Search (40 results, page 2 of 2)

0.0022707502 = product of:
  0.020436753 = sum of:
    0.020436753 = weight(_text_:software in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020436753 = score(doc=4014,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.13149375 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Museen sind gesellschaftliche Kultureinrichtungen, die für eine interessierte Öffentlichkeit ein qualifiziertes Informationsangebot über die materiellen Zeugnisse von Kunst-, Kultur- und Naturgeschichte bereitstellen sollen. Ohne systematische Erfassung der musealen Sammlungsbestände und die darauf fußende wissenschaftliche Erschließung und Dokumentation vermögen sie dieser Aufgabenstellung und Anforderung aber nicht gerecht zu werden. Zum kulturpflegerischen Auftrag der Landschaftsverbände gehört gemäß §5 Abs. lc der Landschaftsverbandsordnung für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 15.5.1953 (in der Neufassung vom 25.8.1984) die "Pflege und Förderung der Heimatmuseen". Da hierfür Inventarisierung und Dokumentation eine Grundvoraussetzung bilden, haben sich die Museumsämter der Landschaftsverbände Rheinland und Westfalen-Lippe seit ihrer Gründung dieser Aufgabe in den Museen ihres Zuständigkeitsbereiches intensiv angenommen. Vor dem Hintergrund rasch wachsender und zunehmend unüberschaubarer Dokumentationsbestände in den aufgebauten Zentralarchiven der Museumsämter - Anfang der 80er-Jahre waren bereits über 65.000 Karteikarten und eine entsprechende Anzahl Fotos archiviert - gewann die Auflösung der lediglich nach dem Provenienzsystem (Ordnung nach Museen) zusammengefaßten Informationsträger äußerste Dringlichkeit. Vordringliche Aufgabe war die Erschließung und Nutzbarmachung der Zentralarchive für einen großen Benutzerkreis über eine differenzierte Sachgruppensystematik mit alphabetischen, Konkordanz- und Verweisregistern, um differenzierte Fragestellungen und einen raschen, direkten und möglichst umfassenden Zugriff auf die Objekte zu ermöglichen. Da eine "konventionelle" Durchführung dieser Arbeiten äußerst personal-, zeit- und kostenintensiv sowie mit hoher Fehlerquote verbunden gewesen wäre, begannen die Museumsämter die Realisierung der systematischen Neustrukturierung ihrer Zentralarchive mit Hilfe EDV-gestützter Verfahren im Rahmen eines 1984 angelaufenen Kooperationsprojektes mit dem Berliner Institut für Museumskunde der Staatlichen Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Nach Abschluß der ersten, bis 1987 terminierten Projektphase dürfen die Beteiligten an dieser Stelle mit großer Genugtuung und nicht ohne Stolz feststellen, daß sich die gemeinsamen Anstrengungen gelohnt haben. Es gelang einerseits eine Ordnungshilfe für die Archive der Museumsämter bereitzustellen (Grobklassifikation) und erste Erfahrungen im Datenverarbeitungsbereich zu sammeln, zum anderen praxisorientierte, generell nutzbare Regelwerke (Thesauri) zu erarbeiten. Da das Institut für Museumskunde und das Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin überdies im Rahmen cles Projektes Software für eine PC-Version des GOS-Datenbanksystems entwickelt haben, die im Laufe dieses Jahres verfügbar sein wird, könnten die Museumsämter die dringend erforderliche Sachkompetenz erwerben, um die zunehmende Nachfrage der Museen in Nordrhein-Westfalen nach Beratung und Entscheidungshilfe bei Fragen und Problemen der EDV-gestützten Erschließung ihrer Sammlungsbestände zu befriedigen.

0.0021780923 = product of:
  0.01960283 = sum of:
    0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01960283 = score(doc=625,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

EC project PRESTO has completed a survey of the holdings and preservation status of ten major broadcast archives. These archives represent a significant portion of total European broadcast archives, including some ofthe largest individual collections.The main findings are that approximately 75% of this material is at risk or inaccessible and that the collections are growing at roughly four times the rate of current progress in preservation work. This article gives detailed results of the survey, and describes the technical developments being produced by project PRESTO to reduce the costs and improve the effectiveness of multimedia archive preservation projects.

0.0021557522 = product of:
  0.019401768 = sum of:
    0.019401768 = weight(_text_:of in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019401768 = score(doc=2671,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.31669703 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.0021037988 = product of:
  0.018934188 = sum of:
    0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018934188 = score(doc=3493,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web

0.0020165213 = product of:
  0.018148692 = sum of:
    0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018148692 = score(doc=5000,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.0018816947 = product of:
  0.016935252 = sum of:
    0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016935252 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.0018816947 = product of:
  0.016935252 = sum of:
    0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 7007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016935252 = score(doc=7007,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7007, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7007)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

The Micro Gallery is a computerised, interactive, public access information system located in the Sainsbury Wing of the National Gallery in London. It provides detailed information about the Gallery's collection of paintings in an accessible form, using digitised colour images and touch screen technology. Discusses the evolution of the system, its reception and the projects it has spawned

0.0018816947 = product of:
  0.016935252 = sum of:
    0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016935252 = score(doc=3945,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Purpose - This research project aims to provide a new visual representation of the Artefacts Canada digital collection, as well as a means for users to browse this content. Artefacts Canada Humanities is a database containing approximately 3.5 million records describing the different collections of Canadian museums. Design/methodology/approach - A four-step methodology was adopted for the development of the faceted taxonomy model. First, a best practice review consisting of an extensive analysis of existing terminology standards in museum communities and public web interfaces of large cultural organizations was performed. The second step of the methodology entailed a domain analysis; this involved extracting and comparing relevant concepts from terminological authoritative sources. The third step proceeded to term clustering and entity listing,which involved the breaking-up of the taxonomy domains into potential facets. An incremental user testing was also realized in order to validate and refine the taxonomy components (facets, values, and relationships). Findings - The project resulted in a bilingual and expandable vocabulary structure that will further be used to describe the Artefacts Canada database records. The new taxonomy simplifies the representation of complex content by grouping objects into similar facets to classify all records of the Artefacts Canada database. The user-friendly bilingual taxonomy provides worldwide visitors with the means to better access Canadian virtual museum collections. Originality/value - Few methodological tools are available for museums which wish to adopt a faceted approach in the development of their web sites. For practitioners, the methodology developed within this project is a direct contribution to support web site development of large cultural organizations.

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO)

0.0018408239 = product of:
  0.016567415 = sum of:
    0.016567415 = weight(_text_:of in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016567415 = score(doc=3720,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

The National Gallery of Canada Library and Archives functions as Canada's national art and supports research on a national and international basis. Given this important mandate and the research interest in art exhibitions, it was important to catalogue the exhibition-related material and to publicize National Gallery holdings. Describes the project of creating an online finding aid for exhibition records and other material related to more than 1900 exhibitions held between 1880 and the present at the National Gallery of Canada. Sets out the goals and many benefits of the project

0.0018332949 = product of:
  0.016499653 = sum of:
    0.016499653 = weight(_text_:of in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016499653 = score(doc=1464,freq=54.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.26932552 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
            54.0 = termFreq=54.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

For the first time, under the leadership of the Visual Resources Association, a cross section of five visual and cultural heritage experts, along with scores of reviewers from varied institutions, have created a new data content standard focused on cultural materials. This cutting-edge reference offers practical resources for cataloging and flexibility to meet the needs of a wide range of institutions - from libraries to museums to archives to visual collections. Consistently following these guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate metadata elements in cultural materials' catalog records: promotes good descriptive cataloging and reduces redundancy; builds a foundation of shared documentation; creates data sharing opportunities; and, complements existing standards

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S. 264-265 (L.C. Howarth): "At a time when cataloguing code revision is continuing apace with the consolidation of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), the drafting of RDA: Resource Description and Access, and the development of common principles for an international cataloguing code (International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code [IME ICC]), the publication of a guide for cataloguing cultural objects is timely and purposeful. Compiling this data content standard on behalf of the Visual Resources Association, the five editors - with oversight from an advisory board - have divided the guide into three parts. Following a brief introduction outlining the purpose, intended audience, and scope and methodology for the publication, Part One, General Guidelines, explains both what the Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) guide is "a broad document that includes rules for formatting data, suggestions for required information, controlled vocabulary requirements, and display issues" (p. I) and is not "not a metadata element set per se" (p. 1). Part Two, Elements, is further divided into nine chapters dealing with one or more metadata elements, and describing the relationships between and among each element. Part Three, Authorities, discusses what elements to include in building authority records. A Selected Bibliography, Glossary, and Index, respectively, round out the guide.
As the editors note in their introduction, "Standards that guide data structure, data values, and data content form the basis for a set of tools that can lead to good descriptive cataloging, consistent documentation, shared records, and increased end-user access" (p. xi). The VRA Core Categories, for example, represent a set of metadata elements expressed within an XML structure (data structure). Likewise, the Art Architecture Thesaurus contains sets of terms and relationships, or defined data values. While much effort has been expended on developing both data structures and values, the editors argue, the third leg of the stool, data content, has received less attention. Unlike the library community with its Anglo-American Cataloging Rules [sic though RDA is referenced in the Selected Bibliography], or its archival equivalent, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), those in the domain of cultural heritage responsible for describing and documenting works of art, architecture, cultural artifacts, and their respective images, have not had the benefit of such data content standards. CCO is intended to address (or redress) that gap, emphasizing the exercise of good judgment and cataloguer discretion over the application of "rigid rules" [p. xii], and building on existing standards. ... Overall, Cataloging Cultural Objects with its attending guidelines for descriptive metadata and authority control for "one-of-a-kind cultural objects" should merit a place among the "well-established" data content standards of the library and archival communities that CCO references with obvious regard."

LCSH

Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.

Subject

Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.

0.0016631988 = product of:
  0.014968789 = sum of:
    0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014968789 = score(doc=7379,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Describes the Remote Access to Museum Archive project, a CEC funded project which aims to promote access to museums documentary databases in museums via telecommunications. Describes existing museum databases which are remotely accessible. The RAMA project aims to interconnect the image documentary databases of seven European museums. Describes its progress, and prospects for creation of an electronic museum

0.0016631988 = product of:
  0.014968789 = sum of:
    0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 4017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014968789 = score(doc=4017,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4017, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4017)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Gives an introduction into the history, theory and practice of iconographic analysis and indexing, also into the application of the ICONCLASS system

0.0014112709 = product of:
  0.012701439 = sum of:
    0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012701439 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.1-49

0.0014112709 = product of:
  0.012701439 = sum of:
    0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012701439 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.33-38

0.0014112709 = product of:
  0.012701439 = sum of:
    0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012701439 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.39-48

0.0011760591 = product of:
  0.010584532 = sum of:
    0.010584532 = weight(_text_:of in 4010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010584532 = score(doc=4010,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4010, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4010)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.0011760591 = product of:
  0.010584532 = sum of:
    0.010584532 = weight(_text_:of in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010584532 = score(doc=2398,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both

0.0011642392 = product of:
  0.010478153 = sum of:
    0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010478153 = score(doc=2887,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Describes a project launched in 1992 to computerize the collections of the Musée des Tissus in Lyon. Known as Système d'Organisation et d'Inventaire Étendu a la Récherche (SOIERIE), it is a tool for internal archiving and management and an image databank. Describes the background to the project, data and equipment, consultation, the users and the current situation

Footnote

Paper presented to the 5th National Meeting of the Sous-Section des Bibliothèques d'Art, Association des Bibliothequaires Francais on 'L'avenir du passe: les nouvelles technologies' in Paris, 19 Sep 1997

9.408473E-4 = product of:
  0.008467626 = sum of:
    0.008467626 = weight(_text_:of in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008467626 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Strategies for sharing, managing and accessing cultural heritage information centred around objects, images and related data are being tested currently through a variety of initiatives and resources. These fall into 3 categories: data sharing projects; image data banks; and rights management. Describes 2 data sharing projects, the Research Libraries Group' REACH and VISIION projects, focusing on core categories, standards and interoperability, metadata, and what might be accomplished through REACH and VISIION

4.7042366E-4 = product of:
  0.004233813 = sum of:
    0.004233813 = weight(_text_:of in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004233813 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.06910896 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Imprint

Sheffield : University of Sheffield