table to reflect the current culture and new authors across India.
-
Körner, H.G.: Short and flexible generic codes for mechanized information retrieval (1965)
0.01
0.013458293 = product of:
0.09420805 = sum of:
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Classification research. Proc. 2nd Int. Study Conf., Elsinore, 1964. Ed.: P. Atherton
-
Sukhmaneva, E.G.: ¬The problems of notation and faceted classification
0.01
0.013320256 = product of:
0.09324179 = sum of:
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=3300,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=3300,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others.
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Zone analysis and mixed notation (1992)
0.01
0.010875943 = product of:
0.0761316 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6708,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6708, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6708)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6708,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6708, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6708)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the emergence of mixed notation with the use of connecting symbols needed in an analytico-synthetic classification suited to the depth classification of micro-documents dealing with a dynamic universe of knowledge. Indicates the advantages of zone-formation in anarray with a mixed notation to accomodate newly emerging main classes, partial comprehension of main classes, heterogeneous sets of isolates in an array of a facet, numerous isolates in a facet, numerous canonical issues within a main class, and telescoping of facets
-
Satija, M.P.; Agrawal, S.P.: Book numbers : some indian methods (1990)
0.01
0.010875943 = product of:
0.0761316 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6922)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 6922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=6922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 6922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6922)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- LCSH
- Classification / Books
- Subject
- Classification / Books
-
Cheti, A.; Crocetti, A.; Danesi, D.: Espansione o elencazione? : Ovvero l'equivoco ingombro (1995)
0.01
0.009516451 = product of:
0.06661515 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=4463,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=4463,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Presents a rebuttal of criticisms of the Italian version of Dewey's 20th ed., which in the section relating to the geography of Italy was alleged to have expanded and updated Auxiliary Table 2 by using classification methods that resulted in errors in the location of some of the country's 8.000 communes (Bibliotecario 38(1993), 147-148). The debate focuses on aspects such as the numbering system of classification, the use of subdivisions, whether or not to list all communes,and the absence in Italy of an intermediate entity between province and commune
-
Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993)
0.01
0.007690453 = product of:
0.053833168 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses a major collection relabelling project undertaken by Queensland University of Technology Library in order to provide a consistent classification and accession numbering scheme on all campuses. The project is examined in terms of how it was done, what was achieved, and what went wrong
-
Satija, M.P.: History of book numbers (1987)
0.01
0.0067291465 = product of:
0.047104023 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- International classification. 14(1987), S.70-76
-
Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000)
0.00
0.0020340008 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = product of:
0.05695202 = sum of:
0.05695202 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05695202 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
-
Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005)
0.00
5.811431E-4 = product of:
0.008136002 = sum of:
0.008136002 = product of:
0.016272005 = sum of:
0.016272005 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016272005 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
