-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985)
0.05
0.050934047 = product of:
0.15280214 = sum of:
0.021999538 = weight(_text_:of in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021999538 = score(doc=2088,freq=6.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.0490556 = weight(_text_:systems in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0490556 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08174701 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.525975 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Source
- 2nd Symposium on Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science, 3.-5.10.84, Atlanta
-
Saarti, J.: Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri (1999)
0.02
0.023541098 = product of:
0.07062329 = sum of:
0.023429861 = weight(_text_:of in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023429861 = score(doc=2983,freq=20.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028615767 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
0.018577661 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037155323 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Considers the theoretical questions involved in the indexing of fiction from several viewpoints: general principles of fiction indexing, and the making of book indexes for novels and other fictional works. Describes the work undertaken to develop fiction thesauri with particular reference to work done in Scandinavia, notably in the development of Kaunokki: the Finnish Thesaurus for Fiction, by Helsinki University Library and BTJ Group Ltd. Briefly presents notes on the structure of Kaunokkis with some examples of its practical use and user feedback from several years' experience of its use in Finnish public libraries. Concludes that the widest field for additional studies would be in the building up of special information systems for fiction.
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 31(1999) no.2, S.85-92
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system (1986)
0.02
0.023054788 = product of:
0.10374655 = sum of:
0.021999538 = weight(_text_:of in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021999538 = score(doc=2961,freq=6.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08174701 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.525975 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Empirical foundation of information and software science. Ed.: J.C. Agarwal u. P. Zunde
-
Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997)
0.02
0.017406443 = product of:
0.078329 = sum of:
0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05872617 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01960283 = score(doc=5844,freq=14.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The arts, humanities, and social sciences commonly borrow concepts and methods from the sciences, but interdisciplinary borrowing seldom occurs in the opposite direction. Research on narrative discourse is relevant to problems of documentary storage and retrieval, for the arts and humanities in particular, but also for other broad areas of knowledge. This paper views the potential application of narrative discourse analysis to information storage and retrieval problems from 2 perspectives: 1) analysis and comparison of narrative documents in all disciplines may be simplified if fundamental categories that occur in narrative documents can be isolated; and 2) the possibility of subdividing the world of knowledge initially into narrative and non-narrative documents is explored with particular attention to Werlich's work on text types
-
DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: French fiction : LCSH applications (1988)
0.01
0.0149145825 = product of:
0.13423124 = sum of:
0.13423124 = weight(_text_:applications in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13423124 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.7782611 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
Nielsen, H.J.: ¬The nature of fiction and its significance for classification and indexing (1997)
0.01
0.013026112 = product of:
0.058617502 = sum of:
0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018148692 = score(doc=1785,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.04046881 = weight(_text_:systems in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04046881 = score(doc=1785,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Considers the nature of fiction in relation to classification and indexing systems. Literary theory today is very heterogeneous. In designing an indexing system a single trend of school should not be chosen. Following a systematic extension and development of the 'how' facet of fictional documents is an useful approach. Themes should be a visible aspect in classification and indexing systems. Aspects of literary history, period, literary movement and influence should be noted
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994)
0.01
0.013026112 = product of:
0.058617502 = sum of:
0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018148692 = score(doc=3413,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.04046881 = weight(_text_:systems in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04046881 = score(doc=3413,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.165-167 (W. Bies); JASIS 46(1995) no.5, S.389-390 (E.G. Bierbaum); Canadian journal of information and library science 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.52-53 (L. Rees-Potter)
-
Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002)
0.01
0.01291258 = product of:
0.05810661 = sum of:
0.025402876 = weight(_text_:of in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025402876 = score(doc=4473,freq=18.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03270373 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the consistency of fiction indexing of library professionals and patrons based on an empirical test. Indexing was carried out with a Finnish fictional thesaurus and all of the test persons indexed the same five novels. The consistency of indexing was determined to be low; several reasons are postulated. Also an algorithm for typified indexing of fiction is given as well as some suggestions for the development of fiction information retrieval systems and content representation.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.49-65
-
Harrell, G.: ¬The classification and organization of adult fiction in larger American public libraries (1985)
0.01
0.012589732 = product of:
0.056653794 = sum of:
0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 5829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023950063 = score(doc=5829,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5829, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5829)
0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 5829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03270373 = score(doc=5829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 5829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5829)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Because classification of fiction has posed a dilemma for librarians for many years, the author conducted a survey of the classification practices of larger llibrary systems in the United States. The majority of libraries physically separate adult fiction from adult nonfiction. A large percentage of libraries use genre categorization to arrange a part of their fiction collection. The author concludes: "We now know what we are doing, but are we sure of the whys?"
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982)
0.01
0.012410768 = product of:
0.055848457 = sum of:
0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014968789 = score(doc=7240,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
0.040879667 = weight(_text_:systems in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040879667 = score(doc=7240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
-
Zyl, R.E. v.: Fiksieherwinning in openbare biblioteke (1993)
0.01
0.012286034 = product of:
0.055287153 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=5837,freq=8.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
0.04046881 = weight(_text_:systems in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04046881 = score(doc=5837,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Public libraries offer fiction readers various approaches to retrieve reading matter: shelving systems that facilityte browsing, knowledgable staff bibliographic aids and also user training and reader guidance. Despite these alternatives, readers often experience difficulty in identifying relevant fiction and no single factor can be isolated as the main cause. Classifies shelving systems and bibliographic aids do not take into account the fiction reader's approach. The nature of fiction does not allow for content to be moulded into any formal knowledge structure. The Analysis and Mediation of Publications (AMP) classification scheme, developed in Denmark, is a fiction classification scheme based on the relation between content and needs of fiction readers
- Source
- South African journal of library and information science. 61(1993) no.4, S.177-186
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.01
0.01165916 = product of:
0.05246622 = sum of:
0.025926704 = weight(_text_:of in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025926704 = score(doc=5835,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.026539518 = product of:
0.053079035 = sum of:
0.053079035 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053079035 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Sapp, G.: ¬The levels of access : subject approaches to fiction (1986)
0.01
0.0115656955 = product of:
0.05204563 = sum of:
0.023429861 = weight(_text_:of in 5823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023429861 = score(doc=5823,freq=20.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 5823, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5823)
0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 5823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028615767 = score(doc=5823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 5823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5823)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Despite the popularity of fiction in libraries, little has been done to analyse systematically the criteria that fiction readers use when selecting books. Describes and evaluates several fiction sclassification systems from the perspective of how well they answer likely reader queries regarding the subject of a novel. Examines the 2-faceted 'levels-of-access' concept that is the common point of reference in all comparisons. Discusses classification schemes in terms of theri utility for browsing, subject headings for card catalogues, and printed indexes. Also discusses the provision of multifaceted subject access through on-line fiction cataloguing. Suggests further investigation of levels of access
-
Austin, J.: ¬The AMP classification system for fiction : Trial application and retrieval tests (1982)
0.01
0.011436489 = product of:
0.0514642 = sum of:
0.010584532 = weight(_text_:of in 6387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010584532 = score(doc=6387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 6387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6387)
0.040879667 = weight(_text_:systems in 6387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040879667 = score(doc=6387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 6387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6387)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Rafferty, P.: Genre theory, knowledge organisation and fiction
0.01
0.011193694 = product of:
0.05037162 = sum of:
0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014968789 = score(doc=3541,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
0.03540283 = weight(_text_:systems in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03540283 = score(doc=3541,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Where the institutionalised study of literature goes, knowledge organisation (KO) approaches to fictional works tend to follow. At the level of generic labelling and categorisation, theoretical conventions of the professional literary critical world appear to be adopted by the information science world, for example in the generic categorisation undertaken by the British National Bibliography. This paper, which is concerned with the epistemological assumptions underpinning fiction categorisation, explores current genre theory and argues for an approach to the understanding of genre, and ultimately the description of genre, that is based on a cultural-materialist, historical world-view. In addition, a novel framework for a genre mapping KO tool is described. Fiction information retrieval is still a fairly underdeveloped area of information science. There have been some developments, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, which focused on user warrant as the basis for developing retrieval systems (e.g. Pejtersen 1992) but there is still space for a generic approach which can identify and describe novels at a micro-level while situating them within a broader systems view. In the current information retrieval context, any such tool, which would be developed for web use, should incorporate both informational fields and affective dimension indexing in the form of user derived tagging.
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
-
Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992)
0.01
0.011068881 = product of:
0.049809963 = sum of:
0.017962547 = weight(_text_:of in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017962547 = score(doc=4155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.031847417 = product of:
0.063694835 = sum of:
0.063694835 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063694835 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:39
-
Garcia-Marco, F.-J.; Moraes, J.-B.-E. de; Garcia-Marco, L.-F.; Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.: Knowledge organization of fiction and narrative documents : a challenge in the age of the multimedia revolution
0.01
0.010392102 = product of:
0.04676446 = sum of:
0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018148692 = score(doc=3539,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028615767 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization (KO) research has been traditionally more oriented toward scientific documents. However, narrative, one of the oldest kinds of literature genre, is increasingly important in the multimedia culture of today, and is getting more important in applied social sciences as business administration, advertising, public relations, politics or education. This paper explores the key facets for KO in the field building on literature theory and faceted classification theory.
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
-
Beghtol, C.: Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus : the case of fiction studies (1995)
0.01
0.010131279 = product of:
0.045590755 = sum of:
0.021062955 = weight(_text_:of in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021062955 = score(doc=7728,freq=22.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0245278 = score(doc=7728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This article reports research that used descriptor subfields in MLA Bibliography online to quantify literary warrant in the domain of scholarly work about fiction (i.e., 'fiction studies'). The research used Hulme's concept of literary warrant and Kernan's description of the interactive processes of literature and literary scholarship to justify quantifying existing subject indexing in existing bibliographic records as a first step in the domain analysis of a field. It was found that certain of the MLA Bibliography onle's descriptor subfields and certain of the descriptor terms within those subfields occured more often than would occur by chance. The techniques used in the research might be extended to domain analysis of other fields. Use of the methodology might improve the ability to evaluate existing and to design future subject access systems
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.30-44
-
Denham, D.: Back to basics : training and education opportunities for the exploitation of fiction in public libraries (1996)
0.01
0.010040373 = product of:
0.045181677 = sum of:
0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023950063 = score(doc=5841,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
0.021231614 = product of:
0.042463228 = sum of:
0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042463228 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Considers the importance of fiction, and the role of the librarian in the successful acquisition and exploitation of fiction books. Examines training and education in this area for both students and practising librarians, and provides details of some possible ways of updating skills through a course being offered by the School of Information Studies at the University of Central England in Birmingham
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:18:22
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994)
0.01
0.009913453 = product of:
0.044610538 = sum of:
0.020082738 = weight(_text_:of in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020082738 = score(doc=5838,freq=20.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0245278 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
