Search (728 results, page 1 of 37)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.05
    0.050293878 = product of:
      0.11316122 = sum of:
        0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009233146 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.027414814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027414814 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.05814285 = weight(_text_:techniques in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05814285 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.018370414 = product of:
          0.03674083 = sum of:
            0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03674083 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships : linkages in the bibliographic universe (1994) 0.04
    0.03929608 = product of:
      0.117888235 = sum of:
        0.067301154 = weight(_text_:line in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067301154 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
        0.011423056 = weight(_text_:information in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011423056 = score(doc=3043,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
        0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03916402 = score(doc=3043,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    A major problem for bibliographic retrieval is an absence of explicit linkages to guide users among manifestations of a work. The purpose of this research was to enhance the power of bibliographic retrieval systems by providing contextual information about the derivative bibliographic relationship. Descriptive survey method was employed. A sample of 411 works from the Georgetown University on-line catalog was drawn. 49.9% of works were derivative. Age of a progenitor work is the characteristic most strongly associated with derivation; language and country of origin are indifferent predictors. Popularity of works might contribute to the phenomenon of derivation. The mean size of bibliographic families of derivative works was 8.44 members. The majority of bibliographic families had successive derivations, large groups of bibliographic families had translations and simultaneous editions; few had extractions, amplifications, or performances; none had adaptations. Successive derivations are the most commonly found members of bibliographic families, and are associated with most other types of derivation within bibliographic families. The bibliographic data required for explicit control of works might easily be compiled from existing records. The development of bibliographic retrieval systems in the network environment could play a dramatic role in improving retrieval of works
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
  3. Evans, D.; Poulter, A.; Shaw, M.: Using the new AACR2 : an expert system apporach to choice of access points (1993) 0.03
    0.033609144 = product of:
      0.15124115 = sum of:
        0.08076138 = weight(_text_:line in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08076138 = score(doc=750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
        0.07047977 = weight(_text_:techniques in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07047977 = score(doc=750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4129904 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This new ed. builds on the success of the decision making flowchart techniques found in 'Using AACR2'. The 1st ed. has proved to be particularly valuable as a teaching aid in the training of staff. The printed algorithms are updated in this ed. in line with the AACR2 1988 Revision using a technique which enables the rules to be applied in a sequence of logical steps. A brief introduction to author cataloguing at the beginning of the book highlights how these techniques might be utilized. A new feature of this edition is the inclusion of a disk. The algorithms containd in the printed volume have been transformed into sets of rules, the algorithms can be used for training cataloguers or in order to investigate the structure of the expert system itself. The expert system shell runs on a PC compatible using DOS 3.2 or above, with a minimum of 512 K memory
  4. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.03
    0.0326653 = product of:
      0.0979959 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.06644897 = weight(_text_:techniques in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06644897 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3893711 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  5. Smith, S.J.: Cataloging with copy : methods of increasing productivity (1994) 0.03
    0.030871484 = product of:
      0.13892168 = sum of:
        0.094221614 = weight(_text_:line in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094221614 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
        0.044700064 = product of:
          0.08940013 = sum of:
            0.08940013 = weight(_text_:theories in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08940013 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21161452 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4624767 = idf(docFreq=509, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.42246687 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4624767 = idf(docFreq=509, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a system of team cataloguing, based on tents taken from Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement management theories, implemented within the OCLC Cataloging Section of the Automated Services Unit at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library. The OCLC Cataloging Section employs 5 half time graduate assistants who are responsible for a substantial portion of the classification and copy editing of records for monographs. The workspace was redesigned so that the graduate assistants could increase their interactions, workflow was streamlined, line of communication were improved, training provided and a mentoring programme was implemented as a staff development initiative for the graduate assistants. The adoption of these measures has effectively eliminated a backlog of materials for which full level OCLC bibliographic records had been found
  6. Ruiz-Perez, R.: Consequences of applying cataloguing codes for author entries to the Spanish National Library online catalogs (2001) 0.03
    0.029478688 = product of:
      0.08843606 = sum of:
        0.053840924 = weight(_text_:line in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053840924 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.24783395 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
        0.0074615083 = weight(_text_:information in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074615083 = score(doc=5435,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
        0.02713363 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02713363 = score(doc=5435,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this empirical study of a sample of catalog records I investigate the implications for information retrieval of the rules for choosing author access points in online catalogs. Aims: To obtain data that can be used to inform a revision of current cataloguing rules, and to propose more functional criteria aimed at improving the retrieval of information located on the basis of author names. Material and methods: A total of 838 records from the Biblioteca Nacional Española (Spanish National Library) were examined to analyze the use of authorities as access points. Authors were classified as creative or non-creative to facilitate the analysis. The variables investigated were author source location, potential author access points, actual entries used in the record, and loss of potential entry points. Results: A total of 3566 potential author access points were identified (mean of 4.25 per record). The title page yielded 57.3% of all potential access points, the table of contents yielded 33.5%, and other sources accounted for the remaining 9.1%. A total of 2125 potential authors were not used as access points in the records (overall loss of 59.5%). A total of 960 authors named on the title page were not used as entries (30.23% loss). In works with up to three authors per responsibility function, 24.8% of the authors were not used as entry points. In works with more than three authors, 75.2% of the potential access points were unused. Discussion and conclusions: A significant proportion of potential access points from the table of contents and the title page went unused. If the access points from these sources were used, author indexes would be more complete and accurate, and retrieval with online catalogs would be more efficient. I suggest that losses for creative authors were caused by neglect of the table of contents as a source of entries, strict application of the rule of three, and other specific factors. Losses for non-creative authors were caused by ambiguities and gaps in current cataloguing rules for choosing added author entries. The findings support the urgent need to revise cataloguing rules for author access points to make them more flexible, more practical, and more in line with actual responsibility functions and types of authorship.
  7. Woodward, J.: Cataloging and classifying information resources on the Internet (1996) 0.03
    0.02901427 = product of:
      0.08704281 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=7397,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
        0.023498412 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023498412 = score(doc=7397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
        0.049836725 = weight(_text_:techniques in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836725 = score(doc=7397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review exploring the problem of bibliographic citations to resources that exist only in electronic form where the cited items may no longer be locatable at the URL indicated. Notes that the Internet is currently in a state of near chaos in terms of access and organization, while searching, usually performed with word based search engines, is generally not adequate for the needs of most users. Reviews strategies used by librarians for cataloguing and classifying information resources on the Internet. Techniques used include: automatic classification projects and classified subject trees, like the BUBL Subject Tree; CyberDewey, and the WWW Virtual Library. Considers OPAC like library catalogues such as the UK's CATRIONA Project and OCLC's InterCat. Explores retrieval tools used with concept analysis and other non traditional proposals, which include some library expertise, usually the use of one of the major library classifications. Pays particular attention to the UDC
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.189-219
  8. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.03
    0.028594801 = product of:
      0.12867661 = sum of:
        0.10768185 = weight(_text_:line in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10768185 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  9. Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.03
    0.027139552 = product of:
      0.12212798 = sum of:
        0.114213854 = weight(_text_:line in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114213854 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.52573526 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.007914125 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007914125 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.
  10. Gatenby, J.; Thornburg, G.; Weitz, J.: Collected work clustering in WorldCat : three techniques for maintaining records (2015) 0.03
    0.02708309 = product of:
      0.08124927 = sum of:
        0.007914125 = weight(_text_:information in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007914125 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
        0.023498412 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023498412 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
        0.049836725 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836725 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    WorldCat records are clustered into works, and within works, into content and manifestation clusters. A recent project revisited the clustering of collected works that had been previously sidelined because of the challenges posed by their complexity. Attention was given to both the identification of collected works and to the determination of the component works within them. By extensively analysing cast-list information, performance notes, contents notes, titles, uniform titles and added entries, the contents of collected works could be identified and differentiated so that correct clustering was achieved. Further work is envisaged in the form of refining the tests and weights and also in the creation and use of name/title authority records and other knowledge cards in clustering. There is a requirement to link collected works with their component works for use in search and retrieval.
  11. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.03
    0.026430156 = product of:
      0.079290465 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.049836725 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836725 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.01574607 = product of:
          0.03149214 = sum of:
            0.03149214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03149214 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
  12. Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990) 0.03
    0.026274227 = product of:
      0.118234016 = sum of:
        0.10768185 = weight(_text_:line in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10768185 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of research designed to explore the feasibility of automatically deriving name access points from machine readable title pages of English language monographs. Results show that approximately 88% of the access points selected by the Library of Congress or the National Library of Medicine could be automatically derived from title page data. These results have implications for the design of bibliographic standards and on-line catalogues.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.254-263
  13. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.03
    0.025591686 = product of:
      0.07677506 = sum of:
        0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011192262 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.049836725 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836725 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.01574607 = product of:
          0.03149214 = sum of:
            0.03149214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03149214 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  14. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.02
    0.021826373 = product of:
      0.09821868 = sum of:
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.0822264 = weight(_text_:techniques in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0822264 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
  15. Gupta, S.: Cataloging Ethiopian personal names (1991) 0.02
    0.02172893 = product of:
      0.09778018 = sum of:
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.06644897 = weight(_text_:techniques in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06644897 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3893711 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Like many other foreign names Ethiopian personal names pose problems in cataloging because of their unique form and composition. People other than Ethiopians might not even be aware of this problem. AACR2 and IFLA's document on personal names are also not much help in this regard. This paper attempts to deal with the unique problem of cataloging Ethiopian names and the necessity of using transliteration techniques for easy filing and exhaustive retrieval.
  16. Normore, L.F.: "Here be dragons" : a wayfinding approach to teaching cataloguing (2012) 0.02
    0.021487951 = product of:
      0.09669578 = sum of:
        0.0065951035 = weight(_text_:information in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065951035 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
        0.090100676 = sum of:
          0.06385723 = weight(_text_:theories in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06385723 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21161452 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4624767 = idf(docFreq=509, maxDocs=44218)
                0.038739666 = queryNorm
              0.30176204 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4624767 = idf(docFreq=509, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
          0.02624345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02624345 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.038739666 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Teaching cataloguing requires the instructor to make strategic decisions about how to approach the variety and complexity of the field and to provide an adequate theoretical foundation while preparing students for their entry into the world of practice. Accompanying these challenges are the tactical demands of providing this instruction in a distance education environment. Rather than focusing on ways to support learners in catalogue record production, instructors may use a problem solving and decision making approach to instruction. In this paper, a way to conceptualize a decision making approach that builds on a foundation provided by theories of information navigation is described. This approach, which is called "wayfinding", teaches by having students learn to find their way in the sets of rules that are commonly used. The method focuses on instruction about the structural features of rule sets, providing basic definitions of what each of the "places" in the rule sets contain (e.g., "formatting personal names" in Chapter 22 of AACR2R) and about ways to navigate those structures, enabling students to learn not only about common rules but also about less well known cataloguing practices ("dragons"). It provides both pragmatic and pedagogical benefits and helps develop links between cataloguing practices and their theoretical foundations.
  17. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.02
    0.020959381 = product of:
      0.06287814 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  18. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.02
    0.020959381 = product of:
      0.06287814 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  19. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.02
    0.020959381 = product of:
      0.06287814 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  20. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.02
    0.020895172 = product of:
      0.06268551 = sum of:
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=941,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.033231772 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033231772 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.01574607 = product of:
          0.03149214 = sum of:
            0.03149214 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03149214 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 659
  • m 43
  • el 28
  • b 16
  • s 15
  • r 6
  • n 3
  • x 3
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects