Search (188 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.35
    0.34804496 = product of:
      0.6264809 = sum of:
        0.06152886 = product of:
          0.18458658 = sum of:
            0.18458658 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18458658 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32843533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18458658 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18458658 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32843533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011192262 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.18458658 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18458658 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32843533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.18458658 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18458658 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32843533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Spitz, A.L.; Wilcox, L.D.: Classification techniques applied to the recognition of office documents (1988) 0.06
    0.056015246 = product of:
      0.2520686 = sum of:
        0.13460231 = weight(_text_:line in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13460231 = score(doc=137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.61958486 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
        0.11746629 = weight(_text_:techniques in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11746629 = score(doc=137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.68831736 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    In the process of developing a document recognition network service, techniques were developed for the segmentation and classification of text, line drawing graphics and pictures
  3. Witten, I.H.; Moffat, A.; Bell, T.C.: Managing gigabytes : compressing and indexing documents and images (1994) 0.05
    0.049535215 = product of:
      0.14860564 = sum of:
        0.026380414 = weight(_text_:information in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026380414 = score(doc=3083,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
        0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03916402 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
        0.08306122 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08306122 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4867139 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Offers both students and professionals guidance on large-scale information systems. This resource describes a new generation of techniques for compressing, storing, and retrieving information - both machine readable text and optically scanned documents. Appropriate for information science and information retrieval courses
  4. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.05
    0.04803291 = product of:
      0.14409873 = sum of:
        0.021873485 = weight(_text_:information in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021873485 = score(doc=3942,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03916402 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.08306122 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08306122 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4867139 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
  5. Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006) 0.03
    0.03492093 = product of:
      0.10476279 = sum of:
        0.011423056 = weight(_text_:information in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011423056 = score(doc=977,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
        0.05180913 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05180913 = score(doc=977,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.442117 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
        0.04153061 = weight(_text_:techniques in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04153061 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.633-649
  6. Veal, D.C.: Techniques of document management : a review of text retrieval and related technologies (2001) 0.03
    0.030729348 = product of:
      0.13828206 = sum of:
        0.04430903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04430903 = score(doc=4150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
        0.09397303 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09397303 = score(doc=4150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5506539 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Present and possible future developments in the techniques of document management are reviewed, the major ones being text retrieval and scanning and OCR. Acquisition, indexing and thesauri, publishing and dissemination and the document management industry are also addressed. The emerging standards are reviewed and the impact of the Internet is analysed.
  7. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.03
    0.029730773 = product of:
      0.089192316 = sum of:
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.054829627 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054829627 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.018370414 = product of:
          0.03674083 = sum of:
            0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03674083 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  8. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.03
    0.02914791 = product of:
      0.1311656 = sum of:
        0.09967345 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09967345 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5840566 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
        0.03149214 = product of:
          0.06298428 = sum of:
            0.06298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06298428 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    Issues devoted in part to the topic of: Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives; covering techniques of records management involving electronic archival materials
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  9. Bittleston, R.: Managing documents in the wider ares : intelligent document management (1995) 0.03
    0.029034777 = product of:
      0.1306565 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
        0.11746629 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11746629 = score(doc=3398,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.68831736 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at a range of techniques which offer intelligent mechanisms for managing documents in a wide area network. Describes differing techniques for increasing bandwidth, reducing data traffic, synchronizing documentation, achieving partial synchronization, audit trails, navigation, distribution control and security
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.5, S.208-213
  10. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.02
    0.024377696 = product of:
      0.07313309 = sum of:
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.018370414 = product of:
          0.03674083 = sum of:
            0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03674083 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  11. Shamir, H.A.: New technologies for records management (1996) 0.02
    0.021389207 = product of:
      0.09625143 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 6780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=6780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6780)
        0.08306122 = weight(_text_:techniques in 6780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08306122 = score(doc=6780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4867139 = fieldWeight in 6780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6780)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews selected technologies in the information and records management field. Covers: non rewritable methods creating cards, sheets, active records, archival methods, and digital so called optical methods such as CDs. Most rewritable technologies are not reviewed. Touches upon some associated techniques, such as diskettes and barcodes and distribution from computer to computer
  12. Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995) 0.02
    0.020324344 = product of:
      0.09145955 = sum of:
        0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009233146 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
        0.0822264 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0822264 = score(doc=2219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Classification of office documents is one of the administrative functions carried out by almost every organization and institution which sends and receives correspondence. Processing of this increasing amount of information coming and out going mail, in particular its classification, is time consuming and expensive. More and more organizations are seeking a solution for meeting this challenge by designing computer based systems for automatic classification. Examines the present status of available knowledge and methodology which can be used for automatic classification of office documents. Besides a review of classic methods and techniques, the focus id also placed on the application of artificial intelligence
  13. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.02
    0.019399479 = product of:
      0.087297656 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
        0.07674549 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07674549 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  14. Geisen, R.: Cognitive automation with ParsyForm : the breakthrough for workflow systems (1997) 0.02
    0.017111365 = product of:
      0.07700114 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
        0.06644897 = weight(_text_:techniques in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06644897 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3893711 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Parsytec Computer GmbH, Germany, has developed PrasyForm to help integrate document management systems and wirkflow systems by automating data capture into the document management system through the application of cognitive automation, i.e. the automation of simple, repetitive tasks where human recognition is unnecessary. It combines greyscale image processing, self-training intelligent character recognition readers (OCR) and associative database matching techniques
    Source
    Information management and technology. 30(1997) no.3, S.127-128
  15. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.02
    0.016287982 = product of:
      0.07329592 = sum of:
        0.018466292 = weight(_text_:information in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018466292 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
        0.054829627 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054829627 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  16. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.02
    0.016287982 = product of:
      0.07329592 = sum of:
        0.018466292 = weight(_text_:information in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018466292 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
        0.054829627 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054829627 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  17. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.02
    0.016269911 = product of:
      0.0732146 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.06266243 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06266243 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  18. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.02
    0.016269911 = product of:
      0.0732146 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.06266243 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06266243 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
    Source
    ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.237-268
  19. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.02
    0.015674341 = product of:
      0.070534535 = sum of:
        0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009233146 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
        0.06130139 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06130139 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  20. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.02
    0.015375618 = product of:
      0.06919028 = sum of:
        0.014923017 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014923017 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
        0.05426726 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05426726 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems

Years

Languages

  • e 119
  • d 61
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 154
  • m 17
  • x 9
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…