Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × author_ss:"Fugmann, R."
  1. Fugmann, R.: Illusory goals in information science research (1992) 0.02
    0.024859987 = product of:
      0.11601327 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.039881673 = product of:
          0.079763345 = sum of:
            0.079763345 = weight(_text_:texts in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079763345 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4845696 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The human's expressing general concepts in uncontrolled natural language, his information need, and meaning recognition in and essence selection from texts are indeterminate processes and therefore defy any satisfactory formalization and programming. Where the equivalence or even superiority of algorithmic approaches to these golas has been claimed, the authors have worked under artificial, experimental conditions and/or have in their evaluation referred to those approaches that are far from exploiting the capabilities of intellectual content analysis, representation and query phrasing
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  2. Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990) 0.02
    0.024859987 = product of:
      0.11601327 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=4781,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=4781,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
        0.039881673 = product of:
          0.079763345 = sum of:
            0.079763345 = weight(_text_:texts in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079763345 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4845696 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Contemporary research in information science has concentrated on the development of methods for the algorithmic processing of natural language texts. Often, the equivalence of this approach to the intellectual technique of content analysis and indexing is claimed. It is, however, disregarded that contemporary intellectual techniques are far from exploiting their full capabilities. This is largely due to the omission of vocabulary categorisation. It is demonstrated how categorisation can drastically improve the quality of indexing and classification, and, hence, of retrieval
  3. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and controlled languages in indexing (1995) 0.02
    0.023512954 = product of:
      0.109727114 = sum of:
        0.042435654 = weight(_text_:subject in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042435654 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
        0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03364573 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  4. Fugmann, R.: ¬An interactive classaurus on the PC (1990) 0.01
    0.010875943 = product of:
      0.0761316 = sum of:
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
        0.0380658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380658 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Both classification systems and thesauri have their specific strengths and weaknesses. Through properly combining both approaches one can eliminate the latter and largely preserve the strenghts. 'Classauri' which originate in this well-known way are most effective if they are constructed and applied during computer-aided indexing. A special variety of classaurus is described which is characterized by the employment of simple bur highly effective conceptual and technical devices and by the renunciation of attempts to generate the wording of index entries algorithmically
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990) no.3/4, S.133-137
  5. Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994) 0.00
    0.004811751 = product of:
      0.067364514 = sum of:
        0.067364514 = weight(_text_:subject in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067364514 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The contents of scientific and technical handbooks often needs fast, reliable and precise subject access, even if the searcher is not familiar with the terminology of the book and has not read it beforehand. This requires careful and expert subject indexing in a highly specific indexing vocabulary, as well as the presentation of the resulting index in a lucid, conceptually transparent manner in print and on disk. Index users, when looking up a general subject heading, often ignore the necessity of looking up the appertaining hierarchically subordinate, more specific subject headings, too. They are either not made aware of these subject headings or their use is felt to be too cumbersome. A classifies approach to computerized subject indexing is described which resembles Ranganathan's Classified Catalogue. Through a variety of peculiarities it leads the searcher rapidly and easily to all subject headings related to a primarily chosen one, and to the postings under all these headings
  6. Fugmann, R.: Galileo and the inverse precision/recall relationship : medieval attitudes in modern information science (1994) 0.00
    0.0021547303 = product of:
      0.030166224 = sum of:
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=8278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 8278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8278)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The tight adherence to dogmas, created and advocated by authorities and disseminated through hearsay, constitutes an impediment to the progress badly needed in view of the low effectiveness of the vast majority of our bibliographic information systems. The Italian mathematician and physicist Galileo has become famous not only for his discoveries but also for his being exposed to the rejective and even hostile attitude on the part of his contemporaries when he contradicted several dogmas prevailing at that time. This obstructive attitude can be traced throughout the centuries and manifests itself in the field of modern information science, too. An example is the allegedly necessary, inevitable precision/recall relationship, as most recently postulated again by Lancaster (1994). It is believed to be confirmed by emprical evidence, with other empirical evidence to the contrary being neglected. This case even constitutes an example of the suppression of truth in the interest of upholding a dogma
  7. Fugmann, R.: Subject analysis and indexing : theoretical foundation and practical advice (1993) 0.00
    0.0021217826 = product of:
      0.029704956 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)