Search (2135 results, page 1 of 107)

0.19673423 = product of:
  0.5902027 = sum of:
    0.062223002 = product of:
      0.186669 = sum of:
        0.186669 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.186669 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26398984 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26398984 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.26398984 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26398984 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.19358268 = product of:
  0.580748 = sum of:
    0.082964 = product of:
      0.24889201 = sum of:
        0.24889201 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24889201 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24889201 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889201 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
    0.24889201 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889201 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.13688362 = product of:
  0.6159763 = sum of:
    0.30798814 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30798814 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.30798814 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30798814 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Footnote

DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.

0.12098919 = product of:
  0.36296755 = sum of:
    0.051852506 = product of:
      0.15555751 = sum of:
        0.15555751 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15555751 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15555751 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15555751 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.15555751 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15555751 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Source

Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

0.11061867 = product of:
  0.49778402 = sum of:
    0.24889201 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889201 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.24889201 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889201 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3321406 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.09454008 = product of:
  0.21271518 = sum of:
    0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05872617 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
    0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018148692 = score(doc=2907,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
    0.04046881 = weight(_text_:systems in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04046881 = score(doc=2907,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
    0.09537151 = weight(_text_:software in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09537151 = score(doc=2907,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)

Abstract

In the introduction for this special issue we briefly review the development of social software, contrasting it with earlier group-based computer applications like groupware and computer- supported cooperative work. The contributions selected span a wide range starting from reflections on informality as a key property of social software. Case studies give details on using wikis for knowledge management and the influence of choosing a specific wiki engine. The transformation problem for non-digital information services is discussed in the context of a large research institute. More recent types of social systems and their potential use for knowledge management are discussed for microblogs as well as semantic wiki systems. Finally, an overview study gives information on the intensity of social software usage for customer communications in large European companies.

0.08684751 = product of:
  0.2605425 = sum of:
    0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014666359 = score(doc=1505,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
    0.19137813 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19137813 = score(doc=1505,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.6570973 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
    0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054498006 = score(doc=1505,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Several partial processes in information and documentation work can now be carried out at the workplace because of the rapid development of decentralised minicomputer and microcomputer technology. In this field particulary suitable areas of application are the subject area or topic-oriented data banks for individual scientists or small research groups, characterised by constant availibility and high topicality. An effective and user-friendly software suited to consistent problem-solving must be created.

0.062136862 = product of:
  0.13980794 = sum of:
    0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05872617 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=1026,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
    0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047685754 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
    0.018577661 = product of:
      0.037155323 = sum of:
        0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037155323 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)

Abstract

We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.057525255 = product of:
  0.17257576 = sum of:
    0.06711562 = weight(_text_:applications in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06711562 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
    0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018934188 = score(doc=3051,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
    0.08652595 = weight(_text_:systems in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08652595 = score(doc=3051,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.7186728 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Survey on hypertext-/hypermedia-systems and applications. Important parts of hypertext systems are shown. Selected systems and developments are presented with their essential characteristics in a frame of a rough classification. Some problems associated with the implementation of hypertext-systems are addressed. Finally it is attempted to sketch the possible future of hypertext/hypermedia. New application possibilities are seen especially in the integration of hypertext and knowledge-based systems, or in utilizing hypertext-systems for knowledge acquisition which are perhaps looked at as expert systems

0.05471098 = product of:
  0.12309971 = sum of:
    0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014666359 = score(doc=1422,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
    0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03270373 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
    0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054498006 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
    0.021231614 = product of:
      0.042463228 = sum of:
        0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042463228 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)

Abstract

Within the SOKRATES project Bavarian state, university and regional libraries are being equipped with locally automated systems. Regensburg university library has piloted the SISIS-OPAC-ONL version 1.0, adapted from the SINIX-based software SISIS-SE, with a machine readable stock of 1,66 million titles. OPAC-ONL offers 3 retrieval functions of different grades. Tests have been approved by Bavarian state libraries provided that certain faults are rectified statewide use of the OPAC should follow

Source

Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 22(1994) H.3, S.358-376

0.04441017 = product of:
  0.19984576 = sum of:
    0.008467626 = weight(_text_:of in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008467626 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
    0.19137813 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19137813 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.6570973 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

The Protestant grammar school in Gütersloh shares a microfiche union catalogue with Gütersloh public library, The school also acquired a microcomputer for cataloguing and list production. The EUMEL operational system is particulary suitable for schools and is used here in all automated procedures. The EBIS program has developed in consultation with pupils since 1986. The system can administer a data stock of up to 65.000 units. Input and search programs are described; there is also a print-out program.

0.043280598 = product of:
  0.12984179 = sum of:
    0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05872617 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
    0.023429861 = weight(_text_:of in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023429861 = score(doc=2829,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
    0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047685754 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Describes the result of seminars on the software package, Allegro, on 27-28 Oct and 3-4 Nov 88, organised by Brunswick Technical University Library and the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbüttel, in order to provide an opportunity for exchanging experiences on different Allegro applications, as well as information on current developments of Allegro and its prospects. Examines a series of case histories, including the use of Allegro in small libraries for cataloguing and the production of card catalogues, the creation of lists of new titles and subject catalogues for circulation, the cataloguing of periodicals with data in MARC format on CD-ROM, the use of Allegro in both MS-DOS and UNIX environment, and improvements in response times, as well as the introduction of window technology.

0.03896336 = product of:
  0.11689007 = sum of:
    0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05872617 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
    0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010478153 = score(doc=5688,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
    0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047685754 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.

0.036401734 = product of:
  0.1092052 = sum of:
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
    0.057231534 = weight(_text_:systems in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231534 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
    0.037155323 = product of:
      0.074310645 = sum of:
        0.074310645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074310645 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Source

Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.25-30

0.035536166 = product of:
  0.15991275 = sum of:
    0.023667734 = weight(_text_:of in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023667734 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.13624501 = weight(_text_:software in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13624501 = score(doc=4748,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.87662494 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

The development of software is a new way of recording knowledge. Beyond archiving literature this will become a future task of libraries. Presents the software information system SISY of the Akademische Software Kooperation (ASK) possibilities of describing and classifying software

0.034032594 = product of:
  0.10209778 = sum of:
    0.03355781 = weight(_text_:applications in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03355781 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.19456528 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
    0.01404197 = weight(_text_:of in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01404197 = score(doc=3000,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
    0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054498006 = score(doc=3000,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.

0.03365761 = product of:
  0.15145925 = sum of:
    0.10899601 = weight(_text_:software in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10899601 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.70129997 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
    0.042463228 = product of:
      0.084926456 = sum of:
        0.084926456 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084926456 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Source

Cogito. 9(1993) H.2, S.18-22

0.030588383 = product of:
  0.13764772 = sum of:
    0.10358646 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 6347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10358646 = score(doc=6347,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.35566437 = fieldWeight in 6347, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6347)
    0.034061253 = weight(_text_:software in 6347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034061253 = score(doc=6347,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 6347, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6347)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Content

"Das Projekt "Chess" ist streng geheim. Wenn sie sich mit den IBM-Experten an einem Tisch setzen, trennt die beteiligten Intel-Ingenieure von ihrem Gegenüber ein dichter, schwarzer Vorhang. Ans Licht kommt das Ergebnis ihrer Arbeit vor 20 Jahren: Am 12. August 1981 wurde der 'IBM Personal Computer 5150' vorgestellt. In ihm werkelte der 8088-Chip von Intel mit einer Taktfrequenz von 4,77 Megahertz, gesteuert wurde die graue Kiste mit dem Betriebssystem PC Dos 1.0 von Microsoft. Die Rechner entwickelten sich rasant. Allein die Prozessorleistung stieg seither um das 300fache. Ein Rolls-Royce würde heute mit einem Liter Benzin mehr als eine Million Kilometer weit fahren können, wenn die Autoindustrie ebenso so schnell vorangekommen wäre, merkt IBM an. ,Wir hatten keine Ahnung, dass unsere Entwicklung die Welt verändern würde", sagt heute Mark Dean, einer der Konzern-Experten, die beim Bau des Ur-PC dabei waren. ,Wir wollten den Menschen ein neues Produkt auf den Schreibtisch stellen, mit dem sie schneller und einfacher arbeiten konnten." IBM, Intel und Microsoft waren freilich nicht die Erfinder persönlicher" Computer, auch wenn siejetzt den 20. Geburtstag feiern. Schon vorher verkauften Apple, Atari, Commodore oder Tandy Spiel- und Schreibtischrechner, so genannte Microcomputer. Und bei Technik-Fans galten Hard- und Software des ersten IBM-PC längst nicht als der letzte Schrei. Dennoch begründete das Trio eine milliardenschwere Branche, machte der PC Karriere. Er folgte den Großrechnern in den sechziger Jahren und den so genannten Minicomputern in den Siebzigern als dritte Welle. Die US-Marktforscher von IDC schätzen, dass von 1981 bis 2000 rund 835 Millionen PC verkauft wurden und derzeit mehr als eine halbe Milliarde rund um den Globus ihren Dienst tun, in etwa soviel wie Autos auf den Straßen der Welt unterwegs sind. Im vorigen Jahr setzten die Hersteller laut IDC rund 140 Millionen Maschinen ab, der Umsatz der Hersteller wird auf 178 Milliarden Dollar taxiert. Die Triebfeder für die Entwicklung des PC: Die IBM-Techniker wollten eine Antwort auf die Microcomputer finden.
Dafür musste der Rechner preisgünstig sein die billigste Version kostete 1981 gut 1500 Dollar - und vor allem schnell an den Markt kommen. Der Konzern griff daher auf Teile anderer Hersteller zurück. Die Wahl von Intel für den Prozessor wurde zur Basis für den Aufstieg der Kalifornier zum Weltmarktftührer in der Halbleiterindustrie. Auch das Betriebssystem entwickelte IBM nicht selbst. Die Gruppe nahm zunächst Kontakt mit Digital Research auf, den Zuschlag erhielt aber letztlich Microsoft. Die Gründer Bill Gates und Paul Allen erkannten ihre Chance, obwohl sie selbst gar keine geeignete Software hatten. Sie kauften diese - der Legende nach für mickrige 50 000 Dollar - von der Firma Seattle Computer Products, entwickelten sie weiter und lizenzierten das Betriebssystem als PC Dos 1.0 an IBM. Das Geschäft gilt heute als Deal des Jahrhunderts", da es den Grundstein für den Aufstieg der Gates-Company zur Nummer eins in der Software-Welt legte. Microsoft modernisierte das Betriebssystem mit verschiedenen Windows-Versionen, Intel brachte immer schnellere Prozessoren heraus. Unter dem Namen Wintel" beherrscht das Duo den Markt. Da IBM seinen PC mit Fremdkomponenten herstellte und das Rezepe für den Bau freigab, ahmten Konkurrenten bald den Rechner nach und boten IBM-kompatible" Computer an. Big Blue konnte sich 1982 darüber freuen, dass sein Gerät vom Magazin Time zum Mann des Jahres" gekürt wurde, schuf einen Industriestandard, erreichte 1987 die Absatzmarke von einer Million und behauptete sich trotz der Klone« jahrelang an der Spitze der Branche, wurde aber später von Compaq und dann auch von Dell überholt, dem heutigen PC-Primus. Die Offenheit der IBMArchitektur sorgte auch dafür, dass viele andere Hersteller Zubehör und Erweiterungen sowie immer neue Programm für die Plattform verkaufen konnten, was der Branche zusätzlich Schwung gab.
In den Achtzigern wurde aus dem Spielzeug Microcomputer ein Werkzeug für Unternehmen. Textverarbeitung, Tabellenkalkulation und einfache Datenbanken waren die Haupteinsatzgebiete. Anfang der Neunziger läuteten Soundkarten, CDRom-Laufwerke und Lautsprecher die Multimedia-Phase ein. Ken Olsen, Gründer von Digital Equipment, der 1977 noch gesagt hatte, es gebe für niemanden einen Grund, einen PC zu Hause zu haben, wurde eines Besseren belehrt: Die inzwischen leichter zu bedienenden Geräte zogen verstärkt in die Wohnungen ein. Einen weiteren Schub erhielt die Branche durch das Internet in der zweiten Hälfte der neunziger Jahre, als der Web-Browser bequemes Surfen im weltweiten Datenmeer ermöglichte und der PC mit E-Mail, Chat und Sofortbotschaften auch zum Kommunikationsinstrument wurde. Doch ausgerechnet im Jubiläumsjahr klemmt das Geschäft. Erstmals schrumpft der Absatz in den USA und Westeuropa. Das hat zunächst mit der Konjunkturflaute zu tun, aber auch mit einer Sättigung in wichtigen Märkten. Viele Nutzer wechseln zudem ihre Geräte nicht so schnell aus, wie von den Herstellern erhofft. Der alte" PC verliert an technischer Faszination. Vom Tod des PC will die Branche freilich nichts wissen. Für Intel und Microsoft gibt es keinen Stillstand, auch wenn ein Durchschnittsrechner heute seinem Nutzer bereits mehr Leistung bietet, als die US-Regierung ihrem ersten Mann auf dem Mond zur Verfügung stellen konnte. Sie sehen den PC künftig als Basisstation, die ein Netz aus verschiedenen Geräten im Haushalt wie digitale Kameras, Handys, Fernseher oder Kühlschränke steuert. Der Rechner werde immer eingeschaltet sein, automatisch die neueste Software herunterladen und sich bei Problemen selbst "heilen". Damit soll auch der Ärger der Anwender ein Ende haben, die auch nach 20 Jahren noch Minuten warten müssen, bis ihr PC hochgefahren ist, und dann so manchen Absturz erleben."

0.030493213 = product of:
  0.13721946 = sum of:
    0.040879667 = weight(_text_:systems in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040879667 = score(doc=5351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.339541 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
    0.096339785 = weight(_text_:software in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096339785 = score(doc=5351,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.6198675 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Eine Bewertung des Retrieval-Systems Faust der Fa. Land Software. Vor allem für Großunternehmen des wissenschaftlichen Sektors, Behörden und Institutionen mit umfassenden Retrieval-Aufgaben scheint das System geeignet zu sein. Zu seinen Stärken gehören: Dynamische Objektverwaltung, ein hierarchischer Thesaurus, Makroprogrammierung und Dublettenprüfung

Theme

Bibliographische Software

0.03037329 = product of:
  0.09111987 = sum of:
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=1092,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1092, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1092)
    0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 1092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028615767 = score(doc=1092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1092)
    0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 1092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047685754 = score(doc=1092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1092)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

After German unification, many former East German government agencies and institutions were closed. Archivists had to secure not only their paper records, but also a considerable number of digital data holdings. East German data processing systems proved not entirely different from those in the Western world, so there were no serious technical problems in terms of hardware and software. However, the conditions of acquisition were very different. In many instances, documentation of these electronic records proved to be incomplete or even totally missing. In such cases, different approaches were taken to identify and verify data file structures and to reconstruct missing documentation