Search (4550 results, page 1 of 228)

  1. Staud, J.L.: Datenbanken entwerfen mit dem ER-Modell (1995) 0.19 
    0.18565309 = product of:
  0.5569593 = sum of:
    0.084141545 = weight(_text_:relationship in 1393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084141545 = score(doc=1393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 1393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1393)
    0.47281772 = weight(_text_:datenmodells in 1393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47281772 = score(doc=1393,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.44948575 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        1.0519081 = fieldWeight in 1393, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1393)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Datenbanken aufbauen - eine Aufgabe, der wir uns immer wieder gegenüber sehen, und sei es auch nur, um bestehende Datenbanken an die Veränderungen der dynamischen Welt anzupassen. Der erste Schritt beim Datenbankaufbau ist die Erstellung eines Datenmodells, genauer: eines konzeptionellen Datenmodells. Dieses stellt ein Abbild des zu betrachtenden Anwendungsbereichs dar (des Weltausschnitts) und wird mit einem Instrumentarium erstellt, das einerseits möglichst viel von den Strukturen, Abläufen, Regeln, usw. des Weltaussschnits erfaßt und das andererseits in ein 'physisches Modell' umgesetzt werden kann. Neben dem Relationalen Datenmodell ist der am meisten verbreitete Ansatz zur Modellierung von Weltausschnitten für Datenbanken der Entity- Relationship Ansatz. Die mit ihm erstellten Modelle werden ER-Modelle genannt. Einführung und Beispiele
  2. RSWK-Mitteilung Nr.10 : Entwurf (1997) 0.13 
    0.1250466 = product of:
  0.75027955 = sum of:
    0.75027955 = weight(_text_:rswk_00 in 6540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.75027955 = score(doc=6540,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51427627 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 6540, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6540)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl. für den Vorabdruck der Regeln: http://www.dbi-berlin.de/dbi_pub/einzelpu/regelw/rswk/rswk_00.htm
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09 
    0.086894244 = product of:
  0.26068273 = sum of:
    0.22268984 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22268984 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.037992902 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037992902 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.07 
    0.07422995 = product of:
  0.44537967 = sum of:
    0.44537967 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.44537967 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  5. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.07 
    0.07340949 = product of:
  0.22022846 = sum of:
    0.14424266 = weight(_text_:relationship in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14424266 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.6396787 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
    0.075985804 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075985804 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.07 
    0.07241188 = product of:
  0.21723562 = sum of:
    0.18557487 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18557487 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.03166075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03166075 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06 
    0.061858293 = product of:
  0.37114975 = sum of:
    0.37114975 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37114975 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  8. Bostian, R.; Robbins, A.: Effective instruction for searching CD-ROM indexes (1990) 0.06 
    0.061174568 = product of:
  0.1835237 = sum of:
    0.1202022 = weight(_text_:relationship in 7552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1202022 = score(doc=7552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.53306556 = fieldWeight in 7552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7552)
    0.0633215 = weight(_text_:22 in 7552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0633215 = score(doc=7552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7552)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes an experiment that examined the relationship between successful searching of CD-ROM databases by undergraduate students and various types of instruction provided by the library staff. The findings indicate that the only level of instruction that resulted in a significant difference was a live demonstration of searches.
    Date
    21. 3.2008 13:22:03
  9. O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002) 0.05 
    0.050620984 = product of:
  0.15186295 = sum of:
    0.1202022 = weight(_text_:relationship in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1202022 = score(doc=2434,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.53306556 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
    0.03166075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03166075 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The report from the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) recommended a new approach to cataloging based on an entity-relationship model. This study examined a single work, The Expedition of Humphry Clinker, to determine benefits and drawbacks associated with creating such an entity-relationship model. Humphry Clinker was selected for several reasons - it has been previously studied, it is widely held, and it is a work of mid-level complexity. In addition to analyzing the bibliographic records, many books were examined to ensure the accuracy of the resulting FRBR model. While it was possible to identify works and manifestations, identifying expressions was problematic. Reliable identification of expressions frequently necessitated the examination of the books themselves. Enhanced manifestation records where the roles of editors, illustrators, translators, and other contributors are explicitly identified may be a viable alternative to expressions. For Humphry Clinker, the enhanced record approach avoids the problem of identifying expressions while providing similar functionality. With the enhanced manifestation record, the three remaining entity-relationship structures - works, manifestations, and items - the FRBR model provides a powerful means to improve bibliographic organization and navigation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05 
    0.049486633 = product of:
  0.2969198 = sum of:
    0.2969198 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2969198 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  11. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.049486633 = product of:
  0.2969198 = sum of:
    0.2969198 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2969198 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39623255 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  12. Callahan, P.F.: ISBD(S) revised edition and AACR2 1988 revision : a comparison (1992) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Article appearing as part of an issue devoted to the theme, Serials Cataloguing: Modern Perspectives and International Developments. Pt.2. In 1988, a revision of AACR2 and a revised edition of the ISBD for serials were published. Discusses and compares the origins of theses 2 standards and their relationship. Describes the inconsistencies between the 2 texts and evaluates their compatibility. Concludes that there is a high degree of compatability on major points but that relatively little progress has been made since the original editions in reducing the substantial number of minor differences
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992) no.3/4, S.249-262
  13. Bovey, J.D.: Event-based personal retrieval (1996) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 7704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=7704,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 7704, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7704)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 7704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=7704,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7704, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7704)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    People who work in a research, academic or business environemtn often have personal information collections which are large enough to need retrieval aids. A major difference between personal information retrieval and standard information retrieval is that the items to be retrieved are often associated with events in the searcher's life and ca be retrieved by their relationship of other events as well as by content. Describes the background to evenet based retrieval and describes a prototype graphical event based retrieval system, developed at Kent University, UK, employing the hive event browser
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.357-366
  14. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  15. André, A.-S.: ¬L'¬information culturelle : acteurs, usages et enjeux pour les professionels de l'information (1997) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=885)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=885)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A summary of a thesis based on the supposition that in an era of increasing leisure more time is to be available for cultural activities and that analysis can lead to a better grasp of the concept of cultural information. Discusses: the relationship of government, cultural networks and the cultural engineering sector to information; existing kinds of cultural information, their use and the impact on them of new technologies; and the characteristics and role of information professionals in this sector
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  17. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  18. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  19. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05 
    0.048939656 = product of:
  0.14681897 = sum of:
    0.09616176 = weight(_text_:relationship in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09616176 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22549234 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
    0.0506572 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0506572 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16366325 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  20. Lindenthal, J.; Scheven, J.E.: ISO 25964 - Standard der Information und Dokumentation (2013) 0.05 
    0.047761805 = product of:
  0.28657082 = sum of:
    0.28657082 = weight(_text_:datenmodells in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28657082 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.44948575 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046736497 = queryNorm
        0.6375526 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Ein neuer internationaler Standard der Information und Dokumentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964) ist in Vorbereitung. Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval wurde Mitte August als DIS 25964-1 im ISO Central Secretariat eingereicht. Die Motivation zur Entwicklung eines neuen Vokabularstandards sowie die wesentlichen Änderungen und Erweiterungen gegenüber ISO 2788/ISO 5964 werden vorgestellt. Anhand des Datenmodells zu Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval werden die grundlegenden Elemente, Attribute und Relationen kurz erläutert. Mit der Arbeit an Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies wurde Ende Juni 2009 begonnen. Es sollen Richtlinien erarbeitet werden, um Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien wie Normdateien für Namen, Schlagwortlisten, Ontologien, Klassifikationen und dgl. zu gewähren. Der erste Commitee Draft (CD 25964-2) ist für Juni 2010 geplant. Über den Stand der Entwicklung des 2. Teiles wird kurz referiert.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3859
  • m 407
  • el 196
  • s 167
  • b 39
  • x 37
  • i 24
  • r 20
  • ? 9
  • n 6
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications