Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographie"
  1. Marco, G.A.: Subject bibliography in the twenty-first century (1988) 0.05
    0.046271957 = product of:
      0.16195184 = sum of:
        0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067897044 = score(doc=430,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes five challenges that will be faced by the compilers of subject bibliographies in the twenty-first century. Because the bibliography of the twenty-first century will need to be selective, the subject bibliographer will need to be a specialist in the discipline as well as bibliographic description. It will be essential for those who write and publish or disseminate subject bibliographies to be most concerned with the precise needs of the end user, rather than the object of the work in itself.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.113-120
  2. trends and prospects : National and international bibliographic databases (1988) 0.04
    0.03527055 = product of:
      0.1645959 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
        0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070387855 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.8, nos.3/4
  3. Lahiri, A.K.: Toward a bibliographic common cause (1987) 0.03
    0.033080112 = product of:
      0.15437385 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
        0.08708239 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08708239 = score(doc=395,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7449978 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article attempts to present a case for a centralized automated national bibliographic system and introduces the idea of cost-benefit analysis relating to this bibliographic common cause.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1987) no.1, S.65-78
  4. Stephens, A.: ¬The British National Bibliographic Service (1988) 0.03
    0.033080112 = product of:
      0.15437385 = sum of:
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.08708239 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08708239 = score(doc=417,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7449978 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library's national bibliographic service and UKMARC database are described in detail. The use of shared cataloguing data in the UK, and overseas distribution of UKMARC records are discussed.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.155-163
  5. Hunstad, S.: Norwegian bibliographic databases and the problem of duplicate records (1988) 0.03
    0.02646409 = product of:
      0.12349908 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
        0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06966591 = score(doc=419,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a view of the structure of libraries and bibliographic databases in Norway and how they deal with duplicate records. Existing library systems are discussed in some detail. However, emphasis is placed on what the author sees as the picture of future library systems in Norway. It is important to note that Norwegian libraries are small when compared to those in other parts of the world.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.239-248
  6. Grignani, E.: Bibliographic databases produced in Italy (1988) 0.03
    0.02646409 = product of:
      0.12349908 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
        0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06966591 = score(doc=422,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The most important bibliographic databases in Italy are surveyed. Among them are the Italian national bibliography, BNI, and the database devoted to Italian books in print, ALICE. Also included are specialized databases such as those in the fields of law, education, economics and science and technology. Because of the lack of an adequate infrastructure for online access, their widespread use has been delayed. However, recent developments, in particular the implementation of the national library service, SBN, promise improvement in the situation.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.225-238
  7. Jones, S.; Browning, L.: ¬The Utlas database design, content and services (1988) 0.02
    0.023724673 = product of:
      0.11071514 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Utlas database with specific reference 10 its design, file structure and content. Means of access to the database, and products and services supported by the database, are addressed, along with interfaces to local systems. The interaction between bibliographic and authority records is also described.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.91-99
  8. Dinberg, D.J.: DOBIS and the Canadian Union Catalogue (1988) 0.02
    0.023724673 = product of:
      0.11071514 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=398,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Canadian federal government's version of the DOBIS database, and the operation of the Canadian Union Catalogue as a subset of that database, are explained. DOBIS' versatility stems from its ability to handle bibliographic records of varying levels of fullness and definition within a shared file. The Union Catalogue's experience with minimal level records as contributions to DOBIS is detailed.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.165-186
  9. McGinn, T.P.: Building a Latin American bibliographic database (1988) 0.02
    0.023156079 = product of:
      0.1080617 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060957674 = score(doc=414,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes three important bibliographic databases in Latin America, two of which have been created by national library networks. In the networks shared cataloging has become increasingly important. The databases contain much cataloging information not available outside Latin America. During the last two years the national libraries of Venezuela and Chile have exchanged their data and furnished it to a library in Colombia which is beginning the automation process. The article describes the formation of the networks from the point of view of database building, and examines prospects for increasing exchanges of data in the region.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.127-139
  10. Bales, K.; Tucker, A.: ¬The RLIN database : current status, work in progress, future developments (1988) 0.02
    0.023156079 = product of:
      0.1080617 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
        0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060957674 = score(doc=415,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The database of the Research Libraries Group's Research Libraries Information Network contains some 25 million records in all USMARC formats for bibliographic and authorities data, as well as a number of additional files for specialized data. These records include source data from the Library of Congress and other national bibliographic agencies, and records contributed by RLG member institutions, and are used both for technical processing and in support of RLG's cooperative programs. Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Cyrillic vernacular records are included in the central database; work on Hebrew is in progress. Future developments will result in the addition of diverse kinds of data, including nonbibliographic data, to RLIN.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.79-89
  11. Conklin, C.E.: Australia: The ABN, ANB, AUSMARC and the National Library (1988) 0.02
    0.023156079 = product of:
      0.1080617 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.060957674 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060957674 = score(doc=420,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Australian libraries have kept up with the latest technology and innovation in cataloging. The Australian Bibliographic Network is a shared cataloging-based national bibliographic utility. This essay delves into the relationships of the ABN, the Australian National Bibliography, AUSMARC, and the role of the Australian National Library in the creation of these elements of computerized cataloging in that country. It also discusses some of the policies and procedures utilized by Australian libraries in their automated cataloging environment, as well as looking at some of the environmental attitudes arising from the change to automated cataloging. Finally, the essay concludes with an outline of some of the similarities and differences between the AUSMARC and USMARC formats.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.141-153
  12. Lee, T.: ¬The development of CJK bibliographic databases in North America and East Asia (1988) 0.02
    0.02310613 = product of:
      0.1078286 = sum of:
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
        0.06745373 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06745373 = score(doc=418,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The successful development of computer technology for automating Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CIK) vernacular scripts and the completion of the RLIN CJK system in 1983 marked the beginning of online operations of East Asian libraries in North America and helped keep them in the mainstream of library automation. The RLIN CJK system and the subsequently developed OCLC CJK system are building CJK bibliographic databases which have made East Asian cooperative cataloging and resources sharing a true reality. The emergence, features, current conditions, and future plans of the two CJK systems are discussed. So are the automated programs of national libraries in East Asia in terms of their building national databases for vernacular materials and designing and producing national MARCs for exchange of bibliographic information among libraries. The outlook of cooperation between the CJK systems and international exchange of CJK bibliographic information is also examined.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.111-126
  13. Little, T.M.: OCLC's international initiatives and the online union catalog (1988) 0.02
    0.020154601 = product of:
      0.0940548 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.67-78
  14. Buchbinder, R.: Bibliographical databases in German-speaking countries (1988) 0.02
    0.017635275 = product of:
      0.08229795 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.199-224
  15. Ziegman, B.N.: WLN's database new directions (1988) 0.02
    0.017635275 = product of:
      0.08229795 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
        0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035193928 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.101-109
  16. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Future of the Union Catalogue : ¬The future of the union catalogue (1982) 0.01
    0.01153568 = product of:
      0.08074976 = sum of:
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 7104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=7104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 7104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7104)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 7104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=7104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 7104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7104)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.2, nos.1/2
  17. Bloss, M.E.: ¬The impact of AACR2 on Union Lists of Serials (1983) 0.01
    0.01153568 = product of:
      0.08074976 = sum of:
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037488 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 3(1983) nos.2/3, S.97-109
  18. Yerkey, N.; Glogowski, M.: Bibliographic scatter of library and information science literature (1989) 0.01
    0.011101547 = product of:
      0.07771082 = sum of:
        0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 6150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02546139 = score(doc=6150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 6150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6150)
        0.05224943 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05224943 = score(doc=6150,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 6150, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6150)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    As part of a largerstudy concerning the scatter of library and information science (LIS) documents in bibliographic databases, this paper focuses on the publishing sources of a sample of 822 highly relevant documents. 67% were journal articles with the largest subject categories outside of LIS being medicine / health sciences, business, education, and computer science. Other journal titles ranged from popular and trade magazines to scholarly journals spanning the disciplinary map. The largest number of nonjournal items were conference reports, government reports, bibliographic resource guides, monographs, and nongovernment agency reports. These were scattered mostly between technological and medical databases. The results show that LIS is an interdisciplinary field, borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines. Articles written about the application of LIS concepts to other fields are often published in the journals of those other fields, not in LIS journals
  19. Mittal, R.: Creation of subject index to NUCSSI database with CDS/ISIS package (1989) 0.01
    0.005939754 = product of:
      0.083156556 = sum of:
        0.083156556 = weight(_text_:subject in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083156556 = score(doc=512,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.77435577 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the application of the CDS/ISIS software package (version 1.0) for the creation of a subject index to the National Union Catalogue of Scientific Periodicals in India (NUCSSI) data base. The subject index helps the user to find the titles available under particular subjects covered by the data base. The subject index has a subject code, UDC number and subject heading selected from the key title of the periodical
  20. Stephens, A.: Recent developments in the British national bibliographic services (1987) 0.01
    0.005745948 = product of:
      0.08044326 = sum of:
        0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08044326 = score(doc=5708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5708)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)