Search (122 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Sieverts, E.G.; Lobbestael, G.; Groeniger, B.O.; Provost, F.; Sikovà, ?: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.5: personal information managers, hypertext and relevance ranking programs (1992) 0.01
    0.014751643 = product of:
      0.06638239 = sum of:
        0.019385567 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019385567 = score(doc=5049,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.046996824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046996824 = score(doc=5049,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the fifth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of seven programs are presented and various properties and qualitites of theses programs are discussed. In this instalment of the series we discuss programs for information storage and retrieval which are primarily characterised by the properties of personal information managers (PIMs), hypertext programs, or best match and ranking retrieval systems. The programs reviewed in this issue are the personal information managers 3by5/RediReference, askSam, Dayflo Tracker, and Ize; Personal Librarian uses best match and ranking; the hypertext programs are Folio Views and the HyperKRS/HyperCard combination (aksSam, Ize and Personal Librarian boast hypertext features as well). HyperKRS/HyperCard is only available for the Apple Macintosh. All other programs run under MS-DOS; versions of Personal Librarian also run under Windows and some other systems. For each of the seven programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
  2. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Nieuwland, A.; Groeneveld, C.; Zwart, B. de: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.6: various additional programs (1993) 0.01
    0.014722604 = product of:
      0.06625172 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=5051,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
        0.05254405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05254405 = score(doc=5051,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the sixth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of nine programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. We discuss additional programs for information storage and retrieval and for text retrieval from several of the various categories which have been looked at in previous instalments. On new (secondary) type of ISR software is defined as administrative software. The program review in this issue are BRS-Search, dtSearch, InfoBank, Micro-OPC, Q&A, STN-PFS, Strix, TINman and ZYIndex. All but dtSearch and ZYIndex can be regarded as primarily classical retrieval packages; Q&A boasts comprehensive administrative features as well; dtSearch and ZYIndex are indexing programs. For ZYIndex a new Windows version has been tested. All other programs run under MS-DOS. For each of the nine programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. All the programs are individually discussed as well
  3. Kashyap, M.M.: Integrated database design for a library system employing library techniques developed by Ranganathan and CDS/ISIS database management system (1993) 0.01
    0.013561998 = product of:
      0.061028987 = sum of:
        0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011192262 = score(doc=3137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
        0.049836725 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836725 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the components and uses of computerized library information systems. Examines the rules stipulated by S.R. Ranganathan in his Classified Catalogue Code (ed.5) (CCC5) for the construction of catalogues and preparation of bibliographies from the point of view of their relevance and suitability for creating bibliographic databases. Compares rules of CCC5 with those of AACR2 and suggests modification of existing rules as well as incorporation of new rules. Concludes that in developing online catalogues or online bibliographic databases, it is neither essential nor desirable to follow strictly the rules of specific traditional catalogue codes such as AACR2 or CCC5. Describes a design for a prototype integrated database for a library system with the aid of CDS/ISIS software
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 18(1993) no.2, S.82-141
  4. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.: Software for information storage and retrieval, evaluated and compared : pt.7: what to choose, or the purpose of it all (1994) 0.01
    0.013489887 = product of:
      0.060704492 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 6885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=6885,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 6885, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6885)
        0.046996824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046996824 = score(doc=6885,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6885, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6885)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The more than 3700 data presented in the tables of preceding articles in this series, pertaining 37 different software packages for information storage and retrieval (ISR), may seem overwhelming to the reader who needs to make a well-founded choice. To make this task easier, some general questions can be asked with respect to the desired ISR application. These questions can be summarised as: what sort of information? How much? For whom? For what purpose? At what cost? The discussion about user needs, typical applications and lists of demands centres around these five basic questions in relation to the categories of retrieval software which were identified in the six earlier articles. They cover the whole range from bibliographic software to advanced full-text retrieval software
  5. Kulkarni, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Viswanathan, T.: ¬An automatic index generation and information retrieval system for bibliographic database developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (1996) 0.01
    0.013203631 = product of:
      0.05941634 = sum of:
        0.02064594 = weight(_text_:information in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02064594 = score(doc=4525,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Information processing is concerned with the representation, storage, organization and access of data. In the case of online databases, it is expected that the information should be retrieved as fast as possible. The query time depends upon how the information has been stored in the database, that is the record structure and associated indexes, as well as the file organization. Based on these concepts, information retrieval software has been developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (INSDOC) for bibliographic databases. Describes the salient features of this software
  6. Nieuwenhuysen, P.: Computerised storage and retrieval of structured text information : CDS/ISIS version 2.3 (1991) 0.01
    0.013162677 = product of:
      0.05923205 = sum of:
        0.014923017 = weight(_text_:information in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014923017 = score(doc=5042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
        0.04430903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430903 = score(doc=5042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The computer software package CDS/ISIS is suitable for the storage and retrieval of structured, text-oriented information, such as bibliographic descriptions. Versions exist for various hardware including IBM microcomputers and compatibles. The software is very attractive, mainly because it is powerful and because the producer, Unesco, normally fulfils requests to use it for free. Micro CDS/ISIS is reviewed in this paper which includes recent experience with version 2.3
  7. Raper, D.: Selecting library housekeeping and information retrieval software (1993) 0.01
    0.012848399 = product of:
      0.057817794 = sum of:
        0.01865377 = weight(_text_:information in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01865377 = score(doc=48,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
        0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03916402 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how a review of the library and information services of D.J. Freeman was carried out, a soecification for a software package prepared, and the choice of the UNICORN system made. Points out that previous knowledge of available systems enabled the selection process to be condensed
  8. Glassco, R.A.: Evaluating commercial text search-and-retrieval packages (1993) 0.01
    0.012191377 = product of:
      0.054861195 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 7414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=7414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7414)
        0.04430903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430903 = score(doc=7414,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 7414, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7414)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a guide to evaluating commercial text search and retrieval programs. Gives an overview of text searching and discusses operating environments, features commonly found in commercial text-search packages, and features that distinguish one text-search from each other e.g. platforms, size of database, query-formulation capabiblities, hypertext capabilities, real-time data-entry and classification, and browsing aids
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.4, S.413-421
  9. Brown, S.: Total recall from Dataware Technologies (1996) 0.01
    0.012191377 = product of:
      0.054861195 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=5808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
        0.04430903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430903 = score(doc=5808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    During 1994, Dataware Technologies acquired the BRS/SEARCH text retrieval package from InfoPro Technologies, as well as exclusive worldwide marketing rights for the Total Recall application programming interface from Kinesis. The products are now being used to create information management applications which offer users the best of 2 very different worlds: the processing power of the relational database, together with the content based searching facilities of a text retrieval system. Discusses the advantages of this, noting also that the package can be used in setting up WWW sites
  10. Jucquois-Delpierre, M.: Is information retrieval with microcomputers mini-information-retrieval? (1992) 0.01
    0.012169484 = product of:
      0.054762676 = sum of:
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=5287,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=5287,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 17(1992) no.1, S.18-23
  11. Ewers, A.: ¬A review of new developments in text retrieval systems (1994) 0.01
    0.012169484 = product of:
      0.054762676 = sum of:
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=1063,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=1063,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a review of current and planned developments of the leading suppliers of text retrieval software, aimed at trying to establish trends in the industry. The products evaluated are those from minicomputer and mainframe computer backgrounds and can be best described as fully functional text information management systems, the majority of which operate in inverted file structures which index every word. The survey was conducted by means of interviews with senior executives of the suppliers concerned and the suppliers and systems reviewed were: Information Dimensions (BASISplus); BRS Dataware (BRS/Search); Excalibur Technologies (EFS); Status/IQ (Status/IQ); and Verity (TOPIC)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.6, S.438-443
  12. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.01
    0.012090692 = product of:
      0.054408114 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
        0.040700447 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040700447 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  13. Jackson, K.: Easy and rapid access to national bibliographies and catalogs with software from On-line Computer Systems (1990) 0.01
    0.01196465 = product of:
      0.10768185 = sum of:
        0.10768185 = weight(_text_:line in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10768185 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  14. Dyer, H. u. A. Gunson (Comp.): ¬A directory of library and information retrieval software for microcomputers (1990) 0.01
    0.0116342725 = product of:
      0.052354228 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
        0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03916402 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  15. Valas, G.: Comparison of some widespread CD-ROM information retrieval software packages (1994) 0.01
    0.011517343 = product of:
      0.05182804 = sum of:
        0.01305764 = weight(_text_:information in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01305764 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study, conducted at the National Technical Information Centre and Library (OMIKK), Hungary, to compare 5 popular proprietary CD-ROM searching software packages: OPTIWARE; BRS/Search; ProQuest; SPIRS; and Dialog OnDisc Manager. Software evaluation was based on analysis of a range of CD-ROM bibliographic databases (with the exception of BRS/Search for which the library held no bibliographic databases) and focused on: response times for various activities (logging on, searching, retrieval, display); other performance factors; direct searching features (Boolean operators, proximity operators, arithmetic relations, truncation); index browsing; search strategy handling; display possibilities; output possibilities; and ergonomic and user friendliness factors. No general conclusions are drawn and users are left to draw their own conclusions
  16. The, K.H.; Wong, S.F.: Developing a CDS/ISIS-based online cataloguing and information retrieval interface for use in small libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.011414675 = product of:
      0.05136604 = sum of:
        0.017449005 = weight(_text_:information in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017449005 = score(doc=2736,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
        0.033917036 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033917036 = score(doc=2736,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development, by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Malaya University, of ONLIS (Online Library Information System), a customized user interface for coputerized MARC cataloguing and information retrieval, targeted for use in small libraries and information centres. Micro CDS/ISIS ver. 3.07 software package and its built in PAscal language were used for the design process and development. Design philosophy centres on the development of a very user friendly and simple interface, capable of mimicking the salient features of a contemporary commercial library package, yet easy to implement and maintain in a small library environment requiring little or no technical expertise. The system incorporates many new features and comprises 2 main components: data entry and file maintenace; and information retrieval. A security system is incorporated into the former environment to ensure data integrity and regulate important file maintenance tasks. While the system is ready for immediate implementation in libraries, modifications and enhancements are currently being undertaken to make it a truly reliable product. Concludes that some degree of user training in MARC and cataloguing using AACR2 is necessary to get the maximum benefits from the systems
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 1(1996) no.1, S.1-20
  17. Chowdhury, G.G.; Chowdhury, S.; Neelameghan, A.: Vocabulary control online in MicroISIS databases : a Pascal interface (1994) 0.01
    0.011024023 = product of:
      0.049608104 = sum of:
        0.018276889 = weight(_text_:information in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018276889 = score(doc=2430,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Most information storage and retrieval software packages for microcomputers including MicroISIS provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrievla, but very few provide any help at the data entry stage. Describes VOCON.PAS, a Pascal interface program for use with MicroISIS software for online selection of term(s) and(or code(s) from a vocabulary control tool to specified field(s) of one or more records of a MicroISIS database
    Source
    Microcomputers for information management. 11(1994) no.4, S.295-305
  18. Hanson, T.A.; Hanson, A.C.: Managing bibliographies with Pro-Cite (1989) 0.01
    0.010469069 = product of:
      0.094221614 = sum of:
        0.094221614 = weight(_text_:line in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094221614 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Pro-Cite is a software package for managing personal bibliographic data bases from which printed bibliographies are frequently required. Condisers the kinds of project for which Pro-Cite is intended, and those for which it is not intended. In the latter category is included the management of large permanent data bases to which powerful online access is frequently required. Its strength lies in its specialisation: it provides pre-defined data structures for various kinds of printed and audiovisual output formats corresponding to a range of standard styles. Discusses the package under the following headings: editing, searching, printing and browsing, indexing, and sorting. Examnines the use of Biblio-Links which are reformatting devices used to convert downloaded on-line serch results to Pro-Cite format
  19. Pickens, K.: ¬The relationship of bibliographic database design to the structure of information : a case study in education (1994) 0.01
    0.010278719 = product of:
      0.046254233 = sum of:
        0.014923017 = weight(_text_:information in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014923017 = score(doc=6661,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=6661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographical databases employing a controlled vocabulary and a Boolean logic approach to retrieval remain the norm. The record structures for databases of this kind need to be designed in a way that reflects the underlying nature of the particular information they contain. Using education as a case study, a basic record structure is described. Possible extensions to this structure are discussed. Professionals in small libraries, working in a PC environment and with time and resource constraints, are the intended audience
  20. Sur, S.N.; Chowdhury, G.G.: ¬A prototype design of a bibliographic database based on CCF using Micro-CDS/ISIS (1993) 0.01
    0.009872008 = product of:
      0.044424035 = sum of:
        0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 8488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011192262 = score(doc=8488,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 8488, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8488)
        0.033231772 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033231772 = score(doc=8488,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 8488, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8488)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Design aspects of bibliographic databases are of utmost importance for effective resource sharing and for providing better information retrieval services in libraries. Standard formats such as the Common Communication Format (CCF) may be adapted for the design of databases. Experience shows that some modifications to the CCF format may be more useful for manipulation of data for various libray operations. Proposes the design of a bibliographic database based on CCF for use in Micr-CDS/ISIS. Almost all the mandatory CCF fields have been adopted and a few new fields added for achieving better results. Formats for display of records conform to AACR2. Provides ample catalogue entries and sample indexes to illustrate how the proposed design helps perform various information retrieval operations in libraries. Modifications in the display of records may be achieved with little effort

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 102
  • d 10
  • i 3
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • ru 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 103
  • m 12
  • s 5
  • ? 1
  • el 1
  • i 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications