Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographie"
  1. Zins, C.; Guttmann, D.: Structuring Web bibliographic resources : an exemplary subject classification scheme (2000) 0.06
    0.062431943 = product of:
      0.21851179 = sum of:
        0.067364514 = weight(_text_:subject in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067364514 = score(doc=6056,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
        0.049448926 = weight(_text_:classification in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049448926 = score(doc=6056,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5171319 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
        0.05224943 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05224943 = score(doc=6056,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
        0.049448926 = weight(_text_:classification in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049448926 = score(doc=6056,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5171319 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet challenges designers of reference resources to structure user interfaces so that they facilitate quick access to bibliographies. Designers can organize bibliographies in chronological order of publication, alphabetical listing by author or title and/or subject-headings; or can follow a subject classification scheme from the relevant field. Chronological order of publication and alphabetical listings of authors and titles are the simplest ways to organize bibliographic materials, but these methods usually fall to present the thematic relations among the various items. The subject classification is the most systematic presentation, but the most complicated to develop. This study explores the subject classification model, elaborates its rationale, demonstrates an exemplary faceted subject classification scheme grounded in solid scientific foundations, and clarifies the scientific foundations of the three-phase structuring methodology that was utilized. The exemplary classificatory model is a seven-facet subject classification scheme designed for classifying scholarly papers in the field of Logotherapy. The study, in particular the scientific structuring methodology, provides an example for structuring bibliographic resources in the social sciences, as well as in other academic fields
  2. Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007) 0.05
    0.04665659 = product of:
      0.16329806 = sum of:
        0.066422306 = weight(_text_:subject in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066422306 = score(doc=698,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  3. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.04
    0.042275622 = product of:
      0.14796467 = sum of:
        0.062367413 = weight(_text_:subject in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062367413 = score(doc=5921,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=5921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
        0.02849856 = product of:
          0.05699712 = sum of:
            0.05699712 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699712 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.35474116 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=5921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  4. Zumer, M.: ¬The new "Guidelines for national bibliographies in the digital age" (2007) 0.02
    0.02075909 = product of:
      0.09687576 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=696,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Working group on Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies was established in 2004 has started the work with an analysis of users and contexts of use of national bibliographies (NB) in the digital age. National bibliographies are changing dramatically: they include more and more also bibliographic records for digital resources and national bibliographic agencies are increasingly complementing (or even replacing) printed versions of NB with electronic. The guidelines will be soon posted for the world-wide review; this paper gives and overview of the document prepared so far.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  5. Gömpel, R.; Hengel, C.; Kunz, M.; Münnich, M.; Solberg, S.; Werner, C.: 68. IFLA General Conference in Glasgow : Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control (2002) 0.02
    0.020154601 = product of:
      0.0940548 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Content
    Enthält Abschnitte zu den Themen: Bibliography Section - Cataloguing Section (Darin Ausführungen zur Diskussion um Regelwerke und Datenformate) - ISBD Reviews Group - IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code - Arbeitsgruppe Guidelines for OPAC displays - UBCIM Working Group FRANAR - Projekt VIAF - Classification and Indexing Section
  6. Parent, I.: ¬The importance of national bibliographies in the digital age (2007) 0.02
    0.020154601 = product of:
      0.0940548 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Technological developments are introducing both challenges and opportunities for the future production of national bibliographies. There are new complex issues which must be addressed collectively by national bibliographic agencies. As an international community, we must consider new methods and models for the on-going provision of authoritative data in national bibliographies, which continue to play an essential role in the control of and access to each country's published heritage.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  7. Gutiérrez García, B.; Rodríguez Yunta, L.; Román Román, A.: Bases de datos bibliográficas y clasificación de revistas científicas : problemas de la interisciplinariedad para la automatización de procesos (2007) 0.02
    0.020154601 = product of:
      0.0940548 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
        0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022163 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Footnote
    Originaltitel: Bibliographic databases and the classification of learned journals: problem of interdisciplinarity for automating procedures
  8. Heiner-Freiling, M.; Landry, P.: ¬The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for the organisation of national bibliographies : Switzerland and Germany/Austria (2005) 0.02
    0.018699627 = product of:
      0.087264925 = sum of:
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=4348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
        0.028549349 = weight(_text_:classification in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028549349 = score(doc=4348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The paper describes the efforts of three national libraries to use the DDC to improve access in German to the national bibliographies of Switzerland, Germany and Austria. The reasons that led to the use of the DDC for the organisation of the bibliographies and the difficulties in adopting a common approach will be explained. The paper will deal with the approach of using the Second Dewey Summary and the adaptations made to suit the bibliographic requirements of each country's bibliography. The presentation will also explain the challenges of incorporating German requirements in the new outline of the different series of the Deutsche Nationalbibliograpfie and will show how these were successfully resolved.
    Series
    139 SI - Classification and Indexing with Cataloguing ; 045-E
  9. Hawkins, D.T.; Larson, S.E.; Caton, B.Q.: Information Science Abstracts : tracking the literature of information science (2003) 0.02
    0.015638731 = product of:
      0.05473556 = sum of:
        0.018375175 = weight(_text_:subject in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018375175 = score(doc=1685,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.17111006 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
        0.0118955625 = weight(_text_:classification in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0118955625 = score(doc=1685,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.124402605 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
        0.01256926 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01256926 = score(doc=1685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.10753117 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
        0.0118955625 = weight(_text_:classification in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0118955625 = score(doc=1685,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.124402605 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Subject classifications and thesauri have become more important than ever in the Web environment. Efforts made to organize information into subject classifications, or taxonomies, offer users the opportunity to substantially improve the effectiveness of their search and retrieval activities. This article continues earlier research an the development of a new definition of the field of information science and the creation of a "map" of the field showing subjects central to it and their relationships to those an the periphery. A case study describes the creation of a new classification structure (taxonomy) for the Information Science Abstracts (ISA) database, aiming to reflect and accommodate the rapid and continued technological and market changes affecting the information industry today and into the future. Based an a sample of some 3,000 ISA abstracts, two validation experiments were conducted by a three-member team comprising a database editor, a reference librarian, and an abstractor-indexer, who represent three of the major communities within the information science field. In the first experiment, the sample of abstracts was classified according to the proposed new taxonomy; alter analysis of the data and revision of the taxonomy, it was revalidated and fine tuned in a second experiment. Indexer consistency measures obtained in this study were significantly higher than those found in previous studies. The taxonomy resulting from this research employs the concepts, definition, and map of information science previously developed. It presents them in an organized hierarchical view of the field and thus makes a significant contribution to information science.
    Content
    2. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 2.1 Thesauri, authority lists Taxonomies, ontologies, semantic networks, nomenclatures, terminologies, vocabularies 2.2 Cataloging and classification Tagging, metatags, Dublin Core, DOIs, OPACs, MARC, AACR2, topic maps, cataloging processes and theories 2.3 Abstracting, indexing, reviewing Automatic indexing and abstracting 2.4 Standards and protocols NISO, Z39.5, XML, SGML, HTML, Open Archives Initiative (OAI), Encoded Archival Description (EAD), OpenURL, portable document format (PDF) 3. THE INFORMATION PROFESSION 3.1 Information professionals Intermediaries, searchers, reference librarians, information brokers, translators, educators, librarians and librarianship, mentoring, career outlook, future of the profession, professional ethics, skills and competencies 3.2 Organizations and societies 4. SOCIETAL ISSUES 4.1 Information ethics, plagiarism, credibility 4.2 Information literacy, lifelong learning 4.3 The Information Society Universal access and accessibility, technological and socioeconomic impacts of information, technology forecasts, information flows, futures scenarios, preservation 5. THE INFORMATION INDUSTRY 5.1 Information and knowledge management Knowledge transfer in organizations, business strategies 5.2 Markets and players Vendor profiles and Interviews, trends 5.3 Economics and pricing Business models, value chain 5.4 Marketing, e-commerce 6. PUBLISHING AND DISTRIBUTION 6.1 Print 6.2 Electronic E-journals, e-books 6.3 Secondary publishing Abstracting and indexing services, directories 6.4 Scholarly communication Peer review process, future of journals, dissertations, grey literature
    7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 7.1 Internet World Wide Web, Invisible Web, Deep Web, search engines, browsers, hypermedia, Listservs, bulletin boards, portals, gateways, directories, pathfinders 7.2 Intranets, Web conferencing 7.3 Software Programming languages, operating systems, platforms 7.4 Hardware 7.5 Multimedia 7.6 Document management Imaging, scanning, text retrieval, digitization, records management, bookmarking, hypertext systems, preservation technologies, digitization, linking and electronic cross referencing, storage, digital rights management 7.7 AI, expert systems, intelligent agents Cybernetics, visualization and mapping, data mining, pattern and character recognition, search agents and robots 7.8 Telecommunications Networks, wireless and satellite information delivery, Palm Pilots and other PDAs, LANs and WANs 7.9 Security, access control, authentication, encryption Digital watermarking 7.10 Other B. ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES 8.1 Information searching and retrieval systems and Services Bibliographie, numeric, and Image databases; descriptions of online Services 8.2 Customized information systems, alerting, current awareness 8.3 Document delivery systems and Services Interlibrary loan, resource sharing 8.4 Geographie information systems 9. SUBJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS 9.1 Physical sciences Chemistry, physics, engineering, earth sciences, Computer science, energy, mathematics 9.2 Life sciences Medicine, biosciences, agriculture, environment 9.3 Social sciences, humanities, history, linguistics 9.4 Business Management, economics, companies 9.5 Law, political science, government Patents and trademarks, intellectual property, case law 9.6 News 9.7 Education, library and information science, ready reference 9.8 Other/multidisciplinary Biography and genealogy databases, encyclopedias, databases of theses and dissertations
    10. LIBRARIES AND LIBRARY SERVICES 10.1 Library descriptions and types Special, government, academic, and public libraries, archives, museums, state and national libraries, depository libraries 10.2 Library Services 10.3 Library automation, operations, and strategic planning 10.4 Library consortia and networks, coalitions, cooperatives 10.5 Digital and virtual libraries, hybrid libraries 10.6 Education and training Distance learning, continuing education, bibliographic instruction library schools, courses and Curricula 11. GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL INFORMATION AND ISSUES 11.1 Intellectual property protection Copyright issues and implications, fair use, trademarks, patent law 11.2 Legislation, laws, and regulations (except Copyright) 11.3 Contracts and licensing 11.4 Liability issues Filtering, censorship, privacy 11.5 Sources of public information 11.6 Information policies and studies Security, encryption, privacy, freedom of information, censoring, national and other information policies 11.7 Systems and infrastructure Technology transfer
  10. Gorman, M.: Bibliographic control or chaos : an agenda for national bibliographic services in the 21st century (2001) 0.01
    0.0071102474 = product of:
      0.09954346 = sum of:
        0.09954346 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09954346 = score(doc=6899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.8516034 = fieldWeight in 6899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6899)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  11. Niggemann, E.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Deutsche Nationalbibliographie und Dewey Decimal Classification : Überlegungen, Probleme, Perspektiven (2001) 0.01
    0.0067974646 = product of:
      0.04758225 = sum of:
        0.023791125 = weight(_text_:classification in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023791125 = score(doc=1505,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24880521 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
        0.023791125 = weight(_text_:classification in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023791125 = score(doc=1505,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24880521 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Wenn im Zusammenhang mit nationalbibliographischen Dienstleistungen über Sacherschließung gesprochen wurde, stand in der Bundesrepublik und den deutschsprachigen Ländern generell lange Zeit die verbale Erschließung mit RSWK im Mittelpunkt. Auf regionaler Ebene haben Klassifikationen zwar eine wichtige Rolle gespielt, die Verbreitung der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation im süddeutschen Raum und in den neuen Bundesländern und die Übernahme der Basisklassifikation im Einflussbereich des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes hatten aber keinerlei Auswirkungen auf die Struktur der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie mit ihren seit 1982 weitgehend unverändert gebliebenen 65 Sachgruppen. Nach der Vorlage des Gutachtens Klassifikationen in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken , in dem im Hinblick auf den internationalen Datenaustausch und die Übernahme von angloamerikanischen Fremddaten für die Nationalbibliographie die Einführung der Dewey Decimal Classification empfohlen wurde, ist die DDC mit allen ihren Vorteilen und Defiziten diskutiert worden und in der Anfang 2000 publizierten Machbarkeitsstudie auch unter dem Aspekt einer Neustrukturierung de Wöchentlichen Verzeichnisses untersucht worden. Die in der Schweizerischen Landesbibliothek Bern angelaufenen Vorbereitungen für eine Gliederung de Schweizer Buches nach DDC ab 2001 haben diesen Überlegungen, die im Folgenden dargestellt werden sollen, zusätzliche Aktualität verliehen, denn eine völlig unterschiedliche Anordnung der Grundstufen in den Nationalbibliographien der drei Nachbarländer Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz ist auf längere Sicht nicht förderlich für Zusammenarbeit und Austausch
  12. Roberts, J.R.; Drost, C.A.: Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (2006) 0.01
    0.0067291465 = product of:
      0.047104023 = sum of:
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023552012 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The article focuses on the EBSCO databases that provide services to libraries. The Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) include resources focusing on librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, and information science. LISTA has more than 21,000 articles from more than 600 periodicals and includes more than 5,000 conference papers and reports. In the database, there are also cited references and the number of times the source was used can also be found within the database. These are helpful tips in bibliography researching. The database has also several search options including "Basic Search," "Advanced Search," and Indexes." The EBSCOhost interface is simple to use and easy to grasp while LISTA is a free abstract database.
  13. Kedar, R.: Bibliographic projects and tools in Israel (2000) 0.01
    0.006094498 = product of:
      0.08532297 = sum of:
        0.08532297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08532297 = score(doc=5406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  14. Madsen, M.: Teaching bibliography, bibliographic control and bibliographical competence (2000) 0.01
    0.006094498 = product of:
      0.08532297 = sum of:
        0.08532297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08532297 = score(doc=5408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 5408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5408)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  15. Snyman, R.: Bibliographic control : is the current training still relevant (2000) 0.01
    0.006094498 = product of:
      0.08532297 = sum of:
        0.08532297 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08532297 = score(doc=5413,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 5413, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5413)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  16. Niggemann, E.; Rinn, R.: Vom CIP- zum Neuerscheinungsdienst : Hintergründe der Neukonzeption, aktueller Stand, Ausblick (2003) 0.01
    0.00576784 = product of:
      0.04037488 = sum of:
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Ramamrita Ranganathan hat 1948 erstmals das Konzept einer "Pre-natal classification and cataloguing" in den USA vorgestellt; rund 10 Jahre später führte die Library of Congress ein "cataloguing-in-source"-Projekt durch, das aber noch nicht bis zur konkreten Realisierung eines entsprechenden LC-Dienstes gedieh. 1971 schlug mit der Gründung des "CIP Office" in der LC die Geburtsstunde des ersten CIP-Dienstes der WeIt ("cataloguing-inpublication"). Andere nationale CIP-Programme folgten bald, darunter bereits 1974 der CIP-Dienst Der Deutschen Bibliothek sowie ein Vorläufer des kanadischen CIP-Dienstes, der offiziell zwei Jahre später aufgenommen wurde, und 1975 der CIP-Dienst der British Library. Die aus bibliothekarischer Sicht wichtigsten Funktionen des CIP-Dienstes waren - die Erwerbungsgrundlage durch möglichst frühzeitige Information über Neuerscheinungen und Neuausgaben sowie - die Katalogisierungsgrundlage (auch mittels des Eindrucks der CIP-Titelaufnahme im Buch). Die Basis des Verfahrens waren bis zuletzt die Titelmeldungen der Verleger auf einem gemeinsamen VLB-CIP-Formular (in den letzten Jahren auch in elektronischer Form) sowie die sog. Titeleien (Kopien der Titelseiten und dgl.), die im Prinzip mindestens vier Wochen vor dem Erscheinungstermin in der CIP-Stelle eingegangen sein mussten.
  17. Bell, B.: National bibliographies and the International Conference on National Bibliographic Services Recommendations : Africa, Middle East and Asia (2001) 0.01
    0.005027704 = product of:
      0.070387855 = sum of:
        0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070387855 = score(doc=6887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 6887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6887)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  18. Hasund Langballe, A.M.; Bell, B.: National bibliographies and the International Conference on National Bibliographic Services Recommendations : introduction (2001) 0.01
    0.005027704 = product of:
      0.070387855 = sum of:
        0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070387855 = score(doc=6900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 6900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6900)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  19. Gömpel, R.: IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) update (2005) 0.00
    0.0048181238 = product of:
      0.06745373 = sum of:
        0.06745373 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06745373 = score(doc=4347,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Almost two years ago the IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards has been established at the IFLA conference in Berlin. The following paper gives a short overview about the ICABS-related activities of the alliance partners. Objectives and goals of ICABS The objectives of ICABS are: - to coordinate activities aimed at the development of standards and practices for bibliographic and resource control - to support the international exchange of bibliographic resources by supporting, promoting, developing, and testing the maintenance of metadata and format standards - to ensure the promotion of new conventions - to act as a clearinghouse for information on all IFLA endeavours in these fields - to organize and participate in seminars and workshops - to enhance communication within the community.
    Series
    129 SI - Division of Bibliographic Control; 025-E
  20. Connell, T.H.; Prabha, C.: Characteristics of resources represented in the OCLC CORC database (2002) 0.00
    0.0044839755 = product of:
      0.03138783 = sum of:
        0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021217827 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.010170003 = product of:
          0.020340007 = sum of:
            0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020340007 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 24
  • d 21
  • es 1
  • More… Less…

Types