-
Seaman, D.: Selection, access, and control in library of electronic texts (1996)
0.06
0.05575563 = product of:
0.1951447 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=599,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.09826894 = sum of:
0.069792934 = weight(_text_:texts in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069792934 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42399842 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Text Center at the University of Virginia has been mounting SGML full-text databases on-line since 1992, and actively building a user community around this Internet resource. Conceiving of what we do as firmly a library operation, we have sought to integrate the electronic text databases into the training, cataloging, preservation, and collection development areas of our library. Central to our selection criteria is the desire for softwareand platform-independent textsif it's not SGML, it's ephermeraland central to our cataloging endeavors is on SGML bibliographic record such as the Text Encoding Initiative header.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-84
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.05
0.04508604 = product of:
0.12624091 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop, held in Dublin, Ohio, 1-3 Mar 95, which resulted in the proposed 'Dublin Core' Metadata Elements. Describes an attempt to map the Dublin Core data elements to the USMARC format (with particular reference to USMARC field 856 for electronic locations), noting problems and outstanding questions. The USMARC format elements considered include: subject, title, author, other-agent, publisher, publication date, identifier, object-type, form, relation, language, source, coverage, and other issues
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
- Source
- Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.033447683 = product of:
0.11706689 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.02301209 = product of:
0.04602418 = sum of:
0.04602418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04602418 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.03
0.031521946 = product of:
0.11032681 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
-
Pole, T.: Contextual classification in the Metadata Object Manager (M.O.M.) (1999)
0.03
0.025181424 = product of:
0.117513314 = sum of:
0.014852478 = weight(_text_:subject in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014852478 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.13830662 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.05133042 = weight(_text_:classification in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05133042 = score(doc=6672,freq=38.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.53680843 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.05133042 = weight(_text_:classification in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05133042 = score(doc=6672,freq=38.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.53680843 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- To Classify is (according to Webster's) "to distribute into classes; to arrange according to a system; to arrange in sets according to some method founded on common properties or characters." A model of classification is a type or category or (excuse the recursive definition) a class of classification "system" as mentioned in Webster's definition. One employs a classification model to implement a specific classification system. (E.g. we employ the hierarchical classification model to implement the Dewey Decimal System) An effective classification model must represent both the commonality (Webster's "common properties"), and also the differences among the items being classified. The commonality of each category or class defines a test to determine which items belong to the set that class represents. The relationships among the classes define the variability among the sets that the classification model can represent. Therefore, a classification model is more than an enumeration or other simple listing of the names of its classes. Our purpose in employing classification models is to build metadata systems that represent and manage knowledge, so that users of these systems we build can: quickly and accurately define (the commonality of) what knowledge they require, allowing the user great flexibility in how that desire is described; be presented existing information assets that best match the stated requirements; distinguish (the variability) among the candidates to determine their best choice(s), without actually having to examine the individual items themselves; retrieve the knowledge they need The MetaData model we present is Contextual Classification. It is a synthesis of several traditional metadata models, including controlled keyword indices, hierarchical classification, attribute value systems, Faceted Classification, and Evolutionary Faceted Classification. Research into building on line library systems of software and software documentation (Frakes and Pole, 19921 and Pole 19962) has shown the need and viability of combining the strengths, and minimizing the weaknesses of multiple metadata models in the development of information systems. The MetaData Object Manager (M.O.M.), a MetaData Warehouse (MDW) and editorial work flow system developed for the Thomson Financial Publishing Group, builds on this earlier research. From controlled keyword systems we borrow the idea of representing commonalties by defining formally defined subject areas or categories of information, which sets are represented by these categories names. From hierarchical classification, we borrow the concept of relating these categories and classes to each other to represent the variability in a collection of information sources. From attribute value we borrow the concept that each information source can be described in different ways, each in respect to the attribute of the information being described. From Faceted Classification we borrow the concept of relating the classes themselves into sets of classes, which a faceted classification system would describe as facets of terms. In this paper we will define the Contextual Classification model, comparing it to the traditional metadata models from which it has evolved. Using the MOM as an example, we will then discuss both the use of Contextual Classification is developing this system, and the organizational, performance and reliability
-
Smits, J.: Metadata : an introduction (1999)
0.02
0.024940047 = product of:
0.11638688 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5333,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=5333,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5333,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- With the transition from cartographic materials to spatial information the nature and amount of access data for the library field is changing. Besides bibliographic data there exists now a range of metadata, each kind for specific purposes within specific user fields. To define their relation to each other they have been put into a diagram. Through the Resource Description Framework these should all be available through a common interface for Internet-searching. To prevent confusion spatial metadata is defined. Spatial metadata introduces new elements to descriptions with new application possibilities.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.3/4, S.303-320
-
Smits, J.: Spatial metadata : an international survey on clearinghouses and infrastructures (1999)
0.02
0.021816231 = product of:
0.10180908 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5334)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=5334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5334)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 5334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=5334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5334)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.3/4, S.321-342
-
Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998)
0.02
0.015022537 = product of:
0.07010517 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.01
0.01314472 = product of:
0.061342027 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.01
0.01314472 = product of:
0.061342027 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.01
0.010450569 = product of:
0.07315398 = sum of:
0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056881975 = score(doc=6095,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Werf-Davelaar, T.v.d.: ¬De bibliografische beschrijving van elektronische informatiebronnen : 2 (1997)
0.01
0.00927127 = product of:
0.064898886 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=7395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=7395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- As the number of publications on the WWW grows exponentially there is an urgent need for a standardised system of bibliographic description. In the Netherlands the PICA national union catalogue has created WebCAT to catalogue online publications from universities and research institutes. However, use of WebCAT is restricted to participating institutions. The DutchESS (Dutch Electronic Subject Service) and SURF-ACE Search Enginges projects provide a partial solution to the problems on indexing online publications. The ultimate solution lies in the development of standardised metadata architecture
-
Velluci, S.L.: Options for organizing electronic resources : the coexistence of metadata (1997)
0.01
0.00927127 = product of:
0.064898886 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 6863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=6863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 6863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6863)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=6863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 6863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6863)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- At present cataloguing of Internet resources are on 2 levels. At level 1, the description of resources is contained in local library catalogues, along with bibliographic surrogates for all other materials that the library access, based on AACR2/MARC systems. At level 2, Internet resources are organized independently of any library agency. These include separate catalogues of selected resources, subject browsing lists and robot-generated search tools, and focus exclusively on Internet resources. A 3rd level needs to be developed - a metacatalogue - whereby a user can identify specific library catalogues to include in a search query of other Internet databases
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.01
0.006783761 = product of:
0.047486324 = sum of:
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Banerjee, K.: Describing electronic documents in the online catalog : current issues (1997)
0.01
0.00576784 = product of:
0.04037488 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 25(1997) no.1, S.5-20
-
Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999)
0.01
0.00576784 = product of:
0.04037488 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The emerging network environment brings access to an increasing population of heterogeneous repositories. Inevitably, these, have quite diverse metadata vocabularies (categorization codes, classification numbers, index and thesaurus terms). So, necessarily, the number of metadata vocabularies that are accessible but unfamiliar for any individual searcher is increasing steeply. When an unfamiliar metadata vocabulary is encountered, how is a searcher to know which codes or terms will lead to what is wanted? This paper reports work at the University of California, Berkeley, on the design and development of English language indexes to metadata vocabularies. Further details and the current status of the work can be found at the project website http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/
-
McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998)
0.01
0.005745948 = product of:
0.08044326 = sum of:
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=1425,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
-
Popham, M.: Resource discovery metadata for electronic texts and linguistic corpora (1997)
0.01
0.005697382 = product of:
0.079763345 = sum of:
0.079763345 = product of:
0.15952669 = sum of:
0.15952669 = weight(_text_:texts in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952669 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9691392 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reports on a workshop convened by the Oxford Text Archiuve, UK, which focussed on identifying the metadata essential to finding electronic texts of interest to those working in the fields of literary and linguistic studies, encompassing texts of every type and period. Makes recommendations for changes to the Dublin Core metadata format to enable better resource discovery
- Source
- Computers and texts. 1997, no.15, S.15-16
-
Hakala, J.: Internet metadata and library cataloguing (1999)
0.01
0.005027704 = product of:
0.070387855 = sum of:
0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070387855 = score(doc=4565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 4565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4565)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.21-25
-
Lehmann, K.-D.: European national libraries and the CoBRA Forum of the EU Libraries Programme (1996)
0.00
0.0048181238 = product of:
0.06745373 = sum of:
0.06745373 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06745373 = score(doc=7162,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 7162, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7162)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reports the involvement of the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL), and its responsibility both to preserve and to provide access to books and information in an increasingly electronic world. Describes the 2 European Commission programmes, managed by a Forum of 8 national libraries, to serve these ends: CoBRA (Computer and Bibliographic Record Actions), which established 4 task groups to study: improved European bibliographic services; user needs for bibliographic products; networked record distribution and reuse; and promotion of data sharing; and a new programme called CoBRA PLus to continue the work of CoBRA and widen its focus to include collection based services, with emphasis on resource sharing, user needs and the use of communication networks. Notes the 2 main task groups, concerned with: metadata and bibliographic access, and electronic publications and digital resources, including legal deposit and storage. Notes briefly the 8 specific projects ranging from networking name authority files to the development of a new relationship between publishers and national bibliographic agencies for the control of electronic publications
