Search (405 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × type_ss:"s"
  1. Classification : options and opportunities (1995) 0.36
    0.3572715 = product of:
      0.62522507 = sum of:
        0.07137337 = weight(_text_:classification in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07137337 = score(doc=3753,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7464156 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.04113413 = product of:
          0.08226826 = sum of:
            0.08226826 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08226826 = score(doc=3753,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.51202476 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.060019795 = product of:
          0.12003959 = sum of:
            0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12003959 = score(doc=3753,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10212677 = weight(_text_:henry in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10212677 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.13401954 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13401954 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12003959 = score(doc=3753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02513852 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.07137337 = weight(_text_:classification in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07137337 = score(doc=3753,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7464156 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
      0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
    
    Abstract
    Explores a wide range of options surrounding the choice and application of library and bibliographic classification Systems. It provides detailed descriptions of alternative provisions in the much-used DDC and LCC systems, as well as descriptions and discussions of several alternative systems, such as BC, UDC and Reader Interest
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: LANGRIDGE, D.W.: Alternative starting points in classification; THOMAS, A.R.: Blissful beliefs: Henry Evelyn Bliss councels on classification; WEINBERG, B.H.: Library classification and information retrieval thesauri: comparison and contrast; LOSEE, R.M.: How to study classification systems and their appropriateness for individual institutions; SHORT, E.C.: Knowledge and the educational purposes of higher education: implications for the design of a classification scheme; CHAN, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification: alternative provisions; MITCHELL, J.S.: Options in the Dewey Decimal Classification system: the current perspective; THOMAS, A.R.: Bliss Classification update; STRACHAN, P.D. u. F.H.M. OOMES: Universal Decimal Classification update; HSU, K.M.: The classification schemes of the Research Libraries of the New York Public Library; SAPIIE, J.: Reader-interst classification: the user-friendly schemes; WINKE, R.C.: Intentional use of multiple classification schemes in United States libraries; CHRESSANTHIS, J.D.: The reclassification decision: Dewey or Library of Congress?; PATTIE, L.-Y.W.: Reclassification revisited: an automated approach; KOH, G.S.: Options in classification available through modern technology; TROTTER, R.: Electronic Dewey: the CD-ROM version of the Dewey Decimal Classification
    Object
    Reader interest classification
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
  2. Reader in classification and descriptive cataloging (1972) 0.16
    0.16233915 = product of:
      0.37879136 = sum of:
        0.036007844 = weight(_text_:subject in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036007844 = score(doc=3421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
        0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08074976 = score(doc=3421,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050928485 = product of:
          0.10185697 = sum of:
            0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10185697 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10185697 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
        0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08074976 = score(doc=3421,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die u.a. die Beiträge: DEWEY, M.: Catalogs and cataloging; BLISS, H.E.: Principles and definitions; LaMONTAGNE, L.E.: Historical background of classification; RICHARDSON, E.C.: Classification: theoretical and practical; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline; SHARP, J.: Classification; SHERA, J.H. Classification: current functions and applications to the subject analysis of library materials; SAYERS, W.C.B.: The nature and purpose of classification; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index; MILLS, J.: Classification as an indexing device; RICHMOND, P.A.: The future of generalized systems of classification; PAINTER, A.F.: Modern classification theory; VICKERY,: Faceted classification schemes; BORKO, H.: Research in automatic generations of classification systems; FARRADANE, J.: Classification and mechanical selection; RICHMOND, P.A.: Some aspects of basic research in classification; RICHMOND, P.A.: Transformation and organization of information content: aspects of recent research in the art and science of classification; STROUT, R.F.: Development of the catalog and cataloging codes; CUTTER, C.A.: Library catalogs; CUTTER, C.A.: Rules for a dictionary catalog; LUBETSKY, S.: Design for a code; JOLLEY, L.: The function of the catalog; WEBER, D.C.: The changing character of the catalog in America; COOPER, W.S.: The potential usefulness of the catalog access points other than author, title and subject
  3. Ranganathan's philosophy : assessment, impact and relevance. Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Libary Association and co-sponsored by Sarada Ranganathan's Endowment for Library Science (1986) 0.14
    0.14485973 = product of:
      0.33800602 = sum of:
        0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021217827 = score(doc=8926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
        0.055795137 = weight(_text_:classification in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055795137 = score(doc=8926,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.58349997 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
        0.060019795 = product of:
          0.12003959 = sum of:
            0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12003959 = score(doc=8926,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12003959 = score(doc=8926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
        0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02513852 = score(doc=8926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
        0.055795137 = weight(_text_:classification in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055795137 = score(doc=8926,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.58349997 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: AITCHISON, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus: the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure; DEVADASON, F.J.: Ranganathan's idea of facet analysis in action; FOSKETT, D.J.: The "personality" of the personaliyt facet; GOPINATH, M.A.: Relevance of Ranganathan's postulational approach in the identification of key concepts in the newly formed subjects and its implications to intellectual organisation of information; IYER, H.: Users preference of sequence of component ideas in subject representation: PMEST model; IYER, H.: Ask hypothesis and Ranganathan's fundamental categories; KASHYAP, M.M.: Ranganathan's postulational approach to classification: its development and impact; KUMAR, P.S.G.: Hidden roots of Colon Classification; LANGRIDGE, D.W.: Disciplines, forms and phenomena; NARASIMHAN, S.: Classification of oriental libraries with the case study of four regions; PARAMESWARAN, M.: The contribution of S.R. Ranganathan in the classification and cataloguing of ancient sanskrit classics; PRASAD, K.N.: Development of classification terminology: contributions of Professor S.R. Ranganathan; SANGAMESWARAN, S.V. u. M.V. GOPINATH: Design and development of depth version of Colon Classification for food technology; SANKARALINGAM, P., RAGHAVAN, K.S. u. P. GANGADHARA RAO: Structure and synthesis in DDC: an analysis; SEETHARAMA, S.: Compatibility issues affecting classification system: relevance of Ranganathan's normative principles; VOHRA, R.: Analytico-synthetic scheme of classification: its impact and relevance to modern thories of classification; DAS, S.P.: Chain procedure and precoordinate indexing; TEJOMURTY, A.: Chain procedure: the first model of pre-coordinate indexing; VINAYAK, K. u. K.K. TANEJA: Chain procedure and its influence on other precoordinate indexing systems; AUSTIN, D.: Standards in documentation: a subjective view
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International classification 13(1986) S.103-105 (K.G.B. Bakewell)
  4. Maltby, A.; Gill, L.: ¬The case for Bliss : modern classification practice and principles in the context of the Bibliographic classification (1979) 0.14
    0.14288712 = product of:
      0.40008393 = sum of:
        0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04758225 = score(doc=3329,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
        0.08488081 = product of:
          0.16976161 = sum of:
            0.16976161 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16976161 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.16976161 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16976161 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
        0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05027704 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
        0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04758225 = score(doc=3329,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
  5. Relevance of Ranganathan's contributions to library science : Companion volume to Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Library Association and co-sponsored by the Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 11.-14.11.1985, New Dehli, India (1988) 0.11
    0.114309706 = product of:
      0.32006717 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=1436,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
        0.06790464 = product of:
          0.13580929 = sum of:
            0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13580929 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13580929 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=1436,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BURY, S.: Ranganathan's theories embodies in both Colon Classification and the second edition of Bliss' Bibliographic Classification; COATES, E.J.: Ranganathan's thought and its significance for the mechanisation of information storage and retrieval
  6. Cataloging heresy : challenging the standard bibliographic product. Proc. of the congress for librarians, Feb.18, 1991, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY with additional contributed papers (1992) 0.11
    0.11121411 = product of:
      0.22242822 = sum of:
        0.029400283 = weight(_text_:subject in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029400283 = score(doc=7286,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2737761 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
        0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0190329 = score(doc=7286,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
        0.03395232 = product of:
          0.06790464 = sum of:
            0.06790464 = weight(_text_:bliss in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06790464 = score(doc=7286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.31614712 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06790464 = weight(_text_:bliss in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06790464 = score(doc=7286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.31614712 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
        0.044969153 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044969153 = score(doc=7286,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3847152 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
        0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0190329 = score(doc=7286,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
        0.008136002 = product of:
          0.016272005 = sum of:
            0.016272005 = weight(_text_:22 in 7286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016272005 = score(doc=7286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 7286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(7/14)
    
    Content
    WEINBERG, B.H.: A theory of relativity for catalogers; ANDERSON, N.: The non-neutrality of descriptive cataloging; BERMAN, S.: Cataloging tools and 'copy': the myth of acceptability - a public librarian's viewpoint; SINN, S.: The development of classification and subject heading systems for medicine; WHITEHEAD, C.: The art & architecture thesaurus as an alternatice to LCSH; PARR, M.: Standard cataloging data and the academic library: the technical services manager's point of view; BISHOFF, L. u. G. PATTON: Master bibliographic record vs. local bibliographic record - who needs what?: an OCLC perspective; GLAZIER, E.: The display and indexing of customized catalog records in RLIN; BYRUM, J.: Standard cataloging data: the view from the Library of Congress; INTNER, S.: Rejecting standard cataloging copy: implications for the education of catalogers; ELLIOTT, P. u. C. BAKKE: Special collections and cataloging standards: issues and compromises at the Steinbeck Research Center and the Center for Beethoven Studies; Whitlow, C.: Music sound recordings: subject retrieval, analysis and access in Online Public Access Catalogs; OLSON, H.: Subject access to women's studies materials; KIM, S.-H.: Volume/date designation and serials holdings; ARMINTOR, B.: 'Marrying' college catalog data with the library's online catalog: enhancing access to nonprint materials at Pikes Peak Community College; LAI, P.C. u. M.-K. WONG: Problems in the cataloging of digital cartographic databases; THOMAS, A.R.: Options in the arrangement of library materials and the new edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.2, S.100-105 (J.M. Perreault); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.35 (M. Norman)
  7. Knowledge organization and the global information society : Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK (2004) 0.09
    0.092632964 = product of:
      0.16210768 = sum of:
        0.0084871305 = weight(_text_:subject in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084871305 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.079032354 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.026061872 = weight(_text_:classification in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026061872 = score(doc=3356,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27255246 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.00949952 = product of:
          0.01899904 = sum of:
            0.01899904 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01899904 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.11824705 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024007918 = product of:
          0.048015837 = sum of:
            0.048015837 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048015837 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.22354977 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048015837 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048015837 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.22354977 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.014220494 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014220494 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.121657625 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.026061872 = weight(_text_:classification in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026061872 = score(doc=3356,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27255246 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.0057530226 = product of:
          0.011506045 = sum of:
            0.011506045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011506045 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Session 1 A: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 1 Hanne Albrechtsen, Hans H K Andersen, Bryan Cleal and Annelise Mark Pejtersen: Categorical complexity in knowledge integration: empirical evaluation of a cross-cultural film research collaboratory; Clare Beghtol: Naive classification systems and the global information society; Terence R Smith and Marcia L Zeng: Concept maps supported by knowledge organization structures; B: Linguistic and Cultural Approaches to Knowledge Organization 1 Rebecca Green and Lydia Fraser: Patterns in verbal polysemy; Maria J López-Huertas, MarioBarite and Isabel de Torres: Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: the case of gender studies; Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan and Eric SanJuan: Mining for knowledge chunks in a terminology network Session 2 A: Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Representation 1 Jin-Cheon Na, Haiyang Sui, Christopher Khoo, Syin Chan and Yunyun Zhou: Effectiveness of simple linguistic processing in automatic sentiment classification of product reviews; Daniel J O'Keefe: Cultural literacy in a global information society-specific language: an exploratory ontological analysis utilizing comparative taxonomy; Lynne C Howarth: Modelling a natural language gateway to metadata-enabled resources; B: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 2: Facets & Their Significance Ceri Binding and Douglas Tudhope: Integrating faceted structure into the search process; Vanda Broughton and Heather Lane: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action: moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform; Kathryn La Barre: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? Session 3 A: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 3 Elin K Jacob: The structure of context: implications of structure for the creation of context in information systems; Uta Priss: A semiotic-conceptual framework for knowledge representation Giovanni M Sacco; Accessing multimedia infobases through dynamic taxonomies; Joseph T Tennis: URIS and intertextuality: incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web; B: Social & Sociological Concepts in Knowledge Organization Grant Campbell: A queer eye for the faceted guy: how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture; Jonathan Furner and Anthony W Dunbar: The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes: a critical ace-theoretic approach; H Peter Ohly: The organization of Internet links in a social science clearing house; Chern Li Liew: Cross-cultural design and usability of a digital library supporting access to Maori cultural heritage resources: an examination of knowledge organization issues; Session 4 A: Knowledge Organization of Universal and Special Systems 1: Dewey Decimal Classification Sudatta Chowdhury and G G Chowdhury: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval; Joan S Mitchell: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey; Diane Vizine-Goetz and Julianne Beall: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDCfor automated classification services; B: Applications in Knowledge Representation 2 Gerhard J A Riesthuis and Maja Zumer: FRBR and FRANAR: subject access; Victoria Frâncu: An interpretation of the FRBR model; Moshe Y Sachs and Richard P Smiraglia: From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC); Session 5 A: Knowledge Organization of Universal and Special Systems 2 Ágnes Hajdu Barát: Knowledge organization of the Universal Decimal Classification: new solutions, user friendly methods from Hungary; Ia C McIlwaine: A question of place; Aida Slavic and Maria Inês Cordeiro: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications;
    B: Applications in Knowledge Representation 3 Barbara H Kwasnik and You-Lee Chun: Translation of classifications: issues and solutions as exemplified in the Korean Decimal Classification; Hur-Li Lee and Jennifer Clyde: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue; Jens-Erik Mai: The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing Session 6 A: Knowledge Organization of Universal and Special Systems 3 Stella G Dextre Clarke, Alan Gilchrist and Leonard Will: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards; Michèle Hudon: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections; Antonio Garcia Jimdnez, Félix del Valle Gastaminza: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context; Ali Asghar Shiri and Crawford Revie: End-user interaction with thesauri: an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection; B: Special Applications Carol A Bean: Representation of medical knowledge for automated semantic interpretation of clinical reports; Chew-Hung Lee, Christopher Khoo and Jin-Cheon Na: Automatic identification of treatment relations for medical ontology learning: an exploratory study; A Neelameghan and M C Vasudevan: Integrating image files, case records of patients and Web resources: case study of a knowledge Base an tumours of the central nervous system; Nancy J Williamson: Complementary and alternative medicine: its place in the reorganized medical sciences in the Universal Decimal Classification; Session 7 A: Applications in Knowledge Representation 4 Claudio Gnoli: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization; Wouter Schallier: On the razor's edge: between local and overall needs in knowledge organization; Danielle H Miller: User perception and the online catalogue: public library OPAC users "think aloud"; B: Knowledge Organization in Corporate Information Systems Anita S Coleman: Knowledge structures and the vocabulary of engineering novices; Evelyne Mounier and Céline Paganelli: The representation of knowledge contained in technical documents: the example of FAQs (frequently asked questions); Martin S van der Walt: A classification scheme for the organization of electronic documents in small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs); Session 8 A: Knowledge Organization of Non-print Information: Sound, Image, Multimedia Laura M Bartoto, Cathy S Lowe and Sharon C Glotzer: Information management of microstructures: non-print, multidisciplinary information in a materials science digital library; Pauline Rafferty and Rob Hidderley: A survey of Image trieval tools; Richard P Smiraglia: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy: extensiog the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts; B: Linguistic and Cultural Approaches to Knowledge Organization 2 Graciela Rosemblat, Tony Tse and Darren Gemoets: Adapting a monolingual consumer health system for Spanish cross-language information retrieval; Matjaz Zalokar: Preparation of a general controlled vocabulary in Slovene and English for the COBISS.SI library information system, Slovenia; Marianne Dabbadie, Widad Mustafa El Hadi and Francois Fraysse: Coaching applications: a new concept for usage testing an information systems. Testing usage an a corporate information system with K-Now; Session 9 Theories of Knowledge and Knowledge Organization Keiichi Kawamura: Ranganathan and after: Coates' practice and theory; Shiyan Ou, Christopher Khoo, Dion H Goh and Hui-Ying Heng: Automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as sentence categorization; Iolo Jones, Daniel Cunliffe, Douglas Tudhope: Natural language processing and knowledge organization systems as an aid to retrieval
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 58(2005) H.1, S.78-81 (O. Oberhauser): "Die 1989 gegründete Internationale Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) ist eine der wenigen Vereinigungen, deren Interessensschwerpunkt ganz auf wissenschaftliche und praktische Fragen der inhaltlichen Erschliessung und des sachlichen Informationszugangs ausgerichtet ist. Die deutschsprachige Sektion der ISKO hat ihren Sitz in Bonn; die Gesellschaft ist jedoch hierzulande nicht ausreichend bekannt und hat bislang nurwenige Mitglieder aus Österreich. Neben der nunmehr bereits seit über dreissig Jahren erscheinenden Fachzeitschrift Knowledge Organization (bis 1993 International Classification) publiziert die ISKO mehrere Buchserien, die früher im Frankfurter Indeks-Verlag erschienen und heute - wie auch die Zeitschrift - in Würzburg bei Ergon verlegt werden. Unter diesen nehmen die Tagungsbände der internationalen ISKO-Konferenzen, die seit 1990 alle zwei Jahre (an wechselnden Orten) abgehalten werden, eine bedeutende Stellung ein. Nun liegen die Proceedings der im Juli des vergangenen Jahres in London veranstalteten achten Konferenz vor, editiert in einheitlichem Layout, an dem mit Ausnahme der relativ kleinen Schrift, einem mitunter miss glückten Randausgleich bei den Titelüberschriften, unschönen (da fehlenden) Abständen bei den Überschriften von Subkapiteln sowie den üblichen vermeidbaren Tippfehlern (z.B. "trieval" anstelle von "retrieval" im Inhaltsverzeichnis, p. 9) wenig auszusetzen ist. Der trotz des kleinen Fonts stattlich wirkende Band versammelt immerhin 55 Vorträge, die, offenbar der Organisation der Tagung entsprechend, in 17 Abschnitte gegliedert sind. Die letzteren sind allerdings nur aus dem Inhaltsverzeichnis ersichtlich und entbehren jeden Kommentars, der sie auch inhaltlich hätte näher charakterisieren können. Die Herkunft der Autoren der Vorträge - darunter einige grosse und bekannte Namen - spiegelt die Internationalität der Vereinigung wider. Der deutsche Sprachraum ist allerdings nur durch einen einzigen Beitrag vertreten (H. Peter Ohly vom IZ Sozialwissenschaften, Bonn, über die Erschliessung einer Datenbank für Web-Ressourcen); bibliothekarische Autoren aus dem Raum "D-A-CH" sucht man vergebens. Die meisten Vorträge sind relativ kurz und bündig gehalten; die durchschnittliche Länge beträgt etwa vier bis sechs Seiten.
    Das Rahmenthema der Tagung kam aufgrund des vor und nach der ISKO-Konferenz abgehaltenen "UN World Summit an an Information Society" zustande. Im Titel des Buches ist die "globale Wissensgesellschaft" freilich eher irreführend, da keiner der darin abgedruckten Beiträge zentral davon handelt. Der eine der beiden Vorträge, die den Begriff selbst im Titel anführen, beschäftigt sich mit der Konstruktion einer Taxonomie für "cultural literacy" (O'Keefe), der andere mit sogenannten "naiven Klassifikationssystemen" (Beghtol), d.h. solchen, die im Gegensatz zu "professionellen" Systemen von Personen ohne spezifisches Interesse an klassifikatorischen Fragen entwickelt wurden. Beiträge mit "multi-kulti"-Charakter behandeln etwa Fragen wie - kulturübergreifende Arbeit, etwa beim EU-Filmarchiv-Projekt Collate (Albrechtsen et al.) oder einem Projekt zur Maori-Kultur (Liew); - Mehrsprachigkeit bzw. Übersetzung, z.B. der koreanischen Dezimalklassifikation (Kwasnik & Chun), eines auf der Sears ListofSubject Headings basierenden slowenischen Schlagwortvokabulars (Zalokar), einer spanisch-englischen Schlagwortliste für Gesundheitsfragen (Rosemblat et al.); - universelle Klassifikationssysteme wie die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (Joan Mitchell über die DDC 22, sowie zwei weitere Beiträge) und die Internationale Dezimalklassifikation (la McIlwaine über Geographika, Nancy Williamson über Alternativ- und Komplementärmedizin in der UDC). Unter den 55 Beiträgen finden sich folgende - aus der Sicht des Rezensenten - besonders interessante thematische "Cluster": - OPAC-orientierte Beiträge, etwa über die Anforderungen bei derAutomatisierung analytisch-synthetischer Klassifikationssysteme (Slavic & Cordeiro) sowie Beiträge zu Benutzerforschung und -verhalten (Lee & Clyde; Miller); - Erschliessung und Retrieval von visuellen bzw. multimedialen Ressourcen, insbesondere mit Ausrichtung auf Thesauri (Hudin; Garcia Jimenez & De Valle Gastaminza; Rafferty & Hidderley); - Thesaurus-Standards (Dextre Clark et al.), Thesauri und Endbenutzer (Shiri & Revie); - Automatisches Klassifizieren (Vizine-Goetz & Beall mit Bezug auf die DDC; Na et al. über methodische Ansätze bei der Klassifizierung von Produktbesprechungen nach positiven bzw. negativen Gefühlsäusserungen); - Beiträge über (hierzulande) weniger bekannte Systeme wie Facettenklassifikation einschliesslich der Bliss-Klassifikation sowie der Umsetzung der Ideen von Ranganathan durch E.J. Coates (vier Vorträge), die Sachs-Klassifikation (Sachs & Smiraglia) sowie M. S. van der Walts Schema zur Klassifizierung elektronischer Dokumente in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Auch die übrigen Beiträge sind mehrheitlich interessant geschrieben und zeugen vom fachlichen Qualitätsstandard der ISKO-Konferenzen. Der Band kann daher bibliothekarischen bzw. informationswissenschaftlichen Ausbildungseinrichtungen sowie Bibliotheken mit Sammelinteresse für Literatur zu Klassifikationsfragen ausdrücklich empfohlen werden. Ausserdem darf der nächsten (= neunten) internationalen ISKO-Konferenz, die 2006 in Wien abgehalten werden soll, mit Interesse entgegengesehen werden.
  8. Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985) 0.08
    0.08233067 = product of:
      0.19210489 = sum of:
        0.05087856 = weight(_text_:subject in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05087856 = score(doc=3622,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4737823 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.027897568 = weight(_text_:classification in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027897568 = score(doc=3622,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29174998 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.021220202 = product of:
          0.042440403 = sum of:
            0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042440403 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042440403 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.021770598 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021770598 = score(doc=3622,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.18624945 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.027897568 = weight(_text_:classification in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027897568 = score(doc=3622,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29174998 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this reader is to assemble in one place those writings considered to have made significant impact an subject analysis. The items selected are considered to contain thoughts and ideas that best illustrate the courses that subject analysis has taken over the years and that shed light an future directions. Most of the writings in this collection have been widely cited and are well known. Many of them were originally published in books that are no longer in print; others appeared in journals that are not easily accessible to many readers. Reprinting these writings in one collection serves two purposes: it makes them readily available for the study and teaching of subject analysis and it shows the genesis and development of some of the most significant ideas in the field.
    Definition and Scope For the purpose of this reader, subject analysis is understood to encompass vocabulary structuring and subject indexing. Vocabulary structuring refers to the constructing of tools, such as classifications, subject heading lists, and thesauri, designed to facilitate the organization and retrieval of information. These tools, though called by different names, are similar in that they structure or control the basic vocabulary of a subject index language by 1) stipulating terms that may be used in the classing or indexing of documents and 2) displaying semantic relationships, such as hierarchy and synonymy, that obtain between these terms. They differ in the kinds of terms and relationships they recognize and in the manner in which these are displayed. Subject indexing refers to the application of a vocabulary, which may be more or less well structured, to indicate the content or aboutness of documents. Traditionally subject indexing limits its domain to only certain types of documents, such as passages within books (back-of-book indexing) or periodical articles, and the expression it uses to only certain types of strings, for example, descriptors or index terms as opposed to subject headings or class numbers. However, in a generalized and more modern sense, subject indexing refers to the indication of the theme or topic of any document, indeed any retrieval artifact, by any meaningful string of alphanumeric characters. The value of construing the meaning of subject analysis broadly is threefold: it permits comparing a variety of approaches to subject analysis; it permits generalizing about these approaches at a relatively high descriptive level, so that principles and objectives are shown in relief; and, most importantly perhaps, it permits a unified view of the traditional and information scientific approaches to subject analysis.
    Criteria for Selection In selecting the writings to be included in this reader, we have followed the criteria listed below: 1. Theoretical emphasis. Our focus is an theoretical and philosophical aspects rather than practical or technical considerations. In a number of cases, where several authors have written an the same subject or idea or expressed similar thoughts, the originator of the idea, if this could be determined, was selected. 2. Significance and impact. Our most important criterion is the significance of a particular piece or the contribution that it has made in the field of subject analysis. The impact of the ideas or concepts an subsequent practice in subject analysis has also been considered. 3. Perspicuity. Where multiple choices were available an a particular topic or area, our tendency was to exclude the writings that are obscure or highly technical and would require a high degree of tech nical sophistication an the part of the reader. Comprehensibility and clarity of style were often our guide. Based an the criteria stated above, the following types of writings have generally been excluded: review articles, the how-to-do-it type of writings, and textbook materials. In a way, it would probably be easier to defend the writings that have been included than to justify the exclusions. In a small volume containing writings chosen from a vast amount of available material, it is virtually impossible to arrive at a collection that will satisfy every reader. Each person has his or her own preferences or criteria. Inevitably, personal bias comes into play in assembling such a reader. At least, we hope that in this case the collective bias of three individuals rather than one has helped to provide a certain degree of balance. A number of writings originally selected for inclusion were omitted because of space limitation or failure to secure permission to reprint.
    Content
    Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
    LCSH
    Subject cataloging / Addresses, essays, lectures
    Classification / Books / Addresses, essays, lectures
    Subject
    Subject cataloging / Addresses, essays, lectures
    Classification / Books / Addresses, essays, lectures
  9. Universal classification I : subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conf. of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (1982) 0.08
    0.08135771 = product of:
      0.22780158 = sum of:
        0.02572525 = weight(_text_:subject in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572525 = score(doc=18,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2395541 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
        0.05647574 = weight(_text_:classification in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05647574 = score(doc=18,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.59061766 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
        0.029708283 = product of:
          0.059416566 = sum of:
            0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059416566 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059416566 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
        0.05647574 = weight(_text_:classification in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05647574 = score(doc=18,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.59061766 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GROLIER, E. de: Classifications as a cultural artefacts; FOSKETT, D.J., S. BURY: Concept organisation and universal classification systems; ROLLAND-THOMAS, P.: Towards the establishment of the validity of encyclopedic library classification systems; KASHYAP, C.M.M.: General theory of measurement and theory of subjects; WELLISCH, H.H.: A new classification of the world's language; MILLS, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification: the new BLISS Classification (BC2); GOPINATH, M.A.: Application of general systems theory to the classification theory of Ranganathan; AUSTIN, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations; FELBER; H., W. NEDOBITY: The basis of Wüster's classification research; EISENWORT, W.: Remarks on certain foundational problems of a general theory of terminology; GÖDERT, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles in the area 'technology' (T), 'industry' (I) and 'material culture' (M) - the TIM project; SVENONIUS, E.: Indexical contents; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Classaurus: its fundamentals, design and use; RICHMOND, P.A.: Classification in syndetic structures; CRAVEN, T.C.: The representation of facets in a general concept network for index display generation; CIGANIK, M.: Fuzzy faceted thesaurus construction; DEVADASON, F.J., M. KOTHANDA RAMANUJAM: Computer-aided construction of an 'alphabetic' classaurus; SECHSER, O.: Theoretical generalizations in retrieval system research, their objectivity and relevance; KUMAR, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems; GLICKERT, P.: Gradational classification: a topic-tagging scheme for computerized production of a scannable list; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: A new approach to the classification of fiction; AUSTIN, J.: The AMP classification system for fiction: trial applications and retrieval tests; BONNER, R.: Community information classification research prject: user oriented empirical methods of classification construction; BORKO, H.: The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries; KELM, B., B. MAASSEN: Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließungsarbeit an der Deutschen Bibliothek; JOITA, E., P. ATANASIU, V. TEODORU: The use of ordering systems by different user groups; COCHRANE, P.A.: Classification as a users's tool in online public access catalogs; TRAVIS, I.L.: Faceted classification in an online environment; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Videotex information retrieval systems: the logical development and optimization of tree structures in a general online interactive system; SCHABAS, A.H.: Videotex information systems: complements to the tree structure; WERSIG, G., M. BURKART-SABSOUB: Empirical classification research as a basis of informaton policy; MALANGA, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data; RIGBY, M.: The use of the UDC in automated terminology data banks; SWAYDAN, N.: The universal classification and the needs of libraries in developing countries; MEDER, N.: Family resemblance and empirical classification, cluster analysis: its philosophy of science and strategy of research; KRAUTH, J.: Models of the measurement of similarity; LÖFFLER, G.: Cluster-Strukturvergleiche - Ein Ansatz zur Zusammenhangsanalyse multivariat definierter Raumstrukturen; KRISHNAMURTHY, E.V., VENKATASEKHAR, H.S.: A relational data-base system and query language for storage, manipulation and retrieval of virus data. -
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 97(1983) S.435-450 (H. Beck); International classification 11(1984) S.169-171 (B. Endres-Niggemeyer); DK-Mitteilungen 28(1984) Nr.1, S.3-4 (B. Endres-Niggemeyer)
  10. Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization : Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada (2000) 0.08
    0.08095392 = product of:
      0.16190784 = sum of:
        0.010608913 = weight(_text_:subject in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010608913 = score(doc=5892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.098790444 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
        0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029138058 = score(doc=5892,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
        0.016792938 = product of:
          0.033585876 = sum of:
            0.033585876 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033585876 = score(doc=5892,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.20903322 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021220202 = product of:
          0.042440403 = sum of:
            0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042440403 = score(doc=5892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042440403 = score(doc=5892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
        0.01256926 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01256926 = score(doc=5892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.10753117 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
        0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029138058 = score(doc=5892,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5892, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5892)
      0.5 = coord(7/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: MITCHELL, J.S., D. Vizine-Goetz: DDC taxonomy server. ALBRECHTSEN, H.: The dynamism and stability of classification in information ecologies: problems and possibilities. OLSON, H.O.: Reading "Primitive Classification" and misreading cultures: the metaphysics of social and logical classification. JACOB, E.K.: The legacy of pragmatism: implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe. MAI, J.E.: Likeness: a pragmatic approach. SOLOMON, P.: Exploring structuration in knowledge organization: implications for managing the tension between stability and dynamism. CARDOSO, A.M.P., J.C. BEMFICA u. M.N. BORGES: Information and organizational knowledge faced with contemporary knowledge theories: unveiling the strength of the myth. JURISICA, I.: Knowledge organization by systematic knowledge management and discovery. BREITENSTEIN, M.: Classification, culture studies, and the experience of the individual: three methods for knowledge discovery. CHRISTENSEN, F.S.: Power and the production of truth in the sciences. LABARRE, K. : Bliss and Ranganathan: synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes?. NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization tools: S.R. Ranganathan's contributions. BROUGHTON, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines: implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments. BEGHTOL, C.: A whole, its kinds, and its parts. FALLIS, D., K. MATHIESEN: Consistency rules for classification schemes (or how to organize your beanie babies). CAMPBELL, G.: The relevance of traditional classification principles in the development and use of semantic markup languages for electronic text. KENT, R.E.: The information flow foundation for conceptual knowledge organization.
    BEAN, C.A.: Mapping down: semantic and structural relationships in user-designated broader-narrow term pairs. DE MOYA-ANEGÓN, F., M.J. LÓPEZ-HUERTAS: An automatic model for updating the conceptual structure of a scientific discipline. BARTOLO, L.M., A.M. TRIMBLE: Heterogeneous structures project database: vocabulary mapping within a multidisciplinary, multiinstitutional research group. FRÂNCU, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus: advantages and limitations. PRISS, U.: Comparing classification systems using facets. WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Thesauri in the digital age: stability and dynamism in their development and use. SIGEL, A.: How can user-oriented depth analysis be constructively guided?. SAGGION, H., G. LAPALME: Selective analysis for the automatic generation of summaries. POLLITT, A.S., A.J. TINKER: Enhanced view-based searching through the decomposition of Dewey Decimal Classification codes. RADEMAKER, C.A.: The classification of ornamental designs in the United States Patent Classification System. HUBER, J.T., M.L. GILLASPY: An examination of the discourse of homosexuality as reflected in medical vocabularies, classificatory structures, and information resources. HE, Q.: A study of the strength indexes in co-word analysis. GREEN, R.: Automated identification of frame semantic relational structures. MCILWAINE, I.C.: Interdisciplinarity: a new retrieval problem?. DAVENPORT, E., H. ROSENBAUM: A system for organizing situational knowledge in the workplace that is based on the shape of documents. HOWARTH, L.C.: Designing a "Human Understandable" metalevel ontology for enhancing resource discovery in knowledge bases. IHADJADENE, M., R. BOUCHÉ u. R. ZÂAFRANI: The dynamic nature of searching and browsing on Web-OPACs: the CATHIE experience. DING, Y., G. CHOWDHURY u. S. FOO: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment: a methodology based on co-word analysis. HUDON, M.: Innovation and tradition in knowledge organization schemes on the Internet, or, Finding one's way in the virtual library. CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software. DEVADASON, F.J., P. PATAMAWONGJARIYA: FAHOO: faceted alphabetico-hierachically organized objects systems. KWASNIK, B.H., X. LIU: Classification structures in the changing environment of active commercial websites: the case of eBay.com.
    ARDÖ, A., J. GODBY u. A. HOUGHTON u.a.: Browsing engineering resources on the Web: a general knowledge organization scheme (Dewey) vs. a special scheme (EI). DRON, J., C. BOYNE u. R. MITCHELL u.a.: Darwin among the indices: a report on COFIND, a self-organising resource base. VAN DER WALT, M.: South African search engines, directories and portals: a survey and evaluation. GARCIA, L.S., S.M.M. OLIVEIRA u. G.M.S. LUZ: Knowledge organization for query elaboration and support for technical response by the Internet. OHLY, H.P.: Information and organizational knowledge faced with contemporary knowledge theories: unveiling the strength of the myth. POLANCO, X., C. FRANCOIS: Data clustering and cluster mapping or visualization in text processing and mining. BOWKER, L.: A corpus-based investigation of variation in the organization of medical terms. CRAIG, B.L.: Rethinking official knowing and its practices: the British Treasury's Registry between the Two World Wars. BUCKLAND, M.K., A. CHEN u. M. GEBBIE u.a.: Variation by subdomain in indexes to knowledge organization systems. HUDON, M., J.M. TURNER u. Y. DEVIN: How many terms are enough?: stability and dynamism in vocabulary management for moving image collections. ARSENAULT, C.: Testing the impact of syllable aggregation in romanized fields of Chinese language bibliographic records. HE, S.: Conceptual equivalence and representational difference in terminology translation of English computer terms in simplified Chinese and traditional Chinese. SMIRAGLIA, R.P.: Works as signs and canons: towards an epistemology of the work. CARLYLE, A., J. SUMMERLIN: Transforming catalog displays: records clustering for works of fiction. HILDRETH, C.R.: Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors?: an experimental study. RIESTHUIS, G.J.A.: Multilingual subject access and the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri: an experimental study.
  11. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.07
    0.07048696 = product of:
      0.16446958 = sum of:
        0.026838662 = weight(_text_:subject in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026838662 = score(doc=2047,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24992225 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.046132706 = weight(_text_:classification in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046132706 = score(doc=2047,freq=94.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48245123 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              9.69536 = tf(freq=94.0), with freq of:
                94.0 = termFreq=94.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.00949952 = product of:
          0.01899904 = sum of:
            0.01899904 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01899904 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.11824705 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031797994 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031797994 = score(doc=2047,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27203473 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.046132706 = weight(_text_:classification in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046132706 = score(doc=2047,freq=94.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.48245123 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              9.69536 = tf(freq=94.0), with freq of:
                94.0 = termFreq=94.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.004068001 = product of:
          0.008136002 = sum of:
            0.008136002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008136002 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
    PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
  12. Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century : integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference, 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain (2003) 0.07
    0.06968306 = product of:
      0.1625938 = sum of:
        0.0189778 = weight(_text_:subject in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0189778 = score(doc=2679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17672172 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
        0.024262283 = weight(_text_:classification in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024262283 = score(doc=2679,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.25373253 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
        0.01899904 = product of:
          0.03799808 = sum of:
            0.03799808 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03799808 = score(doc=2679,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2364941 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053607818 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053607818 = score(doc=2679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19862711 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
        0.022484576 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022484576 = score(doc=2679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.1923576 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
        0.024262283 = weight(_text_:classification in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024262283 = score(doc=2679,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.25373253 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Rebecca GREEN: Conceptual Universals in Knowledge Organization and Representation; 1. Theoretical Models and Universals in Knowledge Organization and Representation Jack ANDERSEN: Ascribing Cognitive Authority to Scholarly Documents an the (Possible) Role of Knowledge Organization in Scholarly Communication; Elin K. JACOB: Augmenting Human Capabilities: Classification as Cognitive Scaffolding; Clare BEGHTOL: Universal Concepts, Cultural Warrant and Cultural Hospitality; Maria Nélida GONZÁLEZ DE GÓMEZ: Knowledge, Communication, Information: Intersubject Links Institutional and Technological Mediations in Information; Joe TENNIS: Subject Ontogeny: Subject Access Through Time and the Dimensionality of Classification; 2. Epistemological Foundations for Knowledge Structures and Analysis Nuno SILVA and Joáo ROCHA: Merging Ontologies Using a Bottom-Up Lexical and Structural Approach; Giliola NEGRINI and Patrizia ZOZI: Ontological Analysis of the Literary Work of Art; Jarmo SAARTI: The Analysis of the Information Process of Fiction: a Holistic Approach to Information Processing; N.Y. KOBASHI, J.W. SMIT and M. de F.G.M. TÁLAMO: Constitution of the Scientific Domain of Information Science; 3. Models and Methods for Knowledge Representation Anita COLEMAN: A Classification of Models; Gian Piero ZARRI: Indexing and Querying of Narrative Documents, a Knowledge Representation Approach: Jeremy J. SHAPIRO: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration and Intellectual Creativity; Rahmatollah FATTAHI and Mehri PARIROKH: Restructuring the Bibliographic Record for Better Organization, Management, and Representation of Knowledge in the Global Online Environment: a New Approach; Devika P. MADALLI and A.R.D. PRASSAD: Vyasa: a Knowledge Representation System for Automatic Maintenance of Analytico-Synthetic Scheme; Catalina NAUMIS PENA: Images and Words; 4. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization. Tools and Systems Maria Ines CORDEIRO and Aida SLAVIC: Data Models for Knowledge Organization Tools: Evolution and Perspectives; Vanda BROUGHTON: Facet Analytical Theory as a Basis for Knowledge Oganization Tool in a Subject Portal; Stella G DEXTRE CLARKE: Planning Controlled Vocabularies for the Uk Public; Sector Widad MUSTAFA el HADI: Terminology & Information Retrieval: New Tools for New Needs. Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries; Hur-Li LEE and Allyson CARLYLE: Academic Library Gateways to Online Information: a Taxonomy of Organizational Structures; 5. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization and Retrieval Gerhard J.A. RIESTHUIS and Maja ZUMER: The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Knowledge Organization; Rochelle KEDAR and Snunith SHOHAM: The Subject Cataloging Of Monographs With The Use Of a Thesaurus; Ana PÉREZ LÓPEZ, Mercedes DE LA MONEDA and Ángel MOROS RAMÍREZ: Application of the Cantor set Theory in Making Decision about the Collection Development; Hemalata IYER and Jeanne M. KEEFE: The WordNet as an Auxiliary Resource To Search Visual Image Database In Architecture; Douglas TUDHOPE, Ceri BINDING, Dorothee BLOCKS and Daniel CUNLIFFE: Representation and Retrieval in Faceted Systems;
    6. Organization of Integrated Knowledge in the Electronic Environment. The Internet José Antonio SALVADOR OLIVÁN, José Maria ANGÓS ULLATE and Maria Jesús FERNÁNDEZ RUÍZ: Organization of the Information about Health Resources an the Internet; Eduardo PEIS, Antonio RUIZ, Francisco J. MUNOZ-FERNÁNDEZ and Francisco de ALBA QUINONES: Practical Method to Code Archive Findings Aids in Internet Marthinus; S. VAN DER WALT: An Integrated Model For The Organization Of Electronic Information/Knowledge in Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (Smme's) in South Africa; Ricardo EITO BRUN: Software Development and Reuse as Knowledge Management; Practice Roberto POLI: Framing Information; 7. Models and Methods for Knowledge Organization and Conceptual Relationships Terence R. SMITH, Marcia Lei ZENG, and ADEPT Knowledge Organization Team: Structured Models of Scientific Concepts for Organizing, Accessing, and Using Learning Materials; M. OUSSALAH, F. GIRET and T. KHAMMACI: A kr Multi-hierarchies/Multi-Views Model for the Development of Complex Systems; Jonathan FURNER: A Unifying Model of Document Relatedness for Hybrid Search Engines; José Manuel BARRUECO and Vicente Julián INGLADA: Reference Linking in Economics: The Citec Project; Allyson CARLYLE and Lisa M. FUSCO: Equivalence in Tillett's Bibliographic Relationships Taxonomy: a Revision; José Antonio FRÍAS and Ana Belén RÍOS HILARIO: Visibility and Invisibility of the Kindship Relationships in Bibliographic Families of the Library Catalogue; 8. Integration of Knowledge in the Internet. Representing Knowledge in Web Sites Houssem ASSADI and Thomas BEAUVISAGE: A Comparative Study of Six French-Speaking Web Directories; Barbara H. KWASNIK: Commercial Web Sites and The Use of Classification Schemes: The Case of Amazon.Com; Jorge SERRANO COBOS and Ana M' QUINTERO ORTA: Design, Development and Management of an Information Recovery System for an Internet Website: from Documentary Theory to Practice; José Luis HERRERA MORILLAS and M' del Rosario FERNÁNDEZ FALERO: Information and Resources About Bibliographic Heritage an The Web Sites of the Spanish Universities; J.F. ALDANA, A.C. GÓMEZ, N. MORENO, A. J. NEBRO, M.M. ROLDÁN: Metadata Functionality for Semantic Web Integration; Uta PRISS: Alternatives to the "Semantic Web": Multi-Strategy Knowledge Representation; 9. Models and Methods for Knowledge Integration in Information Systems Rebecca GREEN, Carol A. BEAN and Michele HUDON: Universality And Basic Level Concepts; Grant CAMPBELL: Chronotope And Classification: How Space-Time Configurations Affect the Gathering of Industrial Statistical Data; Marianne LYKKE NIELSEN and Anna GJERLUF ESLAU: Corporate Thesauri - How to Ensure Integration of Knowledge and Reflections of Diversity; Nancy WILLIAMSON: Knowledge Integration and Classification Schemes; M.V. HURTADO, L. GARCIA and J.PARETS: Semantic Views over Heterogeneous and Distributed Data Repositories: Integration of Information System Based an Ontologies; Fernando ELICHIRIGOITY and Cheryl KNOTT MALONE: Representing the Global Economy: the North American Industry Classification System;
    10. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Information Retrieval (Part I) Christopher S.G. KHOO, Karen NG and Shiyan OU: An Exploratory Study of Human Clustering Of Web Pages; Stephane CHAUDIRON, Majid IHADJADENE and François ROLE: Authorial Index Browsing in an XML Digital Library; Xavier POLANCO: Clusters, Graphs, and Networks for Analyzing Internet-Web-Supported Communication within a Virtual Community; E. HERRERA-VIEDMA, O. CORDÓN, J.C. HERRERA, M. LUQUE: An IRS Based an Multi-Granular Linguistic Information; Pedro CUESTA, Alma M. GÓMEZ and Francisco J. RODRÍGUEZ: Using Agents for Information Retrieval; 11. Integration of Knowledge in Multicultural Domain-Oriented and General Systems. (Part I) Antonio GARCIA JIMANEZ, Alberto DÍAZ ESTEBAN and Pablo GERVÁS: Knowledge Organization in a Multilingual System for the Personalization of Digital News Services: How to Integrate Knowledge; Marfa J. LÓPEZ-HUERTAS and Mario BARITA: Knowledge Representation and Organization of Gender Studies an the Internet: Towards Integration; Victoria FRANCU: Language-Independent Structures and Multilingual Information Access Annelise Mark PEJTERSEN and Hanne ALBRECHTSEN Models for Collaborative Integration of Knowledge; 12. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Information Retrieval (Part II) C. LOPEZ-PUJALTE, V.P. GUERRERO, F. de MOYA-ANEGÓN: Evaluation of the Application of Genetic Algorithms to Relevance Feedback; O. CORDÓN, E. HERRERA-VIEDMA, M. LUQUE, F. de MOYA,ANEGÓN and C. ZARCO: An Inductive Query by Example Technique for Extended Boolean Queries Based an Simulated Annealing-Programming; Vfctor HERRERO-SOLANA and F. de MOYA-ANEGÓN: Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC) for Library Collections: the Aplication of UDC Codes for the Subject Maps; Luis M. CAMPOS, Juan M. FERNEZ-LUNA and Juan HUSTE: Managing Documents with Bayesian Belief Networks: A Brief Survey of Applications and Models; 13. Epistemological Approaches to Classification Principles, Design and Construction Birger HJOERLAND: The Methodology Of Constructing Classification Schemes: A discussion of the State-of-the-Art; Hope OLSON, Juliet NIELSEN and Shona R. DIPPIE: Encyclopaedist Rivalry, Classificatory Commonality, Illusory Universality; Jian QIN: Evolving Paradigms of Knowledge Representation and Organization: A Comparative Study of classification, XML/DTD and Ontology; Jens-Erik MAI: Is Classification Theory Possible? Rethinking Classification Research; I.C. McILWAINE: Where Have All The Flowers Gone? An Investigation Into The Fate of Some Special Classification Schemes; 14. Professional Ethics. Users and Information Structures. Evaluation of Systems J. Carlos FERNÁNDEZ-MOLINA and J. Augusto c. GUIMARAES: Ethical Aspects of Knowledge Organization and Representation in the Digital Environment: Their Articulation in Professional Codes of Ethics; Ali Asghar SHIRI, Crawford REVIE and Gobinda CHOWDHURY: Assessing the Impact of User Interaction with Thesaural Knowledge Structures: A Quantitative Analysis Framework; Carmen CARO CASTRO and Críspulo TRAVIESO RODRÍGUEZ: Ariadne's Thread: Knowledge Structures for Browsing in OPAC's; Linda BANWELL: Developing and Evaluation Framework For a Supranational Digital Library; Antonio L. GARCIA GUTIÉRREZ: Knowledge Organization From a "culture of the Border": Towards a Transcultural Ethics of Mediation; Christopher KING, David H. MARWICK and M. Howard WILLIAMS: The Importance of Context in Resolving of Confliets when Sharing User Profiles;
    15. Integration of Knowledge in Multicultural Domain-Oriented and General.(Part II) Richard P. SMIRAGLIA: Crossing Cultural Boundaries: Perspectives an the Popularity of Works; A. NEELAMEGHAN and Hemalata IYER: Some Patterns of Information Presentation, Organization and Indexing for communication Across Cultures and Faiths; Maria Odaisa ESPINHEIRO DE OLIVEIRA: Knowledge Representation from Amazonian Narratives; Evelyn Goyanes Dill ORRICO: Metaphorical Representations of the Thematic Identity of Social Groups in the Assistance of Information Retrieval 16. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Information Retrieval (Part III) F. MARTÍNEZ, M.T. MARTIN, V. M. RIVAS, M.C. DÍAZ and L.A. URENA: Using Neural Networks for Multiword Recognition in IR; E. PEIS, E. HERRERA-VIEDMA, J.C. HERRERA: On the Evaluation of XML Documents Using Fuzzy Linguistic Techniques; V.P. GUERRERO, C. LÓPEZ-PUJALTE, C. FABA, M.J. REYES, F. ZAPICO and F. de MOYA-ANEGÓN: Artificial Neural Networks Applied to Information Retrieval; I. BLANCO, M.J. MARTÍN-BAUTISTA, D. SÁNCHEZ, A. VILA: Fuzzy Logic for Measuring Information Retrieval Effectiviness
  13. Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization : Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India (2012) 0.07
    0.06731425 = product of:
      0.1884799 = sum of:
        0.02372225 = weight(_text_:subject in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02372225 = score(doc=986,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.22090214 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
        0.026599284 = weight(_text_:classification in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026599284 = score(doc=986,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27817267 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
        0.016792938 = product of:
          0.033585876 = sum of:
            0.033585876 = weight(_text_:schemes in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033585876 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.20903322 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.09476613 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09476613 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35112646 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
        0.026599284 = weight(_text_:classification in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026599284 = score(doc=986,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27817267 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: KEYNOTE ADDRESS Richard P. Smiraglia. Universes, Dimensions, Domains, Intensions and Extensions: Knowledge Organization for the 21st Century DOMAIN OF KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Birger Hjorland. Is Knowledge Organization = Information Organization? - H.Peter Ohly. Mission, Programs and Challenges of Knowledge Organization - Rick Szostak. The Basic Concepts Classification - José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Ely Tannuri de Oliveira and Maria Cláudia Cabrini Gracio. Theoretical Referents in Knowledge Organization: A Domain Analysis of Knowledge Organization Journal - José Augusto Chaves Guimarães and Joseph T. Tennis. Constant Pioneers: The Citation Frontiers of Indexing Theory in the ISKO International Proceedings- Aline Elis Arboit, Maria Cláudia Cabrini Gracio, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira and Leilah Santiago Bufrem. Relationship Between Authors and Main Subject Categories in the Knowledge Organization Domain: A Bibliometric Approach
    GENERAL CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES Almila Akdag Salah, Cheng Gao, Krzysztof Suchecki, Andrea Scharnhorst, and Richard P. Smiraglia. The Evolution of Classification Systems: Ontogeny of the UDC - Joseph T. Tennis. Facets and Fugit Tempus: Considering Time.s Effect on Faceted Classification Schemes - B.A. Sharada. Ranganathan's Colon Classification: Kannada-English Version .dwibindu vargiikaraNa. - KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT Carolyn Watters and Naureen Nizam. Knowledge Organization on the Web: The Emergent Role of Social Classification - M. Cristina Pattuelli and Sara Rubinow. Charting DBpedia: Towards a Cartography of a Major Linked Dataset - Christopher S.G. Khoo. Dong Zhang, Mi Wang and Xin Jie Yun. Subject Organization in Three Types of Information Resources: An Exploratory Study - Kavi Mahesh and Pallavi Karanth. A Novel Knowledge Organization Scheme for the Web: Superlinks with Semantic Roles - Gercina Angela Borem de Oliveira Lima. Conceptual Modeling of Hypertexts: Methodological Proposal for the Management of Semantic Content in Digital Libraries - Evelyn Orrico, Vera Dodebei and Miriam Gontijo. The Precision of Metaphor for Information Retrieval
    KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION AS A NAVIGATION TOOL Charles-Antoine Julien, Pierre Tirilly, John. E. Leide and Catherine Guastavino. Using the LCSH Hierarchy to Browse a Collection - Pierre Tirilly and Charles-Antoine Julien. Random Walks for Subject Hierarchy Simplification - Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan and Gercina Ângela Borém de Oliveira Lima. Faceted Taxonomy as Mechanism for Browsing and Accessing Digital Libraries of Thesis and Dissertations: A Case Study ONTOLOGY Michael Shepherd and Tara Sampalli. Ontology as Boundary Object - Flávio Codeço Coelho, Renato Rocha Souza and Claudia Torres Codeço. Towards an Ontology for Mathematical Modeling with Application to Epidemiology - T. Padmavathy and M. Krishnamurthy. Ontological Representation of Knowledge for Developing Information Services in Food Science and Technology - Sangeeta Deokattey, D.K. Dixit and K. Bhanumurthy. Co-word and Facet Analysis as Tools for Conceptualization in Ontologies: a Preliminary Study for a Micro-Domain
    CATEGORIES IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION L. Hajibayova and E. K. Jacob. A Theoretical Framework for Operationalizing Basic Level Categories in Knowledge Organization Research - A. Y. Asundi. Epistemological Basis of some Common Categories - A Study of Space and Time As Common Concepts - A. Y. Asundi. Domain Specific Categories and Relations and their Potential Applications: A Case Study of Two Arrays of Agriculture Schedule of Colon Classification RELATIONSHIPS IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION K. S. Raghavan and A. Neelameghan. Indic Cultures and Concepts: Implications for Knowledge Organization - Eduardo Ismael Murguia and Rodrigo de Sales. CNPq.s Knowledge Area Table as a Knowledge and Power Apparatus - Maja Zumer, Marcia Lei Zeng and Joan S. Mitchell. FRBRizing KOS Relationships: Applying the FRBR Model to Versions of the DDC - D. Grant Campbell. Farradane.s Relational Indexing and its Relationship to Hyperlinking in Alzheimer.s Information - Elizabeth Milonas. Classifying Web Term Relationships: An Examination of the Search Result Pages of Two Major Search Engines - Rosa San Sengundo and Daniel Martinez Avila. New Conceptual Structures for the Digital Environment: From KOS to the Semantic Interconnection - A. Neelameghan and K.S. Raghavan. Concept of .Time., Semantic Relationships and Cultural Frames
    KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR SPECIFIC DOMAINS Laurence Favier and Widad Mustafa El Hadi. From Text to Image: The Concept of Universality in Knowledge Organization Systems Designed by Paul Otlet and the International Institute of Bibliography - Kathryn La Barre and Rosa Inês de Novais Cordeiro. Unmasking "That Obscure Object of Desire.: A Brief Report from the Films and Facets Project - Hemalatha Iyer and Amber D'Ambrosio. Archetypes, Idealized Cognitive Model and Prototype Effect: A Discussion of Images and Cognition in Categorization - Perspectives for Knowledge Organization - João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. Aboutness in Fiction: Methodological Perspectives for Knowledge Organization - Shu-jiun Chen, Marcia Lei Zeng and Hsueh-hua Chen. Alignment of Conceptual Structures in Controlled Vocabularies in the Domain of Chinese Art - A Discussion of Issues and Patterns - Miriam Gontijo, Vera Dodebei and Evelyn Orrico. Discourse Analysis as an Approach to Categorizing the Domain of Public Policy: The Case of Brazilian E-Government
    KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR ARCHIVES Renato Rocha Souza, Flávio Codeço Coelho and Suemi Higuchi. The CPDOC Semantic Portal: Applying Semantic and Knowledge Organization Systems to the Brazilian Contemporary History Domain - Natália Bolfarini Tognoli and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães. Challenges of Knowledge Representation in Contemporary Archival Science - Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. Archival Classification and Knowledge Organization: Theoretical Possibilities for the Archival Field - Pekka Henttonen. Diversity of Knowledge Organization in Records and Archives Management DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION TOOLS Leonard Will. The ISO 25964 Data Model for the Structure of an Information Retrieval Thesaurus - Wieslaw Babik. A Faceted Classification of Cartographic Materials: Problems of Construction and Use - Ming-Shu, Yuan, Fan-Hua, Nan and Gou-Chi, Lee. Constructing Knowledge Classification Scheme in Industrial Technology via Domain Analysis: An Empirical Study - B.L. Vinod Kumar and Khaiser Nikam. Sanskrit-English Bilingual Thesaurus for Yogic Sciences: A Case Study of Problems and Issues with Terms of Non-Latin Origin - Emilena Josemary Lorenzon, Luciana de Souza Gracioso, Marco Donizete Paulino da Silva, Marcele Tinelli, Roniberto Morato Amaral, Leandro Innocentini Lopes de Faria and Wanda Aparecida Machado Hoffmann. Controlled Vocabulary for Intelligence Information System for Shoes
    INFORMATION MINING / AUTOMATIC INDEXING Flávio Codeço Coelho, Renato Rocha Souza, Daniel Magalhães Chada and Pablo de Camargo Cerdeira. Information Mining and Visualization of Data from the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF): A Case Study - Carlos Alberto Correa and Nair Yumiko Kobashi. Automatic Indexing and Information Visualization: A Study Based on Paraconsistent Logics - Nalini A. Raja. Digitized Contents and Index Pages as Alternative Subject Access Fields USERS AND CONTEXT Carol L. Tilley and Kathryn A. La Barre. What if they build it and no one comes? Balancing Full-Text Access and User Tasks - Sholeh Arastoopoor and Rahmatollah Fattahi. Users. perception of Aboutness and Ofness in Images: An Approach to Subject Indexing Based on Ervin Panofsky's Theory and Users' View - Melodie J. Fox. Communities of Practice, Gender and Social Tagging - Radia Bernaoui and Mohmed Hassoun. User Expectations and Reality and Delineation of Agricultural Information Systems in the Maghreb ABSTRACTS OF POSTERS
  14. Ordering systems for global information networks : Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay, 1975 (1979) 0.06
    0.06474902 = product of:
      0.18129724 = sum of:
        0.039295964 = weight(_text_:subject in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039295964 = score(doc=3431,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.36592492 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.05396444 = weight(_text_:classification in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05396444 = score(doc=3431,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5643547 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.01662416 = product of:
          0.03324832 = sum of:
            0.03324832 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03324832 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.20693234 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05396444 = weight(_text_:classification in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05396444 = score(doc=3431,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5643547 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.017448233 = product of:
          0.034896467 = sum of:
            0.034896467 = weight(_text_:texts in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034896467 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.21199921 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Universal classification I. Subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research ... , S.6-18 (H. Beck); Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 97(1983) S.435-450 (H. Beck)
  15. Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989) 0.06
    0.05964731 = product of:
      0.20876558 = sum of:
        0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05092278 = score(doc=2071,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
        0.06383829 = weight(_text_:classification in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06383829 = score(doc=2071,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.66761446 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
        0.06383829 = weight(_text_:classification in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06383829 = score(doc=2071,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.66761446 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of a conference addressing issues in classification theory and practice especially oriented towards online environments.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
  16. Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA (1994) 0.06
    0.058809437 = product of:
      0.16466641 = sum of:
        0.016974261 = weight(_text_:subject in 8883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016974261 = score(doc=8883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 8883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8883)
        0.050356317 = weight(_text_:classification in 8883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050356317 = score(doc=8883,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52662134 = fieldWeight in 8883, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8883)
        0.026868701 = product of:
          0.053737402 = sum of:
            0.053737402 = weight(_text_:schemes in 8883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053737402 = score(doc=8883,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.33445317 = fieldWeight in 8883, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020110816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020110816 = score(doc=8883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17204987 = fieldWeight in 8883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8883)
        0.050356317 = weight(_text_:classification in 8883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050356317 = score(doc=8883,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52662134 = fieldWeight in 8883, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8883)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ALBRECHTSEN, H. u. B. HJØRLAND: Understanding of language and cognition: implications for classification research; BOWKER, L. u. T.C. LETHBRIDGE: Code4: application for managing classification schemes; DUBIN, D., B.H. KWASNIK u. C. TANGMANEE: Elicitation techniques for classification research: pt.1: ordered trees, pt.2: repertory grids, pt.3: q-methodology; EASTMAN, C.M. u. R.M. CARTER: Anthropological perspectives on classification schemes; GIGUERE, M., S. SHADIE u. J. GALBRAITH: Object-oriented representation of DDC and the number-builiding process; HERT, C.A.: Information technology standardization: a classification process?; LUSTIGMAN, M. u. M.M. LUSTIGMAN: Bibliographic classification of documents dealing with the subject 'Holocaust'; MUCHONEY, D.M.: Relationships and divergence of vegetation and mapping classifications; PARSONS, J.: On the relevance of classification theory to database design; RANNEY, M., P. SCHANK, C. HOADLEY u. J. NEFF: I know one when I see one: how (much) do hypotheses differ from evidence? SOERGEL, D.: Software support for thesaurus construction and display; WILLIAMSON, N.: The Universal Decimal Classification: research to determine the feasibility of restructuring UDC into a fully-faceted system; WOO, J.: The relationship between what we know and how we classify: some philosophical bases for inquiry; AGENBROAD, J.E.: Dynamic displays for browsing hierarchical classifications; ASHKAR, C.S.: Updating the thesaurus of the grants databases for the University of Tennessee; BÖRSTLER, J.: Using feature-oriented classification in software reuse; CONNAWAY, L.S. u. M.E.C. SIEVERT: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance; GIRARDI, M.R. u. B. IBRAHIM: A classification scheme for software artifacts; SHAOYI HE: Conceptual graphs as semantic representation of noun-noun compounds in English and Chinese; ROSE, J.R. u. C.M. EASTMAN: Hierarchical classification as an aid to browsing; WEISBROD, D.: OPACs, integrated thesauri, and user language; DEH-MIN, W.: Classification of management information: a perspective from recognition and its semantics
  17. Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996) 0.05
    0.05442307 = product of:
      0.19048074 = sum of:
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.08532297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08532297 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.024408007 = product of:
          0.048816014 = sum of:
            0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048816014 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Footnote
    Siehe auch unter: Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: Pattie, L.-Y.W. u. B.J. Cox. New York: Haworth 1996.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
  18. Cataloging and classification : trends, transformations, teaching, and training (1997) 0.05
    0.051906887 = product of:
      0.14533928 = sum of:
        0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021217827 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
        0.03761707 = weight(_text_:classification in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03761707 = score(doc=2111,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39339557 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
        0.0237488 = product of:
          0.0474976 = sum of:
            0.0474976 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0474976 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2956176 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02513852 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
        0.03761707 = weight(_text_:classification in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03761707 = score(doc=2111,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39339557 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Content
    Introduction: incorporating the innovations - The cataloger - The Work-Wide Web: a cataloguging career for every librarian? - Changes in technical services and their effect of the role of catalogers and staff education: an overview - Cataloging across the curriculum: a syndetic structure for teaching cataloging - Nice work if you can get it? A study of patterns and trends in cataloging employment in the USA and the UK in the mid-1990s - The future of classification systems - Classification schemes: consultation with users and cooperation between editors - Classification and subject analysis: looking to the future at a distance - New technology and its implications - Knowledge, technology and research in cataloging - Webolution: rethinking the technical services knowledge base and culture in a Web-based information environment - A personal portable information interface: a model for meeting user needs in the networked information environment - The evolving OPAC - The Internet as a tool for descriptive cataloging - A director's perspective - The cataloger's future: a director's view
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 25(1998) nos.1/2, S.49 (M.P. Satija); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 27(1998) no.2, S.44 (J.H. Bowman)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.24, nos.1/2
  19. Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957 (1957) 0.05
    0.048547477 = product of:
      0.22655489 = sum of:
        0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048010457 = score(doc=563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089272216 = score(doc=563,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089272216 = score(doc=563,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline; SHERA, J.H.: Pattern, structure, and conceptualization in classification for information retrieval; MILLS, J.: Classification of a subject field; VICKERY, B.C.: Relations between subject fields: problems of constructing a general classification; COATES, E.J.: Notation in classification; FARRADANE, J.: Classification and mechanical selection; BALL, N.T.: Contributions of classification to science; GROLIER, E. de: Concluding survey; FOSKETT, D.J.: Occupational safety and health documents classification scheme; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (Memorandum of the Classification Research Group)
  20. Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions : Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, 14.-15.5.1971 (1972) 0.05
    0.047510225 = product of:
      0.16628578 = sum of:
        0.066422306 = weight(_text_:subject in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066422306 = score(doc=289,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
        0.03324832 = product of:
          0.06649664 = sum of:
            0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06649664 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033307575 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: WELLISCH, H.H.: Subject retrieval in the seventies: methods, problems, prospects; GROLIER, E. de: Recent research trends in the field of information retrieval languages; SOERGEL, D.: A general model for indexing languages: the basis for compatibility and integration; WILSON, T.D.: The work of the British Classification Research Group; AITCHISON, J.: Thesaurofacet: a new concept in subject retrieval schemes; AUSTIN, D.: The PRECIS system for computer-generated indexes and its use in the British National Bibliography; LLOYD, G.A.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international switching language; RIGBY, M.: The UDC in mechanized subject information retrieval; ANGELL, R.S.: Library of Congress Subject Headings: review and forecast

Languages

  • e 324
  • d 49
  • m 27
  • es 2
  • i 2
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • m 168
  • el 5
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications