Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.01

0.011985633 = product of:
  0.053935345 = sum of:
    0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03270373 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
    0.021231614 = product of:
      0.042463228 = sum of:
        0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042463228 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Footnote: Übers. d. Titels: A national system urgently required: Leerdam and Weert public libraries experiment with alternative shelf location systems
Source: BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24

Goldhor, H.: ¬The effect of prime display location on public library circulation of selected adult titles (1972) 0.00

0.002661118 = product of:
  0.023950063 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=1035,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

East, D.: User views of compact shelving in an open access library (1994) 0.00
```
0.002544205 = product of:
  0.022897845 = sum of:
    0.022897845 = weight(_text_:of in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022897845 = score(doc=828,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

Provides an overview of the installation of electrically and mechanically assisted compact shelving and procedures for relocating over 2.000 linear feet of books, scores, recordings and manuscripts, prior to, during and after installation of such a system at Bowling Green State University (BGSU), Ohio, USA. In the light of concern expressed by librarians that patrons would be dissatisfied with the accompanying restrictions such as reduced browsing capability, slow retrieval, and their need to obtain instruction in operating the shelving, a survey was conducted among graduate and undergraduate students to ascertain their views of electric compact shelving for books and scores in the Music Library of Sound Recordings Archives of BGSU Libraries. The survey identified: apprehension concerning the use of the installation; the adequacy of instructions for use; the level of inconvenience / delay in accessing material; overall satisfaction; and the positive and negative features of the installation
Bruin, H. de: SISO in de aanbieding (1987) 0.00
```
0.0021780923 = product of:
  0.01960283 = sum of:
    0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01960283 = score(doc=907,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

In the Netherlands dissatisfaction with the classification schedules and subject indexing headings assigned to records by the National Bibliographic Service has led librarians to re-arrange their collections in broad reader-interest categories. With the introduction of online public catalogues in libraries and their provision of multiple entry terms for each item, the problems of conflictions in shelf location are largely eliminated. The internal layout of each library may place constraints on such radical reorganisation. Howver, the merging of the children's and adults' sections can be useful in offering children a greater depth of knowledge. A further useful arrangement may be the combination of fiction and non-fiction collections in broad subject catalogues
Cooper, L.: Problems associated with the ability of elementary school children to successfully retrieve material in the school library media center and some alternative methods of classification which may help to alleviate these problems : a case study of the Common School Library, Amherst, Massachusetts (1996) 0.00
```
0.0021780923 = product of:
  0.01960283 = sum of:
    0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 6743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01960283 = score(doc=6743,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 6743, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6743)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a study to determine the need for an alternative classification scheme for children, whether elementary school children have the ability to use such a classification system and the extent to which the use of colours and symbols as search aids may facilitate their search efforts. Findings of the study indicated that children do have the ability to use a system which is designed in keeping with their developmental level and that the use of colours and symbols as supplementary search aids can be successful

Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961) 0.00

0.0019958385 = product of:
  0.017962547 = sum of:
    0.017962547 = weight(_text_:of in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017962547 = score(doc=6162,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Lehmann, K.: Was lange währt... : Die Überarbeitung der KAB/E ist abgeschlossen (2004) 0.00
```
0.0018922918 = product of:
  0.017030627 = sum of:
    0.017030627 = weight(_text_:software in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017030627 = score(doc=2361,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.10957812 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Content

Ziel der Bearbeitung der Gliederung war neben der Aktualisierung des Begriffsapparats die weitere Erhöhung von Transparenz und Aussagekraft der Sachgruppen. Dies wird vor allem durch viele zusätzliche Inhaltsangaben (einleitende Wendung »Hier:...«) unter den Systemstellen erreicht, ein Novum in der KAB. Während der Arbeit an den einzelnen Hauptgruppen waren zahlreiche Klassifizierungsfälle zu klären und Zuordnungs- und Abgrenzungsregeln festzulegen. Diese finden sich auch in den Erläuterungen und sind außerdem durch viele neue Verweisungen unterlegt. Damit ist es gelungen, den Gebrauchswert der Gliederung weiter zu erhöhen. Den Umfang der Änderungen sollen im Folgenden einige Zahlen verdeutlichen. In der Grundstruktur gibt es nur eine Änderung: die Ergänzung durch die Hauptgruppe Z. In dieser ausgebauten Hauptgruppe für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung sind Software (aus M) und Hardware (aus Q) zusammengefasst, eine längst überfällige Entscheidung. Für das Gebiet »Internet« stehen nun zum Beispiel sieben Untergruppen zur Verfügung, unter anderem sind die Themen Internet-Recherche, Homepagegestaltung, Kommunikation per Internet und Mobiles Internet berücksichtigt. Auf der Gruppenebene (beispielsweise L 3) gibt es wenig Änderungen. Streichungen wie Ergänzungen machen je etwa drei Prozent aller Gruppen aus. Bei den ersten Untergruppen (zum Beispiel L 33) sind etwa acht Prozent der vorhandenen Sachstellen gestrichen und etwa sechs Prozent ergänzt worden. In der untersten Ebene, der Ebene der zweiten Untergruppen (zum Beispiel L 331), die den Hauptteil der Gliederung ausmacht, findet man zwanzig Prozent Streichungen gegenüber sechzehn Prozent Ergänzungen. Schließlich gibt es mit den dritten Untergruppen eine neue Gliederungsstufe (zum Beispiel L 331.5)4. Mit insgesamt 162 Sachstellen haben sie an den gesamten Ergänzungen einen Anteil von 35 Prozent. Vorbild für alle neuen beziehungsweise zu erweiternden Gliederungsteile der KAB/E war die »Allgemeine Systematik für Öffentliche Bibliotheken« (ASB) aus dem Jahr 1999. In einigen Fällen bleibt - vor allem auf Grund der unterschiedlichen Be-stände - die KAB/E hinter der ASB zurück beziehungsweise entwickeltvorhandeneASB-Teile bereits weiter (zum Beispiel Gebiete wie Internet oder Festund Feiergestaltung). Die Neuerungen wiederum werden in die geplante Aktualisierung der 99er ASB einfließen. Dies sindwichtige Schritte zur Verwirklichung der angestrebten parallelen Klassifikationspflege von KAB und ASB. Fazit Der Zeitverzug bei der KABRevision hat sich - trotz teilweise schwieriger Bedingungen - letztlich als positiv erwiesen, machte er doch die notwendige gründlichere Prüfung der einzelnen Hauptgruppen anhand systematischer Teilregister möglich und erlaubte weitere Tests neuer Gliederungslösungen. Zum Schluss noch einmal herzlichen Dank an alle, die an der KAB-Überarbeitung mitgewirkt haben! Die gelungene Druckausgabe zeigt, dass sich zusätzlicher zeitlicher Aufwand und großes persönliches Engagement aller Beteiligten gelohnt haben. Es ist zu hoffen, dass möglichst viele KAB-Anwender die Meinung der Bearbeiter teilen werden: Was lange währt, wird gut!

Cramer, C.H.: Open shelves and open minds : a history of the Cleveland Public Library (1972) 0.00

0.0018816947 = product of:
  0.016935252 = sum of:
    0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 7352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016935252 = score(doc=7352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7352)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : an inquiry into the validity of the direct shelf approach, with special reference to browsing (1972) 0.00

0.0016464829 = product of:
  0.014818345 = sum of:
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 7344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=7344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7344)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.00
```
0.001425896 = product of:
  0.0128330635 = sum of:
    0.0128330635 = weight(_text_:of in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0128330635 = score(doc=1524,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification

Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971) 0.00

0.0014112709 = product of:
  0.012701439 = sum of:
    0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012701439 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Hansson, J.: Framvaxten av 'Klassificationssystem for svenska bibliotek' mot bakgrund av folkbibliotekenes tidiga utveckling och aldre svensk klassifikationspraxis (1995) 0.00
```
0.0014112709 = product of:
  0.012701439 = sum of:
    0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012701439 = score(doc=4702,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

Examines the events which led the Swedish Library Association (SAB) in 1921 to publish a unique Swedish classification system, the SAB system. Its origin is set in the social context of public library development since 1800 and seen in the light of Bostrom's philosophy of rational idealism. This had consequences for stock and classification practice in parish, workers' and study circle libraries. From 1915, SAB began debating classification at annual meetings and in the committee set up in 1917. Library consultants played a major role in the system's development; ahich was created for librarians, not users. The main reason for creating a unique system seems to have been a desire to find a common tool for stock acquisition and organisation which was based on Swedish practice and would function in the Swedish setting. This might explain why Dewey, based on American public library ideas, was rejected. But the picture is complex and can be differently interpretated

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: Development of 'CLassification System for Swedish Libraries' against the backgroud or earlier public library development and older Swedish classification practice
Meijer, G.: Zonder SISO is het makkelijker zoeken : kiezen voor kategorisatie in de jeugdbibliotheek en op school (1990) 0.00
```
0.0011642392 = product of:
  0.010478153 = sum of:
    0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010478153 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
```
Abstract

Reply to an article by B. Schaap and W. Dussel in Bibliotheek en samenleving 19(1990) no.4, in which it is suggested that the SISO classification used in adult sections of Dutch public libraries, may be adapted for use in children's libraries. However, experience shows that SISO's highly-structured nater makes it difficult for both adults and children to understand. Moreover, because related aspects of the same subject are scattered throughout the scheme's main categories, the user must first understand how to use a library's cataloue. However, a more useful system is to arrange books in broad categories according to children's interests, e.g. football and horses. To enable sucha method to succeed public libraries and school resource centres must agree a common scheme

Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.00

8.846505E-4 = product of:
  0.007961854 = sum of:
    0.007961854 = product of:
      0.015923709 = sum of:
        0.015923709 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015923709 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date: 22. 3.2008 17:56:19

Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications