-
Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992)
1.10
1.0973651 = product of:
1.5363111 = sum of:
0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067897044 = score(doc=821,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089272216 = score(doc=821,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.053737402 = product of:
0.107474804 = sum of:
0.107474804 = weight(_text_:schemes in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107474804 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66890633 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1796588 = product of:
0.3593176 = sum of:
0.3593176 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3593176 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23108649 = weight(_text_:henry in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23108649 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9808425 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.30325162 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30325162 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1236047 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.3593176 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3593176 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.106416434 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106416434 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9104023 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089272216 = score(doc=821,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.056401204 = product of:
0.11280241 = sum of:
0.11280241 = weight(_text_:texts in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11280241 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6852849 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(10/14)
- COMPASS
- Documents / Subject classification
- LCSH
- Classification, Bibliographic
Bliss Bibliographic classification
- PRECIS
- Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
- Subject
- Classification, Bibliographic
Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
Documents / Subject classification
-
Classification : options and opportunities (1995)
0.36
0.3572715 = product of:
0.62522507 = sum of:
0.07137337 = weight(_text_:classification in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07137337 = score(doc=3753,freq=36.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7464156 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.04113413 = product of:
0.08226826 = sum of:
0.08226826 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08226826 = score(doc=3753,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.51202476 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.060019795 = product of:
0.12003959 = sum of:
0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12003959 = score(doc=3753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10212677 = weight(_text_:henry in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10212677 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.13401954 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13401954 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.12003959 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12003959 = score(doc=3753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.07137337 = weight(_text_:classification in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07137337 = score(doc=3753,freq=36.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7464156 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
- Abstract
- Explores a wide range of options surrounding the choice and application of library and bibliographic classification Systems. It provides detailed descriptions of alternative provisions in the much-used DDC and LCC systems, as well as descriptions and discussions of several alternative systems, such as BC, UDC and Reader Interest
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: LANGRIDGE, D.W.: Alternative starting points in classification; THOMAS, A.R.: Blissful beliefs: Henry Evelyn Bliss councels on classification; WEINBERG, B.H.: Library classification and information retrieval thesauri: comparison and contrast; LOSEE, R.M.: How to study classification systems and their appropriateness for individual institutions; SHORT, E.C.: Knowledge and the educational purposes of higher education: implications for the design of a classification scheme; CHAN, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification: alternative provisions; MITCHELL, J.S.: Options in the Dewey Decimal Classification system: the current perspective; THOMAS, A.R.: Bliss Classification update; STRACHAN, P.D. u. F.H.M. OOMES: Universal Decimal Classification update; HSU, K.M.: The classification schemes of the Research Libraries of the New York Public Library; SAPIIE, J.: Reader-interst classification: the user-friendly schemes; WINKE, R.C.: Intentional use of multiple classification schemes in United States libraries; CHRESSANTHIS, J.D.: The reclassification decision: Dewey or Library of Congress?; PATTIE, L.-Y.W.: Reclassification revisited: an automated approach; KOH, G.S.: Options in classification available through modern technology; TROTTER, R.: Electronic Dewey: the CD-ROM version of the Dewey Decimal Classification
- Object
- Reader interest classification
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
-
Thomas, A.R.: Bibliographic classification : the ideas and achievements of Henry E. Bliss (1997)
0.32
0.32345074 = product of:
0.75471836 = sum of:
0.057690408 = weight(_text_:classification in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057690408 = score(doc=3748,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.60332054 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.11883313 = product of:
0.23766626 = sum of:
0.23766626 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23766626 = score(doc=3748,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.24764426 = weight(_text_:henry in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24764426 = score(doc=3748,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.0511216 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.23766626 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23766626 = score(doc=3748,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=3748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.057690408 = weight(_text_:classification in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057690408 = score(doc=3748,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.60332054 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews the ideas and achievements of Henry E. Bliss concerning his Bliss Classification Scheme (BC), based on material in the Henry E. Bliss Papers at Columbia University, New York. Describes his views on various aspects of classification: its function; arrangements; adaptability; and notation. Discusses the role and qualifications of classification staff. Notes the advantages and disadvantages of standard systems, including: LCC, DDC, and UDC. Explores the origins, evolution, publication, and impact of the original BC and its relationship to the radical revision of the BC, 2nd ed.
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 26(1998) no.2, S.73-75
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 25(1997) no.1, S.51-104
-
Thomas, A.R.: Blissful beliefs : Henry Evelyn Bliss councels on classification (1995)
0.31
0.31421018 = product of:
0.62842035 = sum of:
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=5543,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.059416566 = product of:
0.11883313 = sum of:
0.11883313 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11883313 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14297746 = weight(_text_:henry in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14297746 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6068653 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.18762736 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762736 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6951949 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.11883313 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11883313 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=5543,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- Study of the organization of knowledge and of theories, systems, and practices of library classification provides a foundation for considering the design of an effective scheme. Use of existing standard systems has disadvantages and requires a library to either adapt itself to a standard or adapt that standard to the library. Prompt reclassification to an effective system will produce ultimate economy in service. Helpful order within a system is secured by application of certain principles. The scheme should be plastic to accommodate differing requirements and include alternative locations and citation orders of components. Construction and application of a relative classification present persistent problems.
- Pages
- S.17-22
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
- Source
- Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas
-
Coates, E.J.: BC2 and BSO : presentation at the 36th Allerton Institute, 1994 session on preparing traditional classifications for the future (1995)
0.27
0.27004385 = product of:
0.5400877 = sum of:
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=5566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.07350893 = product of:
0.14701787 = sum of:
0.14701787 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14701787 = score(doc=5566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6844786 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10212677 = weight(_text_:henry in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10212677 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.13401954 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13401954 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.14701787 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14701787 = score(doc=5566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6844786 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513852 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=5566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- This article pertains to two further general classifications, which, in contrast to the reigning classifications just mentioned, incorporate in a thoroughgoing manner a modem view of the world. One of these was announced in 1910, to a chorus of disapproval, saw the light of day as a completed scheme in 1935, fell into suspended animation after the death of its author in the 1950s, and was revived, drastically revised and expanded in England by Jack Mills in 1967. A large part of the expanded scheme has appeared in the form of separately published fascicles; the remainder mostly in the areas of science and technology are in an advanced state of preparation. I refer of course to the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. I use the expression "of course" with some slight hesitation having once met a North American library school academic who thought that Henry Evelyn Bliss was an Englishman who lived in the London inner suburb of Islington. This was an unconscious tribute to Jack Mills, though perhaps unfair to Bliss himself, not to mention America, whose son he was.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.59-67
-
Thomas, A.R.: Addenda to 'Bibliographical Classification: the ideas and achievements of Henry E. Bliss' (1998)
0.25
0.25419116 = product of:
0.5931127 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=3747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=3747,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.09603167 = product of:
0.19206335 = sum of:
0.19206335 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19206335 = score(doc=3747,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8941991 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16340283 = weight(_text_:henry in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16340283 = score(doc=3747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.69356036 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.19206335 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19206335 = score(doc=3747,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8941991 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=3747,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- The original article on the Bliss Bibliographical Classification excluded some text provided with the submitted manuscript and disc: The excluded matter, devised to pilot the reader through a lenghty paper treating a complicated subject, consisted of a contents guide, lists of sources drawn on for each numbered section and for some subsections and axplanation of the arrangement of the reference. The excluded text is provided in this addenda
- Footnote
- Originaltext in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 26(1997) no.1, S.51-104
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.73-75
-
Thomas, A.R.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd Edition : principles features and applications (1992)
0.21
0.21151799 = product of:
0.493542 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=541,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.10291251 = product of:
0.20582502 = sum of:
0.20582502 = weight(_text_:bliss in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20582502 = score(doc=541,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.95827 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.20582502 = weight(_text_:bliss in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20582502 = score(doc=541,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.95827 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=541,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Publication of the 2nd ed. of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification presents librarians with a fresh opportunity to reassess the nature and benefits of helpful order for their collections and records. Half the parts are now available, exhibiting major expansion, revision, and development of the scheme. The new edition is sponsored by the Bliss Classification Association which welcomes the views and inputs of American librarians. It has been applied to libraries and information centers and used in thesaurus construction. This edition provides intensive subject specifity through detailed term listings and full synthetic capability. The notation is designed to be as brief as possible for the detail attainable. The classification allows a large measure of flexibility in arrangement and syntax
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.4, S.3-17
-
Thomas, A.: Bliss regained : the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (1993)
0.21
0.20946257 = product of:
0.58649516 = sum of:
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.14701787 = product of:
0.29403573 = sum of:
0.29403573 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29403573 = score(doc=5077,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.3689572 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.29403573 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29403573 = score(doc=5077,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.3689572 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.04758225 = weight(_text_:classification in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04758225 = score(doc=5077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews the early development of the Bliss Bliographic Classification, the work leading up to the preparation of the second edition, the role of the BC in libraries in the USA, and the potential contribution of the second ed. to library development
-
Classification Research Group / Bliss Classification Association (1991)
0.20
0.19988967 = product of:
0.6996138 = sum of:
0.0951645 = weight(_text_:classification in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0951645 = score(doc=3928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.99522084 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.16976161 = product of:
0.33952323 = sum of:
0.33952323 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33952323 = score(doc=3928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33952323 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33952323 = score(doc=3928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.0951645 = weight(_text_:classification in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0951645 = score(doc=3928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.99522084 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
-
Thomas, A.R.: Options in the arrangement of library materials and the new edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (1992)
0.20
0.19651818 = product of:
0.5502509 = sum of:
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.11883313 = product of:
0.23766626 = sum of:
0.23766626 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23766626 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23766626 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23766626 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.09954346 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09954346 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8516034 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Source
- Cataloging heresy: challenging the standard bibliographic product. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
-
Foskett, D.J.: Concerning general and special classifications (1991)
0.19
0.1881741 = product of:
0.43907288 = sum of:
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=2189,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.057587784 = product of:
0.11517557 = sum of:
0.11517557 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11517557 = score(doc=2189,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.71683466 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.084027715 = product of:
0.16805543 = sum of:
0.16805543 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16805543 = score(doc=2189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16805543 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16805543 = score(doc=2189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=2189,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- The experience of the British Classification Research Group (CRG) suggests that a good general scheme could be compiled by integrating specialist schemes. Examples are given from the 1990 revision of class J Education of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. Sequences in arrays may need adjustment to suit different needs, but a general, or "Ur-Classification" will provide a reservoir of terms for specialist schemes, while the special schemes provide detailed analysis and emuneration by experts in each field. A fraction of money spent on new library buildings would enable the compilation of such a general scheme, which could well be based on the BC2 edition of Bliss B.C.
- Source
- International classification. 18(1991) no.2, S.87-91
-
Chatterjee, A.: Concept of phase relation in CC and its impact on BC (1992)
0.17
0.16753489 = product of:
0.39091474 = sum of:
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=6710,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.053737402 = product of:
0.107474804 = sum of:
0.107474804 = weight(_text_:schemes in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107474804 = score(doc=6710,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66890633 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06790464 = product of:
0.13580929 = sum of:
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=6710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=6710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=6710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=6710,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Though the idea of phase relation was first initiated in documentary classification by UDC in 1899, most of the other schemes either ignored the problem or tried to solve it through enumeration. Bliss followed the latter method in his Bibliographic classification (BC1). It was left to Ranganathan to further develop the idea and give it concrete shape in his Colon Classification (CC). BC2, in 1977, adopted an analytico-synthetic approach instead of the enumerative method. Attempts to establish the impact of CC on BC in this regard through comparison of the 2 schemes
-
Williamson, N.J.: Restructuring UDC : problems and possibilities (1992)
0.15
0.15052561 = product of:
0.42147171 = sum of:
0.058276117 = weight(_text_:classification in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058276117 = score(doc=2116,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.08488081 = product of:
0.16976161 = sum of:
0.16976161 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16976161 = score(doc=2116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16976161 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16976161 = score(doc=2116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7903678 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=2116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.058276117 = weight(_text_:classification in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058276117 = score(doc=2116,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- A proposal for a methodology for restructuring UDC using facet framework provided by the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The restructuring would then lead to the development of a logically structured thesaurus
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Classification schemes : consultation with users and cooperation between editors (1997)
0.15
0.14850429 = product of:
0.34651 = sum of:
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=5610,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.049360957 = product of:
0.098721914 = sum of:
0.098721914 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098721914 = score(doc=5610,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6144297 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.050928485 = product of:
0.10185697 = sum of:
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=5610,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Recent developments in the improvement of communication between those responsible for editing the general schemes of classification and their users are outlined. Increased participation in conferences, the publication of guides and manuals for aiding the implementation of general classifications, and the use of the Internet as a means of communicating are all ways in which users hear more about these schemes and can make their views known to those responsible for maintaining them. Increased communication at editorial level, including coordination of current developments and future revisions, is discussed. The Dewey Decimal Classification, the Library of Congress Classification, the Universal Decimal Classification, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) are reviewed and the ways in which each communicates with its users and participates in joint enterprises are noted.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.81-95
-
Thomas, A.R.: Bliss Classification update (1995)
0.14
0.14021602 = product of:
0.39260486 = sum of:
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=5544,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
0.084027715 = product of:
0.16805543 = sum of:
0.16805543 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16805543 = score(doc=5544,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16805543 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16805543 = score(doc=5544,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=5544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=5544,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Development of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) is outlined. The scope of the Introduction volume is described. Parts already issued, those ready for publication, and those awaiting completion are listed. The level of detail of the vocabulary is indicated. Four forms of synthesis are explained: addition of common subdivisions, facet combination including alternative combination patterns, array combination, and drawing marks from other parts of the system. Notational features which contribute to the relatively brief classmarks are identified. Different kinds of alternative location of subjects are discerned and examples provided. The potential feature of phenomenon-based classification is noted. Present use of the scheme is summarized and documented and its future application suggested.
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
- Source
- Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas
-
Domsa, Z.; Komuves, E.: BLISS Bibliografiai Osztalyozasa (1997)
0.13
0.13152222 = product of:
0.3682622 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1809,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.06790464 = product of:
0.13580929 = sum of:
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=1809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=1809,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Presents Bliss's classification system prepared primarily for school libraries. Describes the basic principles of the classification. Bliss's logic of the organization of disciplines, main classes of the Bibliographic Classification, document groups, the four faceted analysis of diciplines, systematic tables, mnemonic codes, methods of notation, and the index. Finally, the whole system is assessed
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Bliss's Bibliographic Classification
-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.13
0.13049598 = product of:
0.26099196 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.050928485 = product of:
0.10185697 = sum of:
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10185697 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10185697 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.0122040035 = product of:
0.024408007 = sum of:
0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024408007 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Gresham, J.L.: ¬The place of religion in the universe of knowledge according to various systems of bibliographic classification (1994)
0.13
0.12569647 = product of:
0.29329175 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060187314 = score(doc=905,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.06581461 = product of:
0.13162921 = sum of:
0.13162921 = weight(_text_:schemes in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13162921 = score(doc=905,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.8192396 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.060187314 = weight(_text_:classification in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060187314 = score(doc=905,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Considers ways in which bibliographic classification schemes have attempted to map the subject of religion into their treatment of the universe of knowledge and attemps to understand the different conceptions of religion reflected by these various classification schemes. Specific schemes considered include: DDC, LoC, BC, Ernest Cushing Richardson Classification; Julia Pettee's Union Classification; CC
- Date
- 20.10.2000 14:22:53
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.13
0.1255721 = product of:
0.35160187 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=992,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.06790464 = product of:
0.13580929 = sum of:
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13580929 = weight(_text_:bliss in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13580929 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=992,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
-
Hjoerland, B.; Albrechtsen, H.: ¬An analysis of some trends in classification research (1999)
0.11
0.11303562 = product of:
0.26374978 = sum of:
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=6391,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.033585876 = product of:
0.06717175 = sum of:
0.06717175 = weight(_text_:schemes in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06717175 = score(doc=6391,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41806644 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.042440403 = product of:
0.08488081 = sum of:
0.08488081 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08488081 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08488081 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08488081 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.035551235 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035551235 = score(doc=6391,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=6391,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- This paper takes a second look at three prevailing main themes in knowledge organization: i) the academic disciplines as the main structural principle; ii) the fiction/non-fiction distinction; and iii) the appropriate unit of analysis in online retrieval systems. The history and origin of bibliographic classification [Dewey, Bliss, Mills, Beghtol] are discussed from the perspective of pragmatist philosophy and social studies of science [Kuhn, Merton, Reich]. Choices of structural principles in different schemes are found to rely on more or less implicit philosophical foundations, ranging from rationalism to pragmatism. It is further shown how the increasing application of faceted structures as basic structural principles in universal classification schemes [DDC, UDC] impose rationalistic principles and structures for knowledge organization which are not in alignment with the development of knowledge in the covered disciplines. Further evidence of rationalism in knowledge organization is the fiction/non-fiction distinction, excluding the important role of artistic resources for, in particular, humanistic research. Finally, for the analysis of appropriate bibliographic unit, it is argued that there is a need to shift towards a semiotic approach, founded on an understanding of intertextuality, rather than applying standard principles of hierarchical decomposition of documents. It is concluded that a change in classification research is needed, founded on a more historical and social understanding of knowledge
