Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Ahmad, K.: Text summarisation : the role of lexical cohesion analysis (1995) 0.00
    0.004934078 = product of:
      0.06907709 = sum of:
        0.06907709 = product of:
          0.13815418 = sum of:
            0.13815418 = weight(_text_:texts in 5795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13815418 = score(doc=5795,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.8392992 = fieldWeight in 5795, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The work in automatic text summary focuses mainly on computational models of texts. The artificial intelligence related work in text summary deals mainly with narrative texts such as newspaper reports and stories. Presents a study on the summary of non-narrative texts such as those in scientific and technical communication. Discusses syntactic cohesion; lexical cohesion; complex lexical repetition; simple and complex paraphrase; bonds and links; and Tele-pattan; an architecture for cohesion based text analysis and summarisation system working on SGML
  2. Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994) 0.00
    0.003560864 = product of:
      0.04985209 = sum of:
        0.04985209 = product of:
          0.09970418 = sum of:
            0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09970418 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.605712 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The final report of the 2nd British Library abstracting project (the BLAB project), 1990-1992, which was carried out partly at the Computing Department of Lancaster University, and partly at the Centre for Computational Linguistics, UMIST. This project built on the results of the first project, of 1985-1987, to build a system designed create abstracts automatically from given texts
  3. Su, H.: Automatic abstracting (1996) 0.00
    0.003560864 = product of:
      0.04985209 = sum of:
        0.04985209 = product of:
          0.09970418 = sum of:
            0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09970418 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.605712 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an introductory overview of research into the automatic construction of abstracts from the texts of documents. Discusses the origin and definition of automatic abstracting; reasons for using automatic abstracting; methods of automatic abstracting; and evaluation problems
  4. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994) 0.00
    0.003560864 = product of:
      0.04985209 = sum of:
        0.04985209 = product of:
          0.09970418 = sum of:
            0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09970418 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.605712 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  5. Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999) 0.00
    0.0030214933 = product of:
      0.042300906 = sum of:
        0.042300906 = product of:
          0.08460181 = sum of:
            0.08460181 = weight(_text_:texts in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08460181 = score(doc=2944,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.5139637 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The SALOMON project automatically summarizes Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future court decisions. SALOMON extracts text units from the case text to form a case summary. Such a case summary facilitates the rapid determination of the relevance of the case or may be employed in text search. an important part of the research concerns the development of techniques for automatic recognition of representative text paragraphs (or sentences) in texts of unrestricted domains. these techniques are employed to eliminate redundant material in the case texts, and to identify informative text paragraphs which are relevant to include in the case summary. An evaluation of a test set of 700 criminal cases demonstrates that the algorithms have an application potential for automatic indexing, abstracting, and text linkage
  6. Brandow, R.; Mitze, K.; Rau, L.F.: Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection (1995) 0.00
    0.002848691 = product of:
      0.039881673 = sum of:
        0.039881673 = product of:
          0.079763345 = sum of:
            0.079763345 = weight(_text_:texts in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079763345 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.4845696 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Description of a system that performs domain-independent automatic condensation of news from a large commercial news service encompassing 41 different publications. This system was evaluated against a system that condensed the same articles using only the first portions of the texts (the löead), up to the target length of the summaries. 3 lengths of articles were evaluated for 250 documents by both systems, totalling 1.500 suitability judgements in all. The lead-based summaries outperformed the 'intelligent' summaries significantly, achieving acceptability ratings of over 90%, compared to 74,7%
  7. Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.00
    0.0024926048 = product of:
      0.034896467 = sum of:
        0.034896467 = product of:
          0.069792934 = sum of:
            0.069792934 = weight(_text_:texts in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069792934 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.42399842 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The SALOMON project summarises Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future cases. A double methodology was used when developing SALOMON: the cases are processed by employing additional knowledge to interpret structural patterns and features on the one hand and by way of occurrence statistics of index terms on the other. SALOMON performs an initial categorisation and structuring of the cases and subsequently extracts the most relevant text units of the alleged offences and of the opinion of the court. The SALOMON techniques do not themselves solve any legal questions, but they do guide the use effectively towards relevant texts
  8. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  9. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  10. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.00
    0.0011622861 = product of:
      0.016272005 = sum of:
        0.016272005 = product of:
          0.03254401 = sum of:
            0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03254401 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon