Search (49 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"p"
  1. Stoklasova, B.: ¬The national bibliography of a small country in international context (2000) 0.00
    0.0043094605 = product of:
      0.060332447 = sum of:
        0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060332447 = score(doc=5415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5415)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  2. Yitzhaki, M.: ¬A draft version of a consolidated thesaurus for the rapidly growing field of alternative medicine (2000) 0.00
    0.0043094605 = product of:
      0.060332447 = sum of:
        0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060332447 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  3. Butcher, J.E.; Trotter, R.: Building on PRECIS : strategies for online subject access in the British Library (1989) 0.00
    0.0042435653 = product of:
      0.059409913 = sum of:
        0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059409913 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  4. Stephan, W.: Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries (GSARE) : a first step to a worldwide accepted standard (1992) 0.00
    0.0042435653 = product of:
      0.059409913 = sum of:
        0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059409913 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  5. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.00
    0.0024655813 = product of:
      0.034518138 = sum of:
        0.034518138 = product of:
          0.069036275 = sum of:
            0.069036275 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069036275 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  6. Zhai, X.: ChatGPT user experience: : implications for education (2022) 0.00
    0.0015155592 = product of:
      0.021217827 = sum of:
        0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021217827 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    ChatGPT, a general-purpose conversation chatbot released on November 30, 2022, by OpenAI, is expected to impact every aspect of society. However, the potential impacts of this NLP tool on education remain unknown. Such impact can be enormous as the capacity of ChatGPT may drive changes to educational learning goals, learning activities, and assessment and evaluation practices. This study was conducted by piloting ChatGPT to write an academic paper, titled Artificial Intelligence for Education (see Appendix A). The piloting result suggests that ChatGPT is able to help researchers write a paper that is coherent, (partially) accurate, informative, and systematic. The writing is extremely efficient (2-3 hours) and involves very limited professional knowledge from the author. Drawing upon the user experience, I reflect on the potential impacts of ChatGPT, as well as similar AI tools, on education. The paper concludes by suggesting adjusting learning goals-students should be able to use AI tools to conduct subject-domain tasks and education should focus on improving students' creativity and critical thinking rather than general skills. To accomplish the learning goals, researchers should design AI-involved learning tasks to engage students in solving real-world problems. ChatGPT also raises concerns that students may outsource assessment tasks. This paper concludes that new formats of assessments are needed to focus on creativity and critical thinking that AI cannot substitute.
  7. Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996) 0.00
    0.0014528577 = product of:
      0.020340007 = sum of:
        0.020340007 = product of:
          0.040680014 = sum of:
            0.040680014 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040680014 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1996 15:40:22
  8. Aydin, Ö.; Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: : digital twin in healthcare (2022) 0.00
    0.0012124473 = product of:
      0.016974261 = sum of:
        0.016974261 = weight(_text_:subject in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016974261 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Literature review articles are essential to summarize the related work in the selected field. However, covering all related studies takes too much time and effort. This study questions how Artificial Intelligence can be used in this process. We used ChatGPT to create a literature review article to show the stage of the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence application. As the subject, the applications of Digital Twin in the health field were chosen. Abstracts of the last three years (2020, 2021 and 2022) papers were obtained from the keyword "Digital twin in healthcare" search results on Google Scholar and paraphrased by ChatGPT. Later on, we asked ChatGPT questions. The results are promising; however, the paraphrased parts had significant matches when checked with the Ithenticate tool. This article is the first attempt to show the compilation and expression of knowledge will be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. We are still at the beginning of such advances. The future academic publishing process will require less human effort, which in turn will allow academics to focus on their studies. In future studies, we will monitor citations to this study to evaluate the academic validity of the content produced by the ChatGPT. 1. Introduction OpenAI ChatGPT (ChatGPT, 2022) is a chatbot based on the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. It is designed to generate human-like text responses to user input in a conversational context. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations and can be used to create responses to a wide range of topics and prompts. The chatbot can be used for customer service, content creation, and language translation tasks, creating replies in multiple languages. OpenAI ChatGPT is available through the OpenAI API, which allows developers to access and integrate the chatbot into their applications and systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI. It is designed to generate human-like text, allowing it to engage in conversation with users naturally and intuitively. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations, allowing it to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and contexts. It can be used in various applications, such as chatbots, customer service agents, and language translation systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model able to generate coherent and natural text that can be indistinguishable from text written by a human. As an artificial intelligence, ChatGPT may need help to change academic writing practices. However, it can provide information and guidance on ways to improve people's academic writing skills.
  9. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.00
    7.264289E-4 = product of:
      0.010170003 = sum of:
        0.010170003 = product of:
          0.020340007 = sum of:
            0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020340007 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22

Years

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 5

Types

  • el 27
  • a 1
  • More… Less…