Search (83 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Wacholder, N.; Byrd, R.J.: Retrieving information from full text using linguistic knowledge (1994) 0.08
    0.08375433 = product of:
      0.18844724 = sum of:
        0.08076138 = weight(_text_:line in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08076138 = score(doc=8524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
        0.013707667 = weight(_text_:information in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707667 = score(doc=8524,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
        0.023498412 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023498412 = score(doc=8524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
        0.07047977 = weight(_text_:techniques in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07047977 = score(doc=8524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4129904 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how techniques in the field of natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of text in information retrieval. State of the art text searching programs cannot distinguish, for example, between occurrences of the sickness, AIDS and aids as tool or between library school and school nor equate such terms as online or on-line which are variants of the same form. To make these distinction, systems must incorporate knowledge about the meaning of words in context. Research in natural language processing has concentrated on the automatic 'understanding' of language; how to analyze the grammatical structure and meaning of text. Although many asoects of this research remain experimental, describes how these techniques to recognize spelling variants, names, acronyms, and abbreviations
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
  2. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.07
    0.065905795 = product of:
      0.19771737 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
        0.05426726 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05426726 = score(doc=2048,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
        0.13289794 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13289794 = score(doc=2048,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.7787422 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
  3. Bernard, M.: Modelling the efficient access to full-text information (1996) 0.05
    0.053374242 = product of:
      0.16012272 = sum of:
        0.02064594 = weight(_text_:information in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02064594 = score(doc=5610,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=5610,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
        0.100706376 = weight(_text_:techniques in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100706376 = score(doc=5610,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5901092 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a research goal set by many offices within the US Department of Energy. Reviews efficient full text searching techniques being developed to better understand and meet this goal. Classical computer human interaction (CHI) approaches provided by commercial information retrieval engines fail to contextualize information in ways that facilitates timely decision making. Discusses the uses of advanced CHI techniques in combination with deductive database technology to augment the weaknesses found in the presentation capabilities of information retrieval engines. Presents various techniques employed in a WWW based prototype system currently under development
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
  4. Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989) 0.05
    0.049661428 = product of:
      0.14898428 = sum of:
        0.094221614 = weight(_text_:line in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094221614 = score(doc=2876,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
        0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015992278 = score(doc=2876,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=2876,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Examines searching capabilities and search results relating to the same full text data base made available by: a host that offers a command language designed for searching bibliographic data bases and a host that provides search facilities that have been specially designed for full text retrieval. Moreover, the CD-ROM format of an encyclopedia is compared with the equivalent on-line version of the same work, Academic American Encyclopedia. Results reveal that it is easier to search on those systems that offer searching facilities which have been specially designed for full text retrieval.
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online Information 89. Proceedings of the 13th International Online Information Meeting, London, 12-14 December 1989
  5. Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995) 0.05
    0.045285475 = product of:
      0.13585642 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
        0.09397303 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09397303 = score(doc=4087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5506539 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the 2 major query evaluation strategies used in large text retrieval systems and analyzes the performance of these strategies. Discusses several optimization techniques that can be used to reduce evaluation costs and present simulation results to compare the performance of these optimization techniques when evaluating natural language queries with a collection of full text legal materials
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.6, S.831-850
  6. Pearce, C.; Nicholas, C.: TELLTALE: Experiments in a dynamic hypertext environment for degraded and multilingual data (1996) 0.04
    0.03830127 = product of:
      0.11490381 = sum of:
        0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011192262 = score(doc=4071,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
        0.033231772 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033231772 = score(doc=4071,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
        0.07047977 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07047977 = score(doc=4071,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.4129904 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Methods and tools for finding documents relevant to a user's needs in a document corpora can be found in the information retrieval, library science, and hypertext communities. Typically, these systems provide retrieval capabilities for fairly static copora, their algorithms are dependent on the language for which they are written, e.g. English, and they do not perform well when presented with misspelled words or text that has been degraded by OCR techniques. In this article, we present experimentation results for the TELLTALE system. TELLTALE is a dynamic hypertext environment that provides full-text search from a hypertext-style user interface for text corpora that may be garbled by OCR or transmission errors, and that may contain languages other than English. TELLTALE uses several techniques based on n-grams (n character sequences of text). With these results we show that the dynamic linkage mechanisms in TELLTALE are tolerant of garbles in up to 30% of the characters in the body of the texts
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.263-275
  7. Melucci, M.: Passage retrieval : a probabilistic technique (1998) 0.04
    0.035382133 = product of:
      0.106146395 = sum of:
        0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009233146 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=1150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
        0.05814285 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05814285 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a probabilistic technique to retrieve passages from texts having a large size or heterogeneous semantic content. The proposed technique is independent on any supporting auxiliary data, such as text structure, topic organization, or pre-defined text segments. A Bayesian framework implements the probabilistic technique. We carried out experiments to compare the probabilistique technique to one based on a text segmentation algorithm. In particular, the probabilistique technique is more effective than, or as effective as the one based on the text segmentation to retrieve small passages. Results show that passage size affects passage retrieval performance. Results do also suggest that text organization and query generality may have an impact on the difference in effectiveness between the two techniques
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.1, S.43-68
  8. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.03
    0.031179637 = product of:
      0.09353891 = sum of:
        0.018276889 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018276889 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.05426726 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05426726 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  9. Full-text retrieval (1996) 0.02
    0.023034686 = product of:
      0.10365608 = sum of:
        0.02611528 = weight(_text_:information in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02611528 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
        0.0775408 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0775408 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    A special section devoted to full text information retrieval
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-330
  10. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.02
    0.022391915 = product of:
      0.10076362 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.08757341 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08757341 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  11. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.02
    0.021536278 = product of:
      0.09691325 = sum of:
        0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0387704 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.05814285 = weight(_text_:techniques in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05814285 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  12. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.02
    0.020959381 = product of:
      0.06287814 = sum of:
        0.010552166 = weight(_text_:information in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010552166 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031331215 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.02099476 = product of:
          0.04198952 = sum of:
            0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198952 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  13. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.02
    0.02033739 = product of:
      0.09151825 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.07832804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07832804 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  14. Frederick, S.C.: SIRE: full-text retrieval with augmented search (1985) 0.02
    0.018614836 = product of:
      0.08376676 = sum of:
        0.021104332 = weight(_text_:information in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021104332 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
        0.06266243 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06266243 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Information today. 2(1985), S.7-25
  15. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.02
    0.018357579 = product of:
      0.055072732 = sum of:
        0.01582825 = weight(_text_:information in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01582825 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.023498412 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023498412 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.01574607 = product of:
          0.03149214 = sum of:
            0.03149214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03149214 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038739666 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Imprint
    Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  16. Tauchert, W.; Hospodarsky, J.; Krause, J.; Schneider, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Effects of linguistic functions on information retrieval in a German language full-text database : comparison between retrieval in abstract and full text (1991) 0.02
    0.018287066 = product of:
      0.0822918 = sum of:
        0.01582825 = weight(_text_:information in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01582825 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
        0.066463545 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066463545 = score(doc=465,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  17. Ro, J.S.: ¬An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval : 1. On the effectiveness of full-text retrieval (1988) 0.02
    0.018287066 = product of:
      0.0822918 = sum of:
        0.01582825 = weight(_text_:information in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01582825 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
        0.066463545 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066463545 = score(doc=4030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.73-78
  18. Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980) 0.02
    0.018005395 = product of:
      0.08102428 = sum of:
        0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013190207 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
        0.06783407 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06783407 = score(doc=2037,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
  19. Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982) 0.02
    0.017987758 = product of:
      0.08094491 = sum of:
        0.02611528 = weight(_text_:information in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02611528 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
        0.054829627 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054829627 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  20. Sievert, M.E.C.: Full-text information retrieval : an introduction (1996) 0.02
    0.017987758 = product of:
      0.08094491 = sum of:
        0.02611528 = weight(_text_:information in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02611528 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.054829627 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054829627 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038739666 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262

Years

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 13
  • nl 2
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 75
  • m 3
  • x 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…