Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"MacRoberts, B.R."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Quantitative measures of communication in science : a study of the formal level (1986) 0.00 
    0.0032591908 = product of:
  0.029332718 = sum of:
    0.029332718 = weight(_text_:of in 7777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029332718 = score(doc=7777,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.47880095 = fieldWeight in 7777, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7777)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Social studies of science. 16(1986), S.151-172
  2. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a critical review (1989) 0.00 
    0.002661118 = product of:
  0.023950063 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=6901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.342-349
  3. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a study of uncited and seldom-cited influences (2010) 0.00 
    0.002661118 = product of:
  0.023950063 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=3308,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    To determine influences on the production of a scientific article, the content of the article must be studied. We examined articles in biogeography and found that most of the influence is not cited, specific types of articles that are influential are cited while other types of that also are influential are not cited, and work that is uncited and seldom cited is used extensively. As a result, evaluative citation analysis should take uncited work into account.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.1-12
  4. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Author motivation for not citing influences : a methodological note (1988) 0.00 
    0.0024443932 = product of:
  0.021999538 = sum of:
    0.021999538 = weight(_text_:of in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021999538 = score(doc=648,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Footnote
    Stellungnahme zu: Brooks, T.A.: Private acts and private objects: an investigation of citer motivations und Brooks, T.A.: Evidence of complex citer motivation
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.432-433
  5. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: ¬The mismeasure of science : citation analysis (2018) 0.00 
    0.0021780923 = product of:
  0.01960283 = sum of:
    0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01960283 = score(doc=4058,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    For several decades we, among others, have criticized the use of citations for evaluative purposes. Although these criticisms have been noted, they have been largely brushed aside or ignored, not addressed head on. This may be for a number of reasons, but we believe the main one is that these criticisms undermine the desire to have an easy "scientific"-that is, quantitative-method of evaluation. Consequently, we continue and update our criticism of the use of citations for evaluation.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.3, S.474-482

Years