-
Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985)
0.49
0.4919159 = product of:
0.7652025 = sum of:
0.024005229 = weight(_text_:subject in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024005229 = score(doc=3621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.22353725 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=3621,freq=48.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
48.0 = termFreq=48.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.01899904 = product of:
0.03799808 = sum of:
0.03799808 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03799808 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2364941 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11260712 = product of:
0.22521424 = sum of:
0.22521424 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22521424 = score(doc=3621,freq=22.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.0485414 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08170141 = weight(_text_:henry in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08170141 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34678018 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.107215635 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107215635 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39725423 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.22521424 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22521424 = score(doc=3621,freq=22.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.0485414 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.06359599 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06359599 = score(doc=3621,freq=20.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.54406947 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=3621,freq=48.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
48.0 = termFreq=48.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.64285713 = coord(9/14)
- Abstract
- Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
- Footnote
- Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Curwen, A.G.: Bliss for beginners (1989)
0.24
0.24423441 = product of:
0.85482043 = sum of:
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.24007918 = product of:
0.48015836 = sum of:
0.48015836 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.48015836 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
2.2354977 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.48015836 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.48015836 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
2.2354977 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Source
- Bliss classification bulletin. 1989, no.31, S.14-17
-
Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986)
0.23
0.23240851 = product of:
0.5422865 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1569,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.1347441 = product of:
0.2694882 = sum of:
0.2694882 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2694882 = score(doc=1569,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.2546699 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2694882 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2694882 = score(doc=1569,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.2546699 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.042661484 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042661484 = score(doc=1569,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1569,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
-
Campbell, D.J.: ¬A summary of reviews of and published comments on the 2nd edition of the Bibliographic Classification. (1980)
0.23
0.22861941 = product of:
0.64013433 = sum of:
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=4951,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.13580929 = product of:
0.27161857 = sum of:
0.27161857 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27161857 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27161857 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27161857 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=4951,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Source
- Bliss classification bulletin. 7(1980), S.18-30
-
Mills, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification : the new Bliss Classification (BC2) (1982)
0.18
0.18499757 = product of:
0.5179932 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=21,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.10185697 = product of:
0.20371394 = sum of:
0.20371394 = weight(_text_:bliss in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20371394 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.20371394 = weight(_text_:bliss in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20371394 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=21,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Bury, S.: Ranganathan's theories embodied in both Colon Classification and the second edition of Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (1988)
0.17
0.17146455 = product of:
0.48010072 = sum of:
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.10185697 = product of:
0.20371394 = sum of:
0.20371394 = weight(_text_:bliss in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20371394 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.20371394 = weight(_text_:bliss in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20371394 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
-
Aitchison, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986)
0.17
0.1706026 = product of:
0.47768727 = sum of:
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=1570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.12003959 = product of:
0.24007918 = sum of:
0.24007918 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24007918 = score(doc=1570,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.24007918 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24007918 = score(doc=1570,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=1570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=1570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.16
0.16321784 = product of:
0.45700994 = sum of:
0.039739996 = product of:
0.11921998 = sum of:
0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11921998 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11921998 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.05960999 = product of:
0.11921998 = sum of:
0.11921998 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11921998 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11921998 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.11921998 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11921998 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25455406 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Ranganathan's philosophy : assessment, impact and relevance. Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Libary Association and co-sponsored by Sarada Ranganathan's Endowment for Library Science (1986)
0.14
0.14485973 = product of:
0.33800602 = sum of:
0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021217827 = score(doc=8926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.055795137 = weight(_text_:classification in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055795137 = score(doc=8926,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.58349997 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.060019795 = product of:
0.12003959 = sum of:
0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12003959 = score(doc=8926,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12003959 = score(doc=8926,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=8926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.055795137 = weight(_text_:classification in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055795137 = score(doc=8926,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.58349997 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: AITCHISON, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus: the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure; DEVADASON, F.J.: Ranganathan's idea of facet analysis in action; FOSKETT, D.J.: The "personality" of the personaliyt facet; GOPINATH, M.A.: Relevance of Ranganathan's postulational approach in the identification of key concepts in the newly formed subjects and its implications to intellectual organisation of information; IYER, H.: Users preference of sequence of component ideas in subject representation: PMEST model; IYER, H.: Ask hypothesis and Ranganathan's fundamental categories; KASHYAP, M.M.: Ranganathan's postulational approach to classification: its development and impact; KUMAR, P.S.G.: Hidden roots of Colon Classification; LANGRIDGE, D.W.: Disciplines, forms and phenomena; NARASIMHAN, S.: Classification of oriental libraries with the case study of four regions; PARAMESWARAN, M.: The contribution of S.R. Ranganathan in the classification and cataloguing of ancient sanskrit classics; PRASAD, K.N.: Development of classification terminology: contributions of Professor S.R. Ranganathan; SANGAMESWARAN, S.V. u. M.V. GOPINATH: Design and development of depth version of Colon Classification for food technology; SANKARALINGAM, P., RAGHAVAN, K.S. u. P. GANGADHARA RAO: Structure and synthesis in DDC: an analysis; SEETHARAMA, S.: Compatibility issues affecting classification system: relevance of Ranganathan's normative principles; VOHRA, R.: Analytico-synthetic scheme of classification: its impact and relevance to modern thories of classification; DAS, S.P.: Chain procedure and precoordinate indexing; TEJOMURTY, A.: Chain procedure: the first model of pre-coordinate indexing; VINAYAK, K. u. K.K. TANEJA: Chain procedure and its influence on other precoordinate indexing systems; AUSTIN, D.: Standards in documentation: a subjective view
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 13(1986) S.103-105 (K.G.B. Bakewell)
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.13
0.12987468 = product of:
0.25974935 = sum of:
0.039295964 = weight(_text_:subject in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039295964 = score(doc=3631,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.36592492 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.048553713 = weight(_text_:classification in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048553713 = score(doc=3631,freq=34.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5077699 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.01662416 = product of:
0.03324832 = sum of:
0.03324832 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03324832 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.20693234 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029708283 = product of:
0.059416566 = sum of:
0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059416566 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059416566 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.017596964 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017596964 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.15054363 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.048553713 = weight(_text_:classification in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048553713 = score(doc=3631,freq=34.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5077699 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
The Colon Classification has not been widely adopted; however, the theory of facet analysis and synthesis Ranganathan developed has proved to be most influential. Although many theorists of subject analysis do not totally agree with his fundamental categories or citation order, Ranganathan's concept of facet analysis and synthesis has provided a viable method and a framework for approaching subject analysis and has become the foundation of subject analysis in the twentieth century. In this sense, his theory laid the groundwork for later investigations and inquiries into the nature of subject and classificatory categories and citation order. His influence is felt in all modern classification schemes and indexing systems. This is attested to by the citations to his ideas and works in numerous papers included in this collection and by the fact that other modern classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification have become increasingly faceted in recent editions. The following chapter from Elements of Library Classification represents one of Ranganathan's many expositions of facet analysis and fundamental categories. It is chosen because of its clarity of expression and comprehensibility (many readers find the majority of his writings difficult to understand).
- Footnote
- Original in: Ranganathan, S.R.: Elements of library classification. 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House 1962. S.82-89
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980)
0.12
0.12477797 = product of:
0.34937832 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1603,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.03799808 = product of:
0.07599616 = sum of:
0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07599616 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06790464 = product of:
0.13580929 = sum of:
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1603,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
-
Relevance of Ranganathan's contributions to library science : Companion volume to Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Library Association and co-sponsored by the Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 11.-14.11.1985, New Dehli, India (1988)
0.11
0.114309706 = product of:
0.32006717 = sum of:
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=1436,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.06790464 = product of:
0.13580929 = sum of:
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380658 = score(doc=1436,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BURY, S.: Ranganathan's theories embodies in both Colon Classification and the second edition of Bliss' Bibliographic Classification; COATES, E.J.: Ranganathan's thought and its significance for the mechanisation of information storage and retrieval
-
Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985)
0.10
0.10120339 = product of:
0.28336948 = sum of:
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2069,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.040303055 = product of:
0.08060611 = sum of:
0.08060611 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08060611 = score(doc=2069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5016798 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.050928485 = product of:
0.10185697 = sum of:
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2069,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
-
Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985)
0.08
0.08233067 = product of:
0.19210489 = sum of:
0.05087856 = weight(_text_:subject in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05087856 = score(doc=3622,freq=46.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4737823 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.027897568 = weight(_text_:classification in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027897568 = score(doc=3622,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.29174998 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.021220202 = product of:
0.042440403 = sum of:
0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042440403 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.042440403 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042440403 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.021770598 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021770598 = score(doc=3622,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.18624945 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.027897568 = weight(_text_:classification in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027897568 = score(doc=3622,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.29174998 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this reader is to assemble in one place those writings considered to have made significant impact an subject analysis. The items selected are considered to contain thoughts and ideas that best illustrate the courses that subject analysis has taken over the years and that shed light an future directions. Most of the writings in this collection have been widely cited and are well known. Many of them were originally published in books that are no longer in print; others appeared in journals that are not easily accessible to many readers. Reprinting these writings in one collection serves two purposes: it makes them readily available for the study and teaching of subject analysis and it shows the genesis and development of some of the most significant ideas in the field.
Definition and Scope For the purpose of this reader, subject analysis is understood to encompass vocabulary structuring and subject indexing. Vocabulary structuring refers to the constructing of tools, such as classifications, subject heading lists, and thesauri, designed to facilitate the organization and retrieval of information. These tools, though called by different names, are similar in that they structure or control the basic vocabulary of a subject index language by 1) stipulating terms that may be used in the classing or indexing of documents and 2) displaying semantic relationships, such as hierarchy and synonymy, that obtain between these terms. They differ in the kinds of terms and relationships they recognize and in the manner in which these are displayed. Subject indexing refers to the application of a vocabulary, which may be more or less well structured, to indicate the content or aboutness of documents. Traditionally subject indexing limits its domain to only certain types of documents, such as passages within books (back-of-book indexing) or periodical articles, and the expression it uses to only certain types of strings, for example, descriptors or index terms as opposed to subject headings or class numbers. However, in a generalized and more modern sense, subject indexing refers to the indication of the theme or topic of any document, indeed any retrieval artifact, by any meaningful string of alphanumeric characters. The value of construing the meaning of subject analysis broadly is threefold: it permits comparing a variety of approaches to subject analysis; it permits generalizing about these approaches at a relatively high descriptive level, so that principles and objectives are shown in relief; and, most importantly perhaps, it permits a unified view of the traditional and information scientific approaches to subject analysis.
Criteria for Selection In selecting the writings to be included in this reader, we have followed the criteria listed below: 1. Theoretical emphasis. Our focus is an theoretical and philosophical aspects rather than practical or technical considerations. In a number of cases, where several authors have written an the same subject or idea or expressed similar thoughts, the originator of the idea, if this could be determined, was selected. 2. Significance and impact. Our most important criterion is the significance of a particular piece or the contribution that it has made in the field of subject analysis. The impact of the ideas or concepts an subsequent practice in subject analysis has also been considered. 3. Perspicuity. Where multiple choices were available an a particular topic or area, our tendency was to exclude the writings that are obscure or highly technical and would require a high degree of tech nical sophistication an the part of the reader. Comprehensibility and clarity of style were often our guide. Based an the criteria stated above, the following types of writings have generally been excluded: review articles, the how-to-do-it type of writings, and textbook materials. In a way, it would probably be easier to defend the writings that have been included than to justify the exclusions. In a small volume containing writings chosen from a vast amount of available material, it is virtually impossible to arrive at a collection that will satisfy every reader. Each person has his or her own preferences or criteria. Inevitably, personal bias comes into play in assembling such a reader. At least, we hope that in this case the collective bias of three individuals rather than one has helped to provide a certain degree of balance. A number of writings originally selected for inclusion were omitted because of space limitation or failure to secure permission to reprint.
- Content
- Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
- LCSH
- Subject cataloging / Addresses, essays, lectures
Classification / Books / Addresses, essays, lectures
- Subject
- Subject cataloging / Addresses, essays, lectures
Classification / Books / Addresses, essays, lectures
-
Universal classification I : subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conf. of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (1982)
0.08
0.08135771 = product of:
0.22780158 = sum of:
0.02572525 = weight(_text_:subject in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02572525 = score(doc=18,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2395541 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.05647574 = weight(_text_:classification in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05647574 = score(doc=18,freq=46.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.59061766 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.029708283 = product of:
0.059416566 = sum of:
0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059416566 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.059416566 = weight(_text_:bliss in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059416566 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27662873 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.05647574 = weight(_text_:classification in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05647574 = score(doc=18,freq=46.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.59061766 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: GROLIER, E. de: Classifications as a cultural artefacts; FOSKETT, D.J., S. BURY: Concept organisation and universal classification systems; ROLLAND-THOMAS, P.: Towards the establishment of the validity of encyclopedic library classification systems; KASHYAP, C.M.M.: General theory of measurement and theory of subjects; WELLISCH, H.H.: A new classification of the world's language; MILLS, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification: the new BLISS Classification (BC2); GOPINATH, M.A.: Application of general systems theory to the classification theory of Ranganathan; AUSTIN, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations; FELBER; H., W. NEDOBITY: The basis of Wüster's classification research; EISENWORT, W.: Remarks on certain foundational problems of a general theory of terminology; GÖDERT, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles in the area 'technology' (T), 'industry' (I) and 'material culture' (M) - the TIM project; SVENONIUS, E.: Indexical contents; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Classaurus: its fundamentals, design and use; RICHMOND, P.A.: Classification in syndetic structures; CRAVEN, T.C.: The representation of facets in a general concept network for index display generation; CIGANIK, M.: Fuzzy faceted thesaurus construction; DEVADASON, F.J., M. KOTHANDA RAMANUJAM: Computer-aided construction of an 'alphabetic' classaurus; SECHSER, O.: Theoretical generalizations in retrieval system research, their objectivity and relevance; KUMAR, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems; GLICKERT, P.: Gradational classification: a topic-tagging scheme for computerized production of a scannable list; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: A new approach to the classification of fiction; AUSTIN, J.: The AMP classification system for fiction: trial applications and retrieval tests; BONNER, R.: Community information classification research prject: user oriented empirical methods of classification construction; BORKO, H.: The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries; KELM, B., B. MAASSEN: Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließungsarbeit an der Deutschen Bibliothek; JOITA, E., P. ATANASIU, V. TEODORU: The use of ordering systems by different user groups; COCHRANE, P.A.: Classification as a users's tool in online public access catalogs; TRAVIS, I.L.: Faceted classification in an online environment; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Videotex information retrieval systems: the logical development and optimization of tree structures in a general online interactive system; SCHABAS, A.H.: Videotex information systems: complements to the tree structure; WERSIG, G., M. BURKART-SABSOUB: Empirical classification research as a basis of informaton policy; MALANGA, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data; RIGBY, M.: The use of the UDC in automated terminology data banks; SWAYDAN, N.: The universal classification and the needs of libraries in developing countries; MEDER, N.: Family resemblance and empirical classification, cluster analysis: its philosophy of science and strategy of research; KRAUTH, J.: Models of the measurement of similarity; LÖFFLER, G.: Cluster-Strukturvergleiche - Ein Ansatz zur Zusammenhangsanalyse multivariat definierter Raumstrukturen; KRISHNAMURTHY, E.V., VENKATASEKHAR, H.S.: A relational data-base system and query language for storage, manipulation and retrieval of virus data. -
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 97(1983) S.435-450 (H. Beck); International classification 11(1984) S.169-171 (B. Endres-Niggemeyer); DK-Mitteilungen 28(1984) Nr.1, S.3-4 (B. Endres-Niggemeyer)
-
Foskett, D.J.; Bury, S.: Concept organisation and universal classification schemes (1982)
0.07
0.07079503 = product of:
0.24778259 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=17,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
0.05699712 = product of:
0.11399424 = sum of:
0.11399424 = weight(_text_:schemes in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11399424 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7094823 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=17,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.07
0.0702746 = product of:
0.19676888 = sum of:
0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042009152 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Markey, K.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: integration of a library schedule and index into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog (1985)
0.06
0.064001665 = product of:
0.22400582 = sum of:
0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059409913 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070387855 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 14(1985), S.31-34
-
Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989)
0.06
0.05964731 = product of:
0.20876558 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=2071,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.06383829 = weight(_text_:classification in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06383829 = score(doc=2071,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66761446 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.06383829 = weight(_text_:classification in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06383829 = score(doc=2071,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66761446 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of a conference addressing issues in classification theory and practice especially oriented towards online environments.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
-
Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985)
0.06
0.058383856 = product of:
0.20434348 = sum of:
0.029400283 = weight(_text_:subject in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029400283 = score(doc=3629,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2737761 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=3629,freq=24.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.08170141 = weight(_text_:henry in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08170141 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34678018 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=3629,freq=24.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Toward the end of the nineteenth century, Paul Otlet and Henri LaFontaine of Belgium initiated the compilation of an index to all recorded knowledge. Instead of an alphabetical file, they decided to adopt a classified arrangement. For the basis of such an arrangement, they turned to the Dewey Decimal Classification, a system which was gaining wide acceptance in American libraries. With permission secured from Melvil Dewey to expand the system to include details required for an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine began developing what was to become the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). Following the establishment of the Institut International de Bibliographie (IIB), later the Fédération Internationale de Documentation (FID), in 1895, work an the universal index and the classification scheme proceeded under its aegis. In 1905, the classification scheme was published as the Manuel du Répertoire bibliographique universel. While the initial, ambitious project of the universal index was abandoned, the classification scheme itself was widely adopted, particularly in special libraries in Europe. A second edition was published in 1927-1933 under the title Classification décimale universelle. The development and maintanance of the scheme continued with the support of the FID. In the course of its development, the UDC moved further and further away from its prototype, the Dewey Decimal Classification. One of the major differences between the two systems is the use of relators in UDC. The notation adopted by Melvil Dewey for his scheme is a hierarchical one; in other words, the notation reflects the hierarchical relationships among subjects. However, it does not display the relationships among the facets, or aspects, of a particular subject. Furthermore, the use of auxiliaries in the Dewey Decimal Classification, beginning with the form subdivisions and gradually expanding to include geographic subdivisions and finally other auxiliaries in the most recent editions, has been relatively restricted. As an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine felt that their system needed commonly applicable auxiliaries which they called "determinatives."` To this end, a series of special symbols were introduced into the system for the purpose of combining related subjects and indicating different facets or aspects of the main subject. The use of these symbols, called relators, with the auxiliaries has rendered the Universal Decimal Classification a synthetic scheme. In this respect, the UDC has moved much more rapidly than the Dewey Decimal Classification toward becoming a faceted classification. In the following paper, Henry V. Hopwood, a Senior Assistant at the British Patent Office Library during the 1900s, explains the use and rationale of relators, or "marks," as he calls them, in the Universal Decimal Classification.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
