Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bar-Ilan, J."
  1. Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? : Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014) 0.00
    0.0021932174 = product of:
      0.021932174 = sum of:
        0.021932174 = product of:
          0.06579652 = sum of:
            0.06579652 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06579652 = score(doc=1258,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.4484203 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Journal-based citations are an important source of data for impact indices. However, the impact of journal articles extends beyond formal scholarly discourse. Measuring online scholarly impact calls for new indices, complementary to the older ones. This article examines a possible alternative metric source, blog posts aggregated at ResearchBlogging.org, which discuss peer-reviewed articles and provide full bibliographic references. Articles reviewed in these blogs therefore receive "blog citations." We hypothesized that articles receiving blog citations close to their publication time receive more journal citations later than the articles in the same journal published in the same year that did not receive such blog citations. Statistically significant evidence for articles published in 2009 and 2010 support this hypothesis for seven of 12 journals (58%) in 2009 and 13 of 19 journals (68%) in 2010. We suggest, based on these results, that blog citations can be used as an alternative metric source.
  2. Bar-Ilan, J.; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Miller, Y.; Shoham, S.: ¬The effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging (2010) 0.00
    0.0020434097 = product of:
      0.020434096 = sum of:
        0.020434096 = product of:
          0.06130229 = sum of:
            0.06130229 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06130229 = score(doc=3453,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.940-951
    Year
    2010
  3. Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: How is research blogged? : A content analysis approach (2015) 0.00
    0.0012923657 = product of:
      0.012923657 = sum of:
        0.012923657 = product of:
          0.03877097 = sum of:
            0.03877097 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877097 = score(doc=1863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Blogs that cite academic articles have emerged as a potential source of alternative impact metrics for the visibility of the blogged articles. Nevertheless, to evaluate more fully the value of blog citations, it is necessary to investigate whether research blogs focus on particular types of articles or give new perspectives on scientific discourse. Therefore, we studied the characteristics of peer-reviewed references in blogs and the typical content of blog posts to gain insight into bloggers' motivations. The sample consisted of 391 blog posts from 2010 to 2012 in Researchblogging.org's health category. The bloggers mostly cited recent research articles or reviews from top multidisciplinary and general medical journals. Using content analysis methods, we created a general classification scheme for blog post content with 10 major topic categories, each with several subcategories. The results suggest that health research bloggers rarely self-cite and that the vast majority of their blog posts (90%) include a general discussion of the issue covered in the article, with more than one quarter providing health-related advice based on the article(s) covered. These factors suggest a genuine attempt to engage with a wider, nonacademic audience. Nevertheless, almost 30% of the posts included some criticism of the issues being discussed.
  4. Bronstein, J.; Gazit, T.; Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Aharony, N.; Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: ¬An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms (2016) 0.00
    6.927037E-4 = product of:
      0.0069270367 = sum of:
        0.0069270367 = product of:
          0.02078111 = sum of:
            0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02078111 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.00
    5.5416295E-4 = product of:
      0.0055416296 = sum of:
        0.0055416296 = product of:
          0.016624888 = sum of:
            0.016624888 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016624888 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Testing the stability of "wisdom of crowds" judgments of search results over time and their similarity with the search engine rankings (2016) 0.00
    5.5416295E-4 = product of:
      0.0055416296 = sum of:
        0.0055416296 = product of:
          0.016624888 = sum of:
            0.016624888 = weight(_text_:22 in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016624888 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22