Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.02
    0.021332208 = product of:
      0.06399662 = sum of:
        0.021820573 = weight(_text_:of in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021820573 = score(doc=1632,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
        0.02890629 = weight(_text_:systems in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02890629 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
        0.013269759 = product of:
          0.026539518 = sum of:
            0.026539518 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026539518 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  2. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.01
    0.010324167 = product of:
      0.04645875 = sum of:
        0.017552461 = weight(_text_:of in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017552461 = score(doc=3942,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.02890629 = weight(_text_:systems in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02890629 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO)
  3. Henttonen, P.: Diversity of knowledge organization in records and archives management (2012) 0.01
    0.009652025 = product of:
      0.043434113 = sum of:
        0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014818345 = score(doc=849,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Different cultural, administrative and linguistic areas make knowledge organization diverse in records and archives management. The paper suggests that there are four salient differences: what knowledge organization systems (KOS) there are to achieve the goals of records and archives management, what is the moment when they are applied to organize information,what is the granularity of actions that the KOS supports and how the KOS is combined with organizational work and records processes.
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  4. Szulc, J.: Document management in the the Polish central catalogues (2017) 0.01
    0.008687538 = product of:
      0.03909392 = sum of:
        0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010478153 = score(doc=3512,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  5. Baier Benninger, P.: Model requirements for the management of electronic records (MoReq2) : Anleitung zur Umsetzung (2011) 0.01
    0.007895015 = product of:
      0.03552757 = sum of:
        0.010999769 = weight(_text_:of in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010999769 = score(doc=4343,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
        0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0245278 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Viele auch kleinere Unternehmen, Verwaltungen und Organisationen sind angesichts eines wachsenden Berges von digitalen Informationen mit dem Ordnen und Strukturieren ihrer Ablagen beschäftigt. In den meisten Organisationen besteht ein Konzept der Dokumentenlenkung. Records Management verfolgt vor allem in zwei Punkten einen weiterführenden Ansatz. Zum einen stellt es über den Geschäftsalltag hinaus den Kontext und den Entstehungszusammenhang ins Zentrum und zum anderen gibt es Regeln vor, wie mit ungenutzten oder inaktiven Dokumenten zu verfahren ist. Mit den «Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records» - MoReq - wurde von der europäischen Kommission ein Standard geschaffen, der alle Kernbereiche des Records Managements und damit den gesamten Entstehungs-, Nutzungs-, Archivierungsund Aussonderungsbereich von Dokumenten abdeckt. In der «Anleitung zur Umsetzung» wird die umfangreiche Anforderungsliste von MoReq2 (August 2008) zusammengefasst und durch erklärende Abschnitte ergänzt, mit dem Ziel, als griffiges Instrument bei der Einführung eines Record Management Systems zu dienen.
    Content
    Diese Publikation entstand im Rahmen einer Bachelor Thesis zum Abschluss Bachelor of Science (BSc) FHO in Informationswissenschaft. Vgl. unter: http://www.fh-htwchur.ch/uploads/media/CSI_44_Baier.pdf.
  6. Hu, P.J.-H.; Hsu, F.-M.; Hu, H.-f.; Chen, H.: Agency satisfaction with electronic record management systems : a large-scale survey (2010) 0.01
    0.007171934 = product of:
      0.032273702 = sum of:
        0.011833867 = weight(_text_:of in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011833867 = score(doc=4115,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
        0.020439833 = weight(_text_:systems in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020439833 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated agency satisfaction with an electronic record management system (ERMS) that supports the electronic creation, archival, processing, transmittal, and sharing of records (documents) among autonomous government agencies. A factor model, explaining agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, offers hypotheses, which we tested empirically with a large-scale survey that involved more than 1,600 government agencies in Taiwan. The data showed a good fit to our model and supported all the hypotheses. Overall, agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities appears jointly determined by regulatory compliance, job relevance, and satisfaction with support services. Among the determinants we studied, agency satisfaction with support services seems the strongest predictor of agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Regulatory compliance also has important influences on agency satisfaction with ERMS, through its influence on job relevance and satisfaction with support services. Further analyses showed that satisfaction with support services partially mediated the impact of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, and job relevance partially mediated the influence of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Our findings have important implications for research and practice, which we also discuss.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2559-2574
  7. Kampffmeyer, U.; Wasniewski, A.: MoReq2010 - Der europäische Records-Management-Standard (2011) 0.00
    0.003633748 = product of:
      0.03270373 = sum of:
        0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03270373 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Am 8. Juni 2011 veröffentlichte das DLM Forum die Core Services und Plug-in-Module für die Modular Requirements for Record Systems (MoReq2010®)-Spezifikation für elektronische Records-Management- Systeme (ERMS). Kaum veröffentlicht, spalten sich die Meinungen hinsichtlich Funktionalität und Nützlichkeit des neuen Standards. Ist eine Neu-Vermessung der ERM-Systeme notwendig oder wird mit MoReq2010 lediglich ein weiterer Records Management-Standard übers Knie gebrochen?
  8. Bondarenko, O.; Janssen, R.; Driessen, S.: Requirements for the design of a personal document-management system (2010) 0.00
    0.0021780923 = product of:
      0.01960283 = sum of:
        0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01960283 = score(doc=3430,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.468-482
  9. Richards, L.L.: Records management in the cloud : from system design to resource ownership (2018) 0.00
    0.0016631988 = product of:
      0.014968789 = sum of:
        0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 4041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968789 = score(doc=4041,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4041, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4041)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    New technology implementations impact organizational behavior and outcomes, sometimes in unintended ways. A combination of design decisions, altered affordances, and political struggles within a state cloud computing implementation reduced levels of service among records management professionals, in spite of their strongly expressed desire to manage records with excellence. Struggles to maintain ownership and control over organizational processes and resources illustrate the power dynamics that are affected by the design of a new system implementation. By designing the system with a single goal in mind (centralization to reduce costs), strategic management failed to consider otherwise predictable outcomes of reducing the resources controlled by a group with lesser power and increasing the resources controlled by an already dominant power within the institution. These findings provide valuable insights into the considerations which cloud computing designs should take into account. They also offer an understanding of changing educational requirements for records management workers to engage more effectively across occupations in technologically changing environments and the potential risks that cloud computing provide to productivity. The research was comprised of an extensive literature review, a grounded theory methodological approach, and rigorous data collection and synthesis via an empirical case study.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.2, S.281-289
  10. Bergland, K.; Knudson Davis, K.; Traill, S.: CatDoc HackDoc : tools and processes for managing documentation lifecycle, workflows, and accessibility (2019) 0.00
    0.001425896 = product of:
      0.0128330635 = sum of:
        0.0128330635 = weight(_text_:of in 5343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0128330635 = score(doc=5343,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5343, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5343)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Documentation of local policies, workflows, and procedures is an important activity for cataloging and metadata units. But creating and maintaining documentation is a huge task that is not always a high priority. Librarians at the University of Minnesota Libraries planned a documentation hackathon, CatDoc HackDoc, with three primary goals: to update a large amount of documentation quickly, to apply accessibility best practices to all documentation, and to bring new staff into the documentation workflow. This article describes the event's planning process, structure, and outcomes, and offers guidance on how others can adapt the CatDoc HackDoc model in their own organizations.
  11. Troitino Rodriguez, S.; Fujita, M.; Neves, D.A.B.: Indexing in records management (2016) 0.00
    9.408473E-4 = product of:
      0.008467626 = sum of:
        0.008467626 = weight(_text_:of in 4911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008467626 = score(doc=4911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 4911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4911)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  12. Petit, A.L.B.: Ordnungssysteme im Records Management (2014) 0.00
    4.7042366E-4 = product of:
      0.004233813 = sum of:
        0.004233813 = weight(_text_:of in 2305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004233813 = score(doc=2305,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.06910896 = fieldWeight in 2305, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2305)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts im Studiengang Informationswissenschaften. Vgl. auch: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-fhpotsdam/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/903/file/Ordnungssysteme_im_Records_Management_Anne_Petit.pdf.