-
Frost, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH : correlation between assigned LCSH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs (1989)
0.05
0.05485857 = product of:
0.19200498 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.165-179
-
Subject control in online catalogs (1989)
0.05
0.04557904 = product of:
0.15952663 = sum of:
0.06709666 = weight(_text_:subject in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06709666 = score(doc=235,freq=20.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6248056 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Auch als 'Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(198) No.1/2' erschienen
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: HOLLEY, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog; KLUGMAN, S.: Failures in subject retreival; CARLYLE, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog; MURDOCK, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis: toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog; DYKSTRA, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The role of classification in online systems; BROADBENT, E.: The online catalog: dictionary, classified, or both?; OLSEN, R.J., CHRISTENSEN, J.O., LARSEN, K.A. u. K. WILLEY: Implementing NOTIS keyword/Boolean searching: a case study; ROLLAND-THOMA, P. u. G. MERCURE: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue; FROST, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH: correlation between assigned LSCH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs; STONE, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs; CHAN, L.M.: A subject cataloging code?; McCARTHY, C.: A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog; JOUGUELET, S.: Subject access in online catalogs: developments in France; DALE, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs: an overview bibliography
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 35(1990) S.119-120 (P. Lisbon); International classification 18(1991) S.238-239 (W. Gödert)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.10, nos.1/2
-
Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989)
0.04
0.044290405 = product of:
0.1550164 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=457,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.105-124
-
Markey, K.: Subject searching experiences and needs on online catalog users : implications for library classification (1985)
0.04
0.037620723 = product of:
0.17556338 = sum of:
0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067897044 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
-
Nohr, H.: Subject access in german-language OPACs : a survey (1989)
0.04
0.037620723 = product of:
0.17556338 = sum of:
0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067897044 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- International classification. 16(1989), S.95-100
-
Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of the use of the subject catalog, Marriott Library, University of Utah (1984)
0.03
0.032918133 = product of:
0.15361795 = sum of:
0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059409913 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1984) no.3, S.75-83
-
Dale, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs : an overview bibliography (1989)
0.03
0.032735452 = product of:
0.15276544 = sum of:
0.07201569 = weight(_text_:subject in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07201569 = score(doc=856,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.225-251
-
McCarthy, C.: ¬A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog (1989)
0.03
0.030782681 = product of:
0.14365251 = sum of:
0.08981935 = weight(_text_:subject in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08981935 = score(doc=2871,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.83639985 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests that the cataloging community may be setting its goals too low in its approach to online subject access. Truly effective subject retrieval for online catalog users will not be possible until the Library of Congress gives a higher priority to consistency in the assignment of subject headings. In recognition of the intellectual complexity of LCSH, the paper proposes the appointment of subject specialists to monitor the assignment of subject headings at the Library of Congress.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.203-211
-
Hancock, M.: Subject searching behaviour at the library catalogue and at the shelves : implications for online interactive catalogues (1987)
0.03
0.030351074 = product of:
0.106228754 = sum of:
0.0474445 = weight(_text_:subject in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0474445 = score(doc=2280,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4418043 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Searching behaviour in a university library is studied using a holistic approach, encompassing the use of bibliographic tools and shelf browsing. The present study is designed as the first half of a 'before and after' study to permit the evaluation of the impact of a future online catalogue on users' searching behaviour. A combined methodology was devised: searchers were encouraged to talk aloud during their search, and this information, together with some probing and real time expert interpretation, enabled the experimente to record the searching activity on a highly structured observation form. The study reveals the extent of subject searching activity, and suggests that this may have been underestimated in previous studies. The analysis of expressed topics, search formulation strategy and documents retrieved reveals the adaptive nature of the subject searching process, whereby the user adapts to the structure of the available tools. The information retrieval task in a traditional library system is tailored by the system to a single, one dimensional, sequential process. It is suggested that a major obstacle to subject searching effectiveness may lie in the lack of interaction between the different possible approaches in the searching process: the indexing language, the classification, and the titles. It is to be hoped that a future online searching environment will encourage a more truly interactive approach to subject searching.
-
Vasiljev, A.: Online subject access to library holdings (1986)
0.03
0.027802365 = product of:
0.12974437 = sum of:
0.0759112 = weight(_text_:subject in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0759112 = score(doc=1558,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Description of the online catalogue (OLCA) development abd the subject access potency (Controlled and free term indexing, classified approach, subject indication costs, Boolean searching). The subject access research needs are outlined as well as the measures to be taken towards putting the Delft University of Technology Library catalogues online (AUBID-SSX project, subjects access point file, quantitative evaluation) The importance of the use of controlled vocabulary is stressed. The incorporations of a concordance between subject headingsa nd the local library classification is described
-
Chan, L.M.: ¬A subject cataloging code? (1989)
0.03
0.027802365 = product of:
0.12974437 = sum of:
0.0759112 = weight(_text_:subject in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0759112 = score(doc=2870,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to a subject control in on-line catalogues. Examines whether a subject cataloguing code is, at this point in time, necessary or economically feasible, as well as questioning who will develop such a code and if experiences with AACR2 should make librarians fearful or hopeful about similar work with subject headings.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.199-202
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.03
0.027581703 = product of:
0.09653596 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.21-32
-
Murdock, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog (1989)
0.03
0.027279545 = product of:
0.12730454 = sum of:
0.060013074 = weight(_text_:subject in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060013074 = score(doc=455,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the potentialities of an empowered public services/technical services interface as a liberating and exhilarating vehicle for change, improvement, understanding, and access in the online subject catalog.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.65-80
-
Stone, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs (1989)
0.03
0.025685575 = product of:
0.11986601 = sum of:
0.07276198 = weight(_text_:subject in 451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276198 = score(doc=451,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6775613 = fieldWeight in 451, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=451)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=451)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=451)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Law libraries that introduce online catalogs to their publics often experience the same kinds of problems and benefits as other types of libraries. Nevertheless, certain issues for OPAC subject searching can be particularly challenging for law libraries. This paper addresses those issues, especially the impact on subject access of the design of shared OPACs and the special problems regarding subject searches on government agency names and titles of laws. Difficulties with law-related subject headings are also discussed. Finally, keyword and call number searching are examined from the law library perspective.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.181-198
-
Klugman, S.: Failures in subject retrieval (1989)
0.03
0.025685575 = product of:
0.11986601 = sum of:
0.07276198 = weight(_text_:subject in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276198 = score(doc=453,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6775613 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Finding books by subject in large libraries is a difficult task at the best of times. Since users seldom think of their topic in terms of library subject headings, they encounter problems in finding matches. Online catalogs have helped somewhat by allowing keyword searching and Boolean combinations. They have also perpetuated some problems (lack of authority control and of cross references) and created new ones, namely requiring users to acquire complex skills. Libraries need to look carefully at the MARC format and at enhanced and enriched subject approaches. Machine-generated links and leads can provide more paths and wider access to subject information.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.9-35
-
Carson, S.M.: LIAS online catalog at Penn State University (1983)
0.03
0.025193252 = product of:
0.11756851 = sum of:
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The integral components of Library Information Access System-Pennsylvania State University's information exchange networkare outlined. A detailed description of Bibliographic Control, LIAS' record creation/maintenance component, is provided.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.2, S.1-15
-
Cochrane, P.A.: Redesign of catalogs and indexes for improved subject access : selected papers of Pauline A. Cochrane (1985)
0.02
0.02432323 = product of:
0.1702626 = sum of:
0.08981935 = weight(_text_:subject in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08981935 = score(doc=124,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.83639985 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=124,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- LCSH
- Online library catalogs / Subject access
Machine / readable bibliographic data
Subject cataloging / Data processing
Online bibliographic searching
Catalogs, Subject
- Subject
- Online library catalogs / Subject access
Machine / readable bibliographic data
Subject cataloging / Data processing
Online bibliographic searching
Catalogs, Subject
-
Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985)
0.02
0.0241358 = product of:
0.112633735 = sum of:
0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058800567 = score(doc=1459,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986)
0.02
0.023087012 = product of:
0.10773939 = sum of:
0.067364514 = weight(_text_:subject in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067364514 = score(doc=3926,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.; Mercure, G.: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue (1989)
0.02
0.021685526 = product of:
0.10119912 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=450,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028549349 = score(doc=450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028549349 = score(doc=450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Canadian library records, bilingual by statute, are created according to a common set of rules and standards. Subject access to the catalogue remains language dependent. Even searches by classification in some OPACs rely first on an alphabetical index as an entering key. Fully bilingual OPACs with authority control and reciprocal references in one file have yet to appear. Thus far the Canadian Workplace Automation Research Center has produced ISIR/SIRI with an online bilingual thesaurus. The National Library of Canada has developed withh DOBIS a bilingual system providing automatic linkages between records and authority files. But true bilingual searching (a search in one language retrieving records in both languages) could be achieved by a built-in automatic translation module. Total accommodation of diacritical marks by terminal keyboards and display monitors is also a challenge to be met.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.141-163
