-
Kirtland, M.; Cochrane, P.A.: Critical views of LCSH - Library of Congress Subject Headings : a bibliographic and bibliometric essay (1981)
0.06
0.056244634 = product of:
0.19685622 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=273,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=273,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=273,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die Nachfolger: Shubert, S.B.: Critical views of LCSH - ten years later: a bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.2, S.37-97. Fischer, K.S.: Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001: the third bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.x-xx.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.71-94
-
Frost, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH : correlation between assigned LCSH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs (1989)
0.05
0.05485857 = product of:
0.19200498 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.165-179
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.05
0.05484921 = product of:
0.19197223 = sum of:
0.0514505 = weight(_text_:subject in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0514505 = score(doc=1524,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
- Source
- International classification. 13(1986), S.73-78
-
Markey, K.: Searching and browsing the Dewey Decimal Classification in an online catalog (1987)
0.05
0.053660493 = product of:
0.18781172 = sum of:
0.067364514 = weight(_text_:subject in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067364514 = score(doc=384,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=384,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=384,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- In the DDC Online Project, subject searching and browsing of DDC schedules and relative index were featured in an experimental online catalog. The effectiveness of this DDC in an online catalog was tested in online retrieval experiments at four participating libraries. These experiments provided data for analyses of subject searchers' use of a library classification in the information retrieval environment of an online catalog. Recommendations were provided for the enhancement of bibliographic records, online catalogs, and online cataloging systems with a library classification. In this paper, subject searchers' use of the subject outline search capability of the experimental online catalog is described. This capability was unique to the experimental online catalog and all other online catalogs, because it referred searchers to online displays of the classification schedules based on their entry of subject terms. Failure analyses of subject outline searches demonstrated its specific strenghts and weaknesses. Users' postsearch interview comments highlighted their experiences and their satisfaction with this search. Based on the failure analyses and users' interview comments, recommendations are provided for the improvement of the subject outline search in online catalogs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.37-68
-
Langridge, D.W.: Subject analysis : principles and procedures (1989)
0.05
0.053599108 = product of:
0.18759687 = sum of:
0.07276198 = weight(_text_:subject in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276198 = score(doc=2021,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6775613 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04079328 = score(doc=2021,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04079328 = weight(_text_:classification in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04079328 = score(doc=2021,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Subject analysis is the basis of all classifying and indexing techniques and is equally applicable to automatic and manual indexing systems. This book discusses subject analysis as an activity in its own right, independent of any indexing language. It examines the theoretical basis of subject analysis using the concepts of forms of knowledge as applicable to classification schemes.
- LCSH
- Subject cataloging
Classification / Books
- Subject
- Subject cataloging
Classification / Books
-
Holiday, J.: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives (1989)
0.05
0.049909845 = product of:
0.17468445 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=971,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=971,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
0.040303055 = product of:
0.08060611 = sum of:
0.08060611 = weight(_text_:schemes in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08060611 = score(doc=971,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5016798 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=971,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This paper examines how classification schemes provide subject access. Concept arrangement before computers is compared to its role after machine-based exact match techniques have evolved. The change in retrieval techniques corresponds to a change in philosophy of knowledge. Classification schemes, emerging from Aristotelian philosophy, provide conceptual frameworks for direct human interaction to foster reference and communication. Computer-based systems provide access with a different emphasis on conceptual arrangement. Employing a philosophy of knowledge as facets, computer programs use word-frequency analyses, uncontrolled vocabulary, and feedback procedures to define subject access. Classification for machine processing optimizes the power of these systems. Though the influence of Aristotelian philosophy declines, structures for concept communication continue to be instrumental in the efficient operation of computer-based systems. Ongoing classification work can help direct vague inquiries and reflect human and social relationships to knowledge
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Kelm, B.: Classification and subject cataloguing (1983)
0.05
0.047025908 = product of:
0.21945423 = sum of:
0.08487131 = weight(_text_:subject in 7362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08487131 = score(doc=7362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.79032356 = fieldWeight in 7362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7362)
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 7362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=7362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 7362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7362)
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 7362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=7362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 7362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7362)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The consequences of new technologies in classification and subject cataloguing in third world countries : the technological gap (1985)
0.05
0.046418566 = product of:
0.16246498 = sum of:
0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062367413 = score(doc=1733,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Since many nations rely upon subject headings and classification numbers from cataloguing agencies in developed countries, changes requiring computers would hinder subject access in Thrid World areas which lack high technology. New computer-supported systems such as PRECIS will probably take hold only in languages and countries where a subject analysis system does not already exist. For the traditional card catalogue-based subject access system, computer support may lead to more frequent changes in headings, less pre-coordinated structure, and the assignement of more terms per document. Third world countires may have difficulty in adapting to the developments. Classification, especially since it more easily crosses linguistc boundaries, may become to a greater degree the preferred means of subject access in Third World nations. During the transition, IFLA can serve as a forum for developing nations to make their needs known to the providers of bibliographic data
-
Brown, A.G.; Langridge, D.W.; Mills, J.: ¬An introduction to subject indexing (1982)
0.05
0.04629492 = product of:
0.21604297 = sum of:
0.10184556 = weight(_text_:subject in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184556 = score(doc=1062,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9483882 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=1062,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=1062,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Content
- Introduction to subject indexing. - Subject analysis. - Elements of practical classification. - Universal Decimal Classification [UDC]. -Classified catalogue. - Alphabetical subject catalogue. - Post-coordinate indexing
-
Marco, G.A.: Subject bibliography in the twenty-first century (1988)
0.05
0.046271957 = product of:
0.16195184 = sum of:
0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067897044 = score(doc=430,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This article describes five challenges that will be faced by the compilers of subject bibliographies in the twenty-first century. Because the bibliography of the twenty-first century will need to be selective, the subject bibliographer will need to be a specialist in the discipline as well as bibliographic description. It will be essential for those who write and publish or disseminate subject bibliographies to be most concerned with the precise needs of the end user, rather than the object of the work in itself.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.113-120
-
Subject control in online catalogs (1989)
0.05
0.04557904 = product of:
0.15952663 = sum of:
0.06709666 = weight(_text_:subject in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06709666 = score(doc=235,freq=20.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6248056 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Auch als 'Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(198) No.1/2' erschienen
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: HOLLEY, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog; KLUGMAN, S.: Failures in subject retreival; CARLYLE, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog; MURDOCK, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis: toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog; DYKSTRA, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The role of classification in online systems; BROADBENT, E.: The online catalog: dictionary, classified, or both?; OLSEN, R.J., CHRISTENSEN, J.O., LARSEN, K.A. u. K. WILLEY: Implementing NOTIS keyword/Boolean searching: a case study; ROLLAND-THOMA, P. u. G. MERCURE: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue; FROST, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH: correlation between assigned LSCH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs; STONE, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs; CHAN, L.M.: A subject cataloging code?; McCARTHY, C.: A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog; JOUGUELET, S.: Subject access in online catalogs: developments in France; DALE, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs: an overview bibliography
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 35(1990) S.119-120 (P. Lisbon); International classification 18(1991) S.238-239 (W. Gödert)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.10, nos.1/2
-
Bonner, R.A.B.: Community information classification research project : user orientated empirical methods of classification construction (1982)
0.05
0.04551906 = product of:
0.21242228 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=36,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
0.08074976 = weight(_text_:classification in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08074976 = score(doc=36,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Scibor, E.: Polish subject-field classification : broad ordering system for use on a national scale (1982)
0.05
0.04540251 = product of:
0.21187837 = sum of:
0.07201569 = weight(_text_:subject in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07201569 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=62,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=62,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Ross, J.E.: Artists and poets : online issues in cataloging and retrieval (1987)
0.05
0.04525601 = product of:
0.15839604 = sum of:
0.042009152 = weight(_text_:subject in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042009152 = score(doc=374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic records available in WLN (Western Library Network, formerly Washington Library Network) for works which are both by and about authors or artists are evaluated to show the inconsistency in the assignment by descriptive and subject catalogers of subject headings and author access points. The physical description and classification of these works is also examined in relation to its relevance in online use/retrieval. Bibliographic records created over a decade or more illustrate this persistent problem of access which affects retrieval in both DIALOG and WLN online systems as well as in card catalogs. The article includes suggestions for catalogers, particularly those working with art or literature subjects, to improve the situation.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.91-104
-
Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986)
0.04
0.04465949 = product of:
0.15630822 = sum of:
0.044509117 = weight(_text_:classification in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044509117 = score(doc=3487,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.0237488 = product of:
0.0474976 = sum of:
0.0474976 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0474976 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2956176 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.043541197 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043541197 = score(doc=3487,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3724989 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.044509117 = weight(_text_:classification in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044509117 = score(doc=3487,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This paper argues that the semantic axis of bibliographic classification systems can be found in the various warrants that have been used to justify the utility of classification systems. Classificationists, theorists, and critics have emphasized the syntactic aspects of classification theories and systems, but a number of semantic warrants can be identified. The evolution of four semantic warrants is traced through the development of twentieth-century classification theory: literary warrant, scientific/philosophical warrant, educational warrant, and cultural warrant. It is concluded that further examination of semantic warrants might make possible a rationalized approach to the creation of classification systems for particular uses. The attention of scholars on faceted schemes and classificatory structures had heretofore pulled our attention to the syntactic aspects (e.g., concept division and citation order), with semantics being considered more or less a question of the terms and their relationships and somewhat taken for granted, or at least construed as a unitary aspect. Attention is on the choice of the classes and their meaning, as well as their connection to the world, and not so much on their syntactic relationship. This notion is developed by providing an historical and conceptual overview of the various kinds of warrant discernible in working with bibliographic systems. In Beghtol's definition, warrant concerns more than just the selection of terms, but rather the mapping of a classification system to the context and uses.
-
Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification : A guide to construction and use of special schemes (1986)
0.04
0.04458441 = product of:
0.15604542 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2475,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.040303055 = product of:
0.08060611 = sum of:
0.08060611 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08060611 = score(doc=2475,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5016798 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2475,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- A perfect little book, with just 63 pages of text. From chapter A, Introduction, to U, Mechanization, it covers everything about making a faceted classification: what they are, why they are needed, how to do facet analysis, examples from existing faceted schemes, orderings, common subdivisions, the contents of each facet, notation, filing order, how to perform classification with the created system, and indexing. Each chapter is brief but has full coverage of the subject. "The technique of constructing a special faceted classification is not a settled, automatic, codified procedure. Nothing so complex as the field of knowledge could be analysed and organized by rule-of-thumb. We can therefore offer no more than a guide, describing tested procedures and discussing some difficulties." Vickery was a member of the Classification Research Group and one of the foremost classificationists.
-
Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989)
0.04
0.044290405 = product of:
0.1550164 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=457,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.105-124
-
Travis, I.L.: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification (1989)
0.04
0.043632463 = product of:
0.20361815 = sum of:
0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06661515 = score(doc=963,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070387855 = score(doc=963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.06661515 = weight(_text_:classification in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06661515 = score(doc=963,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Gödert, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty (1982)
0.04
0.04337105 = product of:
0.20239824 = sum of:
0.088200845 = weight(_text_:subject in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088200845 = score(doc=744,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.82132834 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Cochrane, P.A.: Classification as a user's tool in online public access catalogs (1982)
0.04
0.040882602 = product of:
0.19078547 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=11,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
0.06993134 = weight(_text_:classification in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993134 = score(doc=11,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6. - 2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
