Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988) 0.15
    0.15198311 = product of:
      0.45594934 = sum of:
        0.025666127 = weight(_text_:of in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025666127 = score(doc=437,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.3349117 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3349117 = score(doc=437,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            1.1499202 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.09537151 = weight(_text_:software in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09537151 = score(doc=437,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
  2. Intner, S.S.: Problems and solutions in descriptive cataloging of microcomputer software (1985) 0.15
    0.14595753 = product of:
      0.43787256 = sum of:
        0.016802425 = weight(_text_:of in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802425 = score(doc=348,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.3209509 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3209509 = score(doc=348,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            1.1019857 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.10011923 = weight(_text_:software in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10011923 = score(doc=348,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.6441852 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Once collections of microcomputer software are established in a library, they grow like wildfire, requiring bibliographic control. Control should have been furnished by AACR2, however, Chapter 9, designed to deal with macroor minicomputer software, was difficult to apply to microcomputer software. Responding to demand from the field, a Task Force of ALA's Committee Cataloging: Description and Access devised Guidelines for Using AACR2 Chapter 9 for Cataloging Microcomputer Software, which was approved at the 1984 Midwinter Conference and is now available for purchase from RTSD. The Guidelines deal with three problems raised by application of Chapter 9 to microcomputer software: teminology; description of the physical manifestation of an item; and notes describing related hardware. A fourth problem concerns which materials are covered by the Guidelines. Each of these is explored and evaluated.
  3. Olsen, N.B.: Cataloging microcomputer software (1988) 0.14
    0.13659784 = product of:
      0.6146903 = sum of:
        0.47844532 = weight(_text_:microcomputer in 3982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47844532 = score(doc=3982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29124779 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            1.6427432 = fieldWeight in 3982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4342074 = idf(docFreq=70, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3982)
        0.13624501 = weight(_text_:software in 3982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13624501 = score(doc=3982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.87662494 = fieldWeight in 3982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3982)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  4. Lauf-Immesberger, K.: Tagung in Gütersloh : EDV Programme für Bibliotheken (1988) 0.04
    0.03896336 = product of:
      0.11689007 = sum of:
        0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05872617 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
        0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010478153 = score(doc=5688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
        0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047685754 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.
  5. Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985) 0.03
    0.030888293 = product of:
      0.092664875 = sum of:
        0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016935252 = score(doc=364,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054498006 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.021231614 = product of:
          0.042463228 = sum of:
            0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042463228 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional cataloging support services such as typing and filing are gradually being eliminated in favor of more sophisticated skills. Library staff members who are specialized in imminently obsolete skills must be re-educated to become productive participants in the "Golden Age" of technology. The Catalog Management section at the Iowa State University Library is attempting to make this process painless and exciting for all of its employees.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:11
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Computer Software Cataloging: Techniques and Examples
  6. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.03
    0.028622082 = product of:
      0.08586624 = sum of:
        0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01960283 = score(doc=366,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047685754 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.018577661 = product of:
          0.037155323 = sum of:
            0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037155323 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Computer Software Cataloging: Techniques and Examples
  7. techniques and examples : Computer software cataloging (1986) 0.02
    0.019842573 = product of:
      0.08929157 = sum of:
        0.021169065 = weight(_text_:of in 2330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021169065 = score(doc=2330,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 2330, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2330)
        0.068122506 = weight(_text_:software in 2330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068122506 = score(doc=2330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 2330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2330)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    LCSH
    Cataloging of computer programs
    Cataloging of computer programs / Specimens
    Subject
    Cataloging of computer programs
    Cataloging of computer programs / Specimens
  8. André, P.W.; Janakiev, E.; Case, M.M.; Randall, K.M.: Serials control in an online integrated system : can latest entry cataloging help? (1986) 0.02
    0.017083302 = product of:
      0.07687486 = sum of:
        0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05872617 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=381,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.
  9. Sluk, J.M.: Enhancing a national database (1985) 0.02
    0.016318265 = product of:
      0.07343219 = sum of:
        0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018934188 = score(doc=352,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
        0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054498006 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The cooperative cataloging of library materials is a centuriesold concept. Efforts at cooperative cataloging have historically attempted to reduce cataloging costs while maintaining a high degree of accuracy. This paper outlines the experience of the University of Pittsburgh with Enhance, the OCLC cooperative project designed to improve the quality of the OCLC database.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Computer Software Cataloging: Techniques and Examples
  10. Darling, K.; Allen, A.: Using the OCLC CJK350 at the University of Oregon Library (1988) 0.02
    0.016318265 = product of:
      0.07343219 = sum of:
        0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018934188 = score(doc=427,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 427, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=427)
        0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054498006 = score(doc=427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=427)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the OCLC CJK350 cataloging system at the University of Oregon Library beginning with the field test in 1986. Hardware, software, catalog maintenance and workflow are discussed. Suggestions are made for other libraries considering automation of the cataloging of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean vernacular materials.
  11. Fenly, J.G.; Irvine, S.D.: ¬The Name Authority Co-op (NACO) project at the Library of Congress : present and future (1986) 0.01
    0.011030885 = product of:
      0.049638983 = sum of:
        0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016935252 = score(doc=378,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
        0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03270373 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past nine years, the Name Authority Co-op Project (NACO) has grown to become an important source of both authority and bibliographic records in the LC database. With the implementation of the Linked Systems Project in late 1985, the enriched LC authorities database is being made available on a more timely basis to a wider library public. This article describes the origin and growth of NACO, its operations, and prospects for future cooperation.
  12. Bierbaum, E.G.: Records and access : museum registration and library cataloging (1988) 0.01
    0.011030885 = product of:
      0.049638983 = sum of:
        0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016935252 = score(doc=432,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
        0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03270373 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries and museums are alike in collecting sources of information, whether print or nonprint items, sound recordings, or three-dimensional objects. The institutions also maintain records of their collections in files or systems which reflect the purpose of the collections. This article compares and contrasts museum registration and library cataloging procedures, suggesting that differences in records management result from philosophical and historical differences. It is suggested also that the competencies of library and information science may be applied to museum registration.
  13. Sanders, T.R.: Monographs of a regular frequency (1988) 0.01
    0.010392102 = product of:
      0.04676446 = sum of:
        0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018148692 = score(doc=435,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    In cataloging, it is necessary to determine whether the item is monographic or serial in nature. Library of Congress rule interpretations have progressively restricted the types of publication which can be cataloged as serial. These interpretations have been, essentially, new rules. These new LC rules depart from past practice, and are not always consistently applied. Restricting the types of publication considered serial may work against efficient acquisition of materials, and confuse patron access, especially on automated in-house systems. Decisions made by major cataloging agencies and distributed via (inter)national bibliographic utilities may be accepted too readily in other libraries. The whole area of what is or is not serial needs to be rethought.
  14. Fuller, E.E.: Variation in personal names in works represented in the catalog (1989) 0.01
    0.010040707 = product of:
      0.04518318 = sum of:
        0.016567415 = weight(_text_:of in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016567415 = score(doc=439,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Recent research suggests that many authority records might be unnecessary in online systems with sophisticated programming. One problem in determining which names can be used without full authority records and the references they provide is that there has been little study of the names themselves, and patterns of variation are unknown. In a random sample of persons with entries in the University of Chicago library general catalog, more than 80% had names appearing in only one form in all works. The study also catagorizes the differences among the forms of those names that do appear in more than one way.
  15. Lambrecht, J.H.: ¬A case for pre-order searching in the catalog department (1988) 0.01
    0.009652025 = product of:
      0.043434113 = sum of:
        0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014818345 = score(doc=433,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
        0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028615767 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Searching and record creation in a total and integrated library system could be accomplished in a number of departments. Local organizational history will inevitably have an impact upon the placement of responsibility for these functions, but should not be the sole criterion. Several factors argue strongly for searching and record creation within the catalog department. Among these are the expertise of the catalog department in creating and maintaining bibliographic records, the increasingly similar methods of pre-order and pre-catalog searching, and the theories upon which total and integrated systems such as NOTIS are based.
  16. Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.01
    0.009184495 = product of:
      0.041330226 = sum of:
        0.016802425 = weight(_text_:of in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802425 = score(doc=266,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0245278 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.
    Source
    Future of online catalogs. Essen Symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985. Ed. by A.H. Helal, J.W. Weiss
  17. Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : Microrechnergestützte Datenbanksysteme für die Verarbeitung bibliothekarischer Daten: Allegro-C, LIDOS, TINman im Vergleich (1989) 0.01
    0.009083001 = product of:
      0.08174701 = sum of:
        0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08174701 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.525975 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  18. Goossens, P.; Mazur-Rzesos, E.: Hierarchical relationships in bibliographic descriptions : problem analysis (1982) 0.01
    0.009083001 = product of:
      0.08174701 = sum of:
        0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 4619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08174701 = score(doc=4619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.525975 = fieldWeight in 4619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4619)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Hierarchical relationships in bibliographic records, INTERMARC software subgroup seminar 4, Essen, 25.3.-27.3.1981
  19. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.01
    0.008925734 = product of:
      0.040165804 = sum of:
        0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018934188 = score(doc=2502,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.021231614 = product of:
          0.042463228 = sum of:
            0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042463228 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  20. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.01
    0.008925734 = product of:
      0.040165804 = sum of:
        0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018934188 = score(doc=358,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
        0.021231614 = product of:
          0.042463228 = sum of:
            0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042463228 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03917671 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22

Authors

Languages

  • e 97
  • d 6
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 92
  • m 10
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications