Search (418 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Crawford, J.C.; Thom, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain (1993) 0.06
    0.055704672 = product of:
      0.15597308 = sum of:
        0.056933407 = weight(_text_:subject in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056933407 = score(doc=5358,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of UK academic libraries to determine the level of use of online public access catalogues (OPACs) and the development of inhouse subject indexes. 75 respondents reported having commercial systems and 7 reported inhouse systems. Data includes: named systems in use and numbers of libraries using each system; percentages of bibliographic records in machine readable format; types of materials; and record formats (UKMARC, LCMARC etc.) Reports the most common access points for searching the OPACs (author, keyword), methods of generating terms to be used for subject searching, subject heading sources (LCSH, MeSH, PRECIS) and classification schemes (Dewey (DDC), UDC). Results show that all universities and polytechnics now have OPACs and only the smaller colleges do not. OPACs are moving towards comprehensive covergae of academic library stocks with the MARC record the most popular format. The 3 main subject access strategies involve: LCSH, inhouse strategies, and strategies not based on controlled terminolgy. Draws heavily on the results of an earlier survey by Fran Slack (Vine 72(1988) Nov., S.8.12)
  2. Frost, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH : correlation between assigned LCSH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs (1989) 0.05
    0.05485857 = product of:
      0.19200498 = sum of:
        0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05092278 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060332447 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.165-179
  3. Wells, A.: Subject access and languages other than English (1993) 0.05
    0.05367205 = product of:
      0.18785216 = sum of:
        0.096020915 = weight(_text_:subject in 7808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096020915 = score(doc=7808,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.894149 = fieldWeight in 7808, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7808)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=7808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7808)
        0.03799808 = product of:
          0.07599616 = sum of:
            0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 7808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07599616 = score(doc=7808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 7808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=7808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7808)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the question of providing subject access to readers in Australia whose first language is not English. Describes 2 methods of subject searching: descriptive cataloguing; and controlled subject access. Sets out the reasons why presenting multilingual subject access to online catalogue users would be difficult and discusses the value of classification schemes in facilitating multilingual controlled subject access. Describes the State Library of New South Wales multicultural service
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  4. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user (1991) 0.05
    0.048064273 = product of:
      0.16822495 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=7907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=7907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
        0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08044326 = score(doc=7907,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=7907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Online catalogue studies indicate that users have difficulties in searching the bibliographic tool. Highlights bibliographic factors which influence the design and use of online catalogues. Shows how existing standards in the areas of cataloguing, subject authority and classification are influencing design of future systems
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  5. Sinno-Rony, S.: ¬Les hypercatalogues : nouvelles perspectives pour le OPAC (1991) 0.05
    0.047161747 = product of:
      0.16506611 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=6601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6601)
        0.0474976 = product of:
          0.0949952 = sum of:
            0.0949952 = weight(_text_:schemes in 6601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0949952 = score(doc=6601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5912352 = fieldWeight in 6601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05027704 = score(doc=6601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6601)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=6601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6601)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a state of the art review of the application oh hypertext searching techniques to online catalogues. The technique improves traditional online catalogues: when consulting the catalogue in a non linear way; and when browsing bibliographic information. New research could improve access to larger databases including thesauri and classification schemes
  6. Subject control in online catalogs (1989) 0.05
    0.04557904 = product of:
      0.15952663 = sum of:
        0.06709666 = weight(_text_:subject in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06709666 = score(doc=235,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6248056 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
        0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02513852 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Auch als 'Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(198) No.1/2' erschienen
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: HOLLEY, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog; KLUGMAN, S.: Failures in subject retreival; CARLYLE, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog; MURDOCK, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis: toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog; DYKSTRA, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The role of classification in online systems; BROADBENT, E.: The online catalog: dictionary, classified, or both?; OLSEN, R.J., CHRISTENSEN, J.O., LARSEN, K.A. u. K. WILLEY: Implementing NOTIS keyword/Boolean searching: a case study; ROLLAND-THOMA, P. u. G. MERCURE: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue; FROST, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH: correlation between assigned LSCH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs; STONE, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs; CHAN, L.M.: A subject cataloging code?; McCARTHY, C.: A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog; JOUGUELET, S.: Subject access in online catalogs: developments in France; DALE, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs: an overview bibliography
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 35(1990) S.119-120 (P. Lisbon); International classification 18(1991) S.238-239 (W. Gödert)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.10, nos.1/2
  7. Casson, E.; Fabbrizzi, A.; Slavic, A.: Subject search in Italian OPACs : an opportunity in waiting? (2011) 0.04
    0.044752624 = product of:
      0.15663418 = sum of:
        0.0735007 = weight(_text_:subject in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0735007 = score(doc=1801,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.68444026 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
        0.023791125 = weight(_text_:classification in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023791125 = score(doc=1801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24880521 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
        0.035551235 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035551235 = score(doc=1801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
        0.023791125 = weight(_text_:classification in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023791125 = score(doc=1801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24880521 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to bibliographic data supported by knowledge organization systems, such as subject headings and classification, plays an important role in ensuring the quality of library catalogues. It is generally acknowledged that users have a strong affinity to subject browsing and searching and are inclined tofollow meaningful links between resources. Research studies, however, show that library OPACs are not designed to support or make good use of subject indexes and their underlying semantic structure. A project entitled OPAC semantici was initiated in 2003 by a number of Italian subject specialists and the Italian "Research Group on Subject Indexing" (GRIS) with a goal to analyse and evaluate subject access in Italian library catalogues through a survey of 150 OPACs. Applying the same methodology, a follow-up survey to assess whether any improvement had taken place was conducted five years later, in spring 2008. Analysis of these two surveys indicated that there was a slight improvement. The authors discuss the results of these two surveys, analyse the problems in subject searching in OPACs and explain the recommendations for subject searching enhancement put forward by GRIS. Using the example of Italian OPACs, the authors will attempt to outline some requirements for a subject searching interface and explain how this can be achieved through authority control.
    Series
    IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  8. Schmidt, R.M.: Online public access catalogs serving users in an electronic library environment (1993) 0.04
    0.044464663 = product of:
      0.12450105 = sum of:
        0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 7002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02546139 = score(doc=7002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 7002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7002)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 7002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=7002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 7002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7002)
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 7002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=7002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 7002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=7002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 7002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7002)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 7002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=7002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 7002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7002)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will discuss the impact on cataloging standards and bibliographic data formats and will point into the direction of a new cataloging environment with different access point accordings to the information requirements of the users. The present subject headings and classification schemes used to index library materials have to be considered obsolete. The aim must be the integration of existing thesauri accepted and used by the acedemic community by utilizing a 'meta language' as a software engineering tool. This 'meta language' will offer access points by means of different facets focusing the information stored, and these facets will be interactivelyselected by the user supporting the demands of his academic field and retrieval practice
  9. Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989) 0.04
    0.044290405 = product of:
      0.1550164 = sum of:
        0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044100422 = score(doc=457,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.105-124
  10. Bryant, B.: Subject wise? : on providing access to information through interactive catalogues (1993) 0.04
    0.042491503 = product of:
      0.14872025 = sum of:
        0.066422306 = weight(_text_:subject in 8115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066422306 = score(doc=8115,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 8115, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8115)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 8115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=8115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 8115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8115)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=8115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 8115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8115)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 8115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=8115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 8115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8115)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the complementarity of cataloguers and librarians and the need for comprehensive access to collections as an introduction to a discussion of developments in the UK and activities af the Book Data and research project at Bath University which has made use of Book Data records. Discusses the problems facing designs of OPACs and the aim of developing the ideal interactive catalogue, the future of bibliographic standards and standards for subject access, the problem of identification and retrieval of information through the interactive catalogue, and the merits of classification in the development of improved subject access
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  11. Wittenbach, S.A.: Building a better mousetrap : enhanced cataloguing and access for the online catalog (1992) 0.04
    0.041332476 = product of:
      0.14466366 = sum of:
        0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033948522 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=3857,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the many options available for embellishing the basic USMARC bibliographic record; the impact for patron access and collection use; improved system features; the economic impact on the cataloguing process; and future prospects for enhanced cataloguing and bibliographic access. Discusses some of the typical enhancements that may be applied: additional subject headings; tables of contents; summaries, abstracts or contents notes; classification numbers
  12. Benediktsson, D.: Problems of subject access to Icelandic collections throughout OPACs (1990) 0.04
    0.039954774 = product of:
      0.1398417 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=5546,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
        0.03799808 = product of:
          0.07599616 = sum of:
            0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07599616 = score(doc=5546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Suggest reasons why there is no operational OPAC station yet in Iceland. Obstacles include the lack of compatability among computer systems adopted by the major libraries, the differing classification schemes used by them and the lack of a controlled indexing vocabulary or thesaurus for subject analysis in the Icelandic language. The Rejkjavik Municipal Library and the National Hospital Library, both users of the DOBIS/LIBIS system, will be the first users of a potential network of OPACs.
  13. Furniss, P.: ¬A proposed methodology for examining the provision of subject access in the OPAC (1990) 0.04
    0.037620723 = product of:
      0.17556338 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990), S.85-89
  14. Markey, K.: Subject searching experiences and needs on online catalog users : implications for library classification (1985) 0.04
    0.037620723 = product of:
      0.17556338 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
  15. Nohr, H.: Subject access in german-language OPACs : a survey (1989) 0.04
    0.037620723 = product of:
      0.17556338 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
        0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053833168 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    International classification. 16(1989), S.95-100
  16. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.04
    0.035982512 = product of:
      0.12593879 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=2646,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=2646,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
    Content
    1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
  17. Yee, M.: Headings for tomorrow : public access display of subject headings (1992) 0.04
    0.035982512 = product of:
      0.12593879 = sum of:
        0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058800567 = score(doc=4384,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=4384,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013458292 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    This short guide is intended to help librarians and OPAC system designers to make decisions about the design of displays of more than one subject heading. The authors stress that they offer guidance rather than standards or prescriptions; their clear prose is cautious and even the number of recommendations is limited. A 12-page introduction contrasts the "structural approach" and "strict alphabetical approach" to filing, showing examples and stating arguments for each. 7 chapters cover display of subdivisions, inverted headings, display of qualified headings, arrangement of numerical headings, display of subjects interfiled with names and titles, punctuation and messages to the user. Within each chapter, questions involving choices between two or more approaches are followed by brief statements of current practice (LC rules, ALA rules, and systems in existing OPACs) extensive examples demonstrating such choices, and arguments for and against each. The authors warn against ever assuming that the user knows the needed subject headings, and acknowledge that the best OPAC design often depends on the setting and on the user's understanding of the system. Although the topic may be beyond the purview of the authoring committee, the discussion here makes one yearn for interactive OPACs that can analyze the user's needs and provide appropriate guidance to whatever system is adopted
    Editor
    Subcommittee on the Display of Subject Headings in Subject Indexes in OPACs, Subject Analysis Committee, Cataloging and Classification Section, ALCTS, ALA
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Subject access / Standards / United States
    Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation
    Machine / readable bibliographic data
    Subject cataloging / Data processing
    Online bibliographic searching
    Subject
    Online library catalogs / Subject access / Standards / United States
    Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation
    Machine / readable bibliographic data
    Subject cataloging / Data processing
    Online bibliographic searching
  18. Schultz Jr., W.N.; Braddy, L.: ¬A librarian-centered study of perceptions of subject terms and controlled vocabulary (2017) 0.04
    0.035516314 = product of:
      0.124307096 = sum of:
        0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042009152 = score(doc=5156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Controlled vocabulary and subject headings in OPAC records have proven to be useful in improving search results. The authors used a survey to gather information about librarian opinions and professional use of controlled vocabulary. Data from a range of backgrounds and expertise were examined, including academic and public libraries, and technical services as well as public services professionals. Responses overall demonstrated positive opinions of the value of controlled vocabulary, including in reference interactions as well as during bibliographic instruction sessions. Results are also examined based upon factors such as age and type of librarian.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.456-466
  19. Subject access : preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future" (2011) 0.03
    0.034108054 = product of:
      0.11937818 = sum of:
        0.06120157 = weight(_text_:subject in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06120157 = score(doc=1799,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5699104 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
        0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0190329 = score(doc=1799,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
        0.020110816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020110816 = score(doc=1799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17204987 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
        0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0190329 = score(doc=1799,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    This volume contains the proceedings of a special conference held in Florence, August 2009. The theoretical and methodological aspects of rethinking semantic access to information and knowledge are explored. Innovative projects deployed to cope with the challenges of the future are presented and discussed. This book offers a unique opportunity for librarians and other information professionals to get acquainted with the state of the art in subject indexing.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction -- Focusing on user needs :new ways of subject access in Czechia -- Subject analysis and indexing :an "Italian version" of the analytico-synthetic model -- Subject search in Italian OPACs :an opportunity in waiting? -- Semiautomatic merging of two universal thesauri :the case of Estonia -- 20 years SWD :German subject authority data prepared for the future -- Mixed translations of the DDC :design, usability, and implications for knowledge organization in multilingual environments -- Animals belonging to the emperor :enabling viewpoint warrant in classification -- Dewey in Sweden :leaving SAB after 87 years -- Enhancing information services using machine-to-machine terminology services -- Social bookmarking and subject indexing -- Social indexing at the Stockholm Public Library -- The Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus :structural features and web application projects -- Jzyk Hasel Przedmiotowych Biblioteki Narodowej (National Library of Poland Subject Headings) :from card catalogs to Digital Library :some questions about the future of a Local Subject Heading Systems in the changing world of information retrieval -- FAST headings as tags for WorldCat
    LCSH
    Subject cataloging / Congresses
    Online library catalogs / Subject access / Congresses
    Series
    IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
    Subject
    Subject cataloging / Congresses
    Online library catalogs / Subject access / Congresses
  20. Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of the use of the subject catalog, Marriott Library, University of Utah (1984) 0.03
    0.032918133 = product of:
      0.15361795 = sum of:
        0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059409913 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1984) no.3, S.75-83

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 373
  • m 18
  • el 11
  • s 11
  • r 9
  • b 3
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects