Search (214 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Breeding, M.: Library systems report 2019 : cycles of innovation (2019) 0.09
    0.08574423 = product of:
      0.19292451 = sum of:
        0.06711562 = weight(_text_:applications in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06711562 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
        0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014666359 = score(doc=5988,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
        0.05664453 = weight(_text_:systems in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05664453 = score(doc=5988,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.4704818 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
        0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054498006 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    The library technology industry, broadly speaking, shows more affinity toward utility than innovation. Library automation systems are not necessarily exciting technologies, but they are workhorse applications that must support the complex tasks of acquiring, describing, and providing access to materials and services. They represent substantial investments, and their effectiveness is tested daily in the library. But more than efficiency is at stake: These products must be aligned with the priorities of the library relative to collection management, service provision, and other functions.
    Source
    https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2019/05/01/library-systems-report-2019/
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  2. Multilingual information management : current levels and future abilities. A report Commissioned by the US National Science Foundation and also delivered to the European Commission's Language Engineering Office and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, April 1999 (1999) 0.05
    0.05319977 = product of:
      0.119699486 = sum of:
        0.05812384 = weight(_text_:applications in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05812384 = score(doc=6068,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.33699697 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
        0.011201616 = weight(_text_:of in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011201616 = score(doc=6068,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.18284513 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
        0.023125032 = weight(_text_:systems in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023125032 = score(doc=6068,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.19207339 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
        0.027249003 = weight(_text_:software in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027249003 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past 50 years, a variety of language-related capabilities has been developed in machine translation, information retrieval, speech recognition, text summarization, and so on. These applications rest upon a set of core techniques such as language modeling, information extraction, parsing, generation, and multimedia planning and integration; and they involve methods using statistics, rules, grammars, lexicons, ontologies, training techniques, and so on. It is a puzzling fact that although all of this work deals with language in some form or other, the major applications have each developed a separate research field. For example, there is no reason why speech recognition techniques involving n-grams and hidden Markov models could not have been used in machine translation 15 years earlier than they were, or why some of the lexical and semantic insights from the subarea called Computational Linguistics are still not used in information retrieval.
    This picture will rapidly change. The twin challenges of massive information overload via the web and ubiquitous computers present us with an unavoidable task: developing techniques to handle multilingual and multi-modal information robustly and efficiently, with as high quality performance as possible. The most effective way for us to address such a mammoth task, and to ensure that our various techniques and applications fit together, is to start talking across the artificial research boundaries. Extending the current technologies will require integrating the various capabilities into multi-functional and multi-lingual natural language systems. However, at this time there is no clear vision of how these technologies could or should be assembled into a coherent framework. What would be involved in connecting a speech recognition system to an information retrieval engine, and then using machine translation and summarization software to process the retrieved text? How can traditional parsing and generation be enhanced with statistical techniques? What would be the effect of carefully crafted lexicons on traditional information retrieval? At which points should machine translation be interleaved within information retrieval systems to enable multilingual processing?
  3. Wåhlin, E.: Research on classification systems : summarizing report on research on classification systems and their applications (1978) 0.05
    0.05038475 = product of:
      0.22673136 = sum of:
        0.13423124 = weight(_text_:applications in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13423124 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.7782611 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
        0.09250013 = weight(_text_:systems in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09250013 = score(doc=3617,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.76829356 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  4. Nicholson, D.: Cataloguing the Internet : CATRIONA feasibility study (1995) 0.04
    0.043340974 = product of:
      0.13002291 = sum of:
        0.07118686 = weight(_text_:applications in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07118686 = score(doc=6296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.41273528 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
        0.017962547 = weight(_text_:of in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017962547 = score(doc=6296,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
        0.040873505 = weight(_text_:software in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040873505 = score(doc=6296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of the CATRIONA (Cataloguing and Retrieval of Information over Networks Applications) feasibility study was to investigate the technical, organizational and financial requirements for the development of applications software and procedures to enable the cataloguing, calssification and retrieval of documents and other resources over networks such as the Internet. The CATRIONA feasibility study demonstrated that the idea of a distributed catalogue of Internet resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces is already a practical proposition at its most basic level. Proposes that the next step should be a distributed CATRIONA demonstrator project, based on the Scottish University and Research Libraries (SCURL) group of libraries cooperating to catalogue local electronic resources and selected areas of BUBL Subject Trees, but also sufficiently 'open' to encompass other sites, projects and approaches
  5. Hammwöhner, R.; Kuhlen, R.: Semantic control of open hypertext systems by typed objects (1993) 0.04
    0.039114557 = product of:
      0.117343664 = sum of:
        0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05872617 = score(doc=1902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=1902,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
        0.04046881 = weight(_text_:systems in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04046881 = score(doc=1902,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The C(K)onstance Hypertext system (KHS) is an elaborated example of an open hypertext system. Open hypertext systems combine heterogeneous resources and different hypertext applications such as email, text and image hypertexts with access to online data bases or other information resources. These hypertexts, to which heterogeneous users have access, grow steadily in size. This paper takes an object-oriented approach and proposes a rigorous typing of hypertext objexts to overcome the problems of open hypertext. The advantage of this typing is shown an an e-mail hypertext as a special application of the KHS system. KHS is written in Smalltalk and is being developed an UNIX-machines.
  6. Hoffos, S.: Multimedia and the interactive display in museums, exhibitions and libraries (1992) 0.04
    0.038918205 = product of:
      0.11675461 = sum of:
        0.06711562 = weight(_text_:applications in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06711562 = score(doc=4024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
        0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016935252 = score(doc=4024,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
        0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03270373 = score(doc=4024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    A 2 part report combining an introduction to multimedia technology with examples of its application. The first part addresses fundamental concepts and technical issues to explain how interactive multimedia systems work, and introduces platforms including optical discs, interactive videodiscs, CD-ROM (and its derivatives), digital video interactive, holograms, and high resolution television. The second part describes over 30 projects at 26 sites, with first hand observation, comments and advice. Includes brief descriptions of many more applications and listings of sited worldwide, plus sources of further information
  7. Goldsmith, G.; Williams, P.W.: Online searching made simple : a microcomputer interface for inexperienced users (1986) 0.04
    0.037212413 = product of:
      0.3349117 = sum of:
        0.3349117 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3349117 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            1.1499202 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  8. Hildebrand, M.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Hardman, L.: ¬An analysis of search-based user interaction on the Semantic Web (2007) 0.04
    0.035163544 = product of:
      0.105490625 = sum of:
        0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05872617 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=59,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Many Semantic Web applications provide access to their resources through text-based search queries, using explicit semantics to improve the search results. This paper provides an analysis of the current state of the art in semantic search, based on 35 existing systems. We identify different types of semantic search features that are used during query construction, the core search process, the presentation of the search results and user feedback on query and results. For each of these, we consider the functionality that the system provides and how this is made available through the user interface.
  9. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.03
    0.034300853 = product of:
      0.102902554 = sum of:
        0.021999538 = weight(_text_:of in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021999538 = score(doc=6158,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
        0.0490556 = weight(_text_:systems in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0490556 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
        0.031847417 = product of:
          0.063694835 = sum of:
            0.063694835 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063694835 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
    Imprint
    Cranfield : College of Aeronautics
  10. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.03
    0.031483404 = product of:
      0.09445021 = sum of:
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=367,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047685754 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
  11. Criteria for the evaluation of terminology management software (1996) 0.03
    0.027984725 = product of:
      0.12593126 = sum of:
        0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 3237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016935252 = score(doc=3237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3237)
        0.10899601 = weight(_text_:software in 3237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10899601 = score(doc=3237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.70129997 = fieldWeight in 3237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3237)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  12. SARA (SGML Aware Retrieval Application) Workshop, 19th June 1994 (1994) 0.03
    0.026985776 = product of:
      0.08095732 = sum of:
        0.015556021 = weight(_text_:of in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015556021 = score(doc=756,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
        0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0245278 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
        0.040873505 = weight(_text_:software in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040873505 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes the workshop, held in Oxford, 19th Jun 94, to launch SARA, the SGML Aware Retrieval Application, a sophisticated searching and retrieval software product development as part of the British National Corpus (BNC) project to allow rapid and sophisticated analysis of the BNC and other text materials encoded using SGML, and to allow the academic community access to BNC as easily as possible. The British National Corpus is a 3 year project to build a 100 million word corpus of contemporary (mostly post 1974) spoken and written English, taken from a range of sources, including fiction and non fiction books, academic periodicals, unpublished materials, radio broadcasts, and transcriptions of spoken conversations. The entire tagged corpus is due to be released in 1994 and is expected to be used for purposes such as: reference book publishing; linguistic research; and the development of systems for natural langugae processing and artificial intelligence
  13. Wood, F.: Information skills for student centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1997) 0.03
    0.026762215 = product of:
      0.12042997 = sum of:
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=812,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
        0.10228128 = product of:
          0.20456256 = sum of:
            0.20456256 = weight(_text_:packages in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20456256 = score(doc=812,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2706874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.75571513 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a study of undergraduate students' use of computer-based information retrieval services in relation to their cognitive and learning styles. Includes a survey of staff at Sheffield University, UK on their use of computer databases and the extend to which undergraduates are made aware of these services. Results show that undergraduate use is low and varies greatly between students of differnt faculties. Student searching behaviour was found to be basic and their performance inadequate. Significant correlation's between cognitive and learning styles and search behaviour were found. Computer-assisted learning (CAL) packages were developed and customised for 3 departments. Guidelines were drawn up based on the project's findings for introducing a computerised information sources programme into the undergraduate curriculum and preparing CAL teaching packages on information skills
  14. Ward, S.: Networked CD-ROMs as academic information sources : the growth of networked electronic information sources in academic libraries (1993) 0.03
    0.026646521 = product of:
      0.07993956 = sum of:
        0.041947264 = weight(_text_:applications in 7233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041947264 = score(doc=7233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2432066 = fieldWeight in 7233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7233)
        0.017552461 = weight(_text_:of in 7233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017552461 = score(doc=7233,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 7233, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7233)
        0.020439833 = weight(_text_:systems in 7233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020439833 = score(doc=7233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 7233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7233)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the place of CD-ROMs in academic libraries and in particular the use of network solutions to widen the access to these services. A questionnaire survey was undertaken of academic libraries in the UK, Eire, USA and Canada and the results analysed. 9 UK libraries were selected as case studies for more detailed examinations of the issues involved: in particular the management issues. These case studies were selected to cover a variety of experiences and circumstances. A parallel survey looked at CD-ROM publishing and a questionnaire survey was sent to publishers but the response was not as good as the previous survey. Trends in CD-ROM publishing, including the future of CD-ROM in the views of the publishers and of librarians, suggest that other electronic media may replace CD-ROM for some applications but that CD-ROM is likely to remain a part of hybrid information systems. The networking of CD-ROM services is constrained by the cost, by technical complexity, and by restrictive licensing agreements. Future electronic information services may include regionally or nationally mounted databases accessible over the Internet or over SuperJanet in the UK. Issues such as the electronic library or the virtual library, and document delivery services are likely to gain prominence
  15. Belkin, N.J.; Vickery, A.: Interaction in information systems : a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems (1985) 0.02
    0.021279104 = product of:
      0.095755965 = sum of:
        0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014818345 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
        0.08093762 = weight(_text_:systems in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08093762 = score(doc=3295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.6722569 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  16. Feldman, T.: Multimedia (1994) 0.02
    0.020995347 = product of:
      0.09447906 = sum of:
        0.08389453 = weight(_text_:applications in 7236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08389453 = score(doc=7236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.4864132 = fieldWeight in 7236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7236)
        0.010584532 = weight(_text_:of in 7236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010584532 = score(doc=7236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 7236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7236)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Defines multimedia. Discusses the electronic information industry. Describes the technology of multimedia and its applications in education and training, business and professional areas, entertainment and leisure and publishing bookselling and libraries. Discusses future developments
  17. Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: ¬The use of hypertext in libraries in the United Kingdom (1994) 0.02
    0.020505097 = product of:
      0.09227294 = sum of:
        0.022897845 = weight(_text_:of in 5383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022897845 = score(doc=5383,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 5383, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5383)
        0.06937509 = weight(_text_:systems in 5383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06937509 = score(doc=5383,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.57622015 = fieldWeight in 5383, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5383)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of hypertext systems in use in UK libraries. Systems include public access point of information (POI) systems that provide guidance to users of local resources, and networked document retrieval systems, such as WWW, that enable users to access texts stored on machines linked by the Internet. Particular emphasis is placed on those systems that are produced inhouse by the libraries in which they are used. The review is based on a series of telephone or face to face interviews conducted with representatives of those organizations that a literature review and mailed questionnaire survey identified as current users of hypertext. Considers issues relating to system development and usability, and presents a set of appropriate guidelines for the designers of future systems. Concludes that: the principle application of hypertext systems in UK libraries is in the implementation of POI systems; that such development is most advanced in the academic sector; and that such development is set to increase in tandem with use of the WWW
  18. Cleverdon, C.W.: Aslib Cranfield research project : report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1962) 0.02
    0.019857228 = product of:
      0.089357525 = sum of:
        0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023950063 = score(doc=2741,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
        0.06540746 = weight(_text_:systems in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06540746 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  19. Colomb, R.M.: Quality of ontologies in interoperating information systems (2002) 0.02
    0.019158738 = product of:
      0.08621432 = sum of:
        0.022227516 = weight(_text_:of in 7858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022227516 = score(doc=7858,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 7858, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7858)
        0.0639868 = weight(_text_:systems in 7858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0639868 = score(doc=7858,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.5314657 = fieldWeight in 7858, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7858)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is an quality of ontologies as they relate to interoperating information systems. Quality is not a property of something but a judgment, so must be relative to some purpose, and generally involves recognition of design tradeoffs. Ontologies used for information systems interoperability have much in common with classification systems in information science, knowledge based systems, and programming languages, and inherit quality characteristics from each of these older areas. Factors peculiar to the new field lead to some additional characteristics relevant to quality, some of which are more profitably considered quality aspects not of the ontology as such, but of the environment through which the ontology is made available to its users. Suggestions are presented as to how to use these Factors in producing quality ontologies.
  20. Booth, A.: Qualitative evaluation of information technology in communication systems (1988) 0.02
    0.018575473 = product of:
      0.08358963 = sum of:
        0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01960283 = score(doc=1410,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
        0.0639868 = weight(_text_:systems in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0639868 = score(doc=1410,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.5314657 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a preliminary investigation of techniques of evaluation applied to information technology based communication systems such as: electronic mail; facsimile transmission (fax); voice mail; and teleconferencing. The aim of the study was to develop a methodology for the consistent and systematic evaluation of such systems using qualitative factors as the basis for the evaluation framework. Concludes that: there is no reported framework within the literature surveyed that deals adequately with the evaluation of information technolgy based communications systems; it is possible the generate evaluation methodologies that can be used consistently and systematically in decision making about information technology based communication systems; and substantial further work is rrequired to validate and develop the recommended methodologies

Authors

Languages

  • e 186
  • d 26

Types

  • el 26
  • m 4
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…